pith. sign in

arxiv: 2501.11271 · v1 · submitted 2025-01-20 · 🧬 q-bio.CB · q-bio.MN· q-bio.TO

Incorporating stochastic gene expression, signaling-mediated intercellular interactions, and regulated cell proliferation in models of coordinated tissue development

Casey O. Barkan , Tom Chou This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 05:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.CB q-bio.MNq-bio.TO
keywords tissue developmentstochastic gene expressionintercellular signalingcell proliferationWaddington vector fieldepigenetic fitness landscapecell differentiationmathematical modeling
0
0 comments X

The pith

A Waddington vector field paired with an epigenetic fitness landscape models tissue development by incorporating stochastic gene expression, intercellular signaling, and regulated cell proliferation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a mathematical framework that brings together three key processes in tissue formation: random fluctuations in gene activity inside cells, chemical signals that pass between neighboring cells and alter those activities, and the controlled division and specialization of cells. Traditional approaches either ignore one or more of these elements or produce equations too cumbersome for practical use. The new approach replaces the usual Waddington potential landscape with a vector field description of cell states; this change permits behaviors such as gene-expression cycles and entropy production that potential landscapes forbid. An epigenetic fitness landscape is then defined to govern how fast each cell type proliferates, and the paper shows how this landscape is directly linked to the vector field. Two concrete examples—an interacting two-gene switch and a planaria-like spatiotemporal model—demonstrate that the framework remains simple enough to analyze while capturing the required biology.

Core claim

We construct a simple theory that incorporates intracellular stochastic gene expression dynamics, signaling chemicals that influence these dynamics and mediate cell-cell interactions, and cell proliferation and its accompanying differentiation. Cellular states (genetic and epigenetic) are described by a Waddington vector field that allows for non-gradient dynamics (cycles, entropy production, loss of detailed balance) which is precluded in Waddington potential landscape representations of gene expression dynamics. We define an epigenetic fitness landscape that describes the proliferation of different cell types, and elucidate how this fitness landscape is related to Waddington's vector field

What carries the argument

The Waddington vector field, which represents cellular states and permits non-gradient dynamics such as cycles and entropy production, together with its explicit mapping to an epigenetic fitness landscape that sets proliferation rates of each cell type.

If this is right

  • The framework reproduces an interacting two-gene differentiation process while retaining stochasticity and signaling.
  • The same equations generate spatiotemporal patterns in an organism-scale model inspired by planaria.
  • Non-gradient features such as gene-expression cycles and entropy production become accessible inside tissue models.
  • Proliferation rates of distinct cell types are controlled by the epigenetic fitness landscape derived from the vector field.
  • The approach keeps the governing equations simple enough for direct analysis and simulation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The vector-field construction may extend naturally to tissues containing multiple feedback loops between signaling pathways.
  • Because the fitness landscape is tied to the vector field, evolutionary changes in proliferation could be explored by varying the field parameters.
  • Direct measurement of cell-type-specific division rates together with single-cell gene-expression trajectories would provide a quantitative test of the predicted relation between the two landscapes.
  • The allowance for loss of detailed balance suggests the framework could describe systems that maintain persistent spatial or temporal order through continuous energy dissipation.

Load-bearing premise

The Waddington vector field description of cellular states can be consistently defined and related to an epigenetic fitness landscape in a manner that incorporates stochastic gene expression, signaling-mediated interactions, and regulated proliferation without introducing intractable complexity or losing predictive power.

