pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.06514 · v2 · submitted 2025-07-09 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.dis-nn· cond-mat.quant-gas· quant-ph

Algebraic States in Continuum in dgt 1 Dimensional Non-Hermitian Systems

Ao Yang , Kai Zhang , Chen Fang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 06:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph
keywords non-Hermitian systemsalgebraic localizationcontinuum statessingle impuritytwo-dimensional latticeslocal density of stateseigenstates
0
0 comments X

The pith

Non-Hermitian systems in two or higher dimensions host eigenstates that decay algebraically inside the bulk continuum when a single impurity is added.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that two-dimensional non-Hermitian lattices with one impurity support eigenstates localized algebraically, falling off as one over the distance from the impurity site. These states sit at energies inside the bulk continuum spectrum under periodic boundaries. An analytic threshold for the impurity strength marks when they appear. The same states are absent in Hermitian systems and in one-dimensional non-Hermitian systems, so the effect is tied to the combination of non-Hermiticity and dimension greater than one. Local density of states measurements can reveal them in photonic or acoustic experiments.

Core claim

In two- and higher-dimensional non-Hermitian systems, a single impurity produces algebraically localized eigenstates embedded in the continuum spectrum. These algebraic states in continuum decay as 1 over radial distance from the impurity, lie inside the bulk continuum under periodic boundary conditions, and require the impurity strength to exceed a derived threshold value. The states cannot form in Hermitian systems or in one-dimensional non-Hermitian systems.

What carries the argument

Algebraic states in continuum (AICs): eigenmodes that decay as 1/|r| from a single impurity and remain embedded in the continuum of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians in dimensions d greater than 1.

If this is right

  • A critical impurity strength must be reached before algebraic states appear inside the continuum.
  • Local density of states measurements can serve as a direct experimental signature of these states.
  • The phenomenon is absent in Hermitian systems and in one dimension, so it is specific to non-Hermitian physics in d greater than 1.
  • The states provide localized modes without requiring an energy gap in the spectrum.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar algebraic embedding might be engineered in other non-Hermitian lattices by tuning impurity strength or lattice geometry.
  • Higher-dimensional versions could exhibit modified decay rates or thresholds that depend on the precise form of the non-Hermitian terms.
  • The local-density-of-states observable could be adapted to detect analogous states in open quantum systems or acoustic metamaterials.

Load-bearing premise

The analytic threshold condition assumes a specific non-Hermitian Hamiltonian with exactly one impurity together with the premise that algebraic localization inside the continuum is impossible in Hermitian systems.

What would settle it

Numerical diagonalization of a finite two-dimensional non-Hermitian lattice with one impurity that shows algebraic decay in the wavefunction precisely when the impurity strength crosses the derived threshold and no such decay below it.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.06514 by Ao Yang, Chen Fang, Kai Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a), can be neglected . In the Supplemental Material [50], we demonstrate that the same result can be derived through asymptotic analysis as |x| → ∞. Specifically, we present a concrete example in which [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: (a) Perturbed spectrum of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report the existence of algebraically localized eigenstates embedded within the continuum spectrum of 2D non-Hermitian systems with a single impurity. These modes, which we term algebraic states in continuum (AICs), decay algebraically as $1/|r|$ from the impurity site, and their energies lie within the bulk continuum spectrum under periodic boundary conditions. We analytically derive the threshold condition for the impurity strength required to generate such states. Remarkably, AICs are forbidden in Hermitian systems and in 1D non-Hermitian systems, making them unique to non-Hermitian systems in two and higher dimensions. To detect AICs, we introduce a local density of states as an experimental observable, which is readily accessible in photonic/acoustic platforms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports the existence of algebraically localized eigenstates (termed AICs) embedded in the continuum spectrum of 2D non-Hermitian systems with a single impurity. These states decay as 1/|r| from the impurity, have energies inside the bulk continuum under periodic boundary conditions, and are claimed to be unique to non-Hermitian systems in d>1. The authors analytically derive a threshold condition on the impurity strength for their appearance and propose a local density of states as an experimental observable accessible in photonic/acoustic platforms.

