xai_evals : A Framework for Evaluating Post-Hoc Local Explanation Methods
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:YPIVCVJSrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
The growing complexity of machine learning and deep learning models has led to an increased reliance on opaque "black box" systems, making it difficult to understand the rationale behind predictions. This lack of transparency is particularly challenging in high-stakes applications where interpretability is as important as accuracy. Post-hoc explanation methods are commonly used to interpret these models, but they are seldom rigorously evaluated, raising concerns about their reliability. The Python package xai_evals addresses this by providing a comprehensive framework for generating, benchmarking, and evaluating explanation methods across both tabular and image data modalities. It integrates popular techniques like SHAP, LIME, Grad-CAM, Integrated Gradients (IG), and Backtrace, while supporting evaluation metrics such as faithfulness, sensitivity, and robustness. xai_evals enhances the interpretability of machine learning models, fostering transparency and trust in AI systems. The library is open-sourced at https://pypi.org/project/xai-evals/ .
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Faithfulness to Refusal: A Causal Audit of Neuron Selectors
A causal audit via neuron-row zeroing shows attribution methods (LRP, IG) faithfully identify dispensable neurons and can install refusal behavior, while rank-stability proxies systematically miss selector failures.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.