REVIEW 1 cited by
AI Recommendations and Non-instrumental Image Concerns
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
AI Recommendations and Non-instrumental Image Concerns
read the original abstract
There is growing enthusiasm about the potential for humans and AI to collaborate by leveraging their respective strengths. Yet in practice, this promise often falls short. This paper uses an online experiment to identify non-instrumental image concerns as a key reason individuals underutilize AI recommendations. I show that concerns about how one is perceived, even when those perceptions carry no monetary consequences, lead participants to disregard AI advice and reduce task performance.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Beyond Accuracy: How Humans Evaluate Legally Correct but Socially Controversial Legal Advice from Machines
AI attribution has no net effect on perceived reasonableness of controversial legal advice because objectivity gains are offset by losses in comprehensiveness and attention to special circumstances; reasoning helps vi...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.