pith. sign in

arxiv: 2504.05611 · v3 · submitted 2025-04-08 · 🪐 quant-ph

Transversal Fault Tolerant Distributed Quantum Computing Operations

John Stack , Ming Wang , Frank Mueller This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 20:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords distributed quantum computingfault tolerancetransversal CNOTsurface codesbivariate bicycle codeslogical error ratesBell pairsquantum algorithms
0
0 comments X

The pith

Transversal non-local CNOT operations achieve up to an order of magnitude lower logical error rates than teleportation at equal code distance and noise levels in distributed quantum systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how to perform reliable quantum operations between separate modules linked by noisy connections. It compares transversal non-local CNOT gates with logical teleportation using surface codes and bivariate-bicycle codes through detailed circuit simulations. The results indicate the transversal approach uses fewer resources while delivering better error performance. Specific code distances are identified that bring logical error rates low enough for practical large-scale algorithms. This work addresses a key bottleneck in scaling quantum computers beyond single devices by characterizing distributed fault tolerance.

Core claim

Circuit-level simulations of transversal non-local CNOT and logical teleportation primitives demonstrate that the non-local CNOT reaches up to an order of magnitude lower logical error rates than teleportation at the same code distance and noise levels. Code distances of d approximately 11 at physical error rate p around 10 to the minus 4 and d approximately 29 at p around 10 to the minus 3, assuming Bell pair error rate ten times p, suffice to reach logical error rates below 10 to the minus 12. These findings are obtained with the scalable Transversal Multiple CodeBlock Simulator library and extend to a major subroutine of common quantum algorithms.

What carries the argument

Transversal non-local CNOT implemented across modules with surface and bivariate-bicycle codes, which performs the distributed gate while suppressing errors through code properties rather than full teleportation.

If this is right

  • Distributed qLDPC transversal operations can outperform surface code lattice surgery on suitable hardware.
  • Parallel computation becomes more efficient because fewer Bell pairs are consumed per operation.
  • Large-scale quantum algorithms become feasible once the identified code distances are reached.
  • Architecture decisions should favor codes that support efficient transversal distributed gates over those relying primarily on teleportation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Hardware designers may prioritize low-latency, high-fidelity inter-module links to maximize the observed advantage of transversal operations.
  • The approach could extend to other quantum codes or hybrid architectures if the noise assumptions are relaxed in future models.
  • Experimental validation on near-term modular devices would test whether the simulated error suppression translates to real systems.

Load-bearing premise

The noise model fixes every Bell pair error rate at exactly ten times the local physical error rate and assumes transversal links add no extra errors from timing, calibration, or other unmodeled effects.

What would settle it

Re-running the simulations or performing an experiment while varying the Bell pair error rate away from exactly ten times p or adding explicit timing and calibration noise to check whether the reported order-of-magnitude advantage and required code distances still hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.05611 by Frank Mueller, John Stack, Ming Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Possible DQC architecture. Nodes are interconnected [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. A circuit for fault tolerant teleportation of logical code block [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Non-local transversal CNOT carried out between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. PER against LER for fixed ebit noise equal to PER [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Physical noise rate against LER for different ebit noise rates for non-local CNOT (left column) or teleportation (right [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: PER again refers to p as defined in Sec. III C. LER is defined identically to the non-local gate case. Error bars and any missing data points have the same meaning and reasons as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. CNOT performed by lattice surgery. Figure repro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Teleportation can be performed via lattice surgery [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Distributed architectures are a route to scalable quantum computing, but the performance of fault-tolerant operations across noisy inter-module links remains poorly characterized. We present circuit-level simulations of two key distributed primitives: transversal non-local CNOT and logical teleportation using surface and bivariate-bicycle codes. We then simulate the use of these distributed primitives in a major subroutine of common quantum algorithms. The results, enabled by our scalable library Transversal Multiple CodeBlock Simulator, demonstrate that on appropriate devices distributed qLDPC transversal operations can outperform surface code lattice surgery and enable efficient parallel computation with lower Bell pair consumption. Notably, we find that the non-local CNOT achieves up to an order of magnitude lower logical error rates than teleportation at the same code distance and noise levels. We further show that code distances of $d \approx 11$ at physical error rate $p \sim 10^{-4}$ and $d \approx 29$ at $p \sim 10^{-3}$, with $p_{\mathrm{ebit}}=10p$, are sufficient to achieve logical error rates below $10^{-12}$, enabling large-scale algorithms. These results provide critical guidance for architecture and code selection in distributed quantum computing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents circuit-level Monte Carlo simulations of two distributed quantum computing primitives—transversal non-local CNOT and logical teleportation—implemented with surface codes and bivariate-bicycle codes. It reports that the non-local CNOT achieves up to an order of magnitude lower logical error rates than teleportation at the same code distance and noise levels, and identifies specific code distances (d ≈ 11 at p ∼ 10^{-4} and d ≈ 29 at p ∼ 10^{-3}, with p_ebit = 10p) sufficient to reach logical error rates below 10^{-12} for large-scale algorithms, enabled by a new simulator library.

