REVIEW 3 cited by
Conditional Conformal Risk Adaptation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Conditional Conformal Risk Adaptation
read the original abstract
Uncertainty quantification is becoming increasingly important in image segmentation, especially for high-stakes applications like medical imaging. While conformal risk control generalizes conformal prediction beyond standard miscoverage to handle various loss functions such as false negative rate, its application to segmentation often yields inadequate conditional risk control: some images experience very high false negative rates while others have negligibly small ones. We develop Conformal Risk Adaptation (CRA), which introduces a new score function for creating adaptive prediction sets that significantly improve conditional risk control for segmentation tasks. We establish a novel theoretical framework that demonstrates a fundamental connection between conformal risk control and conformal prediction through a weighted quantile approach, applicable to any score function. To address the challenge of poorly calibrated probabilities in segmentation models, we introduce a specialized probability calibration framework that enhances the reliability of pixel-wise inclusion estimates. Using these calibrated probabilities, we propose Calibrated Conformal Risk Adaptation (CCRA) and a stratified variant (CCRA-S) that partitions images based on their characteristics and applies group-specific thresholds to further enhance conditional risk control. Our experiments on polyp segmentation demonstrate that all three methods (CRA, CCRA, and CCRA-S) provide valid marginal risk control and deliver more consistent conditional risk control across diverse images compared to standard approaches, offering a principled approach to uncertainty quantification that is particularly valuable for high-stakes and personalized segmentation applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
When Average Calibration Fails: Site-Conditional Federated Conformal Risk Control
A shrinkage-regularized federated CRC protocol using empirical risk curves reduces per-site coverage violations to 2.7/20 while limiting prediction-set inflation to 2.0x on 20-institution brain tumor data.
-
Certified Domain Consistency for Multi-Domain Retrieval: Label-Free Per-Domain Contamination Control with Conformal Risk Guarantees
C3R certifies per-domain retrieval contamination budgets using a two-split conformal scheme, without query-time domain labels.
-
When Average Calibration Fails: Site-Conditional Federated Conformal Risk Control
Pooled conformal calibration in federated medical segmentation can miss its target at 40% of sites; blending site-level and global risk curves with a tuned prior restores per-site coverage at 2.0x prediction-set stretch.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.