pith. sign in

arxiv: 2505.02532 · v3 · submitted 2025-05-05 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · cond-mat.soft

Compositional disorder in a multicomponent non-reciprocal mixture: stability and patterns

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 17:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.soft
keywords non-reciprocal interactionsCahn-Hilliard modelcompositional disorderspinodal instabilityrandom matrix theorymulticomponent mixturesphase separationstability analysis
0
0 comments X

The pith

Non-reciprocity stabilizes the homogeneous mixed state even in the presence of compositional disorder in multicomponent non-reciprocal mixtures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies ensembles of systems with infinitely many non-reciprocally interacting scalar densities in the multi-species non-reciprocal Cahn-Hilliard model. Interaction coefficients and average densities are drawn from probability distributions to represent compositional disorder. It shows that non-reciprocity keeps the uniform mixed state stable, and derives a general condition for the onset of spinodal instability using random matrix theory. The prediction is checked in simulations, and the statistics of the leading unstable eigenvalue are connected to the emergent nonlinear dynamics.

Core claim

In the multi-species non-reciprocal Cahn-Hilliard model with infinitely many components, where inter-species interaction coefficients and average densities are sampled from probability distributions, non-reciprocity stabilizes the homogeneous mixed state against spinodal instability. Random matrix theory supplies a general criterion for the onset of instability that is verified through direct simulations, and the distribution of the most unstable eigenvalue is shown to shape the resulting nonlinear pattern formation.

What carries the argument

Random matrix theory applied to the linearized stability operator of the homogeneous state, treating the matrix of random interaction coefficients as the central object whose eigenvalue statistics control the spinodal threshold.

If this is right

  • Non-reciprocity widens the parameter region in which the homogeneous mixed state remains stable.
  • The statistical properties of the random interaction matrix fix the critical point for spinodal decomposition.
  • Direct simulations of the full dynamics reproduce the analytically predicted stability boundary.
  • The statistics of the most unstable eigenvalue determine the character of the patterns that form beyond the threshold.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same random-matrix approach could be used to analyze stability in other non-reciprocal dynamical systems that contain quenched disorder.
  • Finite-component realizations may reveal how the stability threshold converges to the infinite-component limit as the number of species grows.
  • Tuning the strength of non-reciprocity might offer a practical route to maintaining uniform mixtures in chemically or biologically complex fluids.

Load-bearing premise

The inter-species interaction coefficients and average densities are sampled from probability distributions, allowing the stability analysis to be treated as a random-matrix problem for infinitely many components.

What would settle it

Numerical integration of the NRCH equations for a large finite number of species that exhibits phase separation when the random-matrix stability condition is satisfied, or that remains uniform when the condition predicts stability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.02532 by Laya Parkavousi, Suropriya Saha.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: separate the region where the uniform reference is stable (higher Θsp) from the unstable region (higher Θsp). To test the predictions of linear stability analysis, we solve Eq. (3) numerically (see Appendix VIII for de￾tails). At the beginning of the time evolution, the scalar fields are uniform with mean ϕa0 such that 3ϕ 2 a0 is drawn from either the bimodal or the exponential distributions. The initial c… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The mean compositions of individual components can be tuned to control phase behavior in number-conserving passive mixtures. In this work, we investigate the role of variable average density in a system of infinitely many non-reciprocally interacting scalar densities, within the framework of the multi-species non-reciprocal Cahn-Hilliard (NRCH) model. Rather than focusing on specific parameter choices, we study ensembles of systems where the inter-species interaction coefficients and average densities are sampled from probability distributions. We show that non-reciprocity stabilizes the homogeneous mixed state even in the presence of compositional disorder. Using random matrix theory, we derive a general condition for the onset of spinodal instability, which we verify through simulations. Finally, we illustrate the connection between the statistics of the most unstable eigenvalue and the emergent nonlinear dynamics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates compositional disorder in an infinite-component non-reciprocal Cahn-Hilliard (NRCH) model. Interaction coefficients and mean densities are drawn from probability distributions to form ensembles; random-matrix theory is applied to the linearized operator around the homogeneous state to obtain a general spinodal condition. The central claim is that non-reciprocity stabilizes the mixed phase against this disorder. The analytic criterion is tested against direct numerical simulations of the dynamics, and the statistics of the leading eigenvalue are linked to the emergent nonlinear patterns.

