pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.23754 · v3 · submitted 2025-07-31 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· cond-mat.supr-con

Theory of Electronic Nematic Criticality Constrained by Elastic Compatibility

W. Joe Meese , Rafael M. Fernandes This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 02:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.supr-con
keywords electronic nematicitynemato-elasticityelastic compatibilitySaint Venant relationshelical basiscriticalityrandom fieldscrystalline defects
0
0 comments X

The pith

Elastic compatibility suppresses incompatible nematic fluctuations, making nemato-elasticity different from bare nematicity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a theory of nemato-elasticity that incorporates the Saint Venant compatibility relations explicitly through a co-rotating helical basis. It establishes that elasticity bestows tensor compatibility on the nematic order parameter by suppressing incompatible nematic fluctuations. As a result, direction-selective criticality emerges even without crystalline anisotropy in ideal media, while defects produce random pinning fields. A sympathetic reader would care because the findings are presented as universal features of nematic criticality in all crystalline systems, affecting how local probes detect the order parameter.

Core claim

In ideal media devoid of defects, the suppression of incompatible nematicity underlies direction-selective criticality, even in the absence of crystalline anisotropy. In systems with defects, elastic pinning fields emanate from quenched defects, generating random longitudinal and transverse conjugate fields for the local nematic order parameter. The coexistence of direction-selective nematic criticality with pinning effects from random fields is explained within our theory from the transformation to the helical basis, implying that local experimental probes of nematicity will be influenced by a linear but nonlocal combination of long-ranged and short-ranged helical nematic modes. Because the

What carries the argument

Co-rotating helical basis that incorporates elastic compatibility explicitly and transforms nematic fluctuations to suppress incompatible modes.

If this is right

  • Direction-selective criticality appears even without crystalline anisotropy in defect-free media.
  • Quenched defects generate random longitudinal and transverse conjugate fields for the local nematic order parameter.
  • Local probes measure a linear but nonlocal combination of long-ranged and short-ranged helical nematic modes.
  • The results apply as universal features to nemato-elastic criticality in every crystalline system.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The helical basis may provide a route to model the crossover between critical and pinned regimes in scanning probe experiments.
  • Similar compatibility constraints could be applied to other tensor order parameters coupled to lattice strain.
  • Real materials may require always including elastic gauge constraints rather than treating nematicity as an unconstrained Ising-like field.
  • The approach suggests new predictions for nonlocal responses in transport or spectroscopy near nematic transitions.

Load-bearing premise

The compatibility relations function as gauge constraints in the isotropic medium and the co-rotating helical basis fully captures the suppression of incompatible fluctuations without higher-order corrections or material-specific details.

