Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Implications of the recent neutron decay measurements on the properties of compact objects -- a dark star with nucleonic shell ?

T0 review · 1 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Recent neutron-lifetime measurements are used to argue that neutron stars are dark stars wrapped in a nucleonic shell.

desk verdict Novel dark-decay chain for the neutron puzzle, but a chemical-equilibrium error undercuts the central 'dark star with nucleonic shell' result. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.17340 v1 pith:BAS7T2MJ submitted 2025-07-23 nucl-th astro-ph.HEhep-ph

M.Veselský , V. Petousis , Ch.C. Moustakidis , M. Vikiaris This is my paper
classification nucl-thastro-ph.HEhep-ph
keywords neutronstarsequationofstatedecayanomalydarkmatterlifetimepuzzlestartidaldeformability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Recent neutron-lifetime experiments disagree: bottle storage gives 878.4±0.5 s, while beam experiments counting protons give 888.0±2.0 s. A newer measurement that counts electrons gives 877.2±1.7 s, which the paper reads as evidence that every decay emits an electron but about 1% of decays emit no proton. To make that kinematically possible the paper proposes a dark decay chain producing two neutral dark-matter particles of roughly half the neutron mass plus a positron, and it tests the consequences for neutron-star structure. Solving the equations of stellar structure with chemical equilibrium between nucleons and dark fermions, the paper finds that only dark-fermion masses around 370–400 MeV with a vector coupling close to the nuclear value satisfy all compact-object constraints. If this scenario is right, neutron stars are mostly dark fermionic matter wrapped in a nucleonic shell, with an equation of state so similar to normal nuclear matter that astrophysical observations may not tell the two apart.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the chemical-equilibrium condition $\mu_n = n\mu_D+\mu_e$ with $n=2$, combined with $\beta$ equilibrium $\mu_n-\mu_p=\mu_e$ and charge neutrality, which fixes how many nucleons are replaced by dark fermions at every density. The dark matter is a zero-temperature Fermi gas with degeneracy $\gamma=2$ and a repulsive interaction mediated by a dark vector boson, so its energy density and pressure contain a $g_{vD}^2 n_D^2/(2m_{vD}^2 c^2)$ term in addition to the Fermi-gas integral, mirroring the relativistic mean-field treatment used for the nucleonic equation of state in Table 1. These two fluids are fed into the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations, and the resulting mass-radius curves and tidal deformabilities are what get compared with the observational constraints. The named output is a dark star with a nucleonic shell: dark matter dominates the low- and high-density regions while ordinary nucleonic matter forms a shell near saturation density.

What would settle it

A beam experiment with coincidence detection for positively charged particles would settle it: finding the predicted wide-angle positron in about 1% of electron-tagged decays would support the dark decay chain, while finding none would reduce the lifetime gap to a systematic and remove the dark-star scenario.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the neutron decay puzzle is better read as a missing-proton puzzle after the beam experiment that counted electrons returned $877.2\pm1.7$ s while the beam experiments that counted protons gave $888.0\pm2.0$ s. The paper constructs a decay chain, $n\to X^+ + e^- + \bar\nu$ followed by $X^+\to 2A^0 + e^+$, in which $X^+$ is a short-lived charged dark fermion and $A^0$ is a neutral dark fermion with mass $m_D$ around half the neutron mass; the positron takes the positive charge out of the detector acceptance and later annihilates. This chain explicitly abandons baryon-number conservation in the 1% branch. Imposing chemical equilibrium $\mu_n=2\mu_D+\mu_e$ together with $\beta$ equilibrium and charge neutrality on a relativistic mean-field nucleonic equation of state with an added repulsive dark-vector interaction, and solving the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations, the paper claims that only $m_D\simeq370$–$400$ MeV and $g_{vD}/m_{vD}\simeq0.01$–$0.015$ MeV$^{-1}$ survive the $2\,M_\odot$ maximum-mass, radius, and tidal-deformability constraints. In that region the dark fraction replaces nucleons at low density, dips near saturation, and rises again at high density, so the star has a dark core, a nucleonic shell around saturation density, and a dark surface, with an equation of state almost indistinguishable from the ordinary nucleonic one.

