REVIEW 1 cited by
Euclid Quick Data Release (Q1). NIR processing and data products
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
arxiv 2503.15304 v1 pith:T7OHCZ46 submitted 2025-03-19 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.IM
Euclid Quick Data Release (Q1). NIR processing and data products
show 361 more authors
read the original abstract
This paper describes the near-infrared processing function (NIR PF) that processes near-infrared images from the Near-Infrared Spectrometer and Photometer (NISP) instrument onboard the Euclid satellite. NIR PF consists of three main components: (i) a common pre-processing stage for both photometric (NIR) and spectroscopic (SIR) data to remove instrumental effects; (ii) astrometric and photometric calibration of NIR data, along with catalogue extraction; and (iii) resampling and stacking. The necessary calibration products are generated using dedicated pipelines that process observations from both the early performance verification (PV) phase in 2023 and the nominal survey operations. After outlining the pipeline's structure and algorithms, we demonstrate its application to Euclid Q1 images. For Q1, we achieve an astrometric accuracy of 9-15 mas, a relative photometric accuracy of 5 mmag, and an absolute flux calibration limited by the 1% uncertainty of the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) CALSPEC database. We characterise the point-spread function (PSF) that we find very stable across the focal plane, and we discuss current limitations of NIR PF that will be improved upon for future data releases.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.
-
The Impact of Spectroscopic Redshift Errors on Cosmological Measurements
astro-ph.CO 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0
For slitless-spectroscopy surveys, a 5% catastrophic redshift failure rate biases the growth rate and primordial amplitude by 6-16% (~2.2σ) unless the failure rate is measured and included in the clustering model.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.