pith. sign in

arxiv: 2502.04571 · v2 · submitted 2025-02-06 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Discovery and Timing of 49 Pulsars from the Arecibo 327-MHz Drift Survey

Timothy E. E. Olszanski , Evan F. Lewis , Julia S. Deneva , Maura A. McLaughlin , Kevin Stovall , Paulo C. C. Freire , Benetge B. P. Perera , Manjari Bagchi
show 1 more author
Jose G. Martinez
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 03:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords pulsarspulsar timingAreciboneutron starselectron densitysubpulse driftingGalactic plane
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Arecibo 327-MHz Drift Survey has produced 18 new pulsar discoveries and timing solutions for 49 sources in total.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents 18 pulsar discoveries from the AO327 survey along with timing solutions for these and 31 additional pulsars discovered in the survey. These timing solutions were obtained from follow-up observations using the Arecibo 327-MHz receiver between 2013 and 2019. All but one of the new pulsars are non-recycled, with PSR J0916+0658 showing evidence of partial recycling. The work also includes a census of emission features, distance estimates using three Galactic electron density models, and notes discrepancies in at least 10 sources, plus comparisons to the GBNCC survey.

Core claim

We present 18 pulsar discoveries from the AO327 pulsar survey, along with their timing solutions and those for an additional 31 AO327-discovered pulsars. Timing solutions were constructed using observations from a follow-up timing campaign taken between the periods of 2013 -- 2019 using the Arecibo Observatory's 327-MHz receiver. Aside from PSR J0916+0658, an isolated pulsar that shows evidence for partial recycling, the remaining discoveries are non-recycled pulsars. We present a brief census of emission features for all pulsars with the following standouts. PSR J1942+0142 is found to exhibit the very rare phenomenon of subpulse bi-drifting and PSR J0225+1727 has an interpulse. We also 8.5.

What carries the argument

Follow-up timing campaign observations at 327 MHz from 2013 to 2019 to construct timing solutions for the pulsars.

If this is right

  • The new pulsars contribute to the catalog of known pulsars for population studies.
  • Rare emission features such as subpulse bi-drifting are documented in one source.
  • Discrepancies in electron density models are identified for at least 10 lines of sight.
  • Performance differences between electron density models are highlighted when compared to another survey.
  • The timing solutions enable further studies of the individual pulsars.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Additional monitoring could confirm if the partially recycled pulsar has a companion or other unusual properties.
  • These sources can be used to test and improve future Galactic electron density models.
  • The discoveries off the Galactic plane may help understand selection effects in different surveys.

Load-bearing premise

The timing observations between 2013 and 2019 provide enough data to reliably determine spin-down rates and positions without significant effects from timing noise or other unmodeled phenomena.