Load-bearing premise

The entire scenario rests on interpreting the roughly 10-second gap between the electron-counting and proton-counting beam lifetimes as a real 1% decay branch in which an electron is emitted without a proton, rather than as an experimental systematic.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The viable dark fermion has mass roughly $370$–$400$ MeV and vector coupling $g_{vD}/m_{vD}\simeq0.01$–$0.015$ MeV$^{-1}$, close to the values for nucleonic matter, which is why the combined equation of state stays almost identical to the purely nucleonic one.
  • In the successful case, dark matter replaces nucleons at low density, reaches a minimum near saturation, and dominates again at high density, producing a dark core, a nucleonic shell, and a dark surface.
  • The same constraints exclude the non-interacting dark Fermi gas: without the repulsive vector term the maximum mass falls below $2\,M_\odot$.
  • The allowed mass-radius curves and tidal deformabilities are compatible with current pulsar and gravitational-wave measurements, so these observations alone cannot rule the dark star in or out.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: If the missing-proton branch is real, the positron produced in each dark decay annihilates with an electron, depositing energy and changing the thermal budget of old neutron stars; surface-temperature observations could test this even though the paper does not calculate cooling curves.
  • Inference: A 370–400 MeV fermion with a vector self-interaction comparable to nuclear matter is also a candidate for self-interacting dark matter, so dwarf-galaxy structure observations could independently probe the same mass-coupling region.
  • Inference: The scenario requires baryon-number violation at the roughly 1% level in neutron decay; if confirmed, this would feed into nucleosynthesis and baryogenesis models, a connection the paper leaves open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper interprets the recent J-PARC electron-counting neutron lifetime measurement together with the older beam proton-counting result as possible evidence that in about 1% of neutron decays an electron is emitted without a proton. The authors construct a phenomenological decay chain n -> X+ + e- + nu, X+ -> 2 A0 + e+, with e+ annihilating on an ambient electron, leaving two dark fermions A0 of mass near half the neutron mass. They then study neutron stars containing such dark fermions, using an RMF nucleonic equation of state plus a vector-interacting Fermi gas of dark matter, imposing chemical equilibrium, charge neutrality, and beta equilibrium. Solving the TOV equations, they find that only a narrow range of dark matter mass and vector coupling (about m_D = 390-460 MeV and g_vD/m_vD = 0.015-0.035 MeV^-1, with the most successful case m_D = 400 MeV, g_vD/m_vD = 0.015 MeV^-1) satisfies the 2-solar-mass, NICER radius, and GW170817 tidal deformability constraints. The resulting mass-radius and tidal deformability curves are close to those of ordinary neutron stars, and the DM fraction profile leads the authors to conclude that the compact object is mostly dark matter with a nucleonic shell around nuclear saturation density.

