AION-10: Technical Design Report for a 10m Atom Interferometer in Oxford

A. Beniwal; A. Brzakalik; A. Carroll; A. James; A. Josset; A. L. Marchant; A. Lowe; A. Vick; B. Bostwick; B. E. Sauer

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

AION-10: Technical Design Report for a 10m Atom Interferometer in Oxford

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read AION-10's technical design shows a 10-metre strontium atom interferometer can meet its precision targets, clearing the way for construction and for scaling to longer baselines.

desk verdict A genuine engineering TDR with real content, but the abstract's 97% compliance claim is not supported by the body: the stability numbers in Table 5 already miss one lens specification even under the favorable single-input model, and the vacuum section says pumping needs to be increased. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.03491 v1 pith:LB6FCITG submitted 2025-08-05 physics.atom-ph astro-ph.IMhep-exphysics.ins-detquant-ph

K. Bongs , A. Brzakalik , U. Chauhan , S. Dey , O. Ennis , S. Hedges , T. Hird , M. Holynski

show 84 more authors

S. Lellouch M. Langlois B. Stray B. Bostwick J. Chen Z. Eyler V. Gibson T. L. Harte C. C. Hsu M. Karzazi C. Lu B. Millward J. Mitchell N. Mouelle B. Panchumarthi J. Scheper U. Schneider X. Su Y. Tang K. Tkalčec M. Zeuner S. Zhang Y. Zhi K. Clarke A. Vick C. F. A. Baynham O. Buchmüller D. Evans L. Hawkins R. Hobson L. Iannizzotto-Venezze A. Josset D. Lee E. Pasatembou B. E. Sauer M. R. Tarbutt T. Walker L. Badurina A. Beniwal D. Blas J. Carlton J. Ellis C. McCabe G. Parish D. Pathak Govardhan V. Vaskonen T. Bowcock K. Bridges A. Carroll J. Coleman G. Elertas S. Hindley C. Metelko H. Throssell J. N. Tinsley E. Bentine M. Booth D. Bortoletto C. Foot N. Callaghan C. Gomez-Monedero K. Hughes A. James T. Leese A. Lowe J. March-Russell J. Sander J. Schelfhout I. Shipsey D. Weatherill D. Wood S. N. Balashov M. G. Bason K. Hussain H. Labiad P. Majewski A. L. Marchant D. Newbold Z. Pan Z. Tam T. C. Thornton T. Valenzuela M. G. D. van der Grinten I. Wilmut

This is my paper

classification physics.atom-phastro-ph.IMhep-exphysics.ins-detquant-ph

keywords atominterferometrytechnicaldesignreportstrontium-87gravitationalwavedetectiondarkmattersearchesvibrationisolationmagneticshieldingultra-highvacuum

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This Technical Design Report argues that AION-10, a 10-metre vertical atom interferometer using ultracold strontium atoms, is ready to be built: the tower structure, vacuum vessel, magnetic shielding, and vibration isolation meet the instrument's stated precision requirements. The instrument is a gradiometer made of two 5-metre interferometers stacked in one tower, designed both as a standalone sensor for gravitational