Significance. If the reported performance advantage and distance thresholds hold under the stated noise model, the work supplies concrete, actionable guidance for code and architecture selection in distributed quantum computing, highlighting potential efficiency gains of qLDPC transversal operations over lattice-surgery approaches and reduced Bell-pair consumption.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the specific thresholds d ≈ 11 at p ∼ 10^{-4} and d ≈ 29 at p ∼ 10^{-3} for logical error rates below 10^{-12} are obtained under the fixed assumption p_ebit = 10p with no reported sensitivity sweeps over the multiplier and no modeled error channels for link timing or calibration; these assumptions are load-bearing for the claimed distances and the order-of-magnitude CNOT advantage.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the numerical outcomes (order-of-magnitude CNOT advantage and concrete distance thresholds) are stated without error bars, full noise-model equations, or description of Monte Carlo parameters such as shot count or data-exclusion criteria, preventing independent assessment of the statistical reliability of the results.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'on appropriate devices' is vague; a brief characterization of the device assumptions (e.g., connectivity or calibration requirements) would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback. We address each major comment below and outline revisions to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the specific thresholds d ≈ 11 at p ∼ 10^{-4} and d ≈ 29 at p ∼ 10^{-3} for logical error rates below 10^{-12} are obtained under the fixed assumption p_ebit = 10p with no reported sensitivity sweeps over the multiplier and no modeled error channels for link timing or calibration; these assumptions are load-bearing for the claimed distances and the order-of-magnitude CNOT advantage.

    Authors: The p_ebit = 10p assumption is explicitly stated in the abstract and motivated by expected higher noise on inter-module links relative to local gates. The order-of-magnitude advantage of the non-local CNOT is observed consistently in our simulations across the explored parameter range. We acknowledge that sensitivity sweeps over the multiplier and explicit modeling of link timing or calibration errors are not included; these would require additional computational resources. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in the discussion section noting the load-bearing nature of this assumption, its physical motivation, and the absence of timing/calibration channels as a limitation to be addressed in future work. The abstract will be updated to reference this discussion. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the numerical outcomes (order-of-magnitude CNOT advantage and concrete distance thresholds) are stated without error bars, full noise-model equations, or description of Monte Carlo parameters such as shot count or data-exclusion criteria, preventing independent assessment of the statistical reliability of the results.

    Authors: The complete noise model (including all Pauli channels and the ebit error rate) is defined in Section II of the manuscript. Monte Carlo parameters, shot counts, and any data-exclusion rules are documented in the supplementary material and the open-source Transversal Multiple CodeBlock Simulator library. Space constraints preclude including these details in the abstract itself. We will revise the abstract to include a direct pointer to Section II and the supplementary material for the noise model and simulation parameters. Error bars on the key threshold curves can be added to the relevant figures in the main text. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results from Monte Carlo simulations with externally specified noise model

full rationale

The paper reports logical error rates obtained from circuit-level Monte Carlo simulations of transversal non-local CNOT and teleportation primitives under a fixed noise model (p_ebit = 10p) using surface and bivariate-bicycle codes. No equations or self-citations are presented that define the reported error rates or required code distances in terms of parameters fitted from the same simulation outputs. The noise model multiplier and absence of additional link errors are stated modeling choices, not derived quantities that reduce the central claims to tautology. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against the chosen external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central numerical claims rest on an externally chosen noise model for inter-module links and on the assumption that the chosen codes admit clean transversal implementations across modules.

free parameters (1)
  • p_ebit multiplier = 10
    Inter-module Bell-pair error rate is fixed at exactly 10 times the local physical error rate p.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard circuit-level depolarizing noise model applies uniformly to local gates and to inter-module Bell pairs.
    All simulation results are generated under this common but unproven-for-distributed-links noise model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5733 in / 1522 out tokens · 46921 ms · 2026-05-22T20:59:10.100546+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LightStim: A Framework for QEC Protocol Evaluation and Prototyping with Automated DEM Construction

    quant-ph 2026-04 conditional novelty 8.0

    LightStim automates DEM construction for QEC protocols via an augmented Pauli tableau during compilation, matching public tools on detector counts and error rates while enabling new cross-code designs.

