pith. sign in

arxiv: 2503.05016 · v2 · submitted 2025-03-06 · 🪐 quant-ph

Protecting spin squeezing from decoherence

Lin Jiao , Han Pu , Jun-Hong An This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 00:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords spin squeezingdecoherencenon-Markovian dynamicsdissipative environmentsteady statequantum metrologytrapped ionsprotection mechanism
0
0 comments X

The pith

Non-Markovian effects from local dissipation can protect spin squeezing, allowing it to reach a robust steady state.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates how a local dissipative environment affects spin squeezing when the dynamics are modeled beyond the usual Born-Markov approximation. It identifies a protection mechanism that prevents the usual decay and produces robust squeezing that survives indefinitely in the steady state. This result matters because spin squeezing is a key resource for beating classical limits in quantum metrology, yet decoherence normally destroys that advantage in real devices. The authors also sketch a trapped-ion experiment that could test the prediction.

Core claim

By modeling the local dissipative environment beyond the Born-Markov approximation, the authors find a mechanism that protects spin squeezing from decoherence and demonstrate that robust spin squeezing can be achieved in the steady state.

What carries the argument

The non-Markovian dynamics generated by the local dissipative environment, which supplies a protection mechanism that maintains squeezing at long times.

If this is right

  • Robust spin squeezing becomes available for metrology even when the system couples to a realistic local environment.
  • High-precision sensing can be realized without perfect isolation from decoherence.
  • The non-Markovian character of the bath can be turned into a resource rather than a liability.
  • Trapped-ion platforms provide a concrete route to verify the steady-state protection.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar protection may appear in other collective quantum resources such as entanglement or quantum discord when the same non-Markovian local bath is present.
  • The mechanism could be combined with dynamical decoupling or reservoir engineering to further stabilize squeezing.
  • If the protection relies on memory effects in the bath, then engineering the bath spectrum might offer a tunable knob for squeezing lifetime.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen non-Markovian model of the local environment correctly captures the real system-bath coupling and produces the claimed protection without extra assumptions about initial states or coupling strengths.

What would settle it

Measure whether spin squeezing decays to zero or persists at a finite value in the long-time steady state of a trapped-ion system engineered with controlled local dissipation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2503.05016 by Han Pu, Jun-Hong An, Lin Jiao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Energy spectrum of the composite spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. An implementation of Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

As a crucial resource in the field of quantum metrology, spin squeezing can facilitate highly precise measurements that surpass the limitations imposed by classical physics. However, the quantum advantage of spin squeezing is significantly compromised by decoherence, thus impeding its practical implementation. Here, by investigating the influence of local dissipative environment on spin squeezing beyond the conventional Born-Markov approximation, we find a mechanism to protect spin squeezing from decoherence and show that robust spin squeezing can be achieved in the steady state. We outline an experimental proposal to verify our prediction in a trapped-ion platform. Overcoming the challenges set by decoherence in spin squeezing, our work provides guidance to realize high-precision sensing in realistic environments and sheds light on the effect of non-Markovian environment on quantum systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that investigating the influence of a local dissipative environment on spin squeezing beyond the Born-Markov approximation reveals a protection mechanism against decoherence, enabling robust spin squeezing to persist in the steady state. It supports this with a model analysis and outlines a trapped-ion experimental proposal for verification.

Significance. If the non-Markovian protection mechanism and steady-state result hold under the stated assumptions, the work would provide useful guidance for preserving quantum metrology resources in realistic environments, with the trapped-ion proposal offering a concrete path to experimental tests.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief statement of the key assumptions on the system-environment coupling strength and initial conditions used in the non-Markovian model.
  2. Figure captions for any steady-state plots should explicitly note the parameter regime (e.g., coupling strength relative to system frequencies) to allow readers to assess robustness.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our work and for recommending minor revision. The recognition that the non-Markovian protection mechanism could offer useful guidance for quantum metrology in realistic environments is appreciated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper constructs a non-Markovian master equation for the spin system coupled to a local dissipative environment, solves for the time evolution of the squeezing parameter, and identifies a steady-state value that remains finite due to the memory effects in the bath correlation function. This follows directly from the integro-differential equation without any parameter fitted to the target squeezing value and without load-bearing self-citations that presuppose the protection result. The trapped-ion proposal is a direct mapping of the derived Hamiltonian and dissipation rates. No step reduces the claimed protection mechanism to a redefinition or statistical forcing of its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all such elements remain unknown.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5645 in / 979 out tokens · 51750 ms · 2026-05-23T00:19:26.701830+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Pezz` e, A