What would settle it

New observations that show the reported periods or spin-down rates are inconsistent with the published timing solutions due to unaccounted noise.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.04571 by Benetge B. P. Perera, Evan F. Lewis, Jose G. Martinez, Julia S. Deneva, Kevin Stovall, Manjari Bagchi, Maura A. McLaughlin, Paulo C. C. Freire, Timothy E. E. Olszanski.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Both known and AO327-discovered pulsars in the sky visible from Arecibo. Grey strips indicate sky observed using the PUPPI backend. Black dots correspond to known pulsars from the ATNF catalog. Blue circles show known pulsars detected by the AO327 search pipeline. Red triangles indicate pulsars discovered using the WAPP backend, while red circles and red diamonds were found using the Mock and PUPPI backend… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: P-P diagram showing the periods and period ˙ derivatives of known neutron stars. Black dots denote radio pulsars, purple diamonds X-ray/γ-ray pulsars, black circles systems with companion objects, yellow stars sources with an associated supernova remnant, blue diamonds magnetars, green X’s RRATs, and purple filled squares the pulsars in￾cluded in this work. Also plotted are lines of constant E˙ , in￾ferred… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Top: Pulse sequence for bi-drifting PSR J1942+0147. Below: The epoch-averaged intensity profile over 60% of the full pulse profile. Note the change in drift di￾rection over the components. This pulsar has a rather broad profile for its spin parameters, comprising four-components as inferred from its epoch-averaged profile. Four-component profiles are believed to be associated with unusual viewing geometrie… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Mode-changing PSR J0806+0811 observed at 327 MHz. Top: Pulse number vs pulse phase, with color repre￾senting intensity. Below: The average profile for this ob￾servation. The most significant difference between the two modes can be seen from the relative intensity of the two components. The leading component appearing more often in single pulses on MJD 56600 resulting in a brighter com￾ponent. discrepant di… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Top: All-sky map (Aitoff projection) showing the location of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Epoch-averaged intensity profiles at 327 MHz. We plot intensity on the y-axis and rotational phase on the x-axis. One full rotation is shown. Each profile has a resolution of 256 phase bins. We label each profile with the pulsar’s period and DM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Epoch-averaged intensity profiles at 327 MHz. We plot intensity on the y-axis and rotational phase on the x-axis. One full rotation is shown. Each profile has a resolution of 256 phase bins. We label each profiles with the pulsar’s period and DM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Epoch-averaged intensity profiles at 327 MHz. We plot intensity on the y-axis and rotational phase on the x-axis. One full rotation is shown. Each profile has a resolution of 256 phase bins. We label each profile with the pulsar’s period and DM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Epoch-averaged intensity profiles at 327 MHz. We plot intensity on the y-axis and rotational phase on the x-axis. One full rotation is shown. Each profile has a resolution of 256 phase bins. We label each profile with the pulsar’s period and DM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Epoch-averaged intensity profiles at 327 MHz. We plot intensity on the y-axis and rotational phase on the x-axis. One full rotation is shown. Each profile has a resolution of 256 phase bins. We label each profile with the pulsar’s period and DM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Epoch-averaged intensity profiles at 1380 MHz. We plot intensity on the y-axis and rotational phase on the x-axis. One full rotation is shown. Each profile has a resolution of 256 phase bins. We label each profile with the pulsar’s period and DM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Epoch-averaged intensity profiles at 1380 MHz. We plot intensity on the y-axis and rotational phase on the x-axis. One full rotation is shown. Each profile has a resolution of 256 phase bins. We label each profile with the pulsar’s period and DM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Residuals for individual timing solutions. We plot the postfit residual on the y-axis and the MJD on the x-axis. Blue coloring corresponds to data taken at 327 MHz while red coloring is used for 1380 MHz observations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Residuals for individual timing solutions. We plot the postfit residual on the y-axis and the MJD on the x-axis. Blue coloring corresponds to data taken at 327 MHz while red coloring is used for 1380 MHz observations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Residuals for individual timing solutions. We plot the postfit residual on the y-axis and the MJD on the x-axis. Blue coloring corresponds to data taken at 327 MHz while red coloring is used for 1380 MHz observations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Residuals for individual timing solutions. We plot the postfit residual on the y-axis and the MJD on the x-axis. Blue coloring corresponds to data taken at 327 MHz while red coloring is used for 1380 MHz observations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Residuals for individual timing solutions. We plot the postfit residual on the y-axis and the MJD on the x-axis. Blue coloring corresponds to data taken at 327 MHz while red coloring is used for 1380 MHz observations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Residuals for individual timing solutions. We plot the postfit residual on the y-axis and the MJD on the x-axis. Blue coloring corresponds to data taken at 327 MHz while red coloring is used for 1380 MHz observations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Residuals for individual timing solutions. We plot the postfit residual on the y-axis and the MJD on the x-axis. Blue coloring corresponds to data taken at 327 MHz while red coloring is used for 1380 MHz observations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_19.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present 18 pulsar discoveries from the AO327 pulsar survey, along with their timing solutions and those for an additional 31 AO327-discovered pulsars. Timing solutions were constructed using observations from a follow-up timing campaign taken between the periods of 2013 -- 2019 using the Arecibo Observatory's 327-MHz receiver. Aside from PSR J0916+0658, an isolated pulsar that shows evidence for partial recycling, the remaining discoveries are non-recycled pulsars. We present a brief census of emission features for all pulsars with the following standouts. PSR~J1942+0142 is found to exhibit the very rare phenomenon of subpulse bi-drifting and PSR~J0225+1727 has an interpulse. We also report distance estimates using the NE2001, YMW16, and NE2025 Galactic electron density models, and identify at least 10 sources where either one or more models underestimate the maximum Galactic line of sight dispersion measure. We compare our discoveries with those of the GBNCC survey, finding that off the Galactic plane, the majority of failures arise from YMW16, while in the Galactic plane, NE2025 shows a marginal degradation of performance relative to NE2001.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the discovery of 18 pulsars in the AO327 327-MHz drift survey together with timing solutions for these sources and for 31 additional AO327 pulsars. Timing solutions are obtained from Arecibo 327-MHz observations spanning 2013–2019. The paper also presents a brief census of emission features (noting subpulse bi-drifting in PSR J1942+0142 and an interpulse in PSR J0225+1727), distance estimates derived from the NE2001, YMW16 and NE2025 electron-density models, and a comparison of survey yields with the GBNCC survey that highlights model-dependent completeness differences off and on the Galactic plane.