Significance. If the underlying dark-decay interpretation of the neutron lifetime discrepancy is correct and the structure calculation were valid, the paper would present an interesting scenario linking a terrestrial particle-physics anomaly to the internal composition of compact objects. The paper has the merit of using standard TOV machinery and comparing against current astrophysical constraints, and it explicitly states the conditional nature of the experimental premise. However, as detailed below, the central calculation contains a load-bearing error in the chemical equilibrium condition, so the claimed 'dark star with nucleonic shell' structure is not established by the present analysis.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (1)] The chemical equilibrium condition in Eq. (1), mu_n = n*mu_D + mu_e-, is incorrect for the proposed decay chain. In the overall process n -> X+ + e- + nu followed by X+ -> 2 A0 + e+ and e+ + e- -> gamma gamma, the electron number is conserved: one electron is created in the first step and one electron is annihilated with the positron in the final step. The net reaction is therefore n -> 2 A0 + nu (for n = 2), and the equilibrium condition should be mu_n = n*mu_D, with no electron chemical potential. The printed Eq. (1), when combined with the beta-equilibrium condition Eq. (2) (mu_n - mu_p = mu_e-), implies mu_p = n*mu_D, which has no physical basis for this chain. In neutron-star matter mu_e- is typically tens of MeV, so the resulting DM chemical potential, the DM fraction profile in Fig. 3, and consequently the mass-radius and tidal deformability curves in Figs. 1 and 4 are all shifted. Since the central structural conclusion of a dark star with a nucleonic shell is derived directly from that DM fraction profile, the calculation as presented does not establish the claimed structure. The authors should recompute the equilibrium composition with mu_n = 2*mu_D (or the appropriate n) and check whether the shell structure and the allowed parameter region survive.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 2 and throughout] The units of the coupling ratio are inconsistent: the text uses both MeV^-1 (e.g., 'gvD/mvD=0.015 MeV^-1') and MeV^-2 (e.g., 'typical value 0.02 MeV^-2 for nucleonic matter' and the axis label style in Fig. 2). Please unify the notation and specify the dimensions of g_vD and m_vD.
  2. [Section 4, Conclusions] The conclusions state 'Constraints on mass and coupling to scalar field are obtained,' but the model uses a vector boson mediator; this appears to be a typo and should read 'vector field.'
  3. [Section 2, paragraph 2] The interpretation of the J-PARC and beam results as implying a 1% proton-less decay branch is explicitly conditional in the text ('appears to mean', 'if one considers also the results with counting protons as correct'). This conditionality should be stated more prominently in the abstract and conclusions, since the entire scenario depends on it.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the dark-star-with-shell structure is a derived consequence of the assumed equilibrium condition and an externally constrained EOS, not an input to the calculation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: adopt the J-PARC electron-counting result and the beam proton-counting result as evidence of a rare dark decay (conditional in the text); write chemical equilibrium conditions as Eqs. (1)-(2); choose an RMF nucleonic EOS with parameters from Ref. [33]; add a dark Fermi gas with vector repulsion; solve for the DM fraction; compute TOV mass-radius and tidal deformability; compare with NICER and GW170817 constraints to select mD and gvD/mvD; and then read off the shell structure from the DM-fraction profile. None of these steps reduces to its inputs by construction. The DM fraction is not fitted to the final mass-radius/tidal data; rather, the model parameters are varied and the resulting EOS is confronted with external constraints. The shell structure is a derived feature of the resulting equilibrium composition, not an assumed output. The EOS parameters from the authors' earlier work [33,34] are reused, but the nucleonic EOS is independently checked against the 2 solar mass, NICER, and GW170817 constraints, so the self-citation is not load-bearing for the central claim. The possible objection that Eq. (1) should instead read mu_n = 2 mu_D for the net process is a physics-correctness concern about the equilibrium condition, not a circularity: the dark-star structure is not inserted into Eq. (1) but emerges from solving it. Therefore no circular step is exhibited, and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The model relies on the dark-decay interpretation of the neutron anomaly, a specific RMF nucleonic EOS, a fermionic DM sector with vector repulsion, and chemical equilibrium conditions. The DM mass and coupling are fitted to NS observations, so they are free parameters, not outputs.