    L. Pezz` e, A. Smerzi, M. K. Oberthaler, R. Schmied, and P. Treutlein, Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 035005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    L¨ ucke, J

    B. L¨ ucke, J. Peise, G. Vitagliano, J. Arlt, L. Santos, G. T´ oth, and C. Klempt, Detecting multiparticle entan- glement of Dicke states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 155304 (2014)

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    D. J. Wineland, J. J. Bollinger, W. M. Itano, F. L. Moore, and D. J. Heinzen, Spin squeezing and reduced quantum noise in spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. A 46, R6797 (1992)

    work page 1992

  5. [8]

    G. Rosi, F. Sorrentino, L. Cacciapuoti, M. Prevedelli, and G. M. Tino, Precision measurement of the newtonian gravitational constant using cold atoms, Nature 510, 518 (2014)

    work page 2014

  6. [9]

    C. L. Garrido Alzar, Compact chip-scale guided cold atom gyrometers for inertial navigation: Enabling tech- nologies and design study, A VS Quantum Science 1, 014702 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [10]

    Salvi, N

    L. Salvi, N. Poli, V. Vuleti´ c, and G. M. Tino, Squeezing on momentum states for atom interferometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 033601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [11]

    S. S. Szigeti, S. P. Nolan, J. D. Close, and S. A. Haine, High-precision quantum-enhanced gravimetry with a Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 100402 (2020)

    work page 2020

  9. [12]

    L. I. R. Gil, R. Mukherjee, E. M. Bridge, M. P. A. Jones, and T. Pohl, Spin squeezing in a Rydberg lattice clock, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 103601 (2014)

    work page 2014

  10. [13]

    Pezz` e and A

    L. Pezz` e and A. Smerzi, Heisenberg-limited noisy atomic clock using a hybrid coherent and squeezed state proto- col, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 210503 (2020)

    work page 2020

  11. [14]

    Schulte, C

    M. Schulte, C. Lisdat, P. O. Schmidt, U. Sterr, and K. Hammerer, Prospects and challenges for squeezing- enhanced optical atomic clocks, Nat. Commun. 11, 5955 (2020)

    work page 2020

  12. [15]

    B. K. Malia, Y. Wu, J. Mart ´ ınez-Rinc´ on, and M. A. Kase- vich, Distributed quantum sensing with mode-entangled spin-squeezed atomic states, Nature 612, 661 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [16]

    W. J. Eckner, N. D. Oppong, A. Cao, A. W. Young, W. R. Milner, J. M. Robinson, J. Ye, and A. M. Kauf- man, Realizing spin squeezing with Rydberg interactions in an optical clock, Nature 621, 734 (2023)

    work page 2023

  14. [17]

    J. M. Robinson, M. Miklos, Y. M. Tso, C. J. Kennedy, T. Bothwell, D. Kedar, J. K. Thompson, and J. Ye, Direct comparison of two spin-squeezed optical clock ensembles at the 10−17 level, Nature Physics 20, 208 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [18]

    Muessel, H

    W. Muessel, H. Strobel, D. Linnemann, D. B. Hume, and M. K. Oberthaler, Scalable spin squeezing for quantum- enhanced magnetometry with Bose-Einstein conden- sates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 103004 (2014)

    work page 2014

  16. [19]

    J. B. Brask, R. Chaves, and J. Ko/suppress lody´ nski, Improved quantum magnetometry beyond the standard quantum limit, Phys. Rev. X 5, 031010 (2015)

    work page 2015

  17. [20]

