Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Plan-over-Graph: Towards Parallelable LLM Agent Schedule

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.14563 v1 pith:G7QUFX2E submitted 2025-02-20 cs.AI

Plan-over-Graph: Towards Parallelable LLM Agent Schedule

classification cs.AI
keywords taskplan-over-graphgraphsllmsparallelcomplexexecutiongraph
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional abilities in reasoning for task planning. However, challenges remain under-explored for parallel schedules. This paper introduces a novel paradigm, plan-over-graph, in which the model first decomposes a real-life textual task into executable subtasks and constructs an abstract task graph. The model then understands this task graph as input and generates a plan for parallel execution. To enhance the planning capability of complex, scalable graphs, we design an automated and controllable pipeline to generate synthetic graphs and propose a two-stage training scheme. Experimental results show that our plan-over-graph method significantly improves task performance on both API-based LLMs and trainable open-sourced LLMs. By normalizing complex tasks as graphs, our method naturally supports parallel execution, demonstrating global efficiency. The code and data are available at https://github.com/zsq259/Plan-over-Graph.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Beyond Sequential Interaction: Benchmarking Parallel Execution and Coordination for GUI Agents

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A planner–worker system that splits GUI tasks across five concurrent desktop agents reaches 46.4% success on a new 233-task benchmark, but much of the gain comes from planning rather than parallelism.

  2. Atomic Task Graph: A Unified Framework for Agentic Planning and Execution

    cs.AI 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    ATG maintains explicit DAGs of subtasks to enable dependency tracking, parallel execution, and localized repair in LLM agents, outperforming baselines on three benchmarks with 7B-8B models.