Significance. If the central claims are placed on a firm mathematical footing, the work would introduce a new class of continuum-embedded states that are forbidden in Hermitian and 1D non-Hermitian settings, with direct experimental implications. The analytic (rather than numerical) derivation of the threshold condition is a clear strength, as is the emphasis on an observable that can be measured locally.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (eigenvalue problem for AICs): the derivation treats the algebraically decaying solution as a genuine eigenvector of the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian under PBC, yet |ψ(r)|∼1/|r| produces a logarithmically divergent ∫|ψ|²d²r (or ∑1/r² over lattice shells). The manuscript must specify the function space, regularization, or limiting procedure that allows the state to satisfy the eigenvalue equation while remaining inside the continuum.
  2. [§4] §4 (threshold derivation, Eq. (threshold expression)): the analytic condition for the critical impurity strength is obtained by matching the impurity-induced solution to the bulk continuum; it is unclear whether this matching already incorporates the non-normalizable tail or assumes an auxiliary cutoff that is removed only after the limit is taken. A concrete check that the resulting state still solves the Schrödinger equation at large but finite distance is required.
  3. [§5] §5 (uniqueness to non-Hermitian d>1): the argument that AICs cannot exist in Hermitian systems or in 1D non-Hermitian systems is presented for the specific single-impurity model; an explicit counter-example or a general proof that no algebraic solution can be embedded in the Hermitian continuum would make the uniqueness claim load-bearing rather than model-dependent.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 2] Figure 2 caption: the color scale for the local density of states is not labeled; adding the explicit normalization or units would improve readability.
  2. [Model section] Notation: the symbol for the non-Hermitian parameter (γ) is introduced without an explicit statement of its range; a short sentence clarifying the sign convention would remove ambiguity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for the thorough review and valuable suggestions that have improved the clarity and rigor of our manuscript. Below we provide point-by-point responses to the major comments.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (eigenvalue problem for AICs): the derivation treats the algebraically decaying solution as a genuine eigenvector of the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian under PBC, yet |ψ(r)|∼1/|r| produces a logarithmically divergent ∫|ψ|²d²r (or ∑1/r² over lattice shells). The manuscript must specify the function space, regularization, or limiting procedure that allows the state to satisfy the eigenvalue equation while remaining inside the continuum.

    Authors: We acknowledge the importance of specifying the appropriate function space for these states. The AICs are constructed as solutions to the eigenvalue equation in the sense of distributions or via a limiting procedure on finite systems. Specifically, we solve the problem on a large finite lattice with open or periodic boundaries, where the state is normalizable, and then take the thermodynamic limit. In this limit, the eigenvalue equation holds locally at every site, while the norm diverges logarithmically only in the infinite limit. We have revised Section 3 to include a detailed discussion of this regularization procedure and the associated function space, which can be viewed as a rigged Hilbert space extension commonly used for continuum states. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (threshold derivation, Eq. (threshold expression)): the analytic condition for the critical impurity strength is obtained by matching the impurity-induced solution to the bulk continuum; it is unclear whether this matching already incorporates the non-normalizable tail or assumes an auxiliary cutoff that is removed only after the limit is taken. A concrete check that the resulting state still solves the Schrödinger equation at large but finite distance is required.

    Authors: The derivation of the threshold condition is performed directly in the infinite-volume limit using the exact Green's function of the bulk Hamiltonian, which already encodes the algebraic decay in its asymptotic behavior for non-Hermitian systems. No auxiliary cutoff is assumed in the matching; the solution satisfies the discrete Schrödinger equation exactly at all finite distances from the impurity. To provide the requested concrete check, we have included in the revised manuscript a numerical evaluation of the residual ||Hψ - Eψ|| at large distances, demonstrating that it is zero within machine precision for distances up to several hundred lattice spacings. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§5] §5 (uniqueness to non-Hermitian d>1): the argument that AICs cannot exist in Hermitian systems or in 1D non-Hermitian systems is presented for the specific single-impurity model; an explicit counter-example or a general proof that no algebraic solution can be embedded in the Hermitian continuum would make the uniqueness claim load-bearing rather than model-dependent.

    Authors: We agree that a more general demonstration strengthens the claim. In the revised manuscript, we have added a general argument in Section 5 showing that for Hermitian systems, any solution with algebraic decay 1/|r| in d=2 would not be square-integrable and cannot be an eigenstate embedded in the continuum without reducing to a scattering state, which has different asymptotics. For 1D non-Hermitian systems, we explicitly solve the recurrence relation and show that algebraic decay is incompatible with the continuum spectrum unless the decay is exponential. This generalizes beyond the single-impurity case by considering the far-field behavior dictated by the dispersion relation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Analytic derivation of AIC threshold remains self-contained with no reduction to fitted inputs or self-citations

full rationale

The paper presents an analytic derivation of the impurity-strength threshold for algebraic states in continuum directly from the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian with a single impurity under periodic boundary conditions. No equations or steps are shown to reduce by construction to a fitted parameter, a self-citation chain, or a redefinition of the target quantity. The uniqueness to d>1 non-Hermitian systems is stated as a consequence of the derived condition rather than imported from prior author work as a load-bearing premise. The 1/|r| decay and continuum embedding are treated as outputs of the same analytic solution, not presupposed inputs. This yields a self-contained derivation against external benchmarks with no circular steps identified.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract; the analytic derivation likely relies on standard assumptions in non-Hermitian quantum mechanics such as the form of the Hamiltonian and impurity potential, but no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities beyond the AIC terminology are detailed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5669 in / 1303 out tokens · 46511 ms · 2026-05-19T06:36:56.127231+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Dynamical Poles in Non-Hermitian Impurity Scattering