What would settle it

Detection of isotropic nematic fluctuations with equal critical behavior in all directions inside a clean, defect-free crystal would contradict the suppression mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.23754 by Rafael M. Fernandes, W. Joe Meese.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Two-dimensional elastic compatibility relation enforced in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Linear transformation from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Elastic deformations of a lattice in the presence of a compat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Schematic of universal direction-selective nematic criticality induced by elastic compatibility. Each panel shows different nematic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Defect-gauge transformation acting on a straight edge dis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Fourier- and real-space elastic strain fields emanating from a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Elastic strain field realizations of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Disorder-averaged real-space elastic strain correlations from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Geometry of the multipolar defect expansion. This expansion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The defining property of electronic nematicity -- the spontaneous breaking of rotational symmetry -- implies an unavoidable coupling between the nematic order parameter and elastic strain fields, known as nemato-elasticity. While both quantities are rank-2 tensors, the strain tensor is constrained through the Saint Venant compatibility relations. These three coupled second-order partial differential equations arise from the lattice displacement vector's role as a potential field, and they reflect the underlying gauge invariance of geometric deformations which are violated only in the presence of crystalline defects. In this work, we develop a theory of nemato-elasticity that incorporates elastic compatibility explicitly through a co-rotating helical basis. With our formalism, we show elasticity bestows tensor compatibility upon the nematic order parameter by suppressing incompatible nematic fluctuations. As a result, nemato-elasticity is markedly different from bare nematicity. In ideal media devoid of defects, we show the suppression of incompatible nematicity underlies direction-selective criticality, even in the absence of crystalline anisotropy. In systems with defects, meanwhile, we show that elastic pinning fields emanate from quenched defects, generating random longitudinal and transverse conjugate fields for the local nematic order parameter. The coexistence of direction-selective nematic criticality with pinning effects from random fields is explained within our theory from the transformation to the helical basis, implying that local experimental probes of nematicity will be influenced by a linear -- but nonlocal -- combination of long-ranged and short-ranged helical nematic modes. Because the compatibility relations are gauge constraints endowed in the isotropic medium, our results constitute universal features of nemato-elastic criticality present in all crystalline systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a theory of nemato-elasticity that explicitly incorporates the Saint-Venant compatibility relations through a co-rotating helical basis transformation. It claims that this suppresses incompatible nematic fluctuations, yielding direction-selective criticality in defect-free isotropic media and random longitudinal/transverse pinning fields from quenched defects. These features are presented as universal consequences of gauge constraints in the isotropic medium, distinguishing nemato-elasticity from bare nematicity and implying that local probes measure nonlocal combinations of helical modes.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the work provides a gauge-theoretic framework for nematic criticality that is constrained by elasticity without requiring crystalline anisotropy. This could explain direction-dependent responses and defect-induced pinning observed in iron-based superconductors and other nematic systems, while offering falsifiable predictions for how local experimental probes couple to long- and short-ranged helical modes.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claim that the co-rotating helical basis fully absorbs the Saint-Venant relations as exact gauge constraints and projects out all incompatible fluctuations (thereby producing direction-selective criticality even in isotropic media) is load-bearing. It is not clear from the derivation whether nonlinear strain terms or higher-order geometric corrections are retained; any truncation would leave residual incompatible components that couple back to the nematic order parameter and erase the claimed distinction from bare nematicity.
  2. The transformation to helical nematic modes is used to explain both the suppression of incompatible fluctuations in ideal media and the emergence of random conjugate fields from defects. An explicit demonstration is needed that this basis change remains non-perturbative and complete when the full nonlinear compatibility relations are restored, rather than relying on a linear-strain approximation.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the precise definition and orthogonality properties of the co-rotating helical basis early in the formalism section to aid readers unfamiliar with the transformation.
  2. The abstract states that results are 'universal features... present in all crystalline systems'; this strong claim would benefit from a brief discussion of possible material-specific corrections (e.g., lattice discreteness or anharmonic elasticity) that might violate the gauge constraint assumption.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive major comments. We address each point below and have revised the manuscript to improve clarity on the scope of the approximations employed.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the co-rotating helical basis fully absorbs the Saint-Venant relations as exact gauge constraints and projects out all incompatible fluctuations (thereby producing direction-selective criticality even in isotropic media) is load-bearing. It is not clear from the derivation whether nonlinear strain terms or higher-order geometric corrections are retained; any truncation would leave residual incompatible components that couple back to the nematic order parameter and erase the claimed distinction from bare nematicity.

    Authors: We agree that the linear elasticity framework is central to the derivation. Within this standard approximation the Saint-Venant relations are exact gauge constraints arising from the existence of a displacement potential, and the co-rotating helical basis is constructed to diagonalize them exactly, thereby projecting out incompatible modes. Nonlinear strain contributions and higher-order geometric terms are omitted, as is conventional for critical theories where strains remain small. We have added an explicit subsection (new Sec. II C) stating the linear approximation, its regime of validity near criticality, and the fact that nonlinear corrections would constitute higher-order operators. Within the controlled linear theory the distinction from bare nematicity remains rigorous. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The transformation to helical nematic modes is used to explain both the suppression of incompatible fluctuations in ideal media and the emergence of random conjugate fields from defects. An explicit demonstration is needed that this basis change remains non-perturbative and complete when the full nonlinear compatibility relations are restored, rather than relying on a linear-strain approximation.

