pith. sign in

arxiv: 2503.17461 · v1 · submitted 2025-03-21 · ✦ hep-ex

Electroweak diboson production in association with a high-mass dijet system in semileptonic final states from pp collisions at sqrt{s} = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

ATLAS Collaboration This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 22:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex
keywords electroweak productionvector boson scatteringdibosonsemileptonic final stateseffective field theoryanomalous quartic gauge couplingsATLASLHC
0
0 comments X

The pith

Electroweak diboson production with two jets is observed at 7.4 sigma in semileptonic final states.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes the observation of electroweak WW, WZ, and ZZ production together with a high-mass dijet system using proton-proton collision data at 13 TeV. One boson decays leptonically while the other is reconstructed hadronically either as two small-radius jets or one large-radius jet with substructure. The analysis selects a region dominated by vector-boson scattering and extracts a signal strength consistent with the Standard Model while also measuring the combined electroweak and QCD contributions in a two-dimensional fit. Limits are placed on dimension-8 effective field theory operators that describe possible anomalous quartic gauge couplings, providing the first such ATLAS results in this channel.

Core claim

Electroweak production of WW/WZ/ZZ in association with two jets is observed in a vector-boson-scattering-dominated phase space with a significance of 7.4 sigma, the signal strength is measured to be 1.28 with uncertainties of +0.23 and -0.21, the fiducial cross section is determined, and the first ATLAS limits on the Wilson coefficients of the S02, T0, and M0 operators are reported as (-3.96 < f_S02 / Lambda^4 < 3.96), (-0.25 < f_T0 / Lambda^4 < 0.22), and (-1.26 < f_M0 / Lambda^4 < 1.25) TeV^{-4}.

What carries the argument

Reconstruction of the hadronically decaying boson via two small-radius jets or one large-radius jet with substructure requirements, inside a high-mass dijet selection that isolates the electroweak component from QCD backgrounds.

If this is right

  • The measured fiducial cross section agrees with Standard Model predictions.
  • Signal strengths extracted separately for electroweak and QCD diboson production both match Standard Model expectations.
  • The reported ranges for the S02, T0, and M0 Wilson coefficients exclude regions of parameter space for anomalous quartic gauge couplings.
  • The two-dimensional fit demonstrates that the electroweak and QCD components can be disentangled in the same dataset.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The semileptonic channel can be combined with fully leptonic analyses to increase overall sensitivity to vector-boson scattering at higher luminosities.
  • The jet substructure techniques developed here may transfer to searches for other rare processes involving boosted bosons.
  • Tighter limits on the same operators could emerge from future runs if the current central values remain stable.

Load-bearing premise

Background modeling, jet reconstruction efficiencies, and systematic uncertainties in the semileptonic channel with large-radius jet substructure are accurately estimated and do not bias the extracted signal strength or EFT limits.

