Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

RESMETRIC: Analyzing Resilience to Enable Research on Antifragility

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.18245 v1 pith:DKSJRVWA submitted 2025-01-30 cs.SE

RESMETRIC: Analyzing Resilience to Enable Research on Antifragility

classification cs.SE
keywords resilienceantifragilityresmetricresearchmetricsmodel-agnosticresearchersthere
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

A key feature in self-adaptive systems is resilience, which is an ongoing research topic. Recently, the community started to explore antifragility, which describes the improvement of resilience over time. While there are model-agnostic resilience metrics, there is currently no out-of-the-box tool for researchers and practitioners to determine to which degree their system is resilient. To facilitate research on antifragility, we present ResMetric, a model-agnostic tool that calculates and visualizes various resilience metrics based on the quality of service over time. With ResMetric, researchers can evaluate their definition of resilience and antifragility. This paper highlights how ResMetric can be employed by demonstrating its use in a case study on gas detection.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Beyond Resilience: Antifragility in Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A bounded Jensen-gain/post-disruption-gain definition of antifragility is paired with evidence that sector-level fragility burden and process-level perturbation observability are measurable in public datasets.