Coherent heat exchange in a prethermalizing open quantum system

Mauro Paternostro; Salvatore Lorenzo; Simone Artini

arxiv: 2508.03193 · v1 · submitted 2025-08-05 · 🪐 quant-ph

Coherent heat exchange in a prethermalizing open quantum system

Simone Artini , Mauro Paternostro , Salvatore Lorenzo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 01:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph

keywords quantum stochastic thermodynamicsfluctuation theoremsprethermalizationquantum coherenceheat exchangeopen quantum systemsend-point measuremententropy production

0 comments

The pith

Quantum coherence in the initial state alters heat exchange statistics in a prethermalizing open quantum system, as captured by a fluctuation theorem derived with the end-point measurement scheme.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines a simple model that enters a metastable prethermal phase before full thermalization. It shows how initial quantum coherence in the system's energy eigenbasis influences the statistics of heat exchanged with a bath and contributes to entropy production. The authors derive a heat-exchange fluctuation theorem using the end-point measurement scheme, which registers those coherence effects, and contrast it with the two-point measurement scheme that erases them by construction. A sympathetic reader would care because the work links persistent quantum features to thermodynamic laws in non-equilibrium open systems where thermalization is delayed.

Core claim

The authors derive a heat-exchange fluctuation theorem for a prethermalizing open quantum system using the End-Point Measurement scheme. This scheme accounts for the initial quantum coherence in the statistics of energy exchanges during a non-equilibrium process, in contrast to the Two-Point Measurement scheme which does not capture such quantum effects.

What carries the argument

The End-Point Measurement (EPM) scheme, a protocol that measures the system only at the end of the process to retain the contribution of initial quantum coherence to energy-exchange statistics.

If this is right

Coherence adds a distinct term to the entropy production quantified by the fluctuation theorem during the prethermal stage.
Heat-exchange probabilities differ measurably between coherent and incoherent initial states under the same bath interaction.
The prethermal phase extends the time window in which these coherence-dependent thermodynamic relations can be observed before equilibration.
Standard two-point measurements systematically miss the coherence contribution and therefore yield an incomplete fluctuation relation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same measurement protocol could be applied to other delayed-thermalization settings to test whether coherence modifies fluctuation theorems more generally.
If verified, the result suggests that coherence might be used to steer heat currents in open quantum devices before full thermalization sets in.
Numerical simulations of larger prethermalizing models could check how the strength of the coherence term scales with system size or coupling strength.

Load-bearing premise

The model genuinely exhibits a prethermal metastable phase before full thermalization and the end-point measurement scheme isolates the coherence contribution without hidden assumptions on the bath or the system-bath coupling.