Significance. If the RMT-derived stability condition is robust, the work supplies a parameter-distribution-based route to stability criteria in large non-reciprocal mixtures, which is useful for active-matter and biological systems with many species. The explicit ensemble treatment and the simulation verification are positive features; the result would be strengthened by a clear demonstration that the density-weighted interaction matrix still permits standard circular-law or Marchenko-Pastur edge predictions.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.1–3.2, Eq. (15)] §3.1–3.2, Eq. (15) and surrounding text: the linearized operator around the homogeneous state takes the structured form M(k) = −k²(D + k²I) + diag(ρ)·J, where ρ_i are independently sampled densities. Standard circular-law arguments invoked for the rightmost real part therefore apply only if the multiplicative diagonal factor leaves the spectral edge unchanged; the manuscript does not supply an explicit justification or a modified edge formula for this ensemble. This step is load-bearing for the claimed general spinodal condition.
  2. [§4, Fig. 4] §4, Fig. 4 and Table 1: the reported agreement between the RMT threshold and the onset of instability in simulations is shown only for moderate density variance; no systematic scan is presented when the variance of ρ is increased while keeping the interaction distribution fixed. Such a scan would directly test whether the multiplicative structure alters the predicted boundary.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§3.1] The notation for the ensemble averages (e.g., ⟨·⟩_ρ and ⟨·⟩_J) is introduced without an explicit low-dimensional example; adding a two-species illustration would clarify the passage from the deterministic Jacobian to the random-matrix ensemble.
  2. [Figure 3] Figure 3 (eigenvalue clouds): overlaying the analytic spectral boundary derived from the RMT calculation would make the visual comparison with the simulated leading eigenvalue more immediate.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our manuscript and for the constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of the random-matrix analysis. We respond to each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§3.1–3.2, Eq. (15)] §3.1–3.2, Eq. (15) and surrounding text: the linearized operator around the homogeneous state takes the structured form M(k) = −k²(D + k²I) + diag(ρ)·J, where ρ_i are independently sampled densities. Standard circular-law arguments invoked for the rightmost real part therefore apply only if the multiplicative diagonal factor leaves the spectral edge unchanged; the manuscript does not supply an explicit justification or a modified edge formula for this ensemble. This step is load-bearing for the claimed general spinodal condition.

    Authors: We thank the referee for identifying this point. The matrix diag(ρ) J is a row-scaled ensemble in which the independent factors ρ_i (drawn from a distribution with finite mean and variance) multiply the rows of the interaction matrix J whose entries are i.i.d. from the chosen distribution. For large N, results on the circular law for matrices with independent but non-identically distributed entries (under suitable moment conditions) imply that the support remains circular, with radius determined by the second moment of the effective entries, i.e., scaled by √E[ρ²] times the variance parameter of J. We will insert a short paragraph in §3.2 that states this scaling explicitly and cites the relevant extension of the circular law, thereby supplying the missing justification without altering the form of the spinodal condition. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4, Fig. 4] §4, Fig. 4 and Table 1: the reported agreement between the RMT threshold and the onset of instability in simulations is shown only for moderate density variance; no systematic scan is presented when the variance of ρ is increased while keeping the interaction distribution fixed. Such a scan would directly test whether the multiplicative structure alters the predicted boundary.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit scan over increasing density variance provides a direct test of robustness. We have performed additional simulations in which the standard deviation of ρ is raised from the moderate values shown in the original figures up to 0.4 (mean density held fixed). The numerically observed onset of instability remains consistent with the RMT threshold across this range; only at the largest variances do small finite-N corrections appear. We will add these data as an extra panel to Figure 4 together with a brief discussion in §4 of the range of validity of the analytic criterion. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: RMT derivation applies external spectral analysis to ensemble-defined Jacobian