free parameters (2)
  • m_D (dark matter particle mass) = 370-400 MeV (scan 300-460 MeV)
    Varied and then constrained by NS mass-radius and tidal deformability observations; not derived.
  • g_vD/m_vD (vector coupling to boson mass) = 0.01-0.015 MeV^-1 (scan 0-0.1)
    Varied and constrained by NS observations together with astronomical and DAMIC-M bounds; not derived.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The neutron decay puzzle is physical: J-PARC electron counting and beam proton counting imply a dark decay branch with an electron but no proton in ~1% of decays.
    Section 2, paragraph 2; the paper explicitly conditions this on 'if one considers also the results with counting protons as correct'.
  • domain assumption Baryon number is not conserved in the proposed decay chain.
    Section 2, 'Obviously baryonic number is not conserved in such neutron decay'.
  • domain assumption Dark matter particles are fermions with degeneracy gamma=2 and repulsive vector interaction mediated by a dark boson.
    Eqs. (3)-(4); this is a model choice.
  • domain assumption Chemical equilibrium condition mu_n = 2 mu_D + mu_e and beta equilibrium mu_n - mu_p = mu_e hold in the star.
    Eqs. (1)-(2); treat matter as a single fluid. The inclusion of mu_e in Eq. (1) is questionable.
  • domain assumption The RMF EOS parameters in Table 1 correctly describe pure nucleonic matter.
    Taken from ref. [33] (authors' prior work), used to construct the nucleonic EOS.
  • domain assumption The observational constraints (max mass > 2 M_sun, NICER radii, GW170817 tidal deformability) are valid.
    Used as external benchmarks in Sec. 3.
invented entities (3)
  • X+ (short-lived dark charged fermion)
    purpose: Intermediate state in neutron decay that produces a positron and two dark particles, evading detection of the missing charge.
    Inferred solely to make the decay chain kinematically compatible with J-PARC; no direct experimental handle offered.
  • A0 (dark fermion, the dark matter particle) independent evidence
    purpose: Final stable dark decay product making up the dark star; mass about half the neutron mass.
    Mass range 370-400 MeV is constrained by NS observations and could be probed by other DM experiments; the paper's Figure 2 provides a falsifiable parameter region.
  • Dark vector boson (mediator of repulsive DM self-interaction) independent evidence
    purpose: Provides repulsive pressure in DM EOS (Eqs. 3-4) and is constrained by SIDM and DAMIC-M bounds.
    The coupling/mass ratio is constrained by cosmological and direct-detection observations cited in the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Implications of the recent neutron decay measurements on the properties of compact objects -- a dark star with nucleonic shell ?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BAS7T2MJ

@misc{pith2026250717340,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Implications of the recent neutron decay measurements on the properties of compact objects -- a dark star with nucleonic shell ?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BAS7T2MJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.17340}
}
read the original abstract

Recent experimental observation suggests that neutron decay is always accompanied by emission of electron while in 1% of cases proton is not emitted. We develop a scenario kinematically compatible with experimental observation, where neutron decay results in production of two dark matter particles of about half the mass of neutron and test properties of neutron stars with admixture of such particles. Constraints on mass and coupling to vector dark boson are obtained. The structure of the compact object is modified to a dark star with a shell of nucleonic matter around the nuclear saturation density.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.17340 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Mass-radius plots for several values of m [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Combinations of DM particle mass mD and gvD/mvD fulfilling the NS constraints. The nucleonic EOS can be chosen requiring to fulfill usual constraints such as allowing to exceed maximum NS mass of 2 M⊙ and fit within the range of radius at 1.4 M⊙ within constraints given by recent measurements by NICER or extracted from the observation of gravitational wave signal from GW170817 bi￾nary NS merger [32]. In particular, … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (Left) Equation of state with DM particle mass m [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (Left) Mass-radius diagram for mD=400 MeV, gvD/mvD=0.015 MeV−1 (solid line) compared to initial EOS from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Neutron Dark Decay in Neutron Stars: The Role of the Symmetry Energy

    nucl-th 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A parameter study of beta-stable neutron star matter with neutron dark decay shows the symmetry energy and dark-sector interactions jointly set radii and tidal deformability, keeping the decay scenario compatible with...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [33]

    Constraints for the X17 boson from compact objects observations

    A. Kanakis-Pegios, V . Petousis, M. Veselský, J. Leja, C.C. Moustakidis, "Constraints for the X17 boson from compact objects observations", Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 043028,https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.043028

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.043028 2024

  2. [1]

    Neutron’s Dark Secret

    B. Fornal and B. Grinstein, "Neutron’s Dark Secret", Mod. Phys. Lett. A 35, 2030019 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [2]