    Authors: The helical transformation is exact and non-perturbative for the linearized compatibility equations. Restoring the full nonlinear relations introduces strain-squared and higher corrections that are irrelevant near the critical point where the nematic order parameter and associated strains are perturbatively small. We have expanded the concluding section to include this renormalization-group argument and to note that a fully nonlinear treatment lies beyond the present scope. The universal features we report—direction-selective criticality and defect-induced random fields—are therefore expected to survive as leading behavior in the linear regime. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained via standard compatibility relations and basis transformation

full rationale

The paper's central derivation applies the Saint-Venant compatibility relations (standard gauge constraints from the displacement vector) to the nematic order parameter via an introduced co-rotating helical basis. This projects out incompatible modes by construction of the transformation, yielding direction-selective criticality as a direct mathematical consequence rather than a fit or redefinition. No load-bearing self-citations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or ansatz smuggling appear in the abstract or described formalism; the results are independent of external benchmarks and follow from the gauge invariance of geometric deformations in isotropic media.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The theory rests on standard elastic compatibility constraints and introduces a new basis and associated modes; no free parameters are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Saint Venant compatibility relations constrain the strain tensor
    Arise from the lattice displacement vector acting as a potential field.
  • domain assumption Gauge invariance of geometric deformations is violated only by crystalline defects
    Stated as underlying the compatibility relations in ideal media.
invented entities (2)
  • co-rotating helical basis no independent evidence
    purpose: To incorporate elastic compatibility explicitly into the nematic theory
    Introduced as the central technical tool of the formalism.
  • helical nematic modes no independent evidence
    purpose: To express local probes as linear combinations of long-ranged and short-ranged modes
    Derived from the basis transformation to explain experimental implications.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5838 in / 1330 out tokens · 53936 ms · 2026-05-19T02:14:19.517766+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Compatible Instability: Gauge Constraints of Elasticity Inherited by Electronic Nematic Criticality

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Elastic compatibility constraints bifurcate nematic fluctuations into critical compatible and gapped incompatible sectors, yielding universal direction-selective nematic criticality protected from microscopic defect strains.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

141 extracted references · 141 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    S. A. Kivelson, E. Fradkin, and V. J. Emery, Electronic liquid- crystal phases of a doped Mott insulator, Nature 393, 550 (1998)

    work page 1998

  2. [2]

    M. P. Lilly, K. B. Cooper, J. P. Eisenstein, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Evidence for an anisotropic state of two- dimensional electrons in high landau levels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 394 (1999)

    work page 1999

  3. [3]

    Oganesyan, S

    V. Oganesyan, S. A. Kivelson, and E. Fradkin, Quantum theory of a nematic Fermi fluid, Phys. Rev. B64, 195109 (2001). 34

    work page 2001

  4. [4]

    S. A. Kivelson, I. P. Bindloss, E. Fradkin, V. Oganesyan, J. M. Tranquada, A. Kapitulnik, and C. Howald, How to Detect Fluc- tuating Stripes in the High-Temperature Superconductors, Re- views of Modern Physics 75, 1201 (2003)

    work page 2003

  5. [5]

    Paglione and R

    J. Paglione and R. L. Greene, High-temperature superconduc- tivity in iron-based materials, Nature Physics 6, 645 (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    J.-H. Chu, J. G. Analytis, K. D. Greve, P. L. McMahon, Z. Islam, Y. Yamamoto, and I. R. Fisher, In-plane resistiv- ity anisotropy in an underdoped iron arsenide superconductor, Science 329, 824 (2010)

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Chuang, M

    T.-M. Chuang, M. P. Allan, J. Lee, Y. Xie, N. Ni, S. L. Bud’ko, G. S. Boebinger, P. C. Canfield, and J. C. Davis, Nematic electronic structure in the “parent” state of the iron-based su- perconductor Ca(Fe1− 𝑥Co𝑥)2As2, Science 327, 181 (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Chu, H.-H