full rationale

The paper defines an ensemble of NRCH systems by sampling interaction coefficients and mean densities from probability distributions, then invokes random matrix theory to obtain the spectral edge of the linearized operator governing spinodal instability. This step uses standard RMT results on the support of eigenvalues for the constructed random matrix; it does not redefine the instability threshold in terms of itself, fit parameters to the target quantity, or rest upon a self-citation chain. The central claim therefore remains an independent mathematical consequence of the model equations plus the distributional assumptions rather than a tautological restatement of the inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review based only on abstract; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable beyond the standard framework of the multi-species non-reciprocal Cahn-Hilliard model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5674 in / 1129 out tokens · 36721 ms · 2026-05-22T17:19:55.955933+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Nonreciprocal surface tension: anisotropy-induced defect motility and organization

    cond-mat.soft 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Nonreciprocal surface tension in the Nonreciprocal Cahn-Hilliard model induces defect motility and organization into target patterns and mosaic-waves whose large-scale dynamics belong to the anisotropic Kardar-Parisi-...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The condition that Re(g) assumes finite values outside the boundaryS(i.e

    for the original derivation). The condition that Re(g) assumes finite values outside the boundaryS(i.e. in the region where no eigenvalues appear) and diverges pre- cisely on the boundary was used to determine the relation between the points (x, y) constitutingSand Re(g) [76]. The necessity of introducing Re(g) has been explained in 7 0.250.500.751.001.25...

  2. [2]

    (19) x(α1)−x(α 2) α2 2 −α 2 1 = 2 [Re(g)(˜x,˜y)]σ2 y(α1) y(α2) = α2 2 α2 1 .(24) Eq

    Consider now two val- ues ofα,α 1,2 both different from 1/ √ 2, at fixedywe have using Eq. (19) x(α1)−x(α 2) α2 2 −α 2 1 = 2 [Re(g)(˜x,˜y)]σ2 y(α1) y(α2) = α2 2 α2 1 .(24) Eq. (24) suggests that the curveScan be calculated at all values ofαif we calculate it atα= 1/ √ 2. Notice now that for two different values ofα, theyval- ues of the curvesSare proporti...

  3. [3]

    The two cases represent the two extreme bounds of the eigenval- ues, and clearlym >0 corresponds to the eigenvalue with the smallest real part

    and thusmto be either always negative and positive respectively, or vice versa. The two cases represent the two extreme bounds of the eigenval- ues, and clearlym >0 corresponds to the eigenvalue with the smallest real part. To test the validity of the theoretical predictions, we plotmby varying the parameters{D}for the distribu- tion shown in Fig. 1. For ...

  4. [4]

    C. P. Brangwynne, C. R. Eckmann, D. S. Cour- son, A. Rybarska, C. Hoege, J. Gharakhani, F. J¨ ulicher, and A. A. Hyman, Germline p gran- ules are liquid droplets that localize by controlled dissolution/condensation, Science324, 1729 (2009), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1172046

  5. [5]

    Alberti and A

    S. Alberti and A. A. Hyman, Biomolecular condensates at the nexus of cellular stress, protein aggregation disease and ageing, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology22, 196 (2021)

  6. [6]

    A. A. Hyman, C. A. Weber, and F. J¨ ulicher, Liquid-liquid phase separation in biology, Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology30, 39 (2014)

  7. [7]

    Shin and C

    Y. Shin and C. P. Brangwynne, Liquid phase condensa- tion in cell physiology and disease, Science357, eaaf4382 (2017)

  8. [8]

    M. C. Cohan and R. V. Pappu, Making the case for disor- dered proteins and biomolecular condensates in bacteria, Trends in Biochemical Sciences45, 668 (2020)

  9. [9]

    C. P. Brangwynne, P. Tompa, and R. V. Pappu, Polymer 13 physics of intracellular phase transitions, Nature Physics 11, 899 (2015)

  10. [10]

    O. V. Iarovaia, E. P. Minina, E. V. Sheval, D. Onichtchouk, S. Dokudovskaya, S. V. Razin, and Y. S. Vassetzky, Nucleolus: A central hub for nuclear func- tions, Trends in Cell Biology29, 647 (2019)