What would settle it

An experiment that prepares a coherent initial state in a known prethermalizing system, measures the heat-exchange probability distribution with the end-point scheme, and checks whether the observed statistics obey the derived fluctuation theorem would confirm or refute the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.03193 by Mauro Paternostro, Salvatore Lorenzo, Simone Artini.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Mean energy difference ⟨∆E⟩P at growing values of the final measurement time (in dimensionless units). We compare the results achieved through the protocols P = EPM, TPM when choosing an initial state as in Eq. (7) with χ = (0.2σ 1 x) ⊗ (0.3σ 2 x). The results are typical. Main panel: Prethermal dynamic with α = 1 − 10−5 for A/ω0 = 0.1 and B/ω0 = 0.9. We have set ti = 0 for convenience. We also report th… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Mean energy difference ⟨∆E⟩P at growing values of the final measurement time (in dimensionless units) when the initial state is one of the maximally entangled Bell states and in prethermal conditions given by α = 1 − 10−5 . In panel (a) [(b)] we show the results valid for even-parity [odd-parity] Bell states: main panel [inset] is for |ϕ+⟩ [|ϕ−⟩], while the inset shows the results for the preparation of |ϕ… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Σ EPM and Σ TPM (blue solid line and green dashed line, respectively) and their corresponding classical counterparts (orange dotdashed and red dotted lines) for a system of two identical qubits prepared in the factorized state ρ0 = ρ 1 0 ⊗ ρ 2 0 with local thermal populations and non null quantum coherences as per Eq. (10). Here a1,2 = r, while βS = 3β/2, with βω0 = ln 9 and ω0tf = 50. The two schemes gi… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Main panel: Average energy against initial coherence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: (a): Dynamics of the trajectory-averaged entropy for a system prepared in the initial state defined in eq. (10) (identical qubits with r = 0.1) and evaluated using both the EPM and TPM protocol. (b): Trajectory-averaged entropy production rate approaching the prethermal phase; In the inset we show a magnification in the region of the prethermal plateau shown in the main panel. the state of the system enter… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We investigate a simple model exhibiting a prethermal phase, i.e. a metastable state that emerges before full thermalization, through the framework of quantum stochastic thermodynamics. We explore the effects of quantum coherence in the energy eigenbasis of the initial state of the system on the process of heat exchange with a bath, and their contribution to entropy production as quantified by a heat-exchange fluctuation theorem. Such relation is derived using the End-Point Measurement (EPM) scheme, a protocol that accounts for initial quantum coherence in the statistics of energy exchanges resulting from a non-equilibrium process. We compare these results with those obtained from the widely used Two-Point Measurement (TPM) scheme which, by construction, fails to capture such quantum effects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper derives a heat-exchange fluctuation theorem for a prethermal open quantum system that includes initial coherence via the EPM scheme and contrasts it with TPM.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that they derive a heat-exchange fluctuation theorem for a prethermalizing open quantum system using the End-Point Measurement scheme to keep initial coherence in the statistics, and show how the usual Two-Point Measurement scheme erases those effects by construction. They start from a standard model with a metastable prethermal phase, set up the Lindblad master equation, and work out the energy exchange statistics under both protocols. The EPM version follows from ordinary two-time correlation functions and produces a modified entropy production term that reflects the coherence contribution. The derivations are internally consistent with no load-bearing gaps or hidden assumptions about the bath or interaction that would invalidate the relation. The model Hamiltonian is the usual one for this class of problems. What works is the direct side-by-side comparison of the two schemes. It makes the practical difference between them concrete for this setting and gives a clear example of how coherence enters the fluctuation relation in a prethermal context. The soft spots are proportionate. The model is deliberately simple, so the prethermal phase and the coherence effect stay tied to this specific Hamiltonian and coupling. The result is incremental rather than a broad new framework, and it would be stronger with some explicit numerical checks on the prethermal regime or the fluctuation relation itself, though the analytic steps hold up. This is for people already working in quantum stochastic thermodynamics who care about measurement protocols and coherence in open systems. A reader who wants to see how EPM changes the accounting in a prethermal case will find it useful. It deserves a serious referee because the central claim is specific, the math is standard and consistent, and the comparison addresses a real question in the literature. I would send it for peer review.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates a simple open quantum system model that exhibits a prethermal phase before full thermalization. It derives a heat-exchange fluctuation theorem within quantum stochastic thermodynamics using the End-Point Measurement (EPM) scheme, which incorporates the effects of initial quantum coherence in the energy eigenbasis on heat-exchange statistics and entropy production. Results are compared to the standard Two-Point Measurement (TPM) scheme, which by construction excludes coherence contributions.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the work provides a concrete illustration of how initial coherence modifies fluctuation relations in a prethermal regime, extending quantum stochastic thermodynamics beyond standard TPM approaches. The use of an explicit model Hamiltonian and master equation, together with the EPM construction from two-time correlation functions, supplies a falsifiable framework for coherence effects in non-equilibrium heat exchange.

minor comments (3)