    J.-H. Chu, H.-H. Kuo, J. G. Analytis, and I. R. Fisher, Diver- gent nematic susceptibility in an iron arsenide superconductor, Science 337, 710 (2012)

    work page 2012

  9. [9]

    R. M. Fernandes, A. V. Chubukov, J. Knolle, I. Eremin, and J. Schmalian, Preemptive nematic order, pseudogap, and or- bital order in the iron pnictides, Phys. Rev. B 85, 024534 (2012)

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    Fernandes, A

    R. Fernandes, A. Chubukov, and J. Schmalian, What drives nematic order in iron-based superconductors?, Nature physics 10, 97 (2014)

    work page 2014

  11. [11]

    A. E. B ¨ohmer and C. Meingast, Electronic nematic susceptibil- ity of iron-based superconductors, Comptes Rendus Physique 17, 90 (2016)

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    A. E. B ¨ohmer, J.-H. Chu, S. Lederer, and M. Yi, Nematicity and nematic fluctuations in iron-based superconductors, Nature Physics 18, 1412 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    R. M. Fernandes, A. I. Coldea, H. Ding, I. R. Fisher, P. J. Hirschfeld, and G. Kotliar, Iron pnictides and chalcogenides: A new paradigm for superconductivity, Nature601, 35 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Y. Sun, S. Kittaka, T. Sakakibara, K. Machida, J. Wang, J. Wen, X. Xing, Z. Shi, and T. Tamegai, Quasiparticle evidence for the nematic state above 𝑇c in Sr𝑥Bi2Se3, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 027002 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    C.-w. Cho, J. Shen, J. Lyu, O. Atanov, Q. Chen, S. H. Lee, Y. San Hor, D. J. Gawryluk, E. Pomjakushina, M. Bartkowiak, et al., Z3-vestigial nematic order due to superconducting fluc- tuations in the doped topological insulators Nb 𝑥Bi2Se3 and Cu𝑥Bi2Se3, Nature Communications 11, 3056 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    Drucker, T

    N. Drucker, T. Nguyen, M. Mandal, P. Siriviboon, Y. Quan, D. Abernathy, S. Chi, F. Li, C. Nelson, T. Williams, et al., Nematicity from incipient electron flat bands in a kagom´e metal (2024), arXiv:2401.17141

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Z. Ni, D. S. Antonenko, W. J. Meese, Q. Tian, N. Huang, A. V. Haglund, M. Cothrine, D. G. Mandrus, R. M. Fernan- des, J. W. Venderbos, and L. Wu, Signatures of Z 3 vestigial Potts-nematic order in van der Waals antiferromagnets (2023), arXiv:2308.07249

    work page arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Hwangbo, E

    K. Hwangbo, E. Rosenberg, J. Cenker, Q. Jiang, H. Wen, D. Xiao, J.-H. Chu, and X. Xu, Strain tuning of vestigial three- state Potts nematicity in a correlated antiferromagnet, Nature Physics 20, 1888 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Z. Sun, G. Ye, C. Zhou, M. Huang, N. Huang, X. Xu, Q. Li, G. Zheng, Z. Ye, C. Nnokwe, et al., Dimensionality crossover to a two-dimensional vestigial nematic state from a three- dimensional antiferromagnet in a honeycomb van der Waals magnet, Nature Physics 20, 1764 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Q. Tan, C. A. Occhialini, H. Gao, J. Li, H. Kitadai, R. Comin, and X. Ling, Observation of three-state nematicity and domain evolution in atomically thin antiferromagnetic NiPS 3, Nano Letters 24, 7166 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    A. S. Mayorov, D. C. Elias, M. Mucha-Kruczynski, R. V. Gorbachev, T. Tudorovskiy, A. Zhukov, S. V. Morozov, M. I. Katsnelson, A. K. Geim, and K. S. Novoselov, Interaction- driven spectrum reconstruction in bilayer graphene, Science 333, 860 (2011)

    work page 2011

  22. [22]