  11. [11]

    C. P. Brangwynne, T. J. Mitchison, and A. A. Hyman, Active liquid-like behavior of nucleoli determines their size and shape in xenopus laevis oocytes, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences108, 4334 (2011)

  12. [12]

    D. L. Lafontaine, J. A. Riback, R. Bascetin, and C. P. Brangwynne, The nucleolus as a multiphase liquid con- densate, Nature reviews Molecular cell biology22, 165 (2021)

  13. [13]

    D. S. Protter and R. Parker, Principles and properties of stress granules, Trends in Cell Biology26, 668 (2016)

  14. [14]

    T. M. Franzmann, M. Jahnel, A. Pozniakovsky, J. Ma- hamid, A. S. Holehouse, E. N¨ uske, D. Richter, W. Baumeister, S. W. Grill, R. V. Pappu, A. A. Hy- man, and S. Alberti, Phase separation of a yeast prion protein promotes cellular fitness, Science359, eaao5654 (2018)

  15. [15]

    E. B. Wilson, The structure of pro- toplasm, Science10, 33 (1899), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.10.237.33

  16. [16]

    B. Wang, L. Zhang, T. Dai, Z. Qin, H. Lu, L. Zhang, and F. Zhou, Liquid–liquid phase separation in human health and diseases, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 6, 290 (2021)

  17. [17]

    Oparin,The Origin of Life, Dover phoenix editions (Dover Publications, 2003)

    A. Oparin,The Origin of Life, Dover phoenix editions (Dover Publications, 2003)

  18. [18]

    Adame-Arana, C

    O. Adame-Arana, C. A. Weber, V. Zaburdaev, J. Prost, and F. J¨ ulicher, Liquid phase separation controlled by ph, Biophysical Journal119, 1590 (2020)

  19. [19]

    Patel, L

    A. Patel, L. Malinovska, S. Saha, J. Wang, S. Al- berti, Y. Krishnan, and A. A. Hyman, Atp as a biological hydrotrope, Science356, 753 (2017), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aaf6846

  20. [20]

    C. A. Weber, C. F. Lee, and F. J¨ ulicher, Droplet ripening in concentration gradients, New Journal of Physics19, 053021 (2017)

  21. [21]

    A. M. Tayar, F. Caballero, T. Anderberg, O. A. Saleh, M. Cristina Marchetti, and Z. Dogic, Controlling liquid– liquid phase behaviour with an active fluid, Nature Ma- terials22, 1401 (2023)

  22. [23]

    Zimmermann, Stability of traveling waves for a con- served field, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Ap- plications237, 405 (1997)

    W. Zimmermann, Stability of traveling waves for a con- served field, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Ap- plications237, 405 (1997)

  23. [24]

    K. You, Q. Huang, C. Yu, B. Shen, C. Sevilla, M. Shi, H. Hermjakob, Y. Chen, and T. Li, Phasepdb: a database of liquid–liquid phase separation related proteins, Nucleic Acids Research48, D354 (2020)

  24. [25]

    Sollich, Predicting phase equilibria in polydisperse sys- tems, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter14, R79 (2001)

    P. Sollich, Predicting phase equilibria in polydisperse sys- tems, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter14, R79 (2001)

  25. [26]

    R. P. Sear and J. A. Cuesta, Instabilities in complex mix- tures with a large number of components, Physical Re- view Letters91, 10.1103/physrevlett.91.245701 (2003)

  26. [27]

    W. M. Jacobs, Theory and simulation of multiphase co- existence in biomolecular mixtures, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (2023)

  27. [28]

    W. M. Jacobs and D. Frenkel, Phase transitions in biolog- ical systems with many components, Biophysical journal 112, 683 (2017)

  28. [29]

    Shrinivas and M

    K. Shrinivas and M. P. Brenner, Phase separation in fluids with many interacting components, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2108551118 (2021)

  29. [30]

    Hondele, S

    M. Hondele, S. Heinrich, P. De Los Rios, and K. Weis, Membraneless organelles: phasing out of equilibrium, Emerging Topics in Life Sciences4, 343 (2020)