What would settle it

Numerical integration of the two-gene differentiation model or the planaria-inspired model yields cell-type proportions or spatial patterns that cannot be made to match experimental observations for any choice of the vector-field and fitness parameters.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.11271 by Casey O. Barkan, Tom Chou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of cells at various positions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Example 1: Model of regulated stem cell differentiation. (A) Gene regulatory circuit. Left: Schematic of circuit showing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Example 1: Dynamics of cell populations. (A) Dynamical simulation starting from an initial condition with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Example 2: Model of a spatially structured organism with fissiparous reproduction. (A) Gene regulatory circuit, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Artifacts due to the mis-application of Eqs. 14 and 15. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Formulating quantitative and predictive models for tissue development requires consideration of the complex, stochastic gene expression dynamics, its regulation via cell-to-cell interactions, and cell proliferation. Including all of these processes into a practical mathematical framework requires complex expressions that are difficult to interpret and apply. We construct a simple theory that incorporates intracellular stochastic gene expression dynamics, signaling chemicals that influence these dynamics and mediate cell-cell interactions, and cell proliferation and its accompanying differentiation. Cellular states (genetic and epigenetic) are described by a Waddington vector field that allows for non-gradient dynamics (cycles, entropy production, loss of detailed balance) which is precluded in Waddington potential landscape representations of gene expression dynamics. We define an epigenetic fitness landscape that describes the proliferation of different cell types, and elucidate how this fitness landscape is related to Waddington's vector field. We illustrate the applicability of our framework by analyzing two model systems: an interacting two-gene differentiation process and a spatiotemporal organism model inspired by planaria.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs a theoretical framework for modeling coordinated tissue development that integrates stochastic intracellular gene expression dynamics, signaling-mediated cell-cell interactions, and regulated cell proliferation with differentiation. Cellular states are represented by a Waddington vector field permitting non-gradient dynamics (cycles, entropy production, broken detailed balance), which is related to an epigenetic fitness landscape that governs cell-type-specific proliferation rates. The framework is illustrated on two model systems: an interacting two-gene differentiation process and a spatiotemporal organism model inspired by planaria.

Significance. If the mapping between the vector field and fitness landscape can be rigorously derived while preserving stochasticity, cell-cell coupling, and non-gradient features, the approach could provide a practical, interpretable alternative to traditional potential-landscape models for tissue dynamics, enabling predictions that incorporate non-equilibrium processes without excessive complexity.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract (framework construction paragraph)] Abstract (paragraph describing the framework construction): the central claim that a Waddington vector field can be consistently defined and related to an epigenetic fitness landscape while incorporating stochastic gene expression, signaling interactions, and regulated proliferation is not supported by explicit derivations, consistency checks, or equations showing how vector-field components determine fitness values (or vice versa) without suppressing non-gradient terms or introducing intractability. This mapping is load-bearing for the 'simple theory' unification.
  2. [Model systems illustrations] Model systems section: the two illustrations (two-gene differentiation and planaria-inspired model) are presented without error analysis, parameter sensitivity, or direct validation against the claimed relations between the vector field and fitness landscape, leaving the predictive power of the framework untested.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the vector field and fitness landscape should be introduced with explicit definitions and any assumptions about stochastic terms stated upfront to improve readability.
  2. The abstract refers to 'elucidat[ing] how this fitness landscape is related to Waddington's vector field' but provides no equations; adding at least the key relation in the main text would clarify the construction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. Below we respond point-by-point to the major comments and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract (framework construction paragraph)] Abstract (paragraph describing the framework construction): the central claim that a Waddington vector field can be consistently defined and related to an epigenetic fitness landscape while incorporating stochastic gene expression, signaling interactions, and regulated proliferation is not supported by explicit derivations, consistency checks, or equations showing how vector-field components determine fitness values (or vice versa) without suppressing non-gradient terms or introducing intractability. This mapping is load-bearing for the 'simple theory' unification.

    Authors: We agree that the central mapping requires more explicit support. The manuscript defines the Waddington vector field (allowing non-gradient dynamics) and relates it to the epigenetic fitness landscape through cell-type-specific proliferation rates governed by the underlying epigenetic states. However, to address the concern, we will add a new subsection in the Theory section that supplies the explicit relations, consistency conditions, and verification that non-gradient terms and stochasticity are retained. This will include the relevant equations linking vector-field components to fitness values. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Model systems illustrations] Model systems section: the two illustrations (two-gene differentiation and planaria-inspired model) are presented without error analysis, parameter sensitivity, or direct validation against the claimed relations between the vector field and fitness landscape, leaving the predictive power of the framework untested.