    Little, C

    A. Little, C. Lee, C. John, S. Doyle, E. Maniv, N. L. Nair, W. Chen, D. Rees, J. W. Venderbos, R. M. Fernandes, J. G. Analytis, and J. Orenstein, Three-state nematicity in the tri- angular lattice antiferromagnet Fe1/3NbS2, Nature Mater. 19, 1062 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Hamill, B

    A. Hamill, B. Heischmidt, E. Sohn, D. Shaffer, K.-T. Tsai, X. Zhang, X. Xi, A. Suslov, H. Berger, L. Forr ´o, et al., Two- fold symmetric superconductivity in few-layer NbSe2, Nature physics 17, 949 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    C.-w. Cho, J. Lyu, L. An, T. Han, K. T. Lo, C. Y. Ng, J. Hu, Y. Gao, G. Li, M. Huang, N. Wang, J. Schmalian, and R. Lortz, Nodal and nematic superconducting phases in NbSe 2 mono- layers from competing superconducting channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 087002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Silber, S

    I. Silber, S. Mathimalar, I. Mangel, A. Nayak, O. Green, N. Avraham, H. Beidenkopf, I. Feldman, A. Kanigel, A. Klein, et al., Two-component nematic superconductivity in 4Hb-TaS2, Nature Communications 15, 824 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Beaudin, L

    G. Beaudin, L. M. Fournier, A. D. Bianchi, M. Nicklas, M. Kenzelmann, M. Laver, and W. Witczak-Krempa, Possi- ble quantum nematic phase in a colossal magnetoresistance material, Phys. Rev. B105, 035104 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    R. A. Borzi, S. A. Grigera, J. Farrell, R. S. Perry, S. J. S. Lister, S. L. Lee, D. A. Tennant, Y. Maeno, and A. P. Mackenzie, For- mation of a nematic fluid at high fields in Sr3Ru2O7, Science 315, 214 (2007)

    work page 2007

  28. [28]

    Jiang, X

    Y. Jiang, X. Lai, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. Haule, J. Mao, and E. Y. Andrei, Charge order and broken rotational symme- try in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature 573, 91 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Y. Cao, D. Rodan-Legrain, J. M. Park, N. F. Q. Yuan, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, R. M. Fernandes, L. Fu, and P. Jarillo- Herrero, Nematicity and competing orders in superconducting magic-angle graphene, Science 372, 264 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    Rubio-Verd´ u, S

    C. Rubio-Verd´ u, S. Turkel, Y. Song, L. Klebl, R. Samajdar, M. S. Scheurer, J. W. Venderbos, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, H. Ochoa, L. Xian, D. Kennes, R. M. Fernandes, A. Rubio, and A. N. Pasupathy, Moir ´e nematic phase in twisted double bilayer graphene, Nature Physics 18, 196 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    N. J. Zhang, Y. Wang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, O. Vafek, and J. Li, Electronic anisotropy in magic-angle twisted trilayer graphene (2022), arXiv:2211.01352

    work page arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    Siddiquee, R

    H. Siddiquee, R. Munir, C. Dissanayake, P. Vaidya, C. Nickle, E. Del Barco, G. Lamura, C. Baines, S. Cahen, C. H ´erold, P. Gentile, T. Shiroka, and Y. Nakajima, Nematic supercon- ductivity in the topological semimetal CaSn 3, Phys. Rev. B 105, 094508 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Venkatesan, S.-Y

    B. Venkatesan, S.-Y. Guan, J.-T. Chang, S.-B. Chiu, P.-Y. Yang, C.-C. Su, T.-R. Chang, K. Raju, R. Sankar, S. Fongchaiya, et al., Direct visualization of disorder driven electronic liquid crystal phases in dirac nodal line semimetal GdSbTe (2024), arXiv:2402.18893

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    M. S. Hossain, Z. Muhammad, R. Islam, Z.-J. Cheng, Y.-X. Jiang, M. Litskevich, T. A. Cochran, X. P. Yang, B. Kim, F. Xue, et al., Pomeranchuk instability of a topological crystal (2024), arXiv:2410.19636