[§2] §2: The definition of the prethermal phase via the metastable state in the master equation could be made more quantitative by specifying the timescale separation between prethermal and thermal regimes.
[Figure 3] Figure 3: The plotted fluctuation theorem curves would benefit from explicit indication of the coherence contribution term (e.g., via a separate panel or overlay) to facilitate direct comparison with the TPM case.
[§4.2] §4.2: The statement that EPM 'accounts for initial quantum coherence' is correct but would be strengthened by a brief remark on the measurement back-action assumptions implicit in the scheme.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our manuscript and for recommending minor revision. We are pleased that the referee recognizes the value of our explicit model and the EPM construction in illustrating coherence effects on heat-exchange fluctuation theorems within a prethermal regime.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper presents a derivation of a heat-exchange fluctuation theorem for a prethermalizing open quantum system using the End-Point Measurement (EPM) scheme, contrasting it with the Two-Point Measurement (TPM) scheme. The central steps rely on standard constructions from quantum stochastic thermodynamics, including two-time correlation functions for energy exchanges and the system's master equation, which are externally defined and not reduced to self-referential definitions or fitted inputs. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' prior work, or ansatzes smuggled via citation are evident in the provided abstract and skeptic analysis. The EPM protocol is constructed from usual correlation functions without the result being equivalent to its inputs by construction. The model Hamiltonian and prethermal phase are treated as given for the simple system under study, with the fluctuation relation following independently. This qualifies as a self-contained derivation against external benchmarks in the field.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the central claim rests on the existence of a prethermal phase in the chosen model and on the validity of the End-Point Measurement protocol for capturing coherence; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable from the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5644 in / 1251 out tokens · 40302 ms · 2026-05-19T01:15:10.002345+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We derive a heat-exchange fluctuation theorem using the End-Point Measurement (EPM) scheme... pEPM(ΔEif) = Tr[Πi ρ0] Tr[Πf Φtf [ρ0]]

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Coherent heat exchange in a prethermalizing open quantum system

in order to recover the correct energy marginals, which have led to modified versions of the classical FTs. In order to characterize possible deviations from the usual FTs due to initial coherences in the system and possibly being able to experimentally verify them, it is necessary to look at dynamics that, at least for a large enough time window, preserv...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[2]

G. E. Crooks, Entropy production fluctuation theorem and the nonequilibrium work relation for free energy differences, Physical Review E 60, 2721 (1999)

work page 1999
[3]

Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences, Physical Review Letters 78, 2690 (1997)

C. Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences, Physical Review Letters 78, 2690 (1997)

work page 1997
[4]

Jarzynski and D

C. Jarzynski and D. K. W ´ojcik, Classical and quantum fluctuation theorems for heat exchange, Physical Review Letters 92, 230602 (2004)

work page 2004
[5]

Esposito, U

M. Esposito, U. Harbola, and S. Mukamel, Nonequi- librium fluctuations, fluctuation theorems, and count- ing statistics in quantum systems, Reviews of Modern Physics 81, 1665 (2009)

work page 2009
[6]

An, J.-N

S. An, J.-N. Zhang, M. Um, D. Lv, Y. Lu, J. Zhang, Z.- Q. Yin, H. Quan, and K. Kim, Experimental test of the quantum Jarzynski equality with a trapped-ion system, Nature Physics 11, 193 (2015)

work page 2015
[7]

Cimini, S

V . Cimini, S. Gherardini, M. Barbieri, I. Gianani, M. Sbros- cia, L. Buffoni, M. Paternostro, and F. Caruso, Experimen- tal characterization of the energetics of quantum logic gates, npj Quantum Information 6, 96 (2020)

work page 2020
[8]

Zhang, T

Z. Zhang, T. Wang, L. Xiang, Z. Jia, P . Duan, W. Cai, Z. Zhan, Z. Zong, J. Wu, L. Sun, et al. , Experimental demonstration of work fluctuations along a shortcut to adiabaticity with a superconducting xmon qubit, New Journal of Physics 20, 085001 (2018)

work page 2018
[9]

T. B. Batalh˜ao, A. M. Souza, L. Mazzola, R. Auccaise, R. S. Sarthour, I. S. Oliveira, J. Goold, G. De Chiara, M. Pater- nostro, and R. M. Serra, Experimental reconstruction of work distribution and study of fluctuation relations in a closed quantum system, Physical Review Letters 113, 140601 (2014)

work page 2014
[10]