What would settle it

A re-analysis with additional data or improved modeling that reduces the observed significance below five sigma or shifts the central signal strength value outside the reported uncertainty range would challenge the observation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2503.17461 by ATLAS Collaboration.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The requirement thresholds applied by the boson tagging algorithm on a) 𝐷2, b) 𝑛 ungroomed Tracks , and c) jet-mass for different boson hypothesis and working points corresponding to 50% and 80% signal efficiency as a function of jet 𝑝T. All three requirements are applied to derive the efficiency of the working point. The grey arrow shows the direction of the requirement applied for the 𝐷2 and 𝑛 ungroomed … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Schematic of the analysis categorisation flow. QCD-induced diboson production are small backgrounds for all channels. The background contributions are estimated using a combination of MC and data-driven techniques; indeed, the shapes of kinematic variable distributions are taken from MC simulations in all cases and the normalization of the main backgrounds are constrained using dedicated control regions (C… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The measured (dots) distribution as a function of 𝑚 tag 𝑗 𝑗 in the 2-lepton ZCR. The different simulated processes are shown as stacked histograms. The predictions are normalised to the generator cross section including the pile-up reweighting and other trigger and leptons related scale factors. The bottom panel shows the ratio of data to prediction, without systematic uncertainties. A data-driven procedur… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The measured distribution after background subtraction and linear fit as a function of 𝑚 tag 𝑗 𝑗 in the (a) merged and (b) resolved 2-lepton ZCR. The simulated 𝑍 + jets process is shown as a histogram while the dots show the data after the subtraction of the other background processes; the distributions are normalised to unity. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the data to the prediction, together with t… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: RNN score distributions for signal and background samples showing the training (histograms) and test (markers) datasets used in the training phase for the (a, b) 0-, (c, d) 1- and (e, f) 2-lepton, (a, c, e) merged and (b, d, f) resolved SRs. The ratio of the test and training RNN scores in the signal and background samples is shown in the bottom pannel. 17 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Data and stacked post-fit predicted yields in the various regions. The systematic uncertainty in the prediction is shown as a hatched band. The 𝜇 obs 𝐸𝑊𝐾 value for each of the individual lepton channels and for the resolved and merged regimes is measured by performing a fit with, respectively, three and two parameters to extract; the results are shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Distribution of the RNN score for data (dots) and post-fit prediction separated by process (stacked histograms). The EWK VBS signal, scaled for visibility by a factor of 20, is also shown separately. For comparison, the pre-fit background distribution is overlayed as a dotted histogram. The total uncertainty including all statistical, experimental, and modelling uncertainties is overlayed as a hatched area… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Extracted signal strength 𝜇 obs 𝐸𝑊𝐾 from the combined fit, as well as from the fits which allow various signal regions to be uncorrelated. The total, statistical and systematic uncertainties in these values are displayed. −1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 QCD µ 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 EWK µ Observed 68% CL. Observed 95% CL. Best fit Expected 68% CL. Expected 95% CL. Standard Model ATLAS -1 s = 13 TeV, 140 fb s… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The two dimensional 68% and 95% negative log-likelihood contours for the simultaneous fit to 𝜇EWK and 𝜇QCD. The SM prediction from the generator is highlighted as a star. 25 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Distribution of the RNN score for data (dots) and post-fit prediction separated by process (stacked histograms) for the high-𝑚𝑉𝑉 aQGC signal regions. The FT0 operator is shown separately with a normalisation corresponding to 𝑓 /Λ 4 = 0.10 TeV−4 . For comparison, the pre-fit background distribution is overlayed as a dotted histogram. The total uncertainty including all statistical, experimental, and modell… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Expected and observed 95% confidence limits for the dimension-8 FT operators as a function of the clipping scale. Regions excluded by unitarity constraints are shown as a hatched area. 30 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Expected and observed 95% confidence limits for the dimension-8 FS operators as a function of the clipping scale. Regions excluded by unitarity constraints are shown as a hatched area. 31 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Expected and observed 95% confidence limits for the dimension-8 FM operators as a function of the clipping scale. Regions excluded by unitarity constraints are shown as a hatched area. 32 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper reports the observation of electroweak diboson ($WW/WZ/ZZ$) production in association with a high-mass dijet system, in which final states with one boson decaying leptonically and the other boson decaying hadronically are studied. The hadronically decaying $W/Z$ boson is reconstructed as either two small-radius jets or one large-radius jet with jet substructure requirements. The data analyzed correspond to an integrated luminosity of 140 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV collected with the ATLAS detector during the 2015-2018 data taking at the Large Hadron Collider. The electroweak production of $WW/WZ/ZZ$ in association with two jets is observed in a phase space dominated by vector-boson scattering with a significance of $7.4\sigma$ (expected $6.1\sigma$) and the signal strength is determined to be $1.28^{+0.23}_{-0.21}$. The corresponding production cross section in a fiducial phase space is measured in addition. The signal strengths of both electroweak and QCD associated diboson productions are furthermore measured in a two-dimensional fit, the result of which agrees with the Standard Model prediction. The data are interpreted in the context of a dimension-8 effective field theory to probe anomalous quartic gauge couplings resulting in the first set of exclusion limits on the Wilson coefficients in the semileptonic channel reported by the ATLAS Collaboration. The observed limits for the S02, T0 and M0 operators are $(-3.96 < f_{S02} / \Lambda^4 < 3.96)$ TeV$^{-4}$, $(-0.25 < f_{T0} / \Lambda^4 < 0.22)$ TeV$^{-4}$, $(-1.26 < f_{M0} / \Lambda^4 < 1.25)$ TeV$^{-4}$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper reports the observation of electroweak diboson (WW/WZ/ZZ) production in association with a high-mass dijet system in semileptonic final states (one boson leptonic, one hadronic) using 140 fb^{-1} of 13 TeV pp data with ATLAS. The hadronically decaying boson is reconstructed either as two small-R jets or one large-R jet with substructure. The analysis observes the electroweak VBS-dominated process at 7.4σ (expected 6.1σ), measures a signal strength of 1.28^{+0.23}_{-0.21}, extracts a fiducial cross section, performs a 2D fit separating electroweak and QCD diboson contributions (both consistent with SM), and derives the first ATLAS semileptonic limits on dimension-8 EFT operators S02, T0 and M0.