    Authors: The two model systems are intended as demonstrations of framework applicability rather than quantitative benchmarks. We acknowledge that the absence of sensitivity analysis and explicit checks against the vector-field–fitness mapping limits the strength of the illustrations. In revision we will add parameter-sensitivity results for both examples, together with direct comparisons (in the main text or supplementary material) confirming that the claimed relations between the vector field and fitness landscape hold within each model. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: new framework construction is self-contained

full rationale

The paper presents a modeling framework that defines a Waddington vector field (allowing non-gradient dynamics) and relates it to an epigenetic fitness landscape for cell proliferation, incorporating stochastic gene expression, signaling, and regulated proliferation. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that reduce any claimed result or relation to its own inputs by construction. The central construction is introduced as a novel synthesis rather than a renaming, fit, or load-bearing self-citation chain, so the derivation remains independent and self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 2 invented entities

The framework rests on the introduction of two new descriptive objects (vector field and fitness landscape) whose relation is asserted without external benchmarks or independent evidence shown in the abstract; no free parameters are named.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Waddington vector field can represent cellular states while allowing non-gradient dynamics such as cycles and entropy production
    Explicitly stated in abstract as the replacement for traditional potential landscapes.
invented entities (2)
  • Waddington vector field no independent evidence
    purpose: Describe genetic and epigenetic cellular states with non-gradient dynamics
    Introduced to overcome limitations of potential landscape representations
  • epigenetic fitness landscape no independent evidence
    purpose: Describe proliferation rates of different cell types and link to the vector field
    Defined within the new theory

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5713 in / 1436 out tokens · 40429 ms · 2026-05-23T05:41:01.556862+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Incorporating stochastic gene expression, signaling-mediated intercellular interactions, and regulated cell proliferation in models of coordinated tissue development

    but its use is hampered by its inherent limitation to a single cell (or to non-interacting and non-proliferating populations) and the assumption of both gradient dy- namics and dynamics that obey detailed balance among gene regulation states. When cell division and death are considered, the con- cept of a fitness landscape becomes relevant. In evolu- tion...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters

    Conrad H Waddington. Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters. Nature, 150(3811):563–565, 1942

    work page 1942

  3. [3]

    Bistability, bifurcations, and Waddington’s epigenetic landscape

    James E Ferrell. Bistability, bifurcations, and Waddington’s epigenetic landscape. Current Biology , 22(11):R458–R466, 2012

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Reconstructing developmental landscapes and trajectories from single-cell data

    Geoffrey Schiebinger. Reconstructing developmental landscapes and trajectories from single-cell data. Cur- rent Opinion in Systems Biology , 27:100351, 2021

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Symmetric vs

    Leili Shahriyari and Natalia L Komarova. Symmetric vs. asymmetric stem cell divisions: an adaptation against cancer? PLoS ONE, 8(10):e76195, 2013

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    A general mathematical framework for un- derstanding the behavior of heterogeneous stem cell re- generation

    Jinzhi Lei. A general mathematical framework for un- derstanding the behavior of heterogeneous stem cell re- generation. Journal of Theoretical Biology , 492:110196, 2020

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Mathematicalmodelingofheterogeneousstem cell regeneration: from cell division to Waddington’s epigenetic landscape

    JinzhiLei. Mathematicalmodelingofheterogeneousstem cell regeneration: from cell division to Waddington’s epigenetic landscape. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.08064 , 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Potential landscape and flux framework of nonequilibrium networks: robust- ness, dissipation, and coherence of biochemical oscilla- tions

    Jin Wang, Li Xu, and Erkang Wang. Potential landscape and flux framework of nonequilibrium networks: robust- ness, dissipation, and coherence of biochemical oscilla- tions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 13 105(34):12271–12276, 2008

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    Geometry of gene regula- tory dynamics

    David A Rand, Archishman Raju, Meritxell Sáez, Fran- cis Corson, and Eric D Siggia. Geometry of gene regula- tory dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(38):e2109729118, 2021

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    Noise distorts the epigenetic landscape and shapes cell- fate decisions

    Megan A Coomer, Lucy Ham, and Michael PH Stumpf. Noise distorts the epigenetic landscape and shapes cell- fate decisions. Cell Systems, 13(1):83–102, 2022

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    Statistically derived geometrical landscapes cap- ture principles of decision-making dynamics during cell fate transitions

