REVIEW 1 cited by
Oversight Structures for Agentic AI in Public-Sector Organizations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper finds that the introduction of agentic AI systems intensifies existing challenges to traditional public sector oversight mechanisms -- which rely on siloed compliance units and episodic approvals rather than continuous, integrated supervision. We identify five governance dimensions essential for responsible agent deployment: cross-departmental implementation, comprehensive evaluation, enhanced security protocols, operational visibility, and systematic auditing. We evaluate the capacity of existing oversight structures to meet these challenges, via a mixed-methods approach consisting of a literature review and interviews with civil servants in AI-related roles. We find that agent oversight poses intensified versions of three existing governance challenges: continuous oversight, deeper integration of governance and operational capabilities, and interdepartmental coordination. We propose approaches that both adapt institutional structures and design agent oversight compatible with public sector constraints.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
AI Deployment and Cyber Governance Failures in Public-Sector Organizations: A Typological Analysis
A seven-domain typology of ten AI-driven public-sector cyber-governance failures, with a five-framework coverage matrix showing Shadow AI, speed asymmetry, and governance vacuum are not addressed at operational specificity.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.