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Dynamical poles from Green's function analytic continuation, rather than static bound states, control late-time dynamics in non-Hermitian impurity scattering.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    RpTz1XHGbKk69U30eevFu04TSpI=

    The above integration can be evaluated by residue theo- rem [50] as ψ(x,y)= ˜λ ψ(0,0) 1 y−ax ∝ 1 r (3) Notably, Ima,0 is key for the algebraic localization, which is guaranteed by the finite-area condition for continuum spec- trum, thus making AICs unique to non-Hermitian system in two and higher dimensions. In the Hermitian case, where a∈R, the integral ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Phillips,Advanced solid state physics(Cambridge University Press, 2012)

    P. Phillips,Advanced solid state physics(Cambridge University Press, 2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    P. W. Anderson, Physical review109, 1492 (1958)

    work page 1958

  4. [4]

    Evers and A

    F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, Reviews of Modern Physics80, 1355 (2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    J. B. Conway,A course in functional analysis, V ol. 96 (Springer, 2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    C. W. Hsu, B. Zhen, A. D. Stone, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇci´c, Nature Reviews Materials1, 1 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Rotter, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 42, 153001 (2009)

    I. Rotter, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 42, 153001 (2009)

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Diehl, E

    S. Diehl, E. Rico, M. A. Baranov, and P. Zoller, Nature Physics 7, 971 (2011). 5

    work page 2011

  9. [9]

    Malzard, C

    S. Malzard, C. Poli, and H. Schomerus, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 200402 (2015)

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Dalibard, Y

    J. Dalibard, Y . Castin, and K. Mølmer, Phys. Rev. Lett.68, 580 (1992)

    work page 1992

  11. [11]

    Regensburger, C

    A. Regensburger, C. Bersch, M.-A. Miri, G. Onishchukov, D. N. Christodoulides, and U. Peschel, Nature488, 167 (2012)

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    T. Gao, E. Estrecho, K. Y . Bliokh, T. C. H. Liew, M. D. Fraser, S. Brodbeck, M. Kamp, C. Schneider, S. H¨ofling, Y . Yamamoto, F. Nori, Y . S. Kivshar, A. G. Truscott, R. G. Dall, and E. A. Ostrovskaya, Nature526, 554 (2015)

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    L. Feng, R. El-Ganainy, and L. Ge, Nature Photonics11, 752 (2017)

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    El-Ganainy, K

    R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Mussli- mani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides, Nature Physics14, 11 (2018)

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    Miri and A

    M.-A. Miri and A. Al `u, Science363, eaar7709 (2019)

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    K.¨Ozdemir, S

    S ¸. K.¨Ozdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori, and L. Yang, Nature Materials 18, 783 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Kozii and L

    V . Kozii and L. Fu, Phys. Rev. B109, 235139 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Shen and L

    H. Shen and L. Fu, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 026403 (2018)

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Nagai, Y

    Y . Nagai, Y . Qi, H. Isobe, V . Kozii, and L. Fu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 227204 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    F. Song, S. Yao, and Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 170401 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Ashida , author Z

    Y . Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Advances in Physics69, 249 (2020), doi: 10.1080/00018732.2021.1876991

    work page doi:10.1080/00018732.2021.1876991 2020

  22. [23]

    T. E. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 133903 (2016)

    work page 2016

  23. [24]

    V . M. Martinez Alvarez, J. E. Barrios Vargas, and L. E. F. Foa Torres, Phys. Rev. B97, 121401(R) (2018)

    work page 2018

  24. [25]

    Yao and Z

    S. Yao and Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 086803 (2018)

    work page 2018

  25. [26]

    F. K. Kunst, E. Edvardsson, J. C. Budich, and E. J. Bergholtz, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 026808 (2018)

    work page 2018

  26. [27]

    S. Yao, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 136802 (2018)

    work page 2018

  27. [28]

    Yokomizo and S

    K. Yokomizo and S. Murakami, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 066404 (2019)

    work page 2019

  28. [29]

    C. H. Lee and R. Thomale, Phys. Rev. B99, 201103(R) (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [30]

    C. H. Lee, L. Li, and J. Gong, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 016805 (2019)

    work page 2019

  30. [31]

    Longhi, Phys

    S. Longhi, Phys. Rev. Res.1, 023013 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [32]

    Zhang, Z

    K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and C. Fang, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 126402 (2020)

    work page 2020

  32. [33]

    Okuma, K

    N. Okuma, K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and M. Sato, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 086801 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [34]

    D. S. Borgnia, A. J. Kruchkov, and R.-J. Slager, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 056802 (2020)

    work page 2020

  34. [35]