    Meritxell Sáez, Robert Blassberg, Elena Camacho- Aguilar, Eric D Siggia, David A Rand, and James Briscoe. Statistically derived geometrical landscapes cap- ture principles of decision-making dynamics during cell fate transitions. Cell Systems, 13(1):12–28, 2022

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Construction of the landscape for multi-stable systems: Potential landscape, quasi- potential, A-type integral and beyond

    Peijie Zhou and Tiejun Li. Construction of the landscape for multi-stable systems: Potential landscape, quasi- potential, A-type integral and beyond. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 144(9), 2016

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    A theoretical perspective on Waddington’s genetic assim- ilationexperiments

    Archishman Raju, BingKan Xue, and Stanislas Leibler. A theoretical perspective on Waddington’s genetic assim- ilationexperiments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(51):e2309760120, 2023

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Predictingratesofcellstatechangecaused by stochastic fluctuations using a data-driven landscape model

    Daniel R Sisan, Michael Halter, Joseph B Hubbard, and AnneLPlant. Predictingratesofcellstatechangecaused by stochastic fluctuations using a data-driven landscape model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 109(47):19262–19267, 2012

    work page 2012

  15. [15]

    Quan- tifying the Waddington landscape and biological paths for development and differentiation

    Jin Wang, Kun Zhang, Li Xu, and Erkang Wang. Quan- tifying the Waddington landscape and biological paths for development and differentiation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 108(20):8257–8262, 2011

    work page 2011

  16. [16]

    Not just a colourful metaphor: mod- elling the landscape of cellular development using Hop- field networks

    Atefeh Taherian Fard, Sriganesh Srihari, Jessica C Mar, and Mark A Ragan. Not just a colourful metaphor: mod- elling the landscape of cellular development using Hop- field networks. NPJ Systems Biology and Applications , 2(1):1–9, 2016

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    Mapping transcriptomic vector fields of single cells

    Xiaojie Qiu, Yan Zhang, Jorge D Martin-Rufino, Chen Weng, Shayan Hosseinzadeh, Dian Yang, Angela N Pog- son, Marco Y Hein, Kyung Hoi Joseph Min, Li Wang, et al. Mapping transcriptomic vector fields of single cells. Cell, 185(4):690–711, 2022

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Macrophage phenotype tran- sitions in a stochastic gene-regulatory network model

    Anna-Simone Josefine Frank, Kamila Larripa, Hwayeon Ryu, and Susanna Röblitz. Macrophage phenotype tran- sitions in a stochastic gene-regulatory network model. Journal of Theoretical Biology , 575:111634, 2023

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Evolution of hierarchy and irre- versibility in theoretical cell differentiation model.PNAS NEXUS, 3(1):pgad454, 2024

    Yoshiyuki T Nakamura, Yusuke Himeoka, Nen Saito, and Chikara Furusawa. Evolution of hierarchy and irre- versibility in theoretical cell differentiation model.PNAS NEXUS, 3(1):pgad454, 2024

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    A logic-incorporated gene regulatory network deci- phers principles in cell fate decisions.Elife, 12:RP88742, 2024

    Gang Xue, Xiaoyi Zhang, Wanqi Li, Lu Zhang, Zongxu Zhang, Xiaolin Zhou, Di Zhang, Lei Zhang, and Zhiyuan Li. A logic-incorporated gene regulatory network deci- phers principles in cell fate decisions.Elife, 12:RP88742, 2024

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Quantifying cell fate change under different stochastic gene activation frameworks.Quantitative Bi- ology, 13(1):e82, 2025

    Xinxin Chen, Ying Sheng, Liang Chen, Moxun Tang, and Feng Jiao. Quantifying cell fate change under different stochastic gene activation frameworks.Quantitative Bi- ology, 13(1):e82, 2025

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transi- tion proceeds through directional destabilization of mul- tidimensional attractor

    Weikang Wang, Dante Poe, Yaxuan Yang, Thomas Hy- att, and Jianhua Xing. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transi- tion proceeds through directional destabilization of mul- tidimensional attractor. eLife, 11:e74866, feb 2022

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Transiently increased coordination in gene regulation during cell phenotypic transitions

    Weikang Wang, Ke Ni, Dante Poe, and Jianhua Xing. Transiently increased coordination in gene regulation during cell phenotypic transitions. PRX Life, 2:043009, 2024

