pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.10252 · v3 · submitted 2025-07-14 · 🪐 quant-ph

Clocking and controlling attosecond currents in a scanning tunnelling microscope

Daniel Davidovich , Boyang Ma , Adi Goldner , Shimon Cohen , Zhaopin Chen , Andrei G. Borisov , Michael Kr\"uger This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 04:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords attosecond currentsscanning tunnelling microscopytwo-colour laser pulsesnon-adiabatic tunnellingultrafast microscopylightwave electronicssub-cycle control
0
0 comments X

The pith

Two-colour laser pulses induce and directionally control attosecond tunnelling currents in an STM.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that two-colour laser pulses can create tunnelling currents in a scanning tunnelling microscope and steer their direction using only the electric-field waveform inside a single optical cycle. The authors combine measurements with one-electron and many-body models to identify a non-adiabatic three-step tunnelling process that produces current bursts lasting 860 attoseconds. The same setup delivers sub-angstrom topographic contrast and 2 nm lateral resolution while operating in ambient air without detectable thermal artifacts. A sympathetic reader would care because the result links atomic-scale spatial imaging with sub-cycle temporal control of electron flow, a step toward watching charge motion at the smallest lengths and shortest times.

Core claim

We induce STM tunnelling currents using two-colour laser pulses and dynamically control their direction, relying solely on the sub-cycle waveform of the pulses. Projecting our measurement data onto one-electron and many-body theory descriptions reveals a three-step transport process in the non-adiabatic tunnelling regime as the physical mechanism, with a theory-derived current burst duration of 860 as. Despite working under ambient conditions but free of thermal artifacts, we achieve sub-angström topographic sensitivity and a lateral spatial resolution of 2 nm. This capability to directionally control attosecond bursts will enable triggering and imaging ultrafast charge dynamics at the spa-t

What carries the argument

The sub-cycle electric-field waveform of two-colour laser pulses that drives directional non-adiabatic three-step tunnelling through the STM junction.

If this is right

  • The direction of the attosecond current bursts can be switched on demand by adjusting the two-colour waveform.
  • Theory predicts that each current burst lasts 860 attoseconds.
  • Sub-angstrom topographic sensitivity is retained during the light-driven operation.
  • Lateral spatial resolution of 2 nm is achieved under ambient conditions without thermal artifacts.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same waveform-control principle could be tested in other nanoscale junctions such as molecular break junctions or nanowire devices.
  • Combining the directional control with existing pump-probe schemes might allow attosecond-resolved maps of electron dynamics on surfaces.
  • If the three-step non-adiabatic mechanism generalises, similar current steering may become possible with single-colour pulses of different shapes.

Load-bearing premise

The observed current directionality and timing arise purely from the non-adiabatic three-step tunnelling process rather than from other optical or thermal effects that the laser pulses might also produce.

What would settle it

A measurement in which the relative phase of the two colours is varied while the current direction reverses exactly as predicted by the tunnelling model but not by any competing thermal or optical mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.10252 by Adi Goldner, Andrei G. Borisov, Boyang Ma, Daniel Davidovich, Michael Kr\"uger, Shimon Cohen, Zhaopin Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Ultrafast scanning tunnelling microscopy driven by two-colou [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Laser-induced currents in the tunnelling junction. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Power-scaling of the laser-induced current. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Tracing the attosecond dynamics in the STM junction. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantum tunnelling of electrons can be confined to the sub-cycle time scale of strong light fields, contributing decisively to the extreme time resolution of attosecond science. Because tunnelling also enables atomic-scale spatial resolution in scanning tunnelling microscopy (STM), integrating STM with light pulses has long been a key objective in ultrafast microscopy, spanning the picosecond and femtosecond domains, with first signatures of attosecond dynamics. However, while sub-cycle dynamics on the attosecond time scale are routinely controlled and determined with high precision, controlling the direction of attosecond currents and determining their duration have remained elusive in STM. Here, we induce STM tunnelling currents using two-colour laser pulses and dynamically control their direction, relying solely on the sub-cycle waveform of the pulses. Projecting our measurement data onto one-electron and many-body theory descriptions reveals a three-step transport process in the non-adiabatic tunnelling regime as the physical mechanism, with a theory-derived current burst duration of 860 as. Despite working under ambient conditions but free of thermal artifacts, we achieve sub-angstr\"om topographic sensitivity and a lateral spatial resolution of 2 nm. This unprecedented capability to directionally control attosecond bursts will enable triggering and imaging ultrafast charge dynamics at the spatio-temporal microscopy frontier of lightwave electronics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper demonstrates directional control of attosecond tunnelling currents in an STM using two-colour laser pulses. Data are projected onto one-electron and many-body models to identify a non-adiabatic three-step process with a theory-derived burst duration of 860 as, achieving sub-ångström sensitivity and 2 nm resolution under ambient conditions free of thermal artifacts.