  2. Scalable Qumode-Qubit State Transfer and Fast-forward Quantum Fourier Transform using Oscillators

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Multi-qumode transfer reduces n-qubit state conversion time to O(2^{n/m}) and enables qubit QFT approximation in O(m 2^{n/m}/ε + m²) runtime.

  3. Remote Entanglement in Lattice Surgery: To Distill, or Not to Distill

    quant-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The work identifies a fidelity crossover separating distillation-dominated and no-distillation regimes for remote entanglement in lattice surgery, with up to 100x or >50% resource savings depending on the side of the ...

  4. Architectural Approaches to Fault-Tolerant Distributed Quantum Computing and Their Entanglement Overheads

    quant-ph 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Three architectural types for fault-tolerant distributed quantum computing exhibit distinct scaling of Bell-pair consumption and generation attempts with code distance in planar surface and toric codes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    This is the first full circuit simulation in literature

    Our full circuit simulations of distributed transver- sal operations show fault tolerance and increasing circuit-distance with code distance. This is the first full circuit simulation in literature. It shows that larger distance QEC codes will result in distributed operations being executed with even lower LER

    work page

  2. [2]

    Compared to limit of values simulated in the liter- ature, transversal non-local CNOT carries a signif- icantly lower LER than either non-local CNOT or teleportation achieved by lattice surgery, and that transversal teleportation is the same order of mag- nitude or better as either non-local CNOT or tele- portation achieved by lattice surgery for low PER

    work page

  3. [3]

    Both the non-local CNOT and teleportation oper- ations have thresholds above 10 −3 with the non- local CNOT threshold being approximately equal to lattice surgery memory experiment thresholds in literature

    work page

  4. [4]

    9 holds, a LER of 10 −12 can be achieved for the non-local CNOT operation with a PER of 10 −3 and ebit noise 10 −2 with a sur- face code distance of 31

    Assuming Eq. 9 holds, a LER of 10 −12 can be achieved for the non-local CNOT operation with a PER of 10 −3 and ebit noise 10 −2 with a sur- face code distance of 31. For the teleportation cir- cuit, the same LER can be achieved with a PER of 3 × 10−4 and ebit noise 3 × 10−3 with a surface code distance of 28

    work page

  5. [5]

    Transversal teleportation carries a LER approxi- mately 100 times worse than a non-local CNOT at similar code distance, ebit noise and PER

    work page

  6. [6]

    This effect, however, appears to reduce as distance increases

    For medium and large codes, surface codes carry a LER 10 times lower than BB codes of similar distance. This effect, however, appears to reduce as distance increases

    work page

  7. [7]

    Operations between nodes in a distributed quan- tum computer can be carried out with LER up to 100 ,000 lower than PERs in near-term regimes (PER ≤ 10−4) using ebits that are between 10 and 100 times noisier than PER

    work page

  8. [8]

    Codes can be teleported between nodes in a dis- tributed quantum computer with a LER up to be- tween 1, 000 and 10 ,000 times lower than PERs in near term regimes (with PER ≤ 10−4). V. CONCLUSION This paper contributes circuit-level simulations of sur- face and BB codes of non-local CNOT gates and telepor- tation in a DQC setup. We explore a wide range of...

    work page

  9. [9]

    Arute, K

    F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, R. Barends, R. Biswas, S. Boixo, F. G. S. L. Brandao, D. A. Buell, B. Burkett, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, R. Collins, W. Courtney, A. Dunsworth, E. Farhi, B. Foxen, A. Fowler, C. Gidney, M. Giustina, R. Graff, K. Guerin, S. Habegger, M. P. Harrigan, M. J. Hartmann, A. Ho, M. Hoffmann, T. Huang, T. S...

