Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Beyond the Black Box: Interpretability of LLMs in Finance

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.24650 v1 pith:ZKXTWG4T submitted 2025-05-14 cs.CE cs.LGq-fin.ST

Beyond the Black Box: Interpretability of LLMs in Finance

classification cs.CE cs.LGq-fin.ST
keywords interpretabilityfinancialllmsmechanisticaddressinganalysisbehaviorcompliance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit remarkable capabilities across a spectrum of tasks in financial services, including report generation, chatbots, sentiment analysis, regulatory compliance, investment advisory, financial knowledge retrieval, and summarization. However, their intrinsic complexity and lack of transparency pose significant challenges, especially in the highly regulated financial sector, where interpretability, fairness, and accountability are critical. As far as we are aware, this paper presents the first application in the finance domain of understanding and utilizing the inner workings of LLMs through mechanistic interpretability, addressing the pressing need for transparency and control in AI systems. Mechanistic interpretability is the most intuitive and transparent way to understand LLM behavior by reverse-engineering their internal workings. By dissecting the activations and circuits within these models, it provides insights into how specific features or components influence predictions - making it possible not only to observe but also to modify model behavior. In this paper, we explore the theoretical aspects of mechanistic interpretability and demonstrate its practical relevance through a range of financial use cases and experiments, including applications in trading strategies, sentiment analysis, bias, and hallucination detection. While not yet widely adopted, mechanistic interpretability is expected to become increasingly vital as adoption of LLMs increases. Advanced interpretability tools can ensure AI systems remain ethical, transparent, and aligned with evolving financial regulations. In this paper, we have put special emphasis on how these techniques can help unlock interpretability requirements for regulatory and compliance purposes - addressing both current needs and anticipating future expectations from financial regulators globally.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Emergent Latent-State Computation under Stochastic Volatility

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Volatility forecasters develop linearly decodable representations of the next hidden log-volatility state; in long cycles this appears immediately after the input projection and ℓ2 normalization.

  2. Signal or Noise in Multi-Agent LLM-based Stock Recommendations?

    q-fin.PM 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A multi-agent LLM equity system produces statistically significant outperformance on S&P 500 stocks, with strong-buy portfolios returning +2.18% monthly versus +1.15% for the equal-weight benchmark over 19 months.