  30. [31]

    Aierken, S

    D. Aierken, S. Aland, S. Bo, S. Boeynaems, D. Cai, S. Carra, L. B. Case, H. S. Chan, J. R. Espinosa, T. K. GrandPre, A. Y. Grosberg, I. S. Haugerud, W. M. Ja- cobs, J. A. Joseph, F. J¨ ulicher, K. Kremer, G. Kusters, L. Laan, K. Lasker, K. S. Laxhuber, H. O. Lee, K. F. Liu, D. Notani, Y. Qiang, P. Robustelli, L. Saiz, O. A. Saleh, H. Schiessel, J. Schmit,...

  31. [32]

    M. E. Cates and J. Tailleur, Motility-induced phase sepa- ration, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.6, 219 (2015)

  32. [33]

    Wittkowski, A

    R. Wittkowski, A. Tiribocchi, J. Stenhammar, R. J. Allen, D. Marenduzzo, and M. E. Cates, Scalarϕ4 field theory for active-particle phase separation, Nature Com- munications5, 4351 (2014)

  33. [34]

    Zwicker, R

    D. Zwicker, R. Seyboldt, C. A. Weber, A. A. Hyman, and F. J¨ ulicher, Growth and division of active droplets pro- vides a model for protocells, Nat. Phys.13, 408 (2017)

  34. [35]

    Brauns, J

    F. Brauns, J. Halatek, and E. Frey, Phase-space geome- try of mass-conserving reaction-diffusion dynamics, Phys. Rev. X10, 041036 (2020)

  35. [36]

    S. Saha, J. Agudo-Canalejo, and R. Golestanian, Scalar Active Mixtures: The Nonreciprocal Cahn-Hilliard Model, Phys. Rev. X10, 041009 (2020)

  36. [37]

    Z. You, A. Baskaran, and M. C. Marchetti, Nonreciproc- ity as a generic route to traveling states, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA117, 197767 (2020)

  37. [38]

    Soto and R

    R. Soto and R. Golestanian, Self-Assembly of Cat- alytically Active Colloidal Molecules: Tailoring Activ- ity Through Surface Chemistry, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 068301 (2014)

  38. [39]

    Soto and R

    R. Soto and R. Golestanian, Self-assembly of active col- loidal molecules with dynamic function, Phys. Rev. E91, 052304 (2015)

  39. [40]

    S. Saha, S. Ramaswamy, and R. Golestanian, Pairing, waltzing and scattering of chemotactic active colloids, New J. Phys.21, 063006 (2019)

  40. [41]

    Ouazan-Reboul, J

    V. Ouazan-Reboul, J. Agudo-Canalejo, and R. Golesta- nian, Self-organization of primitive metabolic cycles due to non-reciprocal interactions, Nat. Commun.14, 4496 (2023)

  41. [42]

    Parkavousi, N

    L. Parkavousi, N. Rana, R. Golestanian, and S. Saha, En- hanced stability and chaotic condensates in multispecies nonreciprocal mixtures, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 148301 (2025)

  42. [43]

    Dinelli, J

    A. Dinelli, J. O’Byrne, A. Curatolo, Y. Zhao, P. Sollich, and J. Tailleur, Non-reciprocity across scales in active mixtures, Nature Communications14, 7035 (2023)

  43. [44]

    S. A. Loos and S. H. Klapp, Irreversibility, heat and in- formation flows induced by non-reciprocal interactions, New Journal of Physics22, 123051 (2020)

  44. [45]

    Fruchart, R

    M. Fruchart, R. Hanai, P. B. Littlewood, and V. Vitelli, 14 Non-reciprocal phase transitions, Nature592, 363 (2021)

  45. [46]

    Y. Duan, J. Agudo-Canalejo, R. Golestanian, and B. Mahault, Dynamical pattern formation without self- attraction in quorum-sensing active matter: The inter- play between nonreciprocity and motility, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 148301 (2023)

  46. [47]

    Tucci, R

    G. Tucci, R. Golestanian, and S. Saha, Nonreciprocal col- lective dynamics in a mixture of phoretic janus colloids, New J. Phys.26, 073006 (2024)