Significance. If the central result holds, this constitutes a notable advance in vector-boson scattering measurements by delivering the first observation in the semileptonic channel together with the first EFT limits in that channel. The observed significance exceeds expectation, the signal strength is compatible with the SM, and the combination of resolved and merged topologies plus the 2D fit provides a robust extraction. The work strengthens the ATLAS VBS program and supplies new constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the reported EFT limits are presented without an explicit statement of the confidence level (presumably 95 % CL); adding this phrase would remove any ambiguity for readers.
  2. [Event selection / jet reconstruction] The description of the large-radius jet tagging and substructure selection would benefit from a short quantitative statement of the associated efficiency uncertainty in the main text (rather than only in supplementary material) to allow immediate assessment of its impact on the signal strength.
  3. [Results] Results section: the 2D fit yields signal strengths for both electroweak and QCD components, yet the correlation coefficient between the two extracted strengths is not quoted; including this number would facilitate interpretation of the joint constraint.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and the recommendation to accept.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; data-driven measurement

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental observation of electroweak diboson production and extraction of signal strength plus EFT limits via a fit to 140 fb^{-1} of ATLAS collision data. The central claims (7.4σ significance, μ=1.28^{+0.23}_{-0.21}, and Wilson coefficient limits) are obtained directly from the data excess relative to SM background predictions in a fiducial phase space, using standard background estimation, jet tagging, and systematic evaluation. No step reduces a prediction to a prior fitted constant by construction, invokes a self-citation as the sole justification for a uniqueness theorem or ansatz, or renames a known result. The analysis chain is externally falsifiable against independent data and SM benchmarks, qualifying as self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The measurement assumes Standard Model cross-section predictions as baseline and relies on Monte Carlo modeling of detector response and QCD backgrounds; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond the EFT operators being constrained.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard Model predictions accurately describe the electroweak diboson plus jets process in the fiducial phase space
    Used to define the expected signal strength and to interpret the observed excess.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5920 in / 1233 out tokens · 71428 ms · 2026-05-22T22:25:05.931534+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Constraints on Anomalous Quartic Gauge Couplings via $\gamma\gamma$ and $Z\gamma$ Vector Boson Scattering at Muon Colliders

    hep-ph 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The 10 TeV muon collider can set substantially stronger 95% CL limits on anomalous quartic gauge couplings than the LHC or projected future hadron colliders.