Significance. If the reported timing solutions and model comparisons hold, the work adds 18 new pulsars to the catalog and supplies multi-year timing data for 49 sources that can be used for population studies and tests of Galactic electron-density models. The direct side-by-side evaluation of NE2001, YMW16 and NE2025 against measured DMs is a useful empirical contribution, and the identification of rare emission phenomena is of phenomenological interest.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'taken between the periods of 2013 -- 2019' is redundant; 'taken between 2013 and 2019' is sufficient.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement 'identify at least 10 sources where either one or more models underestimate the maximum Galactic line of sight dispersion measure' would benefit from an explicit reference to the table or figure that lists these sources.
  3. The notation 'PSR~J1942+0142' mixes a non-breaking space with a tilde; consistent use of 'PSR J1942+0142' throughout would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive review of the manuscript, their summary of its contents, and their recommendation to accept. No major comments were raised.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; purely observational report

full rationale

The paper reports 18 new pulsar discoveries and timing solutions for 49 AO327 sources based on direct follow-up observations from 2013-2019. Timing solutions are obtained by fitting standard pulsar timing models to measured pulse times of arrival; distance estimates apply three external published electron-density models (NE2001, YMW16, NE2025) without modification. No equations, predictions, or fitted parameters are derived from or reduce to the paper's own results by construction. All comparisons (e.g., to GBNCC survey) reference independent external data. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks with no load-bearing self-citations or ansatzes.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard pulsar timing assumptions and three published electron-density models; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced beyond those in the cited literature.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions of pulsar timing analysis (constant spin-down, no unmodeled red noise) hold for the 2013-2019 data sets
    Invoked when constructing timing solutions for all 49 sources
  • domain assumption NE2001, YMW16, and NE2025 are the appropriate reference models for line-of-sight DM comparisons
    Used directly for distance estimates and failure-mode analysis

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5811 in / 1338 out tokens · 21065 ms · 2026-05-23T03:16:48.923697+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Pulsar timing solutions for 17 pulsars at 150~MHz from the Irish LOFAR station

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Coherent 150 MHz timing solutions obtained for 17 pulsars (7 new) from 590 hours of Irish LOFAR observations of 33 survey candidates between 2020 and 2023.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 101 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Y _e10 Pid

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command Each re...