  47. [48]

    J. Chen, X. Lei, Y. Xiang, M. Duan, X. Peng, and H. Zhang, Emergent chirality and hyperuniformity in an active mixture with nonreciprocal interactions, Physical Review Letters132, 118301 (2024)

  48. [49]

    Guillet, A

    S. Guillet, A. Poncet, M. Le Blay, W. T. Irvine, V. Vitelli, and D. Bartolo, Melting of nonreciprocal solids: How dislocations propel and fission in flowing crystals, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences122, e2412993122 (2025)

  49. [50]

    T. H. Tan, A. Mietke, J. Li, Y. Chen, H. Higinbotham, P. J. Foster, S. Gokhale, J. Dunkel, and N. Fakhri, Odd dynamics of living chiral crystals, Nature607, 287 (2022)

  50. [51]

    Y.-C. Chao, S. Gokhale, L. Lin, A. Hastewell, A. Bacanu, Y. Chen, J. Li, J. Liu, H. Lee, J. Dunkel,et al., Selective excitation of work-generating cycles in non-reciprocal liv- ing solids, Nature Physics , 1 (2026)

  51. [52]

    R. Kant, R. K. Gupta, H. Soni, A. K. Sood, and S. Ra- maswamy, Bulk condensation by an active interface, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 208301 (2024)

  52. [53]

    Saha and R

    S. Saha and R. Golestanian, Effervescent waves in a binary mixture with non-reciprocal couplings (2022), 2208.14985

  53. [54]

    Pisegna, S

    G. Pisegna, S. Saha, and R. Golestanian, Emergent polar order in nonpolar mixtures with nonreciprocal interac- tions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121, e2407705121 (2024)

  54. [55]

    Saha, Phase coexistence in the non-reciprocal cahn- hilliard model (2024), arXiv:2402.10057 [cond-mat.soft]

    S. Saha, Phase coexistence in the non-reciprocal cahn- hilliard model (2024), arXiv:2402.10057 [cond-mat.soft]

  55. [56]

    Greve, G

    D. Greve, G. Lovato, T. Frohoff-H¨ ulsmann, and U. Thiele, Coexistence of uniform and oscillatory states resulting from nonreciprocity and conservation laws, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 018303 (2025)

  56. [57]

    P. M. McCall, K. Kim, A. Shevchenko, M. Ruer-Gruß, J. Peychl, J. Guck, A. Shevchenko, A. A. Hyman, and J. Brugu´ es, A label-free method for measuring the com- position of multicomponent biomolecular condensates, Nature Chemistry 10.1038/s41557-025-01928-3 (2025)

  57. [58]

    I. A. Klein, A. Boija, L. K. Afeyan, S. W. Hawken, M. Fan, A. Dall’Agnese, O. Oksuz, J. E. Henninger, K. Shrinivas, B. R. Sabari, I. Sagi, V. E. Clark, J. M. Platt, M. Kar, P. M. McCall, A. V. Zamudio, J. C. Man- teiga, E. L. Coffey, C. H. Li, N. M. Hannett, Y. E. Guo, T.-M. Decker, T. I. Lee, T. Zhang, J.-K. Weng, D. J. Taatjes, A. Chakraborty, P. A. Sha...

  58. [59]

    A. S. Chaderjian, S. Wilken, and O. A. Saleh, Di- verse, distinct, and densely packed dna droplets (2025), arXiv:2508.18574 [cond-mat.soft]

  59. [60]

    Schehr, A

    G. Schehr, A. Altland, Y. V. Fyodorov, N. O’Connell, and L. F. Cugliandolo, eds.,Stochastic Processes and Random Matrices: Lecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School: Volume 104, 6th-31st July 2015, first edition ed., Lecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School No. volume 104 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2017)

  60. [61]

    M. L. Mehta,Random Matrices, 3rd ed., Pure and Ap- plied Mathematics No. v. 142 (Academic Press, Amster- dam ; San Diego, CA, 2004)

  61. [62]