    H. Bao, J. Duan, S. Jin, X. Lu, P. Li, W. Qu, M. Wang, I. Novikova, E. E. Mikhailov, K.-F. Zhao, K. Mølmer, H. Shen, and Y. Xiao, Spin squeezing of 10 11 atoms by prediction and retrodiction measurements, Nature 581, 159 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [21]

    Troullinou, R

    C. Troullinou, R. Jim´ enez-Mart ´ ınez, J. Kong, V. G. Lu- civero, and M. W. Mitchell, Squeezed-light enhancement and backaction evasion in a high sensitivity optically pumped magnetometer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 193601 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [22]

    S. Jin, H. Bao, J. Duan, X. Lu, M. Wang, K.-F. Zhao, H. Shen, and Y. Xiao, Adiabaticity in state preparation for spin squeezing of large atom ensembles, Photon. Res. 9, 2296 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [23]

    J. Kong, R. Jim´ enez-Mart ´ ınez, C. Troullinou, V. G. 6 Lucivero, G. T´ oth, and M. W. Mitchell, Measurement- induced, spatially-extended entanglement in a hot, strongly-interacting atomic system, Nature Communica- tions 11, 2415 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [24]

    X. Wang, A. Miranowicz, Y.-x. Liu, C. P. Sun, and F. Nori, Sudden vanishing of spin squeezing under de- coherence, Phys. Rev. A 81, 022106 (2010)

    work page 2010

  22. [25]

    Xue, Spin-squeezing property of weighted graph states, Phys

    P. Xue, Spin-squeezing property of weighted graph states, Phys. Rev. A 86, 023812 (2012)

    work page 2012

  23. [26]

    Koppenh¨ ofer and A

    M. Koppenh¨ ofer and A. A. Clerk, Revisiting the impact of dissipation on time-reversed one-axis-twist quantum- sensing protocols, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043279 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [27]

    L. Jiao, W. Wu, S.-Y. Bai, and J.-H. An, Quantum metrology in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum era, Advanced Quantum Technologies n/a, 2300218

    work page

  25. [28]

    Huang, J

    M.-Z. Huang, J. A. de la Paz, T. Mazzoni, K. Ott, P. Rosenbusch, A. Sinatra, C. L. Garrido Alzar, and J. Reichel, Observing spin-squeezed states under spin- exchange collisions for a second, PRX Quantum 4, 020322 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [29]

    Baamara, A

    Y. Baamara, A. Sinatra, and M. Gessner, Scaling laws for the sensitivity enhancement of non-Gaussian spin states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 160501 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [30]

    Bornet, G

    G. Bornet, G. Emperauger, C. Chen, B. Ye, M. Block, M. Bintz, J. A. Boyd, D. Barredo, T. Comparin, F. Mezzacapo, T. Roscilde, T. Lahaye, N. Y. Yao, and A. Browaeys, Scalable spin squeezing in a dipolar Ryd- berg atom array, Nature 621, 728 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [31]

    Roscilde, F

    T. Roscilde, F. Caleca, A. Angelone, and F. Mezzacapo, Scalable spin squeezing from critical slowing down in short-range interacting systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 210401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [32]

    A. Z. Chaudhry and J. Gong, Protecting and enhanc- ing spin squeezing via continuous dynamical decoupling, Phys. Rev. A 86, 012311 (2012)

    work page 2012

  30. [33]

    Liao, M.-S

    X.-P. Liao, M.-S. Rong, and M.-F. Fang, Protecting and enhancing spin squeezing from decoherence using weak measurements, Laser Physics Letters 14, 065201 (2017)

    work page 2017

  31. [34]

    Bai and J.-H

    S.-Y. Bai and J.-H. An, Generating stable spin squeezing by squeezed-reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 083602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [35]

    Rivas, S

    A. Rivas, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum non-Markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection, Reports on Progress in Physics 77, 094001 (2014)

    work page 2014

  33. [36]

    Breuer, E.-M

    H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, J. Piilo, and B. Vacchini, Colloquium: Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 021002 (2016)

    work page 2016

  34. [37]

    de Vega and D

    I. de Vega and D. Alonso, Dynamics of non-Markovian open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  35. [38]

    L. Li, M. J. Hall, and H. M. Wiseman, Concepts of quan- tum non-Markovianity: A hierarchy, Physics Reports 759, 1 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [39]