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.831784 2019

  4. [5]

    M., et al

    Agazie , G., Anumarlapudi , A., Archibald , A. M., et al. 2023, , 951, L8, 10.3847/2041-8213/acdac6

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acdac6 2023

  5. [6]

    2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 966, 105, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad36be

    Agazie, G., Antoniadis, J., Anumarlapudi, A., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 966, 105, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad36be

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad36be 2024

  6. [7]

    F., Arzoumanian, Z., Baker, P

    Alam, M. F., Arzoumanian, Z., Baker, P. T., et al. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 252, 4, 10.3847/1538-4365/abc6a0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abc6a0 2020

  7. [8]

    C., & Ransom , S

    Andersen , B. C., & Ransom , S. M. 2018, , 863, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/aad59f

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aad59f 2018

  8. [9]

    L., Stovall , K., et al

    Antoniadis , J., Kaplan , D. L., Stovall , K., et al. 2016, , 830, 36, 10.3847/0004-637X/830/1/36

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/830/1/36 2016

  9. [10]

    I., Beskin, V

    Arzamasskiy, L. I., Beskin, V. S., & Pirov, K. K. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 466, 2325, 10.1093/mnras/stw3139

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3139 2017

  10. [11]

    D., Dutta , A., Freire , P

    Barr , E. D., Dutta , A., Freire , P. C. C., et al. 2024, Science, 383, 275, 10.1126/science.adg3005

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adg3005 2024

  11. [12]

    Basu, R., Mitra, D., & Melikidze, G. I. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 889, 133, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab63c9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab63c9 2020

  12. [13]

    I., & Skrzypczak, A

    Basu, R., Mitra, D., Melikidze, G. I., & Skrzypczak, A. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 482, 3757, 10.1093/mnras/sty2846

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2846 2018

  13. [14]

    2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 408, 1181, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17197.x

    Belczynski, K., Lorimer, D. R., Ridley, J. P., & Curran, S. J. 2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 407, 1245, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16970.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16970.x 2010

  14. [15]

    J., Lorimer, D

    Burgay, M., Keith, M. J., Lorimer, D. R., et al. 2012, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 429, 579, 10.1093/mnras/sts359

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sts359 2012

  15. [16]

    B., & Ritchings , R

    Cady , E. B., & Ritchings , R. T. 1977, , 269, 126, 10.1038/269126a0

    work page doi:10.1038/269126a0 1977

  16. [17]

    2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 828, 10.1038/s41550-022-01688-x

    Caleb , M., Heywood , I., Rajwade , K., et al. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 828, 10.1038/s41550-022-01688-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01688-x 2022

  17. [18]

    L., et al

    Caleb , M., Lenc , E., Kaplan , D. L., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 1159, 10.1038/s41550-024-02277-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02277-w 2024

  18. [19]

    N., Guo , Y

    Chen , S., Caballero , R. N., Guo , Y. J., et al. 2021, , 508, 4970, 10.1093/mnras/stab2833

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2833 2021

  19. [20]

    M., & Chatterjee, S

    Cordes, J. M., & Chatterjee, S. 2019, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 57, 417, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104501

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104501 2019

  20. [21]

    NE2001.I. A New Model for the Galactic Distribution of Free Electrons and its Fluctuations

    Cordes , J. M., & Lazio , T. J. W. 2002, arXiv e-prints, astro, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0207156

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0207156 2002

  21. [22]

    M., & McLaughlin , M

    Cordes , J. M., & McLaughlin , M. A. 2003, , 596, 1142, 10.1086/378231

    work page doi:10.1086/378231 2003

  22. [23]

    M., Freire , P

    Cordes , J. M., Freire , P. C. C., Lorimer , D. R., et al. 2006, , 637, 446, 10.1086/498335

    work page doi:10.1086/498335 2006

  23. [24]

    T., Fonseca , E., Ransom , S

    Cromartie , H. T., Fonseca , E., Ransom , S. M., et al. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 72, 10.1038/s41550-019-0880-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0880-2 2020

  24. [25]

    2024, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 24, 085008, 10.1088/1674-4527/ad484e

