pith. sign in

arxiv: 2501.16944 · v2 · pith:5NC7VA5Mnew · submitted 2025-01-28 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.AI

Exact Computation of Any-Order Shapley Interactions for Graph Neural Networks

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.AI
keywords graphgraphshap-iqinteractionsexactnetworkspredictionshapleyany-order
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Albeit the ubiquitous use of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) in machine learning (ML) prediction tasks involving graph-structured data, their interpretability remains challenging. In explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), the Shapley Value (SV) is the predominant method to quantify contributions of individual features to a ML model's output. Addressing the limitations of SVs in complex prediction models, Shapley Interactions (SIs) extend the SV to groups of features. In this work, we explain single graph predictions of GNNs with SIs that quantify node contributions and interactions among multiple nodes. By exploiting the GNN architecture, we show that the structure of interactions in node embeddings are preserved for graph prediction. As a result, the exponential complexity of SIs depends only on the receptive fields, i.e. the message-passing ranges determined by the connectivity of the graph and the number of convolutional layers. Based on our theoretical results, we introduce GraphSHAP-IQ, an efficient approach to compute any-order SIs exactly. GraphSHAP-IQ is applicable to popular message passing techniques in conjunction with a linear global pooling and output layer. We showcase that GraphSHAP-IQ substantially reduces the exponential complexity of computing exact SIs on multiple benchmark datasets. Beyond exact computation, we evaluate GraphSHAP-IQ's approximation of SIs on popular GNN architectures and compare with existing baselines. Lastly, we visualize SIs of real-world water distribution networks and molecule structures using a SI-Graph.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LLM Features Can Hurt GNNs: Concatenation Interference on Homophilous Graph Benchmarks

    cs.LG 2026-06 accept novelty 7.0

    Pure concatenation of LLM features degrades GNN accuracy on homophilous datasets, with Delta_sig metric predicting when the drop occurs better than homophily.

  2. Six Open Questions in Machine-Learned Interatomic Potential Foundation Models

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    This perspective article develops a definition of foundational MLIPs and poses six open questions that the authors believe will define future research in machine-learned interatomic potentials.