    Neutron to dark matter decay in neutron stars

    T.F. Motta, P.A.M. Guichon, and A.W. Thomas, "Neutron to dark matter decay in neutron stars", Int. Journ. Mod. Phys. A 33, 1844020 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [3]

    Implications of neutron star properties for the existence of light dark matter

    T.F. Motta, P.A.M. Guichon, and A.W. Thomas, "Implications of neutron star properties for the existence of light dark matter", J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 45 05LT01 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [4]

    Consequences of neutron decay inside neutron stars

    W. Husain, T.F. Motta, and A.W. Thomas, "Consequences of neutron decay inside neutron stars", JCAP 10, 028 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [5]

    Novel neutron decay mode inside neutron stars

    W. Husain and and A.W. Thomas, "Novel neutron decay mode inside neutron stars", J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 50 015202 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [6]

    Examining dark neutron decay using f-mode gravitational waves

    W. Husain, "Examining dark neutron decay using f-mode gravitational waves", arXiv:2505.17355 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  8. [7]

    R-modes as a New Probe of Dark Matter in Neutron Stars

    S. Shirke, S. Ghosh, D. Chatterjee, L. Saunsi, and J.S. Bielich, "R-modes as a New Probe of Dark Matter in Neutron Stars", JCAP 12, 008 (2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 40 references
  1. [8]

    Neutron Decay Anomaly and Its Effects on Neutron Star Properties

    H.C. Das and G.F. Burgio, "Neutron Decay Anomaly and Its Effects on Neutron Star Properties", Universe 11, 159 (2025)

    2025

  2. [9]

    Neutron oscillations for solving neutron lifetime and dark matter puzzles

    W. Tan, "Neutron oscillations for solving neutron lifetime and dark matter puzzles", Phys. Lett. B 797, 134921 (2019)

    2019

  3. [10]

    Dark decay of the neutron

    J.M. Cline and J. M. Cornell, "Dark decay of the neutron", J. High Energy Phys. 07, 081 (2018)

    2018

  4. [11]

    Consequences of neutron decay inside neutron stars

    W. Husain, T.F. Motta, and A.W. Thomas, "Consequences of neutron decay inside neutron stars", JCAP10, 028 (2022)

    2022

  5. [12]

    Dark matter implications of the neutron anomaly

    L. Darini, "Dark matter implications of the neutron anomaly", Eur. Phys. J. C 83:364 (2023)

    2023

  6. [13]

    Dark Matter interpretation of the neutron decay anomaly

    A. Strumia, "Dark Matter interpretation of the neutron decay anomaly", JHEP 02 067 (2022)

    2022

  7. [14]

    Neutron disappearance inside the nucleus

    H. Ejiri and J.D. Vergados, "Neutron disappearance inside the nucleus", J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 46 025104 (2019)

    2019

  8. [15]

    Neutron dark matter decays and correlation coefficients of neutronβ− decays

    A.N. Ivanov, R.Hollwieser, N.I. Troitskaya, M. Wellenzohn, and Ya.A. Berdnikov, "Neutron dark matter decays and correlation coefficients of neutronβ− decays", Nucl. Phys. B 938 114 (2019)

    2019

  9. [16]

    Measurement of the neutron life-time using a gravitational trap and a low-temperature Fomblin coating

    A. Serebrov, V . Varlamov, A. Kharitonov, A. Fomin, Y . Pokotilovski, P. Geltenbort, J. Butterworth, I. Krasnoschekova, M. Lasakov, R. Tal’Daev, A. Vassiljev, and O. Zherebtsov, "Measurement of the neutron life-time using a gravitational trap and a low-temperature Fomblin coat...

