Retro-Rank-In: A Ranking-Based Approach for Inorganic Materials Synthesis Planning
read the original abstract
Retrosynthesis strategically plans the synthesis of a chemical target compound from simpler, readily available precursor compounds. This process is critical for synthesizing novel inorganic materials, yet traditional methods in inorganic chemistry continue to rely on trial-and-error experimentation. Emerging machine-learning approaches struggle to generalize to entirely new reactions due to their reliance on known precursors, as they frame retrosynthesis as a multi-label classification task. To address these limitations, we propose Retro-Rank-In, a novel framework that reformulates the retrosynthesis problem by embedding target and precursor materials into a shared latent space and learning a pairwise ranker on a bipartite graph of inorganic compounds. We evaluate Retro-Rank-In's generalizability on challenging retrosynthesis dataset splits designed to mitigate data duplicates and overlaps. For instance, for Cr2AlB2, it correctly predicts the verified precursor pair CrB + Al despite never seeing them in training, a capability absent in prior work. Extensive experiments show that Retro-Rank-In sets a new state-of-the-art, particularly in out-of-distribution generalization and candidate set ranking, offering a powerful tool for accelerating inorganic material synthesis.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
ProvMind: Provenance-grounded reasoning for materials synthesis
ProvMind achieves 52.84% accuracy on a strict dual-OOD split for seven process-reasoning tasks by retrieving analogous processes from MatPROV graphs and applying provenance-aware compatibility scoring.
-
RETROSPECT: RETROsynthesis via Sequential Prediction, and Chemically Transformed-ranking
RETROSPECT reports 55.00% top-1 and 86.18% top-10 accuracy on USPTO-50K with a ChemAlign Transformer plus LambdaMART reranker reaching 59.4% top-1 on candidate pools using proposal scores and template statistics.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.