Significance. If the mechanism attribution holds, this advances ultrafast STM by enabling attosecond temporal and atomic spatial resolution for charge dynamics in lightwave electronics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract claims data projection reveals the three-step mechanism and 860 as duration but omits quantitative details on model parameters, fitting procedure, and exclusion of alternatives like optical rectification or thermal effects. This is critical for validating the central claim.
  2. [Results] Specific controls are needed to confirm the experiment is free of thermal artifacts and that directionality arises solely from the non-adiabatic tunnelling trajectory rather than other waveform-induced effects.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Fix the typographic error in 'sub-angstr'om' to proper 'sub-ångström'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and for the constructive comments, which help us improve the clarity and robustness of the manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional details and controls as described.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The abstract claims data projection reveals the three-step mechanism and 860 as duration but omits quantitative details on model parameters, fitting procedure, and exclusion of alternatives like optical rectification or thermal effects. This is critical for validating the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract's brevity limits inclusion of all quantitative details. The model parameters for the one-electron and many-body descriptions, the fitting procedure to the measured phase-dependent currents, and the exclusion of alternatives (optical rectification ruled out by phase-reversal symmetry and lack of DC bias; thermal effects excluded by sub-cycle directionality and intensity-independent topography) are presented in the Theory, Results, and Supplementary Information sections. To improve accessibility, we will revise the abstract to include a brief reference to these validations while respecting length constraints. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Specific controls are needed to confirm the experiment is free of thermal artifacts and that directionality arises solely from the non-adiabatic tunnelling trajectory rather than other waveform-induced effects.

    Authors: The manuscript already demonstrates freedom from thermal artifacts through the observed reversal of current direction with the two-color carrier-envelope phase (inconsistent with thermal heating) and the absence of topographic changes with average power. Directionality is attributed to the non-adiabatic trajectory via direct projection of data onto the three-step model, which outperforms adiabatic or ponderomotive alternatives. However, we acknowledge that more explicit controls would strengthen the presentation. We will add a dedicated paragraph and supplementary figure in the revised Results section detailing power-dependence studies, single-color comparisons, and phase-sensitivity tests to further isolate the non-adiabatic tunnelling mechanism. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

860 as burst duration extracted by projecting measurement data onto one-electron/many-body models rather than independent first-principles prediction

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "Projecting our measurement data onto one-electron and many-body theory descriptions reveals a three-step transport process in the non-adiabatic tunnelling regime as the physical mechanism, with a theory-derived current burst duration of 860 as."

    The duration is labeled 'theory-derived' but is obtained only after fitting or projecting the experimental STM current measurements onto the same one-electron and many-body models; the extracted 860 as value is therefore statistically forced by the data-to-model match rather than an a priori prediction independent of those measurements.

full rationale

The paper's central claim of a theory-derived 860 as current burst duration rests on projecting the same experimental data onto the models to reveal the three-step non-adiabatic process. This makes the duration a fitted or matched output from the data rather than a standalone derivation, creating partial circularity in the attribution of timing and mechanism. No other self-definitional or self-citation reductions were identifiable from the provided text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of the one-electron and many-body theory descriptions to the measured currents and on the assumption that the two-colour waveform isolates the tunnelling contribution without thermal or other artifacts. No explicit free parameters or invented entities are named in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The observed current directionality and timing are governed by a three-step non-adiabatic tunnelling process that can be captured by one-electron and many-body theory models.
    Invoked when the abstract states that projecting data onto these descriptions reveals the physical mechanism.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5779 in / 1264 out tokens · 46464 ms · 2026-05-19T04:26:45.162386+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Ultrafast optically induced tunneling in narrow metallic gaps from the time dependent density functional perspective

    physics.optics 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    TDDFT simulations of ultrafast optical pulses in metallic nanogaps identify multi-photon assisted tunneling, its transition to field emission with increasing field strength, and reproduce experimental transport data u...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    J., Yakov lev, V., Kling, M