    Dai, J.-P., Han, W., & Wang, N. 2024, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 24, 085008, 10.1088/1674-4527/ad484e

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/ad484e 2024

  25. [26]

    S., McLaughlin, M., Olszanski, T

    Deneva, J. S., McLaughlin, M., Olszanski, T. E. E., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 271, 23, 10.3847/1538-4365/ad19da

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad19da 2024

  26. [27]

    S., Stovall, K., McLaughlin, M

    Deneva, J. S., Stovall, K., McLaughlin, M. A., et al. 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 775, 51, 10.1088/0004-637x/775/1/51

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/775/1/51 2013

  27. [28]

    2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 821, 10, 10.3847/0004-637x/821/1/10

    ---. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 821, 10, 10.3847/0004-637x/821/1/10

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/821/1/10 2016

  28. [29]

    F., P \'e rez-Montero E., D \' az \'A

    Edwards, R. T., Hobbs, G. B., & Manchester, R. N. 2006, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 372, 1549, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10870.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10870.x 2006

  29. [30]

    , Arumugam, P

    EPTA Collaboration and InPTA Collaboration , Antoniadis, J. , Arumugam, P. , et al. 2023, A&A, 678, A50, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346844

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346844 2023

  30. [31]

    E., & Weisberg , J

    Everett , J. E., & Weisberg , J. M. 2001, , 553, 341, 10.1086/320652

    work page doi:10.1086/320652 2001

  31. [32]

    A., et al

    Fiore, W., Levin, L., McLaughlin, M. A., et al. 2023, The Green Bank North Celestial Cap Survey. VIII. 21 New Pulsar Timing Solutions. 2305.13624

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [33]

    M., Williams , J

    Folkner , W. M., Williams , J. G., Boggs , D. H., Park , R. S., & Kuchynka , P. 2014, Interplanetary Network Progress Report, 42-196, 1

    work page 2014

  33. [34]

    T., Pennucci , T

    Fonseca , E., Cromartie , H. T., Pennucci , T. T., et al. 2021, , 915, L12, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac03b8

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac03b8 2021

  34. [35]

    Freire , P. C. C., & Wex , N. 2024, Living Reviews in Relativity, 27, 5, 10.1007/s41114-024-00051-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s41114-024-00051-y 2024

  35. [36]

    HEALPix -- a Framework for High Resolution Discretization, and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere

    G \'o rski , K. M., Hivon , E., Banday , A. J., et al. 2005, , 622, 759, 10.1086/427976

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/427976 2005

  36. [37]

    L., Wang , C., Wang , P

    Han , J. L., Wang , C., Wang , P. F., et al. 2021, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 21, 107, 10.1088/1674-4527/21/5/107

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/21/5/107 2021

  37. [38]

    Hankins , T. H. 2018, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 337, Pulsar Astrophysics the Next Fifty Years, ed. P. Weltevrede , B. B. P. Perera , L. L. Preston , & S. Sanidas , 29--32, 10.1017/S1743921317007335

    work page doi:10.1017/s1743921317007335 2018

  38. [39]

    Harding, A. K. 2017, Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, 13, 52, 10.1017/s1743921318000509

    work page doi:10.1017/s1743921318000509 2017

  39. [40]

    J., Pilkington , J

    Hewish , A., Bell , S. J., Pilkington , J. D. H., Scott , P. F., & Collins , R. A. 1968, , 217, 709, 10.1038/217709a0

    work page doi:10.1038/217709a0 1968

  40. [41]

    Johnston , S., & Romani , R. W. 2004, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 218, Young Neutron Stars and Their Environments, ed. F. Camilo & B. M. Gaensler , 315

    work page 2004

  41. [42]

    Kalberla , P. M. W., Burton , W. B., Hartmann , D., et al. 2005, , 440, 775, 10.1051/0004-6361:20041864

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041864 2005

  42. [43]