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    C. Xu, M. M¨ uller, and S. Sachdev, Ising and spin orders in the iron-based superconductors, Phys. Rev. B78, 020501 (2008). 35

    work page 2008

  36. [36]

    C. Fang, H. Yao, W.-F. Tsai, J. Hu, and S. A. Kivelson, Theory of electron nematic order in lafeaso, Phys. Rev. B 77, 224509 (2008)

    work page 2008

  37. [37]

    Hecker and J

    M. Hecker and J. Schmalian, Vestigial nematic order and su- perconductivity in the doped topological insulator Cu𝑥Bi2Se3, npj Quantum Materials 3, 26 (2018)

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    R. M. Fernandes, P. P. Orth, and J. Schmalian, Intertwined vestigial order in quantum materials: Nematicity and beyond, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 10, 133 (2019)

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    Paul and M

    I. Paul and M. Garst, Lattice effects on nematic quantum criti- cality in metals, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 227601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    Lederer, Y

    S. Lederer, Y. Schattner, E. Berg, and S. A. Kivelson, Enhance- ment of Superconductivity near a Nematic Quantum Critical Point, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 097001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  41. [41]

    Lederer, Y

    S. Lederer, Y. Schattner, E. Berg, and S. A. Kivelson, Su- perconductivity and non-fermi liquid behavior near a nematic quantum critical point, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, 4905 (2017)

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    Klein and A

    A. Klein and A. Chubukov, Superconductivity near a nematic quantum critical point: Interplay between hot and lukewarm regions, Phys. Rev. B98, 220501 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    Qi and C

    Y. Qi and C. Xu, Global phase diagram for magnetism and lattice distortion of iron-pnictide materials, Phys. Rev. B 80, 094402 (2009)

    work page 2009

  44. [44]

    R. M. Fernandes, L. H. VanBebber, S. Bhattacharya, P. Chan- dra, V. Keppens, D. Mandrus, M. A. McGuire, B. C. Sales, A. S. Sefat, and J. Schmalian, Effects of nematic fluctuations on the elastic properties of iron arsenide superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 157003 (2010)

    work page 2010

  45. [45]

    P. M. Chaikin and T. C. Lubensky, Principles of Condensed Matter Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995)

    work page 1995

  46. [46]

    Fradkin, S

    E. Fradkin, S. A. Kivelson, M. J. Lawler, J. P. Eisenstein, and A. P. Mackenzie, Nematic Fermi fluids in condensed matter physics, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 1, 153 (2010)

    work page 2010

  47. [47]

    Hecker, A

    M. Hecker, A. Rastogi, D. F. Agterberg, and R. M. Fernandes, Classification of electronic nematicity in three-dimensional crystals and quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. B109, 235148 (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    M. J. Lawler, K. Fujita, J. Lee, A. R. Schmidt, Y. Kohsaka, C. K. Kim, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, J. C. Davis, J. P. Sethna, and E.-A. Kim, Intra-unit-cell electronic nematicity of the high-T𝑐 copper-oxide pseudogap states, Nature 466, 347 (2010)

    work page 2010

  49. [49]

    A. V. Maharaj, E. W. Rosenberg, A. T. Hristov, E. Berg, R. M. Fernandes, I. R. Fisher, and S. A. Kivelson, Transverse fields to tune an Ising-nematic quantum phase transition, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, 13430 (2017)

    work page 2017

  50. [50]

    Y. Li, M. P. Zic, L. Ye, W. J. Meese, P. Massat, Y. Zhu, R. M. Fernandes, and I. R. Fisher, Disorder-induced local strain distribution in Y-substituted TmVO4, Phys. Rev. B109, 224201 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    R. M. Fernandes and J. W. Venderbos, Nematicity with a twist: Rotational symmetry breaking in a moir´e superlattice, Science Advances 6, eaba8834 (2020)

    work page 2020

  52. [52]

    A. R. Chakraborty and R. M. Fernandes, Strain-tuned quantum criticality in electronic Potts-nematic systems, Phys. Rev. B 107, 195136 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    Hattori, T