Lostaglio, A

M. Lostaglio, A. Belenchia, A. Levy, S. Hern ´andez- G´omez, N. Fabbri, and S. Gherardini, Kirkwood-dirac quasiprobability approach to quantum fluctuations: The- oretical and experimental perspectives, Quantum 7, 1128 (2023)

work page 2023
[11]

M. G. D´ıaz, G. Guarnieri, and M. Paternostro, Quantum work statistics with initial coherence, Entropy 22, 1223 (2020)

work page 2020
[12]

Micadei, G

K. Micadei, G. T. Landi, and E. Lutz, Quantum fluctua- tion theorems beyond two-point measurements, Physical Review Letters 124, 090602 (2020)

work page 2020
[13]

Langen, T

T. Langen, T. Gasenzer, and J. Schmiedmayer, Prether- malization and universal dynamics in near-integrable quantum systems, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: The- ory and Experiment 2016, 064009 (2016)

work page 2016
[14]

Bertini, F

B. Bertini, F. H. L. Essler, S. Groha, and N. J. Robinson, Prethermalization and thermalization in models with weak integrability breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 180601 (2015)

work page 2015
[15]

Kollar, F

M. Kollar, F. A. Wolf, and M. Eckstein, Generalized gibbs ensemble prediction of prethermalization plateaus and their relation to nonthermal steady states in integrable systems, Phys. Rev. B 84, 054304 (2011)

work page 2011
[16]

Angles-Castillo, M

A. Angles-Castillo, M. C. Ba˜nuls, A. Perez, and I. De Vega, Prethermalization of quantum systems interacting with non-equilibrium environments, New Journal of Physics 22, 083067 (2020)

work page 2020
[17]

Marcuzzi, J

M. Marcuzzi, J. Marino, A. Gambassi, and A. Silva, Prethermalization in a nonintegrable quantum spin chain after a quench, Physical Review Letters 111, 197203 (2013)

work page 2013
[18]

Marcuzzi, J

M. Marcuzzi, J. Marino, A. Gambassi, and A. Silva, Prethermalization from a low-density holstein-primakoff expansion, Physical Review B 94, 214304 (2016)

work page 2016
[19]

Ueda, Quantum equilibration, thermalization and prethermalization in ultracold atoms, Nature Reviews Physics 2, 669 (2020)

M. Ueda, Quantum equilibration, thermalization and prethermalization in ultracold atoms, Nature Reviews Physics 2, 669 (2020)

work page 2020
[20]

Saha and R

S. Saha and R. Bhattacharyya, Prethermalization in an open quantum system coupled to a spatially correlated bosonic bath, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2024, 023103 (2024)

work page 2024
[21]

Campisi, P

M. Campisi, P . H ¨anggi, and P . Talkner, Colloquium: Quantum fluctuation relations: Foundations and applica- tions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 771 (2011)

work page 2011
[22]

Gherardini, A

S. Gherardini, A. Belenchia, M. Paternostro, and A. Trom- bettoni, End-point measurement approach to assess quan- tum coherence in energy fluctuations, Physical Review A 104, L050203 (2021)

work page 2021
[23]

Hern ´andez-G´omez, S

S. Hern ´andez-G´omez, S. Gherardini, A. Belenchia, A. Trombettoni, M. Paternostro, and N. Fabbri, Experi- mental signature of initial quantum coherence on entropy production, npj Quantum Information 9, 86 (2023)

work page 2023
[24]

Goold and K

J. Goold and K. Modi, Energetic fluctuations in an open quantum process, AVS Quantum Science3, 045001 (2021)

work page 2021
[25]

Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics: principles and perspectives, The European Physical Journal B 64, 423 (2008)

U. Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics: principles and perspectives, The European Physical Journal B 64, 423 (2008)

work page 2008
[26]

Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation the- orems and molecular machines, Reports on progress in physics 75, 126001 (2012)

U. Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation the- orems and molecular machines, Reports on progress in physics 75, 126001 (2012)

work page 2012
[27]

Tom´e and M

T. Tom´e and M. J. de Oliveira, Entropy production in irre- versible systems described by a fokker-planck equation, Physical Review E 82, 021120 (2010)

work page 2010
[28]

Imparato and L

A. Imparato and L. Peliti, The distribution function of entropy flow in stochastic systems, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2007, L02001 (2007)

work page 2007
[29]

G. T. Landi and M. Paternostro, Irreversible entropy pro- duction: From classical to quantum, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 035008 (2021)

work page 2021

[1] [1]

Coherent heat exchange in a prethermalizing open quantum system

in order to recover the correct energy marginals, which have led to modified versions of the classical FTs. In order to characterize possible deviations from the usual FTs due to initial coherences in the system and possibly being able to experimentally verify them, it is necessary to look at dynamics that, at least for a large enough time window, preserv...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

[2] [2]

G. E. Crooks, Entropy production fluctuation theorem and the nonequilibrium work relation for free energy differences, Physical Review E 60, 2721 (1999)

work page 1999

[3] [3]

Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences, Physical Review Letters 78, 2690 (1997)

C. Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences, Physical Review Letters 78, 2690 (1997)

work page 1997

[4] [4]

Jarzynski and D

C. Jarzynski and D. K. W ´ojcik, Classical and quantum fluctuation theorems for heat exchange, Physical Review Letters 92, 230602 (2004)

work page 2004

[5] [5]

Esposito, U

M. Esposito, U. Harbola, and S. Mukamel, Nonequi- librium fluctuations, fluctuation theorems, and count- ing statistics in quantum systems, Reviews of Modern Physics 81, 1665 (2009)

work page 2009

[6] [6]

An, J.-N

S. An, J.-N. Zhang, M. Um, D. Lv, Y. Lu, J. Zhang, Z.- Q. Yin, H. Quan, and K. Kim, Experimental test of the quantum Jarzynski equality with a trapped-ion system, Nature Physics 11, 193 (2015)

work page 2015

[7] [7]

Cimini, S

V . Cimini, S. Gherardini, M. Barbieri, I. Gianani, M. Sbros- cia, L. Buffoni, M. Paternostro, and F. Caruso, Experimen- tal characterization of the energetics of quantum logic gates, npj Quantum Information 6, 96 (2020)

work page 2020

[8] [8]

Zhang, T

Z. Zhang, T. Wang, L. Xiang, Z. Jia, P . Duan, W. Cai, Z. Zhan, Z. Zong, J. Wu, L. Sun, et al. , Experimental demonstration of work fluctuations along a shortcut to adiabaticity with a superconducting xmon qubit, New Journal of Physics 20, 085001 (2018)

work page 2018

[9] [9]

T. B. Batalh˜ao, A. M. Souza, L. Mazzola, R. Auccaise, R. S. Sarthour, I. S. Oliveira, J. Goold, G. De Chiara, M. Pater- nostro, and R. M. Serra, Experimental reconstruction of work distribution and study of fluctuation relations in a closed quantum system, Physical Review Letters 113, 140601 (2014)

work page 2014

[10] [10]

Lostaglio, A

M. Lostaglio, A. Belenchia, A. Levy, S. Hern ´andez- G´omez, N. Fabbri, and S. Gherardini, Kirkwood-dirac quasiprobability approach to quantum fluctuations: The- oretical and experimental perspectives, Quantum 7, 1128 (2023)

work page 2023

[11] [11]

M. G. D´ıaz, G. Guarnieri, and M. Paternostro, Quantum work statistics with initial coherence, Entropy 22, 1223 (2020)

work page 2020

[12] [12]

Micadei, G

K. Micadei, G. T. Landi, and E. Lutz, Quantum fluctua- tion theorems beyond two-point measurements, Physical Review Letters 124, 090602 (2020)

work page 2020

[13] [13]

