Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Counterfactual Inference under Thompson Sampling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.08773 v2 pith:YZUF3HNY submitted 2025-04-03 cs.IR cs.LGstat.ME

Counterfactual Inference under Thompson Sampling

classification cs.IR cs.LGstat.ME
keywords inferencesamplingthompsonunderactioncounterfactualcausalestimators
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recommender systems exemplify sequential decision-making under uncertainty, strategically deciding what content to serve to users, to optimise a range of potential objectives. To balance the explore-exploit trade-off successfully, Thompson sampling provides a natural and widespread paradigm to probabilistically select which action to take. Questions of causal and counterfactual inference, which underpin use-cases like offline evaluation, are not straightforward to answer in these contexts. Specifically, whilst most existing estimators rely on action propensities, these are not readily available under Thompson sampling procedures. We derive exact and efficiently computable expressions for action propensities under a variety of parameter and outcome distributions, enabling the use of off-policy estimators in Thompson sampling scenarios. This opens up a range of practical use-cases where counterfactual inference is crucial, including unbiased offline evaluation of recommender systems, as well as general applications of causal inference in online advertising, personalisation, and beyond.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Accelerating A/B-Tests with Counterfactual Estimation: Reducing Variance through Policy Overlap

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Reframing A/B assignment as a mixture policy and applying Δ-off-policy estimators yields an unbiased ATE estimator with variance provably no larger than difference-in-means whenever the tested policies overlap.