    2011, , 418, 490, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19499.x

    Keane, E. F., Kramer, M., Lyne, A. G., Stappers, B. W., & McLaughlin, M. A. 2011, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 415, 3065, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18917.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18917.x 2011

  43. [44]

    C., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15076.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.397.1661V 397, 1661

    Keith, M. J., Johnston, S., Weltevrede, P., & Kramer, M. 2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 402, 745, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15926.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15926.x 2010

  44. [45]

    2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 408, 1181, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17197.x

    Keith , M. J., Jameson , A., van Straten , W., et al. 2010, , 409, 619, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17325.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17325.x 2010

  45. [46]

    J., Hobbs , G., et al

    Kerr , M., Reardon , D. J., Hobbs , G., et al. 2020, , 37, e020, 10.1017/pasa.2020.11

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2020.11 2020

  46. [47]

    H., Manchester , R

    Kramer , M., Stairs , I. H., Manchester , R. N., et al. 2021, Physical Review X, 11, 041050, 10.1103/PhysRevX.11.041050

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.041050 2021

  47. [48]

    2007, , 76, 087301, 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.087301

    Land , K., & Slosar , A. 2007, , 76, 087301, 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.087301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.087301 2007

  48. [49]

    Lattimer , J. M. 2021, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 71, 433, 10.1146/annurev-nucl-102419-124827

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102419-124827 2021

  49. [50]

    Lazarus, P., Brazier, A., Hessels, J. W. T., et al. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal, 812, 81, 10.1088/0004-637x/812/1/81

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/812/1/81 2015

  50. [51]

    F., Olszanski , T

    Lewis , E. F., Olszanski , T. E. E., Deneva , J. S., et al. 2023, , 956, 132, 10.3847/1538-4357/acf99d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acf99d 2023

  51. [52]

    R., & Kramer , M

    Lorimer , D. R., & Kramer , M. 2004, Handbook of Pulsar Astronomy , Vol. 4

    work page 2004

  52. [53]

    Radio Pulsar Populations

    Lorimer, D. R., Pol, N., Rajwade, K., et al. 2019, Radio Pulsar Populations, arXiv, 10.48550/ARXIV.1903.06526

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.06526 2019

  53. [54]

    Maciesiak, K., Gil, J., & Ribeiro, V. A. R. M. 2011, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 414, 1314, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18471.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18471.x 2011

  54. [55]

    H., Main, R., & Pen, U.-L

    Mahajan, N., van Kerkwijk, M. H., Main, R., & Pen, U.-L. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 867, L2, 10.3847/2041-8213/aae713

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aae713 2018

  55. [56]

    N., Hobbs , G

    Manchester , R. N., Hobbs , G. B., Teoh , A., & Hobbs , M. 2005, , 129, 1993, 10.1086/428488

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/428488 2005

  56. [57]

    N., & Lyne , A

    Manchester , R. N., & Lyne , A. G. 1977, , 181, 761, 10.1093/mnras/181.4.761

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/181.4.761 1977

  57. [58]

    N., Lyne , A

    Manchester , R. N., Lyne , A. G., Camilo , F., et al. 2001, , 328, 17, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04751.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04751.x 2001

  58. [59]

    G., Stovall , K., Freire , P

    Martinez , J. G., Stovall , K., Freire , P. C. C., et al. 2015, , 812, 143, 10.1088/0004-637X/812/2/143

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/812/2/143 2015

  59. [60]

    G., Stovall, K., Freire, P

    Martinez, J. G., Stovall, K., Freire, P. C. C., et al. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 851, L29, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9d87

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa9d87 2017

  60. [61]

    G., Gentile, P., Freire, P

    Martinez, J. G., Gentile, P., Freire, P. C. C., et al. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 881, 166, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2877

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2877 2019

  61. [63]

    A., et al

    McLaughlin , M., Kisseberth , N., Heatherly , S. A., et al. 2023, Computing in Science and Engineering, 25, 17, 10.1109/MCSE.2023.3276811