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    Fellous-Asiani, J

    M. Fellous-Asiani, J. H. Chai, R. S. Whitney, A. Auff` eves, and H. K. Ng, Limitations in Quantum Computing from Resource Constraints, PRX Quantum 2, 040335 (2021)

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    Brenner, C

    L. Brenner, C. Piveteau, and D. Sutter, Optimal wire cutting with classical communication (2023), arXiv:2302.03366 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    Akhtar, F

    M. Akhtar, F. Bonus, F. R. Lebrun-Gallagher, N. I. John- son, M. Siegele-Brown, S. Hong, S. J. Hile, S. A. Kulmiya, S. Weidt, and W. K. Hensinger, A high-fidelity quantum matter-link between ion-trap microchip modules, Nature Communications 14, 531 (2023)

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Kaufmann, T

    P. Kaufmann, T. F. Gloger, D. Kaufmann, M. Johanning, and C. Wunderlich, High-Fidelity Preservation of Quan- tum Information During Trapped-Ion Transport, Physi- cal Review Letters 120, 010501 (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    S. D. Barrett and P. Kok, Efficient high-fidelity quantum computation using matter qubits and linear optics, Phys. Rev. A 71, 060310 (2005)

    work page 2005

  15. [15]

    Eisert, K

    J. Eisert, K. Jacobs, P. Papadopoulos, and M. B. Ple- nio, Optimal local implementation of nonlocal quantum gates, Physical Review A 62, 052317 (2000)

    work page 2000

  16. [16]

    Generalized GHZ States and Distributed Quantum Computing

    A. Yimsiriwattana and S. J. Lomonaco Jr, General- ized GHZ States and Distributed Quantum Computing (2004), arXiv:quant-ph/0402148

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  17. [17]

    Andres-Martinez, T

    P. Andres-Martinez, T. Forrer, D. Mills, J.-Y. Wu, L. He- naut, K. Yamamoto, M. Murao, and R. Duncan, Dis- tributing circuits over heterogeneous, modular quantum computing network architectures, Quantum Science and Technology 9, 045021 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    D. Main, P. Drmota, D. P. Nadlinger, E. M. Ainley, A. Agrawal, B. C. Nichol, R. Srinivas, G. Araneda, and D. M. Lucas, Distributed quantum computing across an optical network link, Nature 638, 383 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    J. Ang, G. Carini, Y. Chen, I. Chuang, M. Demarco, S. Economou, A. Eickbusch, A. Faraon, K.-M. Fu, S. Girvin, M. Hatridge, A. Houck, P. Hilaire, K. Krsulich, A. Li, C. Liu, Y. Liu, M. Martonosi, D. McKay, J. Mis- ewich, M. Ritter, R. Schoelkopf, S. Stein, S. Sussman, H. Tang, W. Tang, T. Tomesh, N. Tubman, C. Wang, N. Wiebe, Y. Yao, D. Yost, and Y. Zhou, ...

    work page doi:10.1145/3674151 2024

  20. [20]

    J. P. B. Ataides, H. Zhou, Q. Xu, G. Baranes, B. Li, M. D. Lukin, and L. Jiang, Constant-Overhead Fault- Tolerant Bell-Pair Distillation using High-Rate Codes (2025), arXiv:2502.09542 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    High-threshold and low-overhead fault-tolerant quantum memory

    S. Bravyi, A. W. Cross, J. M. Gambetta, D. Maslov, P. Rall, and T. J. Yoder, High-threshold and low- overhead fault-tolerant quantum memory, Nature 627, 778 (2024), arXiv:2308.07915 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    A. G. Fowler, M. Mariantoni, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A 86, 032324 (2012)

    work page 2012

  23. [23]

    How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers with less than a million noisy qubits

    C. Gidney, How to factor 2048 bit rsa integers with less than a million noisy qubits (2025), arXiv:2505.15917 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2048

  24. [24]

    Knill, R

    E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and W. H. Zurek, Resilient quan- tum computation, Science 279, 342 (1998)

    work page 1998

  25. [25]

    Y. Zhao, Y. Ye, H.-L. Huang, Y. Zhang, D. Wu, H. Guan, Q. Zhu, Z. Wei, T. He, S. Cao, F. Chen, T.-H. Chung, H. Deng, D. Fan, M. Gong, C. Guo, S. Guo, L. Han, N. Li, S. Li, Y. Li, F. Liang, J. Lin, H. Qian, H. Rong, H. Su, L. Sun, S. Wang, Y. Wu, Y. Xu, C. Ying, J. Yu, C. Zha, K. Zhang, Y.-H. Huo, C.-Y. Lu, C.-Z. Peng, X. Zhu, and J.-W. Pan, Realization of...

