REVIEW 1 cited by
Phantom Events: Demystifying the Issues of Log Forgery in Blockchain
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Phantom Events: Demystifying the Issues of Log Forgery in Blockchain
read the original abstract
With the rapid development of blockchain technology, transaction logs play a central role in various applications, including decentralized exchanges, wallets, cross-chain bridges, and other third-party services. However, these logs, particularly those based on smart contract events, are highly susceptible to manipulation and forgery, creating substantial security risks across the ecosystem. To address this issue, we present the first in-depth security analysis of transaction log forgery in EVM-based blockchains, a phenomenon we term Phantom Events. We systematically model five types of attacks and propose a tool designed to detect event forgery vulnerabilities in smart contracts. Our evaluation demonstrates that our approach outperforms existing tools in identifying potential phantom events. Furthermore, we have successfully identified real-world instances for all five types of attacks across multiple decentralized applications. Finally, we call on community developers to take proactive steps to address these critical security vulnerabilities.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
TrapHunter: Exposing Covert Pathways in Trap Token Contracts
TrapHunter detects six categories of malicious ERC-20 'trap token' logic by combining Abstract Behavior Trees, Augmented Path Graphs, LLM intent reasoning, and fork-based validation, reaching 81.8% precision / 85.4% recall.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.