REVIEW 1 cited by
Theory-to-Practice Gap for Neural Networks and Neural Operators
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Theory-to-Practice Gap for Neural Networks and Neural Operators
abstract
This work studies the sampling complexity of learning with ReLU neural networks and neural operators. For mappings belonging to relevant approximation spaces, we derive upper bounds on the best-possible convergence rate of any learning algorithm, with respect to the number of samples. In the finite-dimensional case, these bounds imply a gap between the parametric and sampling complexities of learning, known as the \emph{theory-to-practice gap}. In this work, a unified treatment of the theory-to-practice gap is achieved in a general $L^p$-setting, while at the same time improving available bounds in the literature. Furthermore, based on these results the theory-to-practice gap is extended to the infinite-dimensional setting of operator learning. Our results apply to Deep Operator Networks and integral kernel-based neural operators, including the Fourier neural operator. We show that the best-possible convergence rate in a Bochner $L^p$-norm is bounded by rates of order $1/p$.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A short tour of operator learning theory: Convergence rates, statistical limits, and open questions
A survey of operator learning theory showing holomorphy gives fast sample-complexity rates, general smoothness gives a polylogarithmic barrier, and FNO-approximable classes cap out at n^{-1/2}.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.