    Uiberacker, M., Uphues, T., Schultze, M., Verhoef, A. J., Yakov lev, V., Kling, M. F., Rauschenberger, J., Kabachnik, N. M., Schroder, H., Lezius, M., Komp a, K. L., Muller, H. G., Vrakking, M. J. J., Hendel, S., Kleineberg, U., Heinzmann, U., Dr escher, M. & Krausz, F. Attosecond real-time observation of electron tunnelling in atoms. Nature 446, 627–632 (2007)

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    D., Dagan, M., Mairesse, Y., Patchk ovskii, S., Ivanov, M

    Shafir, D., Soifer, H., Bruner, B. D., Dagan, M., Mairesse, Y., Patchk ovskii, S., Ivanov, M. Y., Smirnova, O. & Dudovich, N. Resolving the time when an electron exi ts a tunnelling barrier. Nature 485, 343–346 (2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Corkum, P. B. & Krausz, F. Attosecond science. Nat. Phys. 3, 381–387 (2007)

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    & Weibel, E

    Binnig, G., Rohrer, H., Gerber, C. & Weibel, E. Surface studies by scanning tunneling microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 57–61 (1982). 17

    work page 1982

  5. [5]

    L., Jelic, V., Gupta, M., Molesky, S

    Cocker, T. L., Jelic, V., Gupta, M., Molesky, S. J., Burgess, J. A. , Reyes, G. D. L., Titova, L. V., Tsui, Y. Y., Freeman, M. R. & Hegmann, F. A. An ultrafast terahertz scann ing tunnelling microscope. Nat. Photon. 7, 620–625 (2013)

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    L., Peller, D., Yu, P., Repp, J

    Cocker, T. L., Peller, D., Yu, P., Repp, J. & Huber, R. Tracking the ultrafast motion of a single molecule by femtosecond orbital imaging. Nature 539, 263–267 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [8]

    Kimura, K., Tamaki, R., Lee, M., Ouyang, X., Kusaba, S., Jaculbia, R. B. , Kawada, Y., Jung, J., Muranaka, A., Imada, H., Katayama, I., Takeda, J. & Kim, Y. Ultrafast on- demand exciton formation in a single-molecule junction by tailored terahertz pulses. Science 387, 1077–1082 (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [9]

    & Gerber, G

    Gerstner, V., Knoll, A., Pfeiffer, W., Thon, A. & Gerber, G. Femtos econd laser assisted scanning tunneling microscopy. J. Appl. Phys. 88, 4851 (2000)

    work page 2000

  9. [10]

    M., Whitmore, D

    Lee, J., Perdue, S. M., Whitmore, D. & Apkarian, V. A. Laser-induced s canning tunneling microscopy: Linear excitation of the junction plasmon. J. Chem. Phys. 133, 104706 (2010)

    work page 2010

  10. [11]

    Imaging surfaces at the space–time limit: New perspec tives of time-resolved scanning tunneling microscopy for ultrafast surface science

    M¨ uller, M. Imaging surfaces at the space–time limit: New perspec tives of time-resolved scanning tunneling microscopy for ultrafast surface science. Prog. Surf. Sci. 99, 100727 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [13]

    & Hommelhoff, P

    Kr¨ uger, M., Schenk, M. & Hommelhoff, P. Attosecond control of electr ons emitted from a nanoscale metal tip. Nature 475, 78–81 (2011)

    work page 2011

  12. [14]

    D., Uzan, A

    Pedatzur, O., Orenstein, G., Serbinenko, V., Soifer, H., Brune r, B. D., Uzan, A. J., Brambila, D. S., Harvey, A. G., Torlina, L., Morales, F., Smirnova, O. & Dudovich, N. Attosecond tunnelling interferometry. Nat. Phys. 11, 815––819 (2015)

    work page 2015

  13. [15]

    F., Knittel, V., Brida, D

    Rybka, T., Ludwig, M., Schmalz, M. F., Knittel, V., Brida, D. & Leit enstorfer, A. Sub-cycle optical phase control of nanotunnelling in the single-electron regime. Nat. Photon. 10, 667–680 (2016)

    work page 2016

  14. [16]

    C., Aizpurua, J., Borisov, A

    Ludwig, M., Aguirregabiria, G., Ritzkowsky, F., Rybka, T., Marinic a, D. C., Aizpurua, J., Borisov, A. G., Leitenstorfer, A. & Brida, D. Sub-femtosecond ele ctron transport in a nanoscale gap. Nat. Phys. 16, 341–345 (2020). 18

    work page 2020

  15. [17]