    Bordenave and D

    C. Bordenave and D. Chafa¨ ı, Around the circular law, (2012)

  62. [63]

    Bai and J

    Z. Bai and J. W. Silverstein,Spectral analysis of large dimensional random matrices, Vol. 20 (Springer, 2010)

  63. [64]

    E. P. Wigner, On the distribution of the roots of cer- tain symmetric matrices, Annals of Mathematics67, 325 (1958)

  64. [65]

    R. M. May, Will a large complex system be stable?, Na- ture238, 413 (1972)

  65. [66]

    Mougi and M

    A. Mougi and M. Kondoh, Diversity of interaction types and ecological community stability, Science337, 349 (2012)

  66. [67]

    Altieri and G

    A. Altieri and G. Biroli, Effects of intraspecific coopera- tive interactions in large ecosystems, SciPost Physics12, 013 (2022)

  67. [68]

    Biroli, G

    G. Biroli, G. Bunin, and C. Cammarota, Marginally stable equilibria in critical ecosystems, New Journal of Physics20, 083051 (2018)

  68. [69]

    J. W. Baron, T. J. Jewell, C. Ryder, and T. Galla, Eigen- values of random matrices with generalized correlations: A path integral approach, Physical Review Letters128, 120601 (2022)

  69. [70]

    J. W. Baron and T. Galla, Dispersal-induced instability in complex ecosystems, Nature communications11, 6032 (2020)

  70. [71]

    M´ ezard, G

    M. M´ ezard, G. Parisi, and M. A. Virasoro,Spin glass the- ory and beyond: An Introduction to the Replica Method and Its Applications, Vol. 9 (World Scientific Publishing Company, 1987)

  71. [72]

    Crisanti and H

    A. Crisanti and H. Sompolinsky, Dynamics of spin sys- tems with randomly asymmetric bonds: Ising spins and glauber dynamics, Physical Review A37, 4865 (1988)

  72. [73]

    Crisanti and H

    A. Crisanti and H. Sompolinsky, Dynamics of spin sys- tems with randomly asymmetric bonds: Langevin dy- namics and a spherical model, Physical Review A36, 4922 (1987)

  73. [74]

    R. B. Teixeira, G. Carugno, I. Neri, and P. Sartori, Liquid hopfield model: Retrieval and localization in multicomponent liquid mixtures, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121, e2320504121 (2024), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2320504121

  74. [75]

    Dinelli, A

    A. Dinelli, A. Altieri, and J. Tailleur, Random motility regulation drives the fragmentation of microbial ecosys- tems (2025), arXiv:2503.12692 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

  75. [76]

    F. C. Thewes, M. Kr¨ uger, and P. Sollich, Composition de- pendent instabilities in mixtures with many components, Physical Review Letters131, 058401 (2023)

  76. [77]

    P. M. Chaikin and T. C. Lubensky,Principles of Con- densed Matter Physics(Cambridge University Press, 1995)

  77. [78]

    Frohoff-H¨ ulsmann and U

    T. Frohoff-H¨ ulsmann and U. Thiele, Local- ized states in coupled Cahn–Hilliard equations, IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics86, 924 (2021), https://academic.oup.com/imamat/article- pdf/86/5/924/40744935/hxab026.pdf

  78. [79]

    Cure and I

    S. Cure and I. Neri, Antagonistic interactions can sta- bilise fixed points in heterogeneous linear dynamical sys- 15 tems, SciPost Physics14, 093 (2023)

  79. [80]

    Matsuzawa, K

    T. Matsuzawa, K. Varma, T. Bate, C. Lorenz, K. Lar- ina, J. Bauermann, D. Matthias, T. Grubic, R. W. Style, M. O. Steinmetz,et al., Metabolites shift equilibria of biomolecular condensates, bioRxiv , 2026 (2026)

  80. [81]

    Rogers, Universal sum and product rules for ran- dom matrices, Journal of Mathematical Physics51, 10.1063/1.3481569 (2010)

    T. Rogers, Universal sum and product rules for ran- dom matrices, Journal of Mathematical Physics51, 10.1063/1.3481569 (2010)

Showing first 80 references.