  2. Multiboson and VBS measurements in ATLAS and CMS

    hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 1.0

    Review summarizing precision diboson, VBS, and triboson measurements from ATLAS and CMS that test the Standard Model electroweak gauge sector.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

127 extracted references · 127 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 71 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B. W. Lee, C. Quigg and H. B. Thacker, Strength of Weak Interactions at Very High Energies and the Higgs Boson Mass, Phys. Rev. Lett.38 (1977) 883

    work page 1977

  2. [2]

    B. W. Lee, C. Quigg and H. B. Thacker, Weak interactions at very high energies: The role of the Higgs-boson mass, Phys. Rev. D16(1977) 1519

    work page 1977

  3. [3]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716 (2012) 1, arXiv: 1207.7214 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  4. [4]

    CMS Collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 30, arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  5. [5]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and coupling strengths using𝑝 𝑝collision data at√𝑠 = 7 and 8TeV in the ATLAS experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C76 (2016) 6, arXiv:1507.04548 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Study of the spin and parity of the Higgs boson in diboson decays with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C75 (2015) 476, arXiv:1506.05669 [hep-ex], Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 152

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    CMS Collaboration, Precise determination of the mass of the Higgs boson and tests of compatibility of its couplings with the standard model predictions using proton collisions at7and 8TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C75 (2015) 212, arXiv:1412.8662 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  8. [8]

    CMS Collaboration, Constraints on the spin-parity and anomalous HVV couplings of the Higgs boson in proton collisions at7 and 8TeV, Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 012004, arXiv: 1411.3441 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  9. [9]

    O. J. P. Éboli, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia and S. M. Lietti,Bosonic quartic couplings at CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 095005, arXiv:hep-ph/0310141

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  10. [10]

    O. J. P. Éboli, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia and J. K. Mizukoshi,𝑝 𝑝 → 𝑗 𝑗 𝑒±𝜇±𝜈𝜈 and 𝑗 𝑗 𝑒±𝜇∓𝜈𝜈 at 𝑂 (𝛼6 𝑒𝑚) and 𝑂 (𝛼4 𝑒𝑚𝛼2 𝑠) for the study of the quartic electroweak gauge boson vertex at CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 073005, arXiv:hep-ph/0606118

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  11. [11]

    WW Scattering in the Era of Post Higgs Discovery

    J. Chang, K. Cheung, C.-T. Lu and T.-C. Yuan, WW scattering in the era of post-Higgs-boson discovery, Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 093005, arXiv: 1303.6335 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  12. [12]

    Longitudinal WW scattering in light of the "Higgs" discovery

    D. Espriu and B. Yencho,Longitudinal WW scattering in light of the “Higgs boson” discovery, Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 055017, arXiv:1212.4158 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  13. [13]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of𝑍 𝛾𝛾 production in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C83 (2023) 539, arXiv:2211.14171 [hep-ex]. 35

    work page arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    CMS Collaboration, Measurements of the𝑝 𝑝 → 𝑊 𝛾𝛾 and 𝑝 𝑝 → 𝑍 𝛾𝛾 cross sections and limits on anomalous quartic gauge couplings at√𝑠 = 8TeV, JHEP10(2017) 072, arXiv: 1704.00366 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  15. [15]

    Barger, K

    V. Barger, K. Cheung, T. Han and R. J. N. Phillips, Strong 𝑊 +𝑊 + scattering signals at𝑝 𝑝supercolliders, Phys. Rev. D42(1990) 3052

    work page 1990

  16. [16]

    Effective Field Theory: A Modern Approach to Anomalous Couplings

    C. Degrande et al.,Effective field theory: A modern approach to anomalous couplings, Annals Phys.335 (2013) 21, arXiv:hep-ph/1205.4231

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  17. [17]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Combined effective field theory interpretation of Higgs boson and weak boson production and decay with ATLAS data and electroweak precision observables, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2022-037, 2022,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2816369

    work page arXiv 2022

  18. [18]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Observation of Electroweak Production of a Same-Sign𝑊 Boson Pair in Association with Two Jets in𝑝 𝑝Collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.123 (2019) 161801, arXiv:1906.03203 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  19. [19]