    K. Bai, Z. Peng, H.-G. Luo, and J.-H. An, Retrieving ideal precision in noisy quantum optical metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 040402 (2019)

    work page 2019

  37. [40]

    A. W. Chin, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum metrology in non-Markovian environments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 233601 (2012)

    work page 2012

  38. [41]

    Long, W.-T

    X. Long, W.-T. He, N.-N. Zhang, K. Tang, Z. Lin, H. Liu, X. Nie, G. Feng, J. Li, T. Xin, Q. Ai, and D. Lu, Entanglement-enhanced quantum metrology in colored noise by quantum Zeno effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 070502 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [42]

    Bai and J.-H

    S.-Y. Bai and J.-H. An, Floquet engineering to overcome no-go theorem of noisy quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 050801 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [43]

    W. M. Itano, J. C. Bergquist, J. J. Bollinger, J. M. Gilli- gan, D. J. Heinzen, F. L. Moore, M. G. Raizen, and D. J. Wineland, Quantum projection noise: Population fluctu- ations in two-level systems, Phys. Rev. A 47, 3554 (1993)

    work page 1993

  41. [44]

    B. C. Sanders, Quantum dynamics of the nonlinear rota- tor and the effects of continual spin measurement, Phys. Rev. A 40, 2417 (1989)

    work page 1989

  42. [45]

    Wu, G.-R

    L.-N. Wu, G.-R. Jin, and L. You, Spin squeezing of the non-Hermitian one-axis twisting model, Phys. Rev. A 92, 033826 (2015)

    work page 2015

  43. [46]

    Fujiwara, Quantum channel identification problem, Phys

    A. Fujiwara, Quantum channel identification problem, Phys. Rev. A 63, 042304 (2001)

    work page 2001

  44. [47]

    Fernholz, H

    T. Fernholz, H. Krauter, K. Jensen, J. F. Sherson, A. S. Sørensen, and E. S. Polzik, Spin squeezing of atomic en- sembles via nuclear-electronic spin entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 073601 (2008)

    work page 2008

  45. [48]

    Chaudhury, S

    S. Chaudhury, S. Merkel, T. Herr, A. Silberfarb, I. H. Deutsch, and P. S. Jessen, Quantum control of the hy- perfine spin of a Cs atom ensemble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 163002 (2007)

    work page 2007

  46. [49]

    Grond, J

    J. Grond, J. Schmiedmayer, and U. Hohenester, Optimiz- ing number squeezing when splitting a mesoscopic con- densate, Phys. Rev. A 79, 021603 (2009)

    work page 2009

  47. [50]

    Orzel, A

    C. Orzel, A. K. Tuchman, M. L. Fenselau, M. Yasuda, and M. A. Kasevich, Squeezed states in a Bose-Einstein condensate, Science 291, 2386 (2001)

    work page 2001

  48. [51]

    Helmerson and L

    K. Helmerson and L. You, Creating massive entangle- ment of Bose-Einstein condensed atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 170402 (2001)

    work page 2001

  49. [52]

    J. G. Bohnet, B. C. Sawyer, J. W. Britton, M. L. Wall, A. M. Rey, M. Foss-Feig, and J. J. Bollinger, Quantum spin dynamics and entanglement generation with hun- dreds of trapped ions, Science 352, 1297 (2016)

    work page 2016

  50. [53]

    Y. Lu, S. Zhang, K. Zhang, W. Chen, Y. Shen, J. Zhang, J.-N. Zhang, and K. Kim, Global entangling gates on arbitrary ion qubits, Nature 572, 363 (2019)

    work page 2019

  51. [54]

    Figgatt, A

    C. Figgatt, A. Ostrander, N. M. Linke, K. A. Landsman, D. Zhu, D. Maslov, and C. Monroe, Parallel entangling operations on a universal ion-trap quantum computer, Nature 572, 368 (2019)

    work page 2019

  52. [55]