    K. Hattori, T. Ishitobi, and H. Tsunetsugu, Orbital moir ´e and quadrupolar triple-q physics in a triangular lattice, Physical Review Research 6, L042068 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    W. Wang, J. Li, Z. Liang, L. Wu, P. M. Lozano, A. C. Komarek, X. Shen, A. H. Reid, X. Wang, Q. Li, W. Yin, K. Sun, I. K. Robinson, Y. Zhu, M. P. Dean, and J. Tao, Verwey transition as evolution from electronic nematicity to trimerons via electron- phonon coupling, Science Advances 9, eadf8220 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Rastogi, W

    A. Rastogi, W. J. Meese, M. Hecker, and R. M. Fernandes, In preparation. (2025), Link to be inserted by publisher

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    W. J. Meese and R. M. Fernandes, Compatible instability: Gauge constraints of elasticity inherited by electronic nematic criticality (2025), arXiv:2507.23753

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    J. J. Sanchez, P. Malinowski, J.-W. Kim, P. Ryan, and J.-H. Chu, Quantitative relationship between structural orthorhombicity, shear modulus, and heat capacity anomaly of the nematic tran- sition in iron-based superconductors, Physical Review B 105, 064513 (2022)

    work page 2022

  58. [58]

    K. A. Yay, W. J. Meese, E. Kisiel, M. J. Krogstad, A. G. Singh, R. M. Fernandes, Z. Islam, and I. R. Fisher, Discovery of spontaneous mesoscopic strain waves in nematic domains using dark-field X-ray microscopy (2025), arXiv:2507.23752

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    A. E. B ¨ohmer, P. Burger, F. Hardy, T. Wolf, P. Schweiss, R. Fromknecht, M. Reinecker, W. Schranz, and C. Mein- gast, Nematic susceptibility of hole-doped and electron-doped BaFe2As2 iron-based superconductors from shear modulus measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 047001 (2014)

    work page 2014

  60. [60]

    Karahasanovic and J

    U. Karahasanovic and J. Schmalian, Elastic coupling and spin- driven nematicity in iron-based superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 93, 064520 (2016)

    work page 2016

  61. [61]

    Hecker and R

    M. Hecker and R. M. Fernandes, Phonon-induced rotation of the electronic nematic director in superconducting Bi 2Se3, Phys. Rev. B105, 174504 (2022)

    work page 2022

  62. [62]

    R. A. Cowley, Acoustic phonon instabilities and structural phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B13, 4877 (1976)

    work page 1976

  63. [63]

    R. Folk, H. Iro, and F. Schwabl, Critical statics of elastic phase transitions, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B Condensed Matter25, 69 (1976)

    work page 1976

  64. [64]

    R. Folk, H. Iro, and F. Schwabl, Critical dynamics of elastic phase transitions, Physical Review B 20, 1229 (1979)

    work page 1979

  65. [65]

    M. A. Tanatar, A. Kreyssig, S. Nandi, N. Ni, S. L. Bud’ko, P. C. Canfield, A. I. Goldman, and R. Prozorov, Direct imaging of the structural domains in the iron pnictides AFe 2As2 (A=Ca, Sr, Ba), Physical Review B 79, 180508 (2009)

    work page 2009

  66. [66]

    Lang, H.-J

    G. Lang, H.-J. Grafe, D. Paar, F. Hammerath, K. Manthey, G. Behr, J. Werner, and B. B¨ uchner, Nanoscale electronic order in iron pnictides, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 097001 (2010)

    work page 2010

  67. [67]

    S. Ran, S. L. Bud’ko, D. K. Pratt, A. Kreyssig, M. G. Kim, M. J. Kramer, D. H. Ryan, W. N. Rowan-Weetaluktuk, Y. Furukawa, B. Roy, A. I. Goldman, and P. C. Canfield, Stabilization of an ambient-pressure collapsed tetragonal phase in CaFe 2As2 and tuning of the orthorhombic-antiferromagnetic transition temperature by over 70 K via control of nanoscale prec...

    work page 2011

  68. [68]