    Z. Yang, K. Zhang, C. Fang, and J. Hu, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 226402 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [36]

    Yi and Z

    Y . Yi and Z. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 186802 (2020)

    work page 2020

  36. [37]

    L. Xiao, T. Deng, K. Wang, G. Zhu, Z. Wang, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Nature Physics16, 761 (2020)

    work page 2020

  37. [38]

    Ghatak, M

    A. Ghatak, M. Brandenbourger, J. van Wezel, and C. Coulais, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117, 29561 (2020)

    work page 2020

  38. [39]

    Helbig, T

    T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, S. Imhof, M. Abdelghany, T. Kiessling, L. W. Molenkamp, C. H. Lee, A. Szameit, M. Greiter, and R. Thomale, Nature Physics16, 747 (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [40]

    L. Li, C. H. Lee, S. Mu, and J. Gong, Nature Communications 11, 5491 (2020)

    work page 2020

  40. [41]

    Kawabata, N

    K. Kawabata, N. Okuma, and M. Sato, Phys. Rev. B101, 195147 (2020)

    work page 2020

  41. [42]

    C. C. Wanjura, M. Brunelli, and A. Nunnenkamp, Nature Com- munications11, 3149 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [43]

    Xue, M.-R

    W.-T. Xue, M.-R. Li, Y .-M. Hu, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. B103, L241408 (2021)

    work page 2021

  43. [44]

    L. Li, S. Mu, C. H. Lee, and J. Gong, Nature Communications 12, 5294 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [45]

    Zhang, Z

    K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and C. Fang, Nature Communications13, 2496 (2022)

    work page 2022

  45. [46]

    Zhang, C

    K. Zhang, C. Fang, and Z. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 036402 (2023)

    work page 2023

  46. [47]

    Longhi, Phys

    S. Longhi, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 157601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  47. [48]

    Hu, H.-Y

    Y .-M. Hu, H.-Y . Wang, Z. Wang, and F. Song, Geomet- ric Origin of Non-Bloch PT Symmetry Breaking (2022), arXiv:2210.13491

    work page arXiv 2022

  48. [49]

    Kawabata, T

    K. Kawabata, T. Numasawa, and S. Ryu, Phys. Rev. X13, 021007 (2023)

    work page 2023

  49. [50]

    Zhang, C

    K. Zhang, C. Shu, and K. Sun, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.06682 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  50. [51]

    See Supplementary Material for more details

    work page

  51. [52]

    von Neumann and E

    J. von Neumann and E. P. Wigner, The Collected Works of Eu- gene Paul Wigner: Part A: The Scientific Papers , 291 (1993)

    work page 1993

  52. [53]

    Z. Fang, C. Fang, and K. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B108, 165132 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [54]

    A. Yang, Z. Fang, K. Zhang, and C. Fang, Communications Physics8, 124 (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [55]

    E. N. Economou,Green’s functions in quantum physics, V ol. 7 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2006)

    work page 2006

  55. [56]

    H.-Y . Wang, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Physical Review X14, 021011 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [57]

    Zhang, Z

    K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and K. Sun, Physical Review B109, 165127 (2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [58]

    Z. Xu, B. Pang, K. Zhang, and Z. Yang, arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.16868 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  58. [59]

    Xiong, Z.-Y

    Y . Xiong, Z.-Y . Xing, and H. Hu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.01296 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  59. [60]

    P. D. Miller,Applied asymptotic analysis, V ol. 75 (American Mathematical Soc., 2006)

    work page 2006

  60. [61]

    The theory for bound state with energy outside the continuum spectrum has been established in Refs [52, 53]

    work page

  61. [62]

    Since the sin- gularity set depends onEnon-analytically,λ −1(E) also exhibits non-analytic behavior [50]

    As a side remark,λ(E) is in fact non-analytic. Since the sin- gularity set depends onEnon-analytically,λ −1(E) also exhibits non-analytic behavior [50]

    work page

  62. [63]

    Thus, to complete the proof of this statement, one needs to prove the convergence of integral if the integrand near the singularity be- haves like 1 knx+aky ,a∈C\R,n≥2

    Technically, what we’ve shown concerns with the system whose derivative with respect to both variablesk x,k y is nonzero. Thus, to complete the proof of this statement, one needs to prove the convergence of integral if the integrand near the singularity be- haves like 1 knx+aky ,a∈C\R,n≥2. We omit the mixing term kn−m x km y here since one can extract the...

    work page

  63. [64]

    backward

    We remark that the reference [53] deals with bound states out- side the spectrum, i.e.,λ(E) forE∈C\ {H 0(k),k∈BZ}. Thus, by Liouville’s theorem, this function takes the minimum value at the boundary. So BSP needs to be at the boundary of the spec- trum to eliminate the threshold. Since we are now considering states in the continuum, this constraint can of...

    work page