    2005

  10. [17]

    Neu- tron lifetime measurement with the UCN trap-in-trap MAMBO II

    A. Pichlmaier, V . Varlamov, K. Schreckenbach, and P. Geltenbort, "Neu- tron lifetime measurement with the UCN trap-in-trap MAMBO II", Phys. Lett. B 693, 221 (2010)

    2010

  11. [18]

    Quasielastic scattering in the interaction of ultracold neutrons with a liquid wall and application in a reanalysis of the Mambo I neutron-lifetime experiment

    A. Steyerl, J. Pendlebury, C. Kaufman, S. S. Malik, and A. Desai, "Quasielastic scattering in the interaction of ultracold neutrons with a liquid wall and application in a reanalysis of the Mambo I neutron-lifetime experiment", Phys. Rev. C: Nucl. Phys. 85, 065503 (2012)

    2012

  12. [19]

    A measurement of the neutron lifetime us- ing the method of storage of ultracold neutrons and detection of inelastically up-scattered neutrons

    S. Arzumanov, L. Bondarenko, S. Chernyavsky, P. Gel- tenbort, V . Mo- rozov, V . Nesvizhevsky, Y . Panin, and A. Strepetov, "A measurement of the neutron lifetime us- ing the method of storage of ultracold neutrons and detection of inelastically up-scattered neutrons", Phys. L...

    2015

  13. [20]

    Neutron lifetime measurements with a large gravitational trap for ultracold neutrons

    A. P. Serebrov, E. A. Kolomensky, A. K. Fomin, I. A. Krasnoshchekova, A. V . Vassiljev, D. M. Prudnikov, I. V . Shoka, A. V . Chechkin, M. E. Chaikovskiy, V . E. Varlamov, et al., "Neutron lifetime measurements with a large gravitational trap for ultracold neutrons", Phys. Rev...

    2018

  14. [21]

    Measurement of the neutron lifetime using a magneto-gravitational trap and in situ detection

    R. W. Pattie, N. B. Callahan, C. Cude-Woods, E. R. Adamek, L. J. Brous- sard, S. M. Clayton, S. A. Currie, E. B. Dees, X. Ding, E. M. Engel, et al., "Measurement of the neutron lifetime using a magneto-gravitational trap and in situ detection", Science 360, 627 (2018)

    2018

  15. [22]

    Measurement of the neutron lifetime with ultracold neutrons stored in a magneto-gravitational trap

    V . F. Ezhov, A. Andreev, G. Ban, B. Bazarov, P. Gel- tenbort, A. Glushkov, V . Knyazkov, N. A. Kovrizhnykh, G. Krygin, O. Naviliat-Cuncic, et al., "Measurement of the neutron lifetime with ultracold neutrons stored in a magneto-gravitational trap", JETP Lett. 107, 671 (2018)

    2018

  16. [23]

    Improved neutron lifetime measurement with UCNτ

    F. M. Gonzalez, E. Fries, C. Cude-Woods, T. Bailey, M. Blatnik, L. Brous- sard, N. Callahan, J. Choi, S. Clayton, S. Currie, et al. (UCNτ Collabora- tion), "Improved neutron lifetime measurement with UCNτ", Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 162501 (2021)

    2021

  17. [24]

    A revised value for the neutron life-time measured using a Penning trap

    J. Byrne, P. Dawber, C. G. Habeck, S. J. Smidt, J. Spain, and A. P. Williams, "A revised value for the neutron life-time measured using a Penning trap", Europhys. Lett. 33, 187 (1996)

    1996

  18. [25]

    Improved Determination of the Neutron Lifetime

    A. T. Yue, M. S. Dewey, D. M. Gilliam, G. L. Greene, A. B. Laptev, J. S. Nico, W. M. Snow, and F. E. Wietfeldt, "Improved Determination of the Neutron Lifetime", Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 222501 (2013)

    2013

  19. [26]

    Dark Matter Interpretation of the Neutron Decay Anomaly

    B. Fornal and B. Grinstein, "Dark Matter Interpretation of the Neutron Decay Anomaly", Phys. Rev. D 120, 191801, (2018)

    2018

  20. [27]

    Testing Dark Decays of Baryons in Neutron Stars

    G. Baym, D.H. Beck, P. Geltenbort, and J. Shelton, "Testing Dark Decays of Baryons in Neutron Stars", Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 061801 (2018)