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Fundamental limits on dynamic inference from single-cell snapshots.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 115(10):E2467– E2476, 2018

    Caleb Weinreb, Samuel Wolock, Betsabeh K Tusi, Merav Socolovsky, and Allon M Klein. Fundamental limits on dynamic inference from single-cell snapshots.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 115(10):E2467– E2476, 2018

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    Inferring population dynamics from single-cell rna-sequencing time series data

    David S Fischer, Anna K Fiedler, Eric M Kernfeld, RyanMJGenga, AiméeBastidas-Ponce, MostafaBakhti, Heiko Lickert, Jan Hasenauer, Rene Maehr, and Fabian J Theis. Inferring population dynamics from single-cell rna-sequencing time series data. Nature Biotechnology, 37(4):461–468, 2019

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Quantifying pluripotency landscape of cell differentiation from scRNA-seq data by continuous birth-death process

    JifanShi, TiejunLi, LuonanChen, andKazuyukiAihara. Quantifying pluripotency landscape of cell differentiation from scRNA-seq data by continuous birth-death process. PLoS Computational Biology, 15(11):e1007488, 2019

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    Opti- mal transport analysis reveals trajectories in steady-state systems

    Stephen Zhang, Anton Afanassiev, Laura Greenstreet, Tetsuya Matsumoto, and Geoffrey Schiebinger. Opti- mal transport analysis reveals trajectories in steady-state systems. PLoS Computational Biology, 17(12):e1009466, 2021

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    LineageOT is a unified framework for lineage tracing and trajectory inference

    Aden Forrow and Geoffrey Schiebinger. LineageOT is a unified framework for lineage tracing and trajectory inference. Nature Communications, 12(1):4940, 2021

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Energy landscape decomposition for cell differenti- ation with proliferation effect.National Science Review, 9(8):nwac116, 2022

    Jifan Shi, Kazuyuki Aihara, Tiejun Li, and Luonan Chen. Energy landscape decomposition for cell differenti- ation with proliferation effect.National Science Review, 9(8):nwac116, 2022

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Mingtao Xia and Tom Chou. Kinetic theory for struc- tured populations: application to stochastic sizer-timer models of cell proliferation.Journal of Physics A: Math- ematical and Theoretical, 54(38):385601, 2021

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Kinetic theories of state- and generation-dependent cell populations.Physical Re- view E, 110:064146, 2024

    Mingtao Xia and Tom Chou. Kinetic theories of state- and generation-dependent cell populations.Physical Re- view E, 110:064146, 2024

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Greenman and Tom Chou

    Chris D. Greenman and Tom Chou. Kinetic theory of age-structured stochastic birth-death processes.Physical Review E, 93:012112, 2016

    work page 2016

  33. [33]

    Greenman

    Tom Chou and Chris D. Greenman. A hierarchical ki- netic theory of birth, death and fission in age-structured interacting populations. J. Stat. Phys. , 164:49–76, 2016

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    Oxford University Press, 2023

    Michael Barresi and Scott Gilbert.Developmental Biol- ogy, 13 th Ed. Oxford University Press, 2023

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Growth factors, matrices, and forces combine and control stem cells.Science, 324(5935):1673–1677, 2009

    Dennis E Discher, David J Mooney, and Peter W Zand- stra. Growth factors, matrices, and forces combine and control stem cells.Science, 324(5935):1673–1677, 2009

    work page 2009

  36. [36]

    Sui Huang. Genetic and non-genetic instability in tumor progression: link between the fitness landscape and the epigenetic landscape of cancer cells.Cancer and Metas- tasis Reviews, 32:423–448, 2013

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    Reconciling non-genetic plasticity with so- matic evolution in cancer

    Sui Huang. Reconciling non-genetic plasticity with so- matic evolution in cancer. Trends in Cancer , 7(4):309– 322, 2021

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    One straightforward la- beling scheme is to label cells from oldest to youngest, i.e., cell α = 1 is the oldest cell

    The labeling of cells is arbitrary. One straightforward la- beling scheme is to label cells from oldest to youngest, i.e., cell α = 1 is the oldest cell. When a cell dies, all cells younger than the dying cell are then re-labeled

    work page

  39. [39]