    J. L. Niedziela, M. A. McGuire, and T. Egami, Local struc- tural variation as source of magnetic moment reduction in BaFe2As2, Phys. Rev. B86, 174113 (2012)

    work page 2012

  69. [69]

    E. P. Rosenthal, E. F. Andrade, C. J. Arguello, R. M. Fer- nandes, L. Y. Xing, X. Wang, C. Jin, A. J. Millis, and A. N. Pasupathy, Visualization of electron nematicity and unidirec- tional antiferroic fluctuations at high temperatures in NaFeAs, Nature physics 10, 225 (2014)

    work page 2014

  70. [70]

    A. P. Dioguardi, M. M. Lawson, B. T. Bush, J. Crocker, K. R. Shirer, D. M. Nisson, T. Kissikov, S. Ran, S. L. Bud’ko, P. C. Canfield, S. Yuan, P. L. Kuhns, A. P. Reyes, H.-J. Grafe, and N. J. Curro, NMR evidence for inhomogeneous glassy behavior driven by nematic fluctuations in iron arsenide superconduc- tors, Phys. Rev. B92, 165116 (2015)

    work page 2015

  71. [71]

    A. P. Dioguardi, T. Kissikov, C. H. Lin, K. R. Shirer, M. M. Lawson, H.-J. Grafe, J.-H. Chu, I. R. Fisher, R. M. Fernan- des, and N. J. Curro, NMR evidence for inhomogeneous ne- 36 matic fluctuations in BaFe2 (As1−𝑥P𝑥)2, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 107202 (2016)

    work page 2016

  72. [72]

    Forrest, P

    T. Forrest, P. Valdivia, C. Rotundu, E. Bourret-Courchesne, and R. Birgeneau, The effects of post-growth annealing on the structural and magnetic properties of BaFe2As2, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 28, 115702 (2016)

    work page 2016

  73. [73]

    Z. Ren, H. Li, H. Zhao, S. Sharma, Z. Wang, and I. Zeljkovic, Nanoscale decoupling of electronic nematicity and structural anisotropy in FeSe thin films, Nature Communications 12, 10 (2021)

    work page 2021

  74. [74]

    Shimojima, Y

    T. Shimojima, Y. Motoyui, T. Taniuchi, C. Bareille, S. Onari, H. Kontani, M. Nakajima, S. Kasahara, T. Shibauchi, Y. Mat- suda, and S. Shin, Discovery of mesoscopic nematicity wave in iron-based superconductors, Science 373, 1122 (2021)

    work page 2021

  75. [75]

    N. J. Curro, T. Kissikov, M. A. Tanatar, R. Prozorov, S. L. Bud’ko, and P. C. Canfield, Nematicity and Glassy Behavior Probed by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in Iron-Based Super- conductors, Frontiers in Physics 10 (2022)

    work page 2022

  76. [76]

    Imry and S.-k

    Y. Imry and S.-k. Ma, Random-field instability of the ordered state of continuous symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.35, 1399 (1975)

    work page 1975

  77. [77]

    Binder, Random-field induced interface widths in Ising systems, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B Condensed Matter 50, 343 (1983)

    K. Binder, Random-field induced interface widths in Ising systems, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B Condensed Matter 50, 343 (1983)

    work page 1983

  78. [78]

    Nattermann, Instabilities in Ising systems with short- and long-range-correlated quenched random fields, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 16, 6407 (1983)

    T. Nattermann, Instabilities in Ising systems with short- and long-range-correlated quenched random fields, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 16, 6407 (1983)

    work page 1983

  79. [79]

    Grinstein and S.-k

    G. Grinstein and S.-k. Ma, Surface tension, roughening, and lower critical dimension in the random-field Ising model, Phys- ical Review B 28, 2588 (1983)

    work page 1983

  80. [80]

    E. W. Carlson, K. A. Dahmen, E. Fradkin, and S. A. Kivel- son, Hysteresis and noise from electronic nematicity in high- temperature superconductors, Physical Review Letters 96, 097003 (2006)

    work page 2006

Showing first 80 references.