Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

BELE: Blur Equivalent Linearized Estimator

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.00503 v1 pith:OSP2REZL submitted 2025-03-01 eess.IV cs.CV

BELE: Blur Equivalent Linearized Estimator

classification eess.IV cs.CV
keywords blurdistortionseffectsestimatorimagemodelqualityassessment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment context, Mean Opinion Score values represent subjective evaluations based on retinal perception, while objective metrics assess the reproduced image on the display. Bridging these subjective and objective domains requires parametric mapping functions, which are sensitive to the observer's viewing distance. This paper introduces a novel parametric model that separates perceptual effects due to strong edge degradations from those caused by texture distortions. These effects are quantified using two distinct quality indices. The first is the Blur Equivalent Linearized Estimator, designed to measure blur on strong and isolated edges while accounting for variations in viewing distance. The second is a Complex Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio, which evaluates distortions affecting texture regions. The first-order effects of the estimator are directly tied to the first index, for which we introduce the concept of \emph{focalization}, interpreted as a linearization term. Starting from a Positional Fisher Information loss model applied to Gaussian blur distortion in natural images, we demonstrate how this model can generalize to linearize all types of distortions. Finally, we validate our theoretical findings by comparing them with several state-of-the-art classical and deep-learning-based full-reference image quality assessment methods on widely used benchmark datasets.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Partial-Reference IQA Based on Hermite-Gauss Structural Prediction and Texture Deviation

    eess.IV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    A partial-reference IQA method extracts one scalar noise prior from strong edges and fuses it with Hermite-Gauss self-prediction of structure to rival deep NR models with three parameters.

  2. Partial-Reference IQA Based on Hermite-Gauss Structural Prediction and Texture Deviation

    eess.IV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    PreSPA predicts perceptual image quality from a single reference scalar and Hermite-Gauss self-prediction of the distorted gradient field, rivaling deep NR models with three affine parameters.