    Enhanced Waddington landscape model with cell–cell communication can explain molec- ular mechanisms of self-organization

    Hosein Fooladi, Parsa Moradi, Ali Sharifi-Zarchi, and Babak Hosein Khalaj. Enhanced Waddington landscape model with cell–cell communication can explain molec- ular mechanisms of self-organization. Bioinformatics, 35(20):4081–4088, 2019

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    Kulkarni

    Niraj Kumar, Thierry Platini, and Rahul V. Kulkarni. Exact distributions for stochastic gene expression models 14 withburstingandfeedback. Phys. Rev. Lett., 113:268105, 2014

    work page 2014

  41. [41]

    Small protein num- ber effects in stochastic models of autoregulated bursty gene expression

    Chen Jia and Ramon Grima. Small protein num- ber effects in stochastic models of autoregulated bursty gene expression. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 152(8):084115, 2020

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    Poisson rep- resentation: a bridge between discrete and continuous models of stochastic gene regulatory networks.Journal of The Royal Society Interface , 20(208):20230467, 2023

    Xinyu Wang, Youming Li, and Chen Jia. Poisson rep- resentation: a bridge between discrete and continuous models of stochastic gene regulatory networks.Journal of The Royal Society Interface , 20(208):20230467, 2023

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Exact stochastic simulation of cou- pled chemical reactions

    Daniel T Gillespie. Exact stochastic simulation of cou- pled chemical reactions. The Journal of Physical Chem- istry, 81(25):2340–2361, 1977

    work page 1977

  44. [44]

    The chemical Langevin equation.The Journal of Chemical Physics , 113(1):297–306, 2000

    Daniel T Gillespie. The chemical Langevin equation.The Journal of Chemical Physics , 113(1):297–306, 2000

    work page 2000

  45. [45]

    Material ap- proaches to active tissue mechanics.Nature Reviews Ma- terials, 4(1):23–44, 2019

    Wang Xi, Thuan Beng Saw, Delphine Delacour, Chwee Teck Lim, and Benoit Ladoux. Material ap- proaches to active tissue mechanics.Nature Reviews Ma- terials, 4(1):23–44, 2019

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    Fluidization of tissues by cell division and apoptosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 107(49):20863–20868, 2010

    Jonas Ranft, Markus Basan, Jens Elgeti, Jean-Francois Joanny, Jacques Prost, and Frank Jülicher. Fluidization of tissues by cell division and apoptosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 107(49):20863–20868, 2010

    work page 2010

  47. [47]

    Frequency-dependent chemolocation and chemotactic target selection

    Sarah A Nowak, B Chakrabarti, Tom Chou, and Ajay Gopinathan. Frequency-dependent chemolocation and chemotactic target selection. Physical Biology , 7(2):026003, 2010

    work page 2010

  48. [48]

    Anomalous dynamics of cell migra- tion

    Peter Dieterich, Rainer Klages, Roland Preuss, and Al- brecht Schwab. Anomalous dynamics of cell migra- tion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 105(2):459–463, 2008

    work page 2008

  49. [49]

    Generalized Lévy walks and the role of chemokines in migration of effector CD8+ T cells

    Tajie H Harris, Edward J Banigan, David A Christian, Christoph Konradt, Elia D Tait Wojno, Kazumi Norose, Emma H Wilson, Beena John, Wolfgang Weninger, An- drew D Luster, et al. Generalized Lévy walks and the role of chemokines in migration of effector CD8+ T cells. Nature, 486(7404):545–548, 2012

    work page 2012

  50. [50]

    Anomalous trans- port in the crowded world of biological cells.Reports on Progress in Physics, 76(4):046602, 2013

    Felix Höfling and Thomas Franosch. Anomalous trans- port in the crowded world of biological cells.Reports on Progress in Physics, 76(4):046602, 2013

    work page 2013

  51. [51]

    Dy- namics of embryonic stem cell differentiation inferred from single-cell transcriptomics show a series of transi- tions through discrete cell states.eLife, 6:e20487, 2017

