Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Membership Inference Risks in Quantized Models: A Theoretical and Empirical Study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.06567 v2 pith:TWYNWEAK submitted 2025-02-10 stat.ML cs.LG

Membership Inference Risks in Quantized Models: A Theoretical and Empirical Study

classification stat.ML cs.LG
keywords modelsinferenceindicatorlearningmachinemembershipattackscontext
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Quantizing machine learning models has demonstrated its effectiveness in lowering memory and inference costs while maintaining performance levels comparable to those of the original models. In this work, we investigate the impact of quantization procedures on privacy in data-driven models, focusing on their vulnerability to membership inference attacks. Membership Inference Security (MIS) has recently been proposed to characterize the privacy of machine learning models against the most powerful (and possibly unknown) attacks. However, quantifying MIS appears to be computationally very difficult. In this paper, we propose a new MIS indicator for post-training quantization procedures of machine learning models that minimizes an empirical loss. This new indicator is a byproduct of a theoretical asymptotic analysis of the MIS in this context. We also present a methodology for empirically estimating our MIS indicator. Using synthetic datasets and real-world data (in the context of drug discovery), we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in assessing and ranking the MIS of different quantizers.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Bits and Memories: Measuring Verbatim Extraction Across LLM Quantization

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Quantizing LLMs selectively forgets memorized text faster than capability, but 1B-scale 4-bit models still extract ~72% of memorized sequences, so quantization is not a privacy defense.