    CMS Collaboration, Observation of Electroweak Production of Same-Sign𝑊 Boson Pairs in the Two Jet and Two Same-Sign Lepton Final State in Proton–Proton Collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.120 (2018) 081801, arXiv:1709.05822 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Observation of electroweak production of𝑊 +𝑊 − in association with jets in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV with the ATLAS Detector, JHEP07 (2024) 254, arXiv: 2403.04869 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    CMS Collaboration, Observation of electroweak𝑊 +𝑊 − pair production in association with two jets in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV, Phys. Lett. B841 (2023) 137495, arXiv: 2205.05711 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurements of electroweak𝑊 ±𝑍 boson pair production in association with two jets in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP06 (2024) 192, arXiv: 2403.15296 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    CMS Collaboration, Measurement of electroweak𝑊 𝑍 boson production and search for new physics in𝑊 𝑍+two jets events in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV, Phys. Lett. B795 (2019) 281, arXiv: 1901.04060 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  24. [24]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Observation of electroweak production of two jets and a𝑍-boson pair, Nature Phys.19(2023) 237, arXiv:2004.10612 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    CMS Collaboration, Evidence for electroweak production of four charged leptons and two jets in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV, Phys. Lett. B812(2021) 135992, arXiv: 2008.07013 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Fiducial and differential cross-section measurements of electroweak𝑊 𝛾 𝑗 𝑗 production in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C84 (2024) 1064, arXiv:2403.02809 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    CMS Collaboration, Measurement of the electroweak production of𝑊 𝛾in association with two jets in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 032017, arXiv: 2212.12592 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of electroweak𝑍 (𝜈 ¯𝜈)𝛾 𝑗 𝑗 production and limits on anomalous quartic gauge couplings in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP06 (2023) 082, arXiv:2208.12741 [hep-ex]. 36

    work page arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the cross-sections of the electroweak and total production of a𝑍 𝛾pair in association with two jets in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeVwith the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B846(2023) 138222, arXiv:2305.19142 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    CMS Collaboration, Measurement of the electroweak production of𝑍 𝛾and two jets in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV and constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 072001, arXiv:2106.11082 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    CMS Collaboration, Evidence for𝑊𝑊 /𝑊 𝑍 vector boson scattering in the decay channelℓ𝜈𝑞𝑞 produced in association with two jets in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV, Phys. Lett. B834(2022) 137438, arXiv:2112.05259 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    CMS Collaboration, Search for anomalous electroweak production of vector boson pairs in association with two jets in proton–proton collisions at13TeV, Phys. Lett. B798(2019) 134985, arXiv: 1905.07445 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  33. [33]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for electroweak diboson production in association with a high-mass dijet system in semileptonic final states in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 032007, arXiv:1905.07714 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    ATLAS Collaboration, The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, JINST3 (2008) S08003

    work page 2008

  35. [35]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Software and computing for Run 3 of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, (2024), arXiv:2404.06335 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Luminosity determination in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C83 (2023) 982, arXiv:2212.09379 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Selection of jets produced in13TeV proton–proton collisions with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2015-029, 2015,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2037702

    work page arXiv 2015

  38. [38]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS trigger system in 2015, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 317, arXiv:1611.09661 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  39. [39]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of electron and photon triggers in ATLAS during LHC Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C80 (2020) 47, arXiv:1909.00761 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  40. [40]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS muon triggers in Run 2, JINST15(2020) P09015, arXiv:2004.13447 [physics.ins-det]

    work page arXiv 2020

  41. [41]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the missing transverse momentum triggers for the ATLAS detector during Run-2 data taking, JHEP08(2020) 080, arXiv:2005.09554 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  42. [42]

    J. Alwall et al.,The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP07 (2014) 079, arXiv: 1405.0301 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  43. [43]

    NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions for the LHC run II, JHEP04(2015) 040, arXiv:1410.8849 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  44. [44]

    A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1

    T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P. Skands,A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun.178 (2008) 852, arXiv:0710.3820 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  45. [45]

    ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS Pythia 8 tunes to7 TeV data, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-021, 2014, url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1966419. 37

    work page arXiv 2014

  46. [46]

    Automatic spin-entangled decays of heavy resonances in Monte Carlo simulations

    P. Artoisenet, R. Frederix, O. Mattelaer and R. Rietkerk, Automatic spin-entangled decays of heavy resonances in Monte Carlo simulations, JHEP03 (2013) 015, arXiv:1212.3460 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  47. [47]

    An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

    T. Sjöstrand et al.,An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun.191 (2015) 159, arXiv: 1410.3012 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  48. [48]

    Bothmann et al.,Event generation with Sherpa 2.2, SciPost Phys.7(2019) 034, arXiv:1905.09127 [hep-ph]

    E. Bothmann et al.,Event generation with Sherpa 2.2, SciPost Phys.7 (2019) 034, arXiv: 1905.09127 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    Comix, a new matrix element generator

    T. Gleisberg and S. Höche,Comix, a new matrix element generator, JHEP12 (2008) 039, arXiv: 0808.3674 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  50. [50]

    Buccioni et al.,OpenLoops 2, Eur

    F. Buccioni et al.,OpenLoops 2, Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 866, arXiv:1907.13071 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  51. [51]

    Scattering Amplitudes with Open Loops

    F. Cascioli, P. Maierhöfer and S. Pozzorini,Scattering Amplitudes with Open Loops, Phys. Rev. Lett.108 (2012) 111601, arXiv:1111.5206 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  52. [52]

    Collier: a fortran-based Complex One-Loop LIbrary in Extended Regularizations

    A. Denner, S. Dittmaier and L. Hofer, Collier: A fortran-based complex one-loop library in extended regularizations, Comput. Phys. Commun.212 (2017) 220, arXiv:1604.06792 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  53. [53]

    A parton shower algorithm based on Catani-Seymour dipole factorisation

    S. Schumann and F. Krauss, A parton shower algorithm based on Catani–Seymour dipole factorisation, JHEP03(2008) 038, arXiv: 0709.1027 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  54. [54]

    A critical appraisal of NLO+PS matching methods

    S. Höche, F. Krauss, M. Schönherr and F. Siegert, A critical appraisal of NLO+PS matching methods, JHEP09(2012) 049, arXiv: 1111.1220 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  55. [55]

    QCD matrix elements + parton showers: The NLO case

    S. Höche, F. Krauss, M. Schönherr and F. Siegert, QCD matrix elements + parton showers. The NLO case, JHEP04(2013) 027, arXiv: 1207.5030 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  56. [56]

    QCD Matrix Elements + Parton Showers

    S. Catani, F. Krauss, B. R. Webber and R. Kuhn,QCD Matrix Elements + Parton Showers, JHEP11(2001) 063, arXiv:hep-ph/0109231

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  57. [57]

    QCD matrix elements and truncated showers

    S. Höche, F. Krauss, S. Schumann and F. Siegert,QCD matrix elements and truncated showers, JHEP05(2009) 053, arXiv:0903.1219 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  58. [58]

    Single-top Wt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method

    E. Re, Single-top 𝑊𝑡-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method, Eur. Phys. J. C71 (2011) 1547, arXiv:1009.2450 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  59. [59]

    A Positive-Weight Next-to-Leading-Order Monte Carlo for Heavy Flavour Hadroproduction

    S. Frixione, G. Ridolfi and P. Nason, A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction, JHEP09(2007) 126, arXiv:0707.3088 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  60. [60]

    A New Method for Combining NLO QCD with Shower Monte Carlo Algorithms

    P. Nason, A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms, JHEP11(2004) 040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  61. [61]

    Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method

    S. Frixione, P. Nason and C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method, JHEP11(2007) 070, arXiv:0709.2092 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  62. [62]

    A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

    S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari and E. Re,A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, JHEP06 (2010) 043, arXiv: 1002.2581 [hep-ph]. 38

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  63. [63]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Studies on top-quark Monte Carlo modelling for Top2016, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-020, 2016,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2216168

    work page arXiv 2016

  64. [64]

    NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions with LHC data, Nucl. Phys. B867 (2013) 244, arXiv:1207.1303 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  65. [65]

    D. J. Lange,The EvtGen particle decay simulation package, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A462 (2001) 152

    work page 2001

  66. [66]

    High-precision QCD at hadron colliders: electroweak gauge boson rapidity distributions at NNLO

    C. Anastasiou, L. Dixon, K. Melnikov and F. Petriello,High-precision QCD at hadron colliders: Electroweak gauge boson rapidity distributions at next-to-next-to leading order, Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 094008, arXiv:hep-ph/0312266

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  67. [67]

    Event generation with SHERPA 1.1

    T. Gleisberg et al.,Event generation with SHERPA 1.1, JHEP02(2009) 007, arXiv: 0811.4622 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  68. [68]

    The total top quark pair production cross-section at hadron colliders through O(alpha_S^4)

    M. Czakon, P. Fiedler and A. Mitov, Total Top-Quark Pair-Production Cross Section at Hadron Colliders ThroughO (𝛼4 𝑆), Phys. Rev. Lett.110 (2013) 252004, arXiv:1303.6254 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  69. [69]

    Top++: a program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders

    M. Czakon and A. Mitov, Top++: A program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders, Comput. Phys. Commun.185 (2014) 2930, arXiv:1112.5675 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  70. [70]

    NNLL resummation for s-channel single top quark production

    N. Kidonakis, Next-to-next-to-leading logarithm resummation for s-channel single top quark production, Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 054028, arXiv:hep-ph/1001.5034

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  71. [71]

    Two-loop soft anomalous dimensions for single top quark associated production with a W- or H-

    N. Kidonakis, Two-loop soft anomalous dimensions for single top quark associated production with a𝑊 − or 𝐻 −, Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 054018, arXiv:1005.4451 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  72. [72]

    ATLAS Collaboration, The ATLAS Simulation Infrastructure, Eur. Phys. J. C70 (2010) 823, arXiv: 1005.4568 [physics.ins-det]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  73. [73]

    Agostinelli et al.,Geant4 – a simulation toolkit, Nucl

    S. Agostinelli et al.,Geant4 – a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250

    work page 2003

  74. [74]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Electron and photon efficiencies in LHC Run 2 with the ATLAS experiment, JHEP05 (2024) 162, arXiv:2308.13362 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  75. [75]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Electron and photon performance measurements with the ATLAS detector using the 2015–2017 LHC proton–proton collision data, JINST14 (2019) P12006, arXiv: 1908.00005 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2015

  76. [76]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Muon reconstruction and identification efficiency in ATLAS using the full Run 2𝑝 𝑝collision data set at√𝑠 = 13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C81 (2021) 578, arXiv: 2012.00578 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  77. [77]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Muon reconstruction performance of the ATLAS detector in proton–proton collision data at√𝑠 = 13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 292, arXiv:1603.05598 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  78. [78]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for heavy diboson resonances in semileptonic final states in𝑝 𝑝 collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 1165, arXiv: 2004.14636 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  79. [79]

    The anti-k_t jet clustering algorithm

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,The anti-𝑘𝑡 jet clustering algorithm, JHEP04 (2008) 063, arXiv: 0802.1189 [hep-ph]. 39

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  80. [80]

    FastJet user manual

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,FastJet user manual, Eur. Phys. J. C72(2012) 1896, arXiv: 1111.6097 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

Showing first 80 references.