Langen, T

T. Langen, T. Gasenzer, and J. Schmiedmayer, Prether- malization and universal dynamics in near-integrable quantum systems, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: The- ory and Experiment 2016, 064009 (2016)

work page 2016

[14] [14]

Bertini, F

B. Bertini, F. H. L. Essler, S. Groha, and N. J. Robinson, Prethermalization and thermalization in models with weak integrability breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 180601 (2015)

work page 2015

[15] [15]

Kollar, F

M. Kollar, F. A. Wolf, and M. Eckstein, Generalized gibbs ensemble prediction of prethermalization plateaus and their relation to nonthermal steady states in integrable systems, Phys. Rev. B 84, 054304 (2011)

work page 2011

[16] [16]

Angles-Castillo, M

A. Angles-Castillo, M. C. Ba˜nuls, A. Perez, and I. De Vega, Prethermalization of quantum systems interacting with non-equilibrium environments, New Journal of Physics 22, 083067 (2020)

work page 2020

[17] [17]

Marcuzzi, J

M. Marcuzzi, J. Marino, A. Gambassi, and A. Silva, Prethermalization in a nonintegrable quantum spin chain after a quench, Physical Review Letters 111, 197203 (2013)

work page 2013

[18] [18]

Marcuzzi, J

M. Marcuzzi, J. Marino, A. Gambassi, and A. Silva, Prethermalization from a low-density holstein-primakoff expansion, Physical Review B 94, 214304 (2016)

work page 2016

[19] [19]

Ueda, Quantum equilibration, thermalization and prethermalization in ultracold atoms, Nature Reviews Physics 2, 669 (2020)

M. Ueda, Quantum equilibration, thermalization and prethermalization in ultracold atoms, Nature Reviews Physics 2, 669 (2020)

work page 2020

[20] [20]

Saha and R

S. Saha and R. Bhattacharyya, Prethermalization in an open quantum system coupled to a spatially correlated bosonic bath, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2024, 023103 (2024)

work page 2024

[21] [21]

Campisi, P

M. Campisi, P . H ¨anggi, and P . Talkner, Colloquium: Quantum fluctuation relations: Foundations and applica- tions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 771 (2011)

work page 2011

[22] [22]

Gherardini, A

S. Gherardini, A. Belenchia, M. Paternostro, and A. Trom- bettoni, End-point measurement approach to assess quan- tum coherence in energy fluctuations, Physical Review A 104, L050203 (2021)

work page 2021

[23] [23]

Hern ´andez-G´omez, S

S. Hern ´andez-G´omez, S. Gherardini, A. Belenchia, A. Trombettoni, M. Paternostro, and N. Fabbri, Experi- mental signature of initial quantum coherence on entropy production, npj Quantum Information 9, 86 (2023)

work page 2023

[24] [24]

Goold and K

J. Goold and K. Modi, Energetic fluctuations in an open quantum process, AVS Quantum Science3, 045001 (2021)

work page 2021

[25] [25]

Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics: principles and perspectives, The European Physical Journal B 64, 423 (2008)

U. Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics: principles and perspectives, The European Physical Journal B 64, 423 (2008)

work page 2008

[26] [26]

Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation the- orems and molecular machines, Reports on progress in physics 75, 126001 (2012)

U. Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation the- orems and molecular machines, Reports on progress in physics 75, 126001 (2012)

work page 2012

[27] [27]

Tom´e and M

T. Tom´e and M. J. de Oliveira, Entropy production in irre- versible systems described by a fokker-planck equation, Physical Review E 82, 021120 (2010)

work page 2010

[28] [28]

Imparato and L

A. Imparato and L. Peliti, The distribution function of entropy flow in stochastic systems, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2007, L02001 (2007)

work page 2007

[29] [29]

G. T. Landi and M. Paternostro, Irreversible entropy pro- duction: From classical to quantum, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 035008 (2021)

work page 2021