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Viszlai, W

    J. Viszlai, W. Yang, S. F. Lin, J. Liu, N. Nottingham, J. M. Baker, and F. T. Chong, Matching generalized- bicycle codes to neutral atoms for low-overhead fault- tolerance (2024), arXiv:2311.16980 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.10001 (2024)

    M. Wang and F. Mueller, Coprime bivariate bicycle codes (2024), arXiv:2408.10001 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Eastin and E

    B. Eastin and E. Knill, Restrictions on transversal en- coded quantum gate sets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 110502 (2009)

    work page 2009

  29. [29]

    Singh, F

    S. Singh, F. Gu, S. de Bone, E. Villase˜ nor, D. Elkouss, and J. Borregaard, Modular architectures and entangle- ment schemes for error-corrected distributed quantum computation (2024), arXiv:2408.02837 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    N. H. Nickerson, J. F. Fitzsimons, and S. C. Benjamin, Freely scalable quantum technologies using cells of 5-to- 50 qubits with very lossy and noisy photonic links, Phys. Rev. X 4, 041041 (2014)

    work page 2014

  31. [31]

    Li and S

    Y. Li and S. C. Benjamin, Hierarchical surface code for network quantum computing with modules of arbitrary size, Phys. Rev. A 94, 042303 (2016)

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    Sutcliffe, B

    E. Sutcliffe, B. Jonnadula, C. L. Gall, A. E. Moylett, and C. M. Westoby, Distributed quantum error cor- rection based on hyperbolic floquet codes (2025), arXiv:2501.14029 [quant-ph]. 14

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Ramette, J

    J. Ramette, J. Sinclair, N. P. Breuckmann, and V. Vuleti´ c, Fault-tolerant connection of error-corrected qubits with noisy links, npj Quantum Information 10, 58 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    M. A. Shalby, R. Wang, D. Sedov, and L. P. Pryadko, Optimized noise-resilient surface code teleportation in- terfaces (2025), arXiv:2503.04968 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Guinn, S

    C. Guinn, S. Stein, E. Tureci, G. Avis, C. Liu, S. Krastanov, A. A. Houck, and A. Li, Co-designed superconducting architecture for lattice surgery of sur- face codes with quantum interface routing card (2023), arXiv:2312.01246 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    Jacinto, ´Elie Gouzien, and N

    H. Jacinto, ´Elie Gouzien, and N. Sangouard, Network re- quirements for distributed quantum computation (2025), arXiv:2504.08891 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Ryan-Anderson, N

    C. Ryan-Anderson, N. C. Brown, C. H. Baldwin, J. M. Dreiling, C. Foltz, J. P. Gaebler, T. M. Gatterman, N. Hewitt, C. Holliman, C. V. Horst, J. Johansen, D. Lucchetti, T. Mengle, M. Matheny, Y. Matsuoka, K. Mayer, M. Mills, S. A. Moses, B. Neyenhuis, J. Pino, P. Siegfried, R. P. Stutz, J. Walker, and D. Hayes, High- fidelity teleportation of a logical qub...

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Sahay, Y

    K. Sahay, Y. Lin, S. Huang, K. R. Brown, and S. Puri, Error correction of transversal cnot gates for scalable surface-code computation, PRX Quantum 6, 020326 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Bluvstein, S

    D. Bluvstein, S. J. Evered, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, H. Zhou, T. Manovitz, S. Ebadi, M. Cain, M. Kali- nowski, D. Hangleiter, J. P. Bonilla Ataides, N. Maskara, I. Cong, X. Gao, P. Sales Rodriguez, T. Karolyshyn, G. Semeghini, M. J. Gullans, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature 626, ...

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Gidney, Stim: a fast stabilizer circuit simulator, Quan- tum 5, 497 (2021)

    C. Gidney, Stim: a fast stabilizer circuit simulator, Quan- tum 5, 497 (2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    A. Gong, S. Cammerer, and J. M. Renes, Toward low- latency iterative decoding of qldpc codes under circuit- level noise (2024), arXiv:2403.18901 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    Roffe, D

    J. Roffe, D. R. White, S. Burton, and E. Campbell, De- coding across the quantum low-density parity-check code landscape, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043423 (2020)

    work page 2020

  43. [43]

    Burt, K.-C

    F. Burt, K.-C. Chen, and K. K. Leung, A multi- level framework for partitioning quantum circuits (2025), arXiv:2503.19082 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    A. G. Fowler and C. Gidney, Low overhead quantum com- putation using lattice surgery (2019), arXiv:1808.06709 [quant-ph]. Appendix A: Bivariate Bicycle Code Parameters TABLE V. Parameters for generating the BB codes used in this paper. Code l m a (x, y) b(x, y) J18, 4, 4K 3 3 1 + x + y 1 + x2 + y2 J54, 4, 8K 3 9 x + y + y3 1 + x2 + y2 J144, 12, 12K 12 6 x...

    work page arXiv 2019