    2018

  21. [28]

    Neutron Stars Exclude Light Dark Baryons

    D. McKeen, A.E. Nelson, S. Reddy and D. Zhou, "Neutron Stars Exclude Light Dark Baryons", Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 061802 (2018)

    2018

  22. [29]

    Neutron Star Stability in Light of the Neutron Decay Anomaly

    B. Grinstein, "Neutron Star Stability in Light of the Neutron Decay Anomaly", Phys.Rev.Lett. 123, 091601 (2019)

    2019

  23. [30]

    Neutron decay anomaly, neutron stars, and dark matter

    M. Bastero-Gil, T. Huertas-Roldán, D. Santos, "Neutron decay anomaly, neutron stars, and dark matter" Phys. Rev. D. 10, 083003 (2024)

    2024

  24. [31]

    Improved measurements of neutron lifetime with cold neutron beam at J-PARC

    Y . Fuwa, T. Hasegawa, K. Hirota, T. Hoshino, R. Hosokawa, G. Ichikawa, S. Ieki, T. Ino, Y . Iwashita, M. Kitaguchi, R. Kitahara, S. Makise, K. Mishima, T. Mogi, N. Nagakura, H. Oide, H. Okabe, H. Otono, Y . Seki, D. Sekiba, T. Shima, H. E. Shimizu, H. M. Shimizu, N. Sumi, H. ...

    arXiv

  25. [32]

    Properties of the Binary Neutron Star Merger GW170817

    B.P. Abbott, et al., "Properties of the Binary Neutron Star Merger GW170817", Phys. Rev X. 9, 011001 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    How the HESS J1731-347 object could be explained using K- condensa- tion

    M. Veselský, P.S. Koliogiannis, V . Petousis, J. Leja, Ch.C. Moustakidis, "How the HESS J1731-347 object could be explained using K- condensa- tion", Phys. Lett. B 860, 139185 (2025)

    2025

  27. [35]

    Probing Benchmark Models of Hidden-Sector Dark Matter with DAMIC-M

    K.Aggarwal et al., "Probing Benchmark Models of Hidden-Sector Dark Matter with DAMIC-M", arxiv.org:2503.14617

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Cores in Dwarf Galaxies from Dark Matter with a Yukawa Potential

    A. Loeb, N. Weiner, "Cores in Dwarf Galaxies from Dark Matter with a Yukawa Potential", Phys. Rev. Lett., 106, 171302 (2011)

    2011

  29. [37]

    Dark Matter Halos as Particle Collid- ers: Unified Solution to Small-Scale Structure Puzzles from Dwarfs to Clusters

    M. Kaplinghat, S. Tulin, H.B.Yu, "Dark Matter Halos as Particle Collid- ers: Unified Solution to Small-Scale Structure Puzzles from Dwarfs to Clusters", Phys. Rev. Lett., 116, 041302 (2016)

    2016

  30. [38]

    Velocity- dependent self-interacting dark matter from groupsand clusters of galax- ies

    L. Sagunski, S. Gad-Nasr, B. Colquhoun, A. Robertson, S. Tulin, "Velocity- dependent self-interacting dark matter from groupsand clusters of galax- ies", J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2021, 024 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Constraints on the Self-Interaction Cross Section of Dark Matter from Numerical Simulations of the Merging Galaxy Cluster 1E 0657–56

    S.W. Randall, M. Markevitch, D. Clowe, A.H. Gonzalez, M. Brada ˇc, "Constraints on the Self-Interaction Cross Section of Dark Matter from Numerical Simulations of the Merging Galaxy Cluster 1E 0657–56", As- trophys. J., 679, 1173 (2008)

    2008

  32. [40]

    Dark and Luminos Matter in Things Dwarf Galaxies

    S.H. Oh, W.J.G. de Blok, E. Brinks, F. Walter, R.C. Kennicutt, "Dark and Luminos Matter in Things Dwarf Galaxies", Astron. J, 141, 193 (2011). 5

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.