Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

CardioCoT: Hierarchical Reasoning for Multimodal Survival Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.19195 v1 pith:P4V3TIX6 submitted 2025-05-25 cs.AI cs.CV

classification cs.AIcs.CV
keywords reasoningriskpredictioncardiocotclinicalhierarchicalmodelanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Accurate prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events recurrence risk in acute myocardial infarction patients based on postoperative cardiac MRI and associated clinical notes is crucial for precision treatment and personalized intervention. Existing methods primarily focus on risk stratification capability while overlooking the need for intermediate robust reasoning and model interpretability in clinical practice. Moreover, end-to-end risk prediction using LLM/VLM faces significant challenges due to data limitations and modeling complexity. To bridge this gap, we propose CardioCoT, a novel two-stage hierarchical reasoning-enhanced survival analysis framework designed to enhance both model interpretability and predictive performance. In the first stage, we employ an evidence-augmented self-refinement mechanism to guide LLM/VLMs in generating robust hierarchical reasoning trajectories based on associated radiological findings. In the second stage, we integrate the reasoning trajectories with imaging data for risk model training and prediction. CardioCoT demonstrates superior performance in MACE recurrence risk prediction while providing interpretable reasoning processes, offering valuable insights for clinical decision-making.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Reasoning4Sciences: Bridging Reasoning Language Models to All Scientific Branches

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Survey of RLM adoption in 28 disciplines reveals maturity disparities via a new assessment framework, with focus on development, evaluation, and public resources.

  2. Reasoning4Sciences: Bridging Reasoning Language Models to All Scientific Branches

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A survey of RLM use in 28 disciplines reveals uneven adoption and introduces a maturity assessment framework showing larger gaps when limited to public resources.

  3. A Composite Alignment-Aware Framework for Myocardial Lesion Segmentation in Multi-sequence CMR Images

    eess.IV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CAA-Seg combines selective slice alignment with hierarchical feature fusion to improve infarction, edema, and myocardium segmentation on a 397-patient multi-sequence CMR dataset.

  4. Reasoning4Sciences: Bridging Reasoning Language Models to All Scientific Branches

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey of reasoning language model adoption across 28 ERC scientific disciplines finds large maturity gaps, especially when only public resources are counted.

Pith tools