    C. Song, K. Xu, W. Liu, C.-p. Yang, S.-B. Zheng, H. Deng, Q. Xie, K. Huang, Q. Guo, L. Zhang, P. Zhang, D. Xu, D. Zheng, X. Zhu, H. Wang, Y.-A. Chen, C.-Y. Lu, S. Han, and J.-W. Pan, 10-qubit entanglement and parallel logic operations with a superconducting circuit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 180511 (2017)

    work page 2017

  53. [56]

    C. Song, K. Xu, H. Li, Y.-R. Zhang, X. Zhang, W. Liu, Q. Guo, Z. Wang, W. Ren, J. Hao, H. Feng, H. Fan, D. Zheng, D.-W. Wang, H. Wang, and S.-Y. Zhu, Gen- eration of multicomponent atomic Schr¨ odinger cat states of up to 20 qubits, Science 365, 574 (2019)

    work page 2019

  54. [57]

    Xu, Z.-H

    K. Xu, Z.-H. Sun, W. Liu, Y.-R. Zhang, H. Li, H. Dong, W. Ren, P. Zhang, F. Nori, D. Zheng, H. Fan, and H. Wang, Probing dynamical phase transitions with a superconducting quantum simulator, Science Advances 6, eaba4935 (2020)

    work page 2020

  55. [58]

    Y. C. Liu, Z. F. Xu, G. R. Jin, and L. You, Spin squeez- ing: Transforming one-axis twisting into two-axis twist- ing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 013601 (2011)

    work page 2011

  56. [59]

    Zhang, X.-F

    J.-Y. Zhang, X.-F. Zhou, G.-C. Guo, and Z.-W. Zhou, 7 Dynamical spin squeezing via a higher-order Trotter- Suzuki approximation, Phys. Rev. A 90, 013604 (2014)

    work page 2014

  57. [60]

    Huang, Y.-L

    W. Huang, Y.-L. Zhang, C.-L. Zou, X.-B. Zou, and G.-C. Guo, Two-axis spin squeezing of two-component Bose- Einstein condensates via continuous driving, Phys. Rev. A 91, 043642 (2015)

    work page 2015

  58. [61]

    Huang, X

    L.-G. Huang, X. Zhang, Y. Wang, Z. Hua, Y. Tang, and Y.-C. Liu, Heisenberg-limited spin squeezing in coupled spin systems, Phys. Rev. A 107, 042613 (2023)

    work page 2023

  59. [62]

    P. Xu, H. Sun, S. Yi, and W. Zhang, Rebuilding of de- stroyed spin squeezing in noisy environments, Sci. Rep. 7, 14102 (2017)

    work page 2017

  60. [63]

    Tong, J.-H

    Q.-J. Tong, J.-H. An, H.-G. Luo, and C. H. Oh, Mech- anism of entanglement preservation, Phys. Rev. A 81, 052330 (2010)

    work page 2010

  61. [64]

    Zhang, P.-Y

    W.-M. Zhang, P.-Y. Lo, H.-N. Xiong, M. W.-Y. Tu, and F. Nori, General non-Markovian dynamics of open quan- tum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 170402 (2012)

    work page 2012

  62. [65]

    Zhu, G.-F

    H.-J. Zhu, G.-F. Zhang, L. Zhuang, and W.-M. Liu, Uni- versal dissipationless dynamics in Gaussian continuous- variable open systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 220403 (2018)

    work page 2018

  63. [66]

    Kraus, A

    K. Kraus, A. B¨ ohm, J. D. Dollard, and W. H. Wootters, States, Effects, and Operations Fundamental Notions of Quantum Theory: Lectures in Mathematical Physics at the University of Texas at Austin (Springer Berlin Hei- delberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1983)

    work page 1983

  64. [67]

    See the Supplemental Material for the derivation of dy- namical solution and its long-time limit, the spin squeez- ing parameter, and the Husimi Q function

    work page

  65. [70]

    Huang, K

    Z. Huang, K. R. Motes, P. M. Anisimov, J. P. Dowling, and D. W. Berry, Adaptive phase estimation with two- mode squeezed vacuum and parity measurement, Phys. Rev. A 95, 053837 (2017)

    work page 2017

  66. [71]

