REVIEW 2 cited by
Line-of-sight mass estimator and the masses of the Milky Way and Andromeda Galaxy
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Line-of-sight mass estimator and the masses of the Milky Way and Andromeda Galaxy
read the original abstract
The total mass of a galaxy group, such as the Milky Way (MW) and the Andromeda Galaxy (M 31), is typically determined from the kinematics of satellites within their virial zones. Bahcall and Tremaine (1981) proposed the $v^2r$ estimator as an alternative to the virial theorem. In this work, we extend their approach by incorporating the three-dimensional spatial distribution of satellites within the system to improve the reliability and accuracy of galaxy mass estimates. Applying this method to a comprehensive dataset of Local Group satellites based on recent, high-precision distance measurements, we estimate the total mass of the MW to be $(7.9 \pm 2.3) \times 10^{11}$ $M_\odot$ and that of M~31 to be $(15.5 \pm 3.4) \times 10^{11}$ $M_\odot$. The effectiveness of the method is constrained by the precision of distance measurements, making it particularly well suited for the Local Group, but challenging to apply to more distant systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Tighter Dark Matter Constraints from the Projected Mass Method: A Neural Network Enhanced Method for Galaxy Groups and Clusters
A simulation-trained neural network removes most of the systematic overestimate of the Projected Mass Estimator, yielding Milky Way, M81, and NGC 5128 halo masses in line with the literature.
-
Refining primordial black hole dark matter constraints with dust heating: the role of spin and halo profile dependence
Dust-heating constraints on PBH dark matter tighten to f_PBH ≈ 10^-4 when PBH spin is included, with the strongest limits for the Isothermal halo profile and weakest for Burkert.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.