Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Super Co-alignment of Human and AI for Sustainable Symbiotic Society

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.17404 v5 pith:GKZ3X46N submitted 2025-04-24 cs.AI

Super Co-alignment of Human and AI for Sustainable Symbiotic Society

classification cs.AI
keywords humanvaluesoversightsuperalignmentsymbioticalignmentartificialco-alignment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) advances toward Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and eventually Artificial Superintelligence (ASI), it may potentially surpass human control, deviate from human values, and even lead to irreversible catastrophic consequences in extreme cases. This looming risk underscores the critical importance of the "superalignment" problem - ensuring that AI systems which are much smarter than humans, remain aligned with human (compatible) intentions and values. While current scalable oversight and weak-to-strong generalization methods demonstrate certain applicability, they exhibit fundamental flaws in addressing the superalignment paradigm - notably, the unidirectional imposition of human values cannot accommodate superintelligence's autonomy or ensure AGI/ASI's stable learning. We contend that the values for sustainable symbiotic society should be co-shaped by humans and living AI together, achieving "Super Co-alignment." Guided by this vision, we propose a concrete framework that integrates external oversight and intrinsic proactive alignment. External oversight superalignment should be grounded in human-centered ultimate decision, supplemented by interpretable automated evaluation and correction, to achieve continuous alignment with humanity's evolving values. Intrinsic proactive superalignment is rooted in a profound understanding of the Self, others, and society, integrating self-awareness, self-reflection, and empathy to spontaneously infer human intentions, distinguishing good from evil and proactively prioritizing human well-being. The integration of externally-driven oversight with intrinsically-driven proactive alignment will co-shape symbiotic values and rules through iterative human-ASI co-alignment, paving the way for achieving safe and beneficial AGI and ASI for good, for human, and for a symbiotic ecology.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Contrastive Weak-to-strong Generalization

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0

    Contrastive decoding between pre- and post-alignment weak models generates better supervision samples, improving weak-to-strong generalization on AlpacaEval2 and Arena-Hard.

  2. The Morality of Probability: How Implicit Moral Biases in LLMs May Shape the Future of Human-AI Symbiosis

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0

    Six large language models consistently rated care and virtue outcomes as most moral and libertarian outcomes as least moral across 54 AI-generated dilemma variants, with reasoning models more context-sensitive but les...