Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Can Cross Encoders Produce Useful Sentence Embeddings?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.03552 v1 pith:4EYNAEYI submitted 2025-02-05 cs.CL cs.IR

Can Cross Encoders Produce Useful Sentence Embeddings?

classification cs.CL cs.IR
keywords encoderssentenceembeddingspairsusedcrossinferenceinformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Cross encoders (CEs) are trained with sentence pairs to detect relatedness. As CEs require sentence pairs at inference, the prevailing view is that they can only be used as re-rankers in information retrieval pipelines. Dual encoders (DEs) are instead used to embed sentences, where sentence pairs are encoded by two separate encoders with shared weights at training, and a loss function that ensures the pair's embeddings lie close in vector space if the sentences are related. DEs however, require much larger datasets to train, and are less accurate than CEs. We report a curious finding that embeddings from earlier layers of CEs can in fact be used within an information retrieval pipeline. We show how to exploit CEs to distill a lighter-weight DE, with a 5.15x speedup in inference time.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Cross-Attention Calibrated Deduplication for Retrieval-Augmented Generation System

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5

    CACD deduplicates RAG chunks via cross-encoder scores, attention-entropy NIS, and majority vote, dropping ~9.75% of chunks on SQuAD faster than cosine filtering.