    Sumin Jang, Sandeep Choubey, Leon Furchtgott, Ling- Nan Zou, Adele Doyle, Vilas Menon, Ethan B Loew, Anne-Rachel Krostag, Refugio A Martinez, Linda Madisen, Boaz P Levi, and Sharad Ramanathan. Dy- namics of embryonic stem cell differentiation inferred from single-cell transcriptomics show a series of transi- tions through discrete cell states.eLife, 6:e20...

    work page 2017

  52. [52]

    Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after Kramers.Reviews of modern physics , 62(2):251, 1990

    Peter Hänggi, Peter Talkner, and Michal Borkovec. Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after Kramers.Reviews of modern physics , 62(2):251, 1990

    work page 1990

  53. [53]

    Dessalles, M

    R. Dessalles, M. D’Orsogna, and T. Chou. Ex- act steady-state distributions of multispecies birth–death–immigration processes: Effects of mu- tations and carrying capacity on diversity. J. Stat. Phys., 173:82–221, 2018

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    Cell-state transitions and density-dependent interactions together explain the dy- namics of spontaneous epithelial-mesenchymal hetero- geneity

    Paras Jain, Ramanarayanan Kizhuttil, Madhav B Nair, Sugandha Bhatia, Erik W Thompson, Jason T George, and Mohit Kumar Jolly. Cell-state transitions and density-dependent interactions together explain the dy- namics of spontaneous epithelial-mesenchymal hetero- geneity. iScience, 2024

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    Handbook of stochastic methods for physics, chemistry and the natural sciences.Springer Series in Synergetics , 1985

    Crispin W Gardiner. Handbook of stochastic methods for physics, chemistry and the natural sciences.Springer Series in Synergetics , 1985

    work page 1985

  56. [56]

    Bifurcation dynamics in lineage-commitment in bipotent progenitor cells

    Sui Huang, Yan-Ping Guo, Gillian May, and Tariq Enver. Bifurcation dynamics in lineage-commitment in bipotent progenitor cells. Developmental Biology, 305(2):695–713, 2007

    work page 2007

  57. [57]

    Experimental studies of the regen- eration of Planaria maculata , volume 2

    ThomasHuntMorgan. Experimental studies of the regen- eration of Planaria maculata , volume 2. W. Engelmann, 1898

    work page

  58. [58]

    Modeling planarian regeneration: a primer for reverse- engineering the worm

    Daniel Lobo, Wendy S Beane, and Michael Levin. Modeling planarian regeneration: a primer for reverse- engineering the worm. PLoS Computational Biology , 8(4):e1002481, 2012

    work page 2012

  59. [59]

    Swat, Gilberto L

    M. Swat, Gilberto L. Thomas, Julio M. Belmonte, A. Shirinifard, D. Hmeljak, and J. A. Glazier. Multi- scale modeling of tissues using compuCell3D.Computa- tional Methods in Cell Biology, Methods in Cell Biology , 110:325–366, 2012

    work page 2012

  60. [60]

    Cell di- vision and tissue mechanics

    Benoit G Godard and Carl-Philipp Heisenberg. Cell di- vision and tissue mechanics. Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 60:114–120, 2019

    work page 2019

  61. [61]

    Overcompen- sation of transient and permanent death rate increases in age-structured models with cannibalistic interactions

    MingtaoXia, XiangtingLi, andTomChou. Overcompen- sation of transient and permanent death rate increases in age-structured models with cannibalistic interactions. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena , 470:134339, 2024

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    Emergent properties of collective gene-expression patterns in multicellular sys- tems

    Matthew Smart and Anton Zilman. Emergent properties of collective gene-expression patterns in multicellular sys- tems. Cell Reports Physical Science , 4(2), 2023

    work page 2023

  63. [63]

    Jeremy B. A. Green and James Sharpe. Positional in- formation and reaction-diffusion: two big ideas in devel- opmental biology combine. Development, 142(7):1203– 1211, 04 2015

    work page 2015

  64. [64]

    Hierarchical inductions of cell states: A model for segmentation in Drosophila.Journal of Cell Science, 1986:357–381, 1986

    Hans Meinhardt. Hierarchical inductions of cell states: A model for segmentation in Drosophila.Journal of Cell Science, 1986:357–381, 1986

    work page 1986