Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

AccessGuru: Leveraging LLMs to Detect and Correct Web Accessibility Violations in HTML Code

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2507.19549 v1 pith:IM4LHI5D submitted 2025-07-24 cs.SE cs.AI

classification cs.SEcs.AI
keywords accessibilityviolationsaccessgurubenchmarkcorrectdetectautomaticallycategories
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The vast majority of Web pages fail to comply with established Web accessibility guidelines, excluding a range of users with diverse abilities from interacting with their content. Making Web pages accessible to all users requires dedicated expertise and additional manual efforts from Web page providers. To lower their efforts and promote inclusiveness, we aim to automatically detect and correct Web accessibility violations in HTML code. While previous work has made progress in detecting certain types of accessibility violations, the problem of automatically detecting and correcting accessibility violations remains an open challenge that we address. We introduce a novel taxonomy classifying Web accessibility violations into three key categories - Syntactic, Semantic, and Layout. This taxonomy provides a structured foundation for developing our detection and correction method and redefining evaluation metrics. We propose a novel method, AccessGuru, which combines existing accessibility testing tools and Large Language Models (LLMs) to detect violations and applies taxonomy-driven prompting strategies to correct all three categories. To evaluate these capabilities, we develop a benchmark of real-world Web accessibility violations. Our benchmark quantifies syntactic and layout compliance and judges semantic accuracy through comparative analysis with human expert corrections. Evaluation against our benchmark shows that AccessGuru achieves up to 84% average violation score decrease, significantly outperforming prior methods that achieve at most 50%.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Flow-A11y: Flow-Aware Accessibility Testing

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Runtime interaction traces plus criterion-specific evidence packets let an LLM judge dynamic WCAG criteria far more accurately than unconstrained browser-agent audits.

Pith tools