REVIEW 1 cited by
Quality evaluation of Tabby coding assistant using real source code snippets
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Quality evaluation of Tabby coding assistant using real source code snippets
read the original abstract
Large language models have become a popular tool in software development, providing coding assistance. The proper measurement of the accuracy and reliability of the code produced by such tools is a challenge due to natural language prompts. We propose a simple pipeline that uses state-of-the-art implementation of classic and universal genres of algorithms and data structures. We focus on measuring the quality of TabbyML code assistant due to its open licence and the flexibility in the choice of the language model. Our results presented as cyclomatic complexity, Halstead's Bugs \& Effort and four text-based similarity matrices depict the usability of TabbyML in coding assistance tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Do These Violent Delights Have Violent Ends? Measuring the Post-Merge Fate of Agentic Code
Post-merge, agentic code needs ~46–51% more corrective/bug-fix maintenance and introduces more security and dependency findings than human code, with higher burden in low-review projects.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.