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2023.3276811 2023

  62. [64]

    New Pulsars Discovered in Arecibo Drift-Scan Searches

    McLaughlin , M. A., Lorimer , D. R., Champion , D. J., et al. 2004, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 218, Young Neutron Stars and Their Environments, ed. F. Camilo & B. M. Gaensler , 127, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0310454

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0310454 2004

  63. [65]

    A., Lyne , A

    McLaughlin , M. A., Lyne , A. G., Lorimer , D. R., et al. 2006, , 439, 817, 10.1038/nature04440

    work page doi:10.1038/nature04440 2006

  64. [66]

    2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 491, 725, 10.1093/mnras/stz2997

    Michilli, D., Bassa, C., Cooper, S., et al. 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 491, 725, 10.1093/mnras/stz2997

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2997 2019

  65. [67]

    2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 903, 81, 10.3847/1538-4357/abb94f

    Ng, C., Wu, B., Ma, M., et al. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 903, 81, 10.3847/1538-4357/abb94f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb94f 2020

  66. [68]

    2016, , 54, 401, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023322

    \"O zel , F., & Freire , P. 2016, , 54, 401, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023322

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023322 2016

  67. [69]

    T., Perera, B

    Palliyaguru, N. T., Perera, B. B. P., McLaughlin, M. A., Osłowski, S., & Siebert, G. L. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 520, 2747, 10.1093/mnras/stad194

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad194 2023

  68. [70]

    G., Jiang , P., et al

    Pan , Z., Lu , J. G., Jiang , P., et al. 2023, , 620, 961, 10.1038/s41586-023-06308-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06308-w 2023

  69. [71]

    2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 480, 3302, 10.1093/mnras/sty1992

    Pang, D., Goseva-Popstojanova, K., Devine, T., & McLaughlin, M. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 480, 3302, 10.1093/mnras/sty1992

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1992 2018

  70. [72]

    Parent, E., Sewalls, H., Freire, P. C. C., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 924, 135, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac375d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac375d 2022

  71. [73]

    Perera , B. B. P., DeCesar , M. E., Demorest , P. B., et al. 2019, , 490, 4666, 10.1093/mnras/stz2857

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2857 2019

  72. [74]

    C., Flynn , C., & Deller , A

    Price , D. C., Flynn , C., & Deller , A. 2021, , 38, e038, 10.1017/pasa.2021.33

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2021.33 2021

  73. [75]

    Rankin , J. M. 1993, , 405, 285, 10.1086/172361

    work page doi:10.1086/172361 1993

  74. [76]

    2011, PRESTO: PulsaR Exploration and Search TOolkit , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1107.017

    Ransom , S. 2011, PRESTO: PulsaR Exploration and Search TOolkit , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1107.017. 1107.017

    work page 2011

  75. [77]

    Ransom , S. M. 2001, PhD thesis, Harvard University, Massachusetts

    work page 2001

  76. [78]

    M., Eikenberry , S

    Ransom , S. M., Eikenberry , S. S., & Middleditch , J. 2002, , 124, 1788, 10.1086/342285

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/342285 2002

  77. [79]

    J., Zic, A., Shannon, R

    Reardon, D. J., Zic, A., Shannon, R. M., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 951, L6, 10.3847/2041-8213/acdd02

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acdd02 2023

  78. [80]

    Ridolfi , A., Gautam , T., Freire , P. C. C., et al. 2021, , 504, 1407, 10.1093/mnras/stab790

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab790 2021

  79. [81]

    A., et al

    Rosen , R., Swiggum , J., McLaughlin , M. A., et al. 2013, , 768, 85, 10.1088/0004-637X/768/1/85

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/768/1/85 2013

  80. [82]

    , Cooper, S

    Sanidas, S. , Cooper, S. , Bassa, C. G. , et al. 2019, A&A, 626, A104, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935609

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935609 2019

Showing first 80 references.