REVIEW 1 cited by
Unified weak lensing constraints on the evolution of the mass -- X-ray luminosity relation for galaxy clusters
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Unified weak lensing constraints on the evolution of the mass -- X-ray luminosity relation for galaxy clusters
read the original abstract
Scaling relations between galaxy cluster properties are crucial for understanding cosmology and baryonic physics. Rigorous calibration of the $M-L_X$ relation, employing weak lensing mass and consistent statistical methodology, is challenging due to heterogeneous cluster samples. The release of LEGACY imaging data introduced the possibility of unifying the cluster selection. We present the all-sky extension of the CODEX catalog based on LEGACY data and introduce a Bayesian framework for calibrating the X-ray luminosity-mass relation, derived for 100 clusters with weak lensing mass measurements. Using the X-ray luminosity estimates for those clusters from ROSAT All-Sky Survey (RASS) data, we perform a power-law fit to the $M-L_X$ relation. Furthermore, taking advantage of the recently released eROSITA data (eRASS1), we assess the impact of point source contamination on cluster fluxes for 42 clusters in the eRASS1 footprint. The RASS fit yields a slope of $\beta = 0.75 \pm 0.09$, 1.7$\sigma$ lower than the best self-similar prediction, with marginal evidence for the redshift evolution of the normalization ($\gamma = 0.65 \pm 0.43$). As for the eRASS1 analysis, the slope is substantially steeper, $\beta = 1.11 \pm 0.15$, and in further agreement with the prediction of self-similarity. No additional evolution is also seen ($\gamma = 0.004 \pm 0.790 $). While our results provide the practical means for cosmological studies of both RASS and eRASS data, the link to cluster physics is much cleaner after the cluster flux contamination is reduced. We also analyzed the impact of the selection function on calibration, finding that its full modeling is essential.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
S-PLUS Clusters And Large-scale Environments (SCALE): II. PZWav versus redMaPPer identification of eRosita groups
A probabilistic Hausdorff-distance matching of PZWav/AME optical systems to eRASS1 X-ray contours yields multi-wavelength group/cluster catalogs with tunable purity and improved low-mass completeness versus redMaPPer.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.