Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Two Heads are Better Than One: Test-time Scaling of Multi-agent Collaborative Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.09772 v2 pith:Y7SBEASD submitted 2025-04-14 cs.AI

Two Heads are Better Than One: Test-time Scaling of Multi-agent Collaborative Reasoning

classification cs.AI
keywords reasoningmulti-agentcollaborationadaptivecollaborativescalingtasksagent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multi-agent systems (MAS) built on large language models (LLMs) offer a promising path toward solving complex, real-world tasks that single-agent systems often struggle to manage. While recent advancements in test-time scaling (TTS) have significantly improved single-agent performance on challenging reasoning tasks, how to effectively scale collaboration and reasoning in MAS remains an open question. In this work, we introduce an adaptive multi-agent framework designed to enhance collaborative reasoning through both model-level training and system-level coordination. We construct M500, a high-quality dataset containing 500 multi-agent collaborative reasoning traces, and fine-tune Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct on this dataset to produce M1-32B, a model optimized for multi-agent collaboration. To further enable adaptive reasoning, we propose a novel CEO agent that dynamically manages the discussion process, guiding agent collaboration and adjusting reasoning depth for more effective problem-solving. Evaluated in an open-source MAS across a range of tasks-including general understanding, mathematical reasoning, and coding-our system significantly outperforms strong baselines. For instance, M1-32B achieves 12% improvement on GPQA-Diamond, 41% on AIME2024, and 10% on MBPP-Sanitized, matching the performance of state-of-the-art models like DeepSeek-R1 on some tasks. These results highlight the importance of both learned collaboration and adaptive coordination in scaling multi-agent reasoning. Code is available at https://github.com/jincan333/MAS-TTS

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. RankFlow: A Multi-Role Collaborative Reranking Workflow Utilizing Large Language Models

    cs.IR 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RankFlow deploys four LLM roles in sequence to rewrite queries, generate pseudo-answers, summarize passages, and rerank candidates, outperforming prior methods on TREC-DL, BEIR, and NovelEval.

  2. EMO-R3: Reflective Reinforcement Learning for Emotional Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0

    EMO-R3, which combines a three-step emotional reasoning prompt with a reward for the model agreeing with its own image–emotion judgments, raises visual emotion-recognition accuracy by about one point over plain GRPO.

  3. DIANOIA: Diagnostic Decomposition and Joint Optimization for Multi-Agent Reasoning

    cs.AI 2026-02 reject novelty 3.0

    Multi-agent reasoning gains can be written as coverage × selection accuracy, which is a conditioning identity rather than a new decomposition; the PRISM system still shows moderate benchmark gains.