    P. A. Knott, T. J. Proctor, K. Nemoto, J. A. Dunning- ham, and W. J. Munro, Effect of multimode entangle- ment on lossy optical quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. A 90, 033846 (2014)

    work page 2014

  67. [72]

    Liu and A

    Y. Liu and A. A. Houck, Quantum electrodynamics near a photonic bandgap, Nat. Phys. 13, 48 (2012)

    work page 2012

  68. [73]

    Krinner, M

    L. Krinner, M. Stewart, A. Pazmi˜ no, J. Kwon, and D. Schneble, Spontaneous emission of matter waves from a tunable open quantum system, Nature 559, 589 (2018)

    work page 2018

  69. [74]

    J. Kwon, Y. Kim, A. Lanuza, and D. Schneble, Formation of matter-wave polaritons in an optical lattice, Nature Physics 18, 657 (2022)

    work page 2022

  70. [75]

    Y. Kim, A. Lanuza, and D. Schneble, Super- and subra- diant dynamics of quantum emitters mediated by atomic matter waves, Nature Physics 21, 70 (2025)

    work page 2025

  71. [76]

    Hosten, N

    O. Hosten, N. J. Engelsen, R. Krishnakumar, and M. A. Kasevich, Measurement noise 100 times lower than the quantum-projection limit using entangled atoms, Nature 529, 505 (2016)

    work page 2016

  72. [77]

    Tamascelli, A

    D. Tamascelli, A. Smirne, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Nonperturbative treatment of non-Markovian dynamics of open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 030402 (2018)

    work page 2018

  73. [78]

    Lemmer, C

    A. Lemmer, C. Cormick, D. Tamascelli, T. Schaetz, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, A trapped-ion simulator for spin-boson models with structured environments, New J. Phys. 20, 073002 (2018)

    work page 2018

  74. [79]

    Franke, S

    J. Franke, S. R. Muleady, R. Kaubruegger, F. Kranzl, R. Blatt, A. M. Rey, M. K. Joshi, and C. F. Roos, Quantum-enhanced sensing on optical transi- tions through finite-range interactions, Nature 621, 740 (2023)

    work page 2023

  75. [80]

    Wang, Y.-K

    G.-X. Wang, Y.-K. Wu, R. Yao, W.-Q. Lian, Z.-J. Cheng, Y.-L. Xu, C. Zhang, Y. Jiang, Y.-Z. Xu, B.-X. Qi, P.-Y. Hou, Z.-C. Zhou, L. He, and L.-M. Duan, Simulating the spin-boson model with a controllable reservoir in an ion trap, Phys. Rev. A 109, 062402 (2024)

    work page 2024

  76. [81]

    C. D. Bruzewicz, R. McConnell, J. Chiaverini, and J. M. Sage, Scalable loading of a two-dimensional trapped-ion array, Nature Communications 7, 13005 (2016)

    work page 2016

  77. [82]

    Xue, Non-Markovian dynamics of spin squeezing, Physics Letters A 377, 1328 (2013)

    P. Xue, Non-Markovian dynamics of spin squeezing, Physics Letters A 377, 1328 (2013)

    work page 2013

  78. [83]

    J.-Q. Li, L. Du, and J.-Q. Liang, Spin squeezing and pair- wise entanglement under non-Markovian environments with dynamical decoupling pulses, Laser Physics 28, 095202 (2018)

    work page 2018

  79. [84]

    X. Yin, J. Ma, X. Wang, and F. Nori, Spin squeezing under non-Markovian channels by the hierarchy equation method, Phys. Rev. A 86, 012308 (2012)

    work page 2012

  80. [85]

    Protecting spin squeezing from decoherence

    Y.-H. Ma, Q.-Z. Ding, and T. Yu, Persistent spin squeez- ing of a dissipative one-axis twisting model embedded in a general thermal environment, Phys. Rev. A 101, 022327 (2020). Supplemental Material to “Protecting spin squeezing from decoherence” Lin Jiao, 1 Han Pu, 1,∗and Jun-Hong An 2,† 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, and Smalley-Curl Institute, ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

Showing first 80 references.