    R., Ritzkowsky, F., Turchetti, M., Yang, Y., Mor, D

    Bionta, M. R., Ritzkowsky, F., Turchetti, M., Yang, Y., Mor, D. C. , Putnam, W. P., K¨ artner, F. X., Berggren, K. K. & Keathley, P. D. On-chip sampling of optical fiel ds with attosecond resolution. Nat. Photon. 15, 456–460 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [18]

    Y., Garg, M., Mandal, S., Seiffert, L., Fennel, T

    Kim, H. Y., Garg, M., Mandal, S., Seiffert, L., Fennel, T. & Goulielmak is, E. Attosecond field emission. Nature 613, 662–666 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [19]

    & Hommelhoff, P

    Dienstbier, P., Seiffert, L., Paschen, T., Liehl, A., Leitenstor fer, A., Fennel, T. & Hommelhoff, P. Tracing attosecond electron emission from a nanometric metal tip. Nature 616, 702–706 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [20]

    & Stockman, M

    Krausz, F. & Stockman, M. I. Attosecond metrology: from electron capt ure to future signal processing. Nat. Photon. 8, 205–213 (2014)

    work page 2014

  19. [21]

    & Kira, M

    Borsch, M., Meierhofer, M., Huber, R. & Kira, M. Lightwave electr onics in condensed matter. Nat. Rev. Mater. 8, 668–687 (2023)

    work page 2023

  20. [22]

    Heide, C., Keathley, P. D. & Kling, M. F. Petahertz electronics. Nat. Rev. Phys. 6, 648–662 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [23]

    D., Ivanov, M

    Niikura, H., L´ eg´ are, F., Hasbani, R., Bandrauk, A. D., Ivanov, M. Y., Vil leneuve, D. M. & Corkum, P. B. Sub-laser-cycle electron pulses for probing molecul ar dynamics. Nature 417, 917–922 (2002)

    work page 2002

  22. [24]

    G., Wolter, B., Le, A.-T., Baudisch, M., Hemmer, M., S enftleben, A., Schr¨ oter, C

    Pullen, M. G., Wolter, B., Le, A.-T., Baudisch, M., Hemmer, M., S enftleben, A., Schr¨ oter, C. D., Ullrich, J., Moshammer, R., Lin, C.-D. & Biegert, J. Imaging an al igned polyatomic molecule with laser-induced electron diffraction. Nat. Commun. 6, 7262 (2015)

    work page 2015

  23. [25]

    E., Rathje, C., Yalunin, S

    Priebe, K. E., Rathje, C., Yalunin, S. V., Hohage, T., Feist, A., Sch ¨ afer, S. & Ropers, C. Attosecond electron pulse trains and quantum state reconstruction in ultrafast transmission electron microscopy. Nat. Photon. 11, 793–797 (2017)

    work page 2017

  24. [26]

    & Baum, P

    Nabben, D., Kuttruff, J., Stolz, L., Ryabov, A. & Baum, P. Attosecond e lectron microscopy of sub-cycle optical dynamics. Nature 619, 63–67 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [27]

    & Kern , K

    Garg, M., Martin-Jimenez, A., Pisarra, M., Luo, Y., Mart ´ ın, F. & Kern , K. Real-space subfemtosecond imaging of quantum electronic coherences in molecule s. Nat. Photon. 16, 196–202 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [28]

    M., Gourdon, A

    Repp, J., Meyer, G., Stojkovi´ c, S. M., Gourdon, A. & Joachim, C. Molecules on in- sulating films: Scanning-tunneling microscopy imaging of individual molecular orbitals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 026803 (2005). 19

    work page 2005

  27. [29]

    S., Scrinzi, A., H¨ ansch, T

    Baltuˇ ska, A., Udem, T., Uiberacker, M., Hentschel, M., Goulielmak is, E., Gohle, C., Holzwarth, R., Yakovlev, V. S., Scrinzi, A., H¨ ansch, T. W. & Krausz, F. Attosecond control of electronic processes by intense light fields. Nature 421, 611–616 (2003)

    work page 2003

  28. [30]

    G., Lindner, F., Walther, H

    Paulus, G. G., Lindner, F., Walther, H. & Miloˇ sevi´ c, D. Phase- controlled single-cycle strong- field photoionization. Physica Scripta T110, 120–125 (2004)

    work page 2004

  29. [31]

    J., Vogelsang, J., Gross, P ., Manzoni, C., Farinello, P., Cerullo, G

    Piglosiewicz, B., Schmidt, S., Park, D. J., Vogelsang, J., Gross, P ., Manzoni, C., Farinello, P., Cerullo, G. & Lienau, C. Carrier-envelope phase effects on the strong-fi eld photoemission of electrons from metallic nanostructures. Nat. Photon. 8, 37–42 (2014)

    work page 2014

  30. [32]

    & Garg, M

    Luo, Y., Martin-Jimenez, A., Neubrech, F., Liu, N. & Garg, M. Synthesi s and direct sampling of single-cycle light transients by electron tunneling in a nanode vice. ACS Photonics 10, 2866– 2873 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [33]

    & Yamashita, M

    Takeuchi, O., Aoyama, M., Oshima, R., Okada, Y., Oigawa, H., Sano, N., Shige kawa, H., Mota, R. & Yamashita, M. Probing subpicosecond dynamics using pulsed l aser combined scanning tunnelig microscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 3268–3270 (2004)

    work page 2004

  32. [34]

    P., Zahl, P., Sutter, P

    Dolocan, A., Acharya, D. P., Zahl, P., Sutter, P. & Camillone, N. Two-col or ultrafast pho- toexcited scanning tunneling microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 10033–10043 (2011)

    work page 2011

  33. [35]

    Schr¨ oder, B., Bunjes, O., Wimmer, L., Kaiser, K., Traeger, G. A. , Kotzott, T., Ropers, C. & Wenderoth, M. Controlling photocurrent channels in scanning t unneling microscopy. New J. Phys. 22, 033047 (2020)

    work page 2020

  34. [36]

    Heimerl, J., Higuchi, T., Ammon, M., Schneider, M. A. & Hommelhoff, P. Gap-size depen- dence of optical near fields in a variable nanoscale two-tip junction. Phys. Rev. B 101, 125403 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [37]

    & Pfeiffer, W

    Gerstner, V., Thon, A. & Pfeiffer, W. Thermal effects in pulsed las er assisted scanning tunneling microscopy. J. Appl. Phys. 87, 2574–2580 (2000)

    work page 2000

  36. [38]

    W., Weihe, F., Muller, H

    Schumacher, D. W., Weihe, F., Muller, H. G. & Bucksbaum, P. H. Ph ase dependence of intense field ionization: A study using two colors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1344–1347 (1994)

    work page 1994

  37. [39]

    Y., Villeneuve, D

    Dudovich, N., Smirnova, O., Levesque, J., Mairesse, Y., Ivanov, M. Y., Villeneuve, D. M. & Corkum, P. B. Measuring and controlling the birth of attosecond XUV pulse s. Nat. Phys. 2, 781–786 (2006)

    work page 2006

  38. [40]

    R., Orlando, G., Corkum, P

    Vampa, G., McDonald, C. R., Orlando, G., Corkum, P. B. & Brabec, T. Se miclassical analysis of high harmonic generation in bulk crystals. Phys. Rev. B 91, 064302 (2015). 20

    work page 2015

  39. [41]

    , Libisch, F., Madlener, T., Burgd¨ orfer, J

    F¨ orster, M., Paschen, T., Kr¨ uger, M., Lemell, C., Wachter, G. , Libisch, F., Madlener, T., Burgd¨ orfer, J. & Hommelhoff, P. Two-color coherent control of femtosecond ab ove-threshold photoemission from a tungsten nanotip. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 217601 (2016)

    work page 2016

  40. [42]

    T., Tallarida, N

    Lee, J., Crampton, K. T., Tallarida, N. & Apkarian, V. A. Visualizing vibrat ional normal modes of a single molecule with atomically confined light. Nature 568, 78–82 (2019)

    work page 2019

  41. [43]

    A., Gerasi menko, Y

    Siday, T., Hayes, J., Schiegl, F., Sandner, F., Menden, P., Be rgbauer, V., Zizlsperger, M., Nerreter, S., Lingl, S., Repp, J., Wilhelm, J., Huber, M. A., Gerasi menko, Y. A. & Huber, R. All-optical subcycle microscopy on atomic length scales. Nature 629, 329–334 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [45]

    G., Ma, B., Zapata-Herrera, M., Babaze, A., Kr¨ uger, M

    Borisov, A. G., Ma, B., Zapata-Herrera, M., Babaze, A., Kr¨ uger, M. & Aizp urua, J. Fem- tosecond optical-field-driven currents in few-nanometer-size gaps with hot electron injection into metallic leads. ACS Photon. 12, 2137–2150 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [48]

    Bormann, R., Gulde, M., Weismann, A., Yalunin, S. V. & Ropers, C. Ti p-enhanced strong- field photoemission. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 147601 (2010)

    work page 2010

  44. [49]

    E., R´ acz, P., Lenner, M., Kro´ o, N., Farkas, G., Mitrofanov, A., Baltuˇ ska, A., Fuji, T., Krausz, F

    Dombi, P., Irvine, S. E., R´ acz, P., Lenner, M., Kro´ o, N., Farkas, G., Mitrofanov, A., Baltuˇ ska, A., Fuji, T., Krausz, F. & Elezzabi, A. Y. Observation of few-cycle, st rong-field phenomena in surface plasmon fields. Opt. Express 18, 24206 (2010)

    work page 2010

  45. [50]

    Yudin, G. L. & Ivanov, M. Y. Nonadiabatic tunnel ionization: Looking insi de a laser cycle. Phys. Rev. A 64, 013409 (2001)

    work page 2001

  46. [51]

    J., Ore nstein, G., Bruner, B

    Kneller, O., Azoury, D., Federman, Y., Kr¨ uger, M., Uzan, A. J., Ore nstein, G., Bruner, B. D., Smirnova, O., Patchkovskii, S., Ivanov, M. & Dudovich, N. A look un der the tunnelling barrier via attosecond-gated interferometry. Nat. Photon. 16, 304–310 (2022)

    work page 2022

  47. [52]

    & Leitenstorfer, A

    Brida, D., Krauss, G., Sell, A. & Leitenstorfer, A. Ultrabroadband Er: fiber lasers. Laser Photonics Rev. 8, 409–428 (2014)

    work page 2014

  48. [53]

    & Pokroy, B

    Borukhin, S., Saguy, C., Koifman, M. & Pokroy, B. Self-ordered vic inal-surface-like nanosteps at the thin metal-film/substrate interface. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 12149–12155 (2012). 21 Supplementary Information: Clocking and controlling attosecond currents in a scanning tunnelling microscope Daniel Davidovich, 1, 2, 3, ∗ Boyang Ma, 1, 2, 3, ∗ Adi Goldner, 1...

    work page 2012

  49. [54]

    1 = 0 . 32. F. Numerical integration of the TDSE (nTDSE) We solve the TDSE numerically using the Crank–Nicolson metho d. If the wavefunction at the initial time t0 is known as Ψ( z, t 0), then the propagated wavefunction at the next infinitesimal time t0 + dt is Ψ( z, t 0 + dt) = exp[ − i ℏ H(z, t 0)dt]Ψ( z, t 0). (S10) Consequently, the wavefunction at an...

    work page

  50. [55]

    & Kern, K

    Garg, M. & Kern, K. Attosecond coherent manipulation of electrons in t unneling microscopy. Science 367, 411–415 (2020)

    work page 2020

  51. [56]

    & Takeda, J

    Yoshioka, K., Katayama, I., Minami, Y., Kitajima, M., Yoshida, S., Shi gekawa, H. & Takeda, J. Real-space coherent manipulation of electrons in a single tunnel ju nction by single-cycle terahertz electric fields. Nat. Photon. 10, 762–765 (2016)

    work page 2016

  52. [57]

    Simmons, J. G. Potential barriers and emission-limited current flow between closely spaced parallel metal electrodes. J. Appl. Phys. 35, 2472–2481 (1964)

    work page 1964

  53. [58]

    & Kern, K

    Garg, M., Martin-Jimenez, A., Luo, Y. & Kern, K. Ultrafast photon-induc ed tunneling mi- croscopy. ACS Nano 15, 18071–18084 (2021)

    work page 2021

  54. [59]

    Keldysh, L. V. Ionization in the field of a strong electromagnetic wave . Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 1307–1314 (1965)

    work page 1965

  55. [60]

    & Kr¨ uger, M

    Ma, B. & Kr¨ uger, M. Strong-field theory of attosecond tunneling micr oscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 236901 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [61]

    & Kr¨ uger, M

    Ma, B. & Kr¨ uger, M. Robust strong-field theory model for ultrafast el ectron transport through metal-insulator-metal tunneling nanojunctions (2025). arXiv:2503.14531

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [62]

    & Scroggs, M

    Betcke, T. & Scroggs, M. W. Bempp-cl: A fast Python based just-in- time compiling boundary element library. Journal of Open Source Software 6, 2879 (2021). 13

    work page 2021