Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Self-Correction Makes LLMs Better Parsers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.14165 v1 pith:HO5EHTEA submitted 2025-04-19 cs.CL

Self-Correction Makes LLMs Better Parsers

classification cs.CL
keywords llmslanguageparsingrulesdatasetserrorsexistinggrammar
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success across various natural language processing (NLP) tasks. However, recent studies suggest that they still face challenges in performing fundamental NLP tasks essential for deep language understanding, particularly syntactic parsing. In this paper, we conduct an in-depth analysis of LLM parsing capabilities, delving into the specific shortcomings of their parsing results. We find that LLMs may stem from limitations to fully leverage grammar rules in existing treebanks, which restricts their capability to generate valid syntactic structures. To help LLMs acquire knowledge without additional training, we propose a self-correction method that leverages grammar rules from existing treebanks to guide LLMs in correcting previous errors. Specifically, we automatically detect potential errors and dynamically search for relevant rules, offering hints and examples to guide LLMs in making corrections themselves. Experimental results on three datasets with various LLMs, demonstrate that our method significantly improves performance in both in-domain and cross-domain settings on the English and Chinese datasets.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SAC-Opt: Semantic Anchors for Iterative Correction in Optimization Modeling

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    A semantic-anchor alignment loop that reconstructs and verifies constraints from generated solver code lifts average modeling accuracy by 7.8 percentage points over seven datasets.

  2. Lost in Speech: Benchmarking, Evaluation, and Parsing of Spoken Bilingual Conversational Language Beyond Standard UD Assumptions

    cs.CL 2026-02 reject novelty 5.0

    A 126-sentence spoken code-switching benchmark, a flexible scoring metric, and an agentic LLM parser are introduced, but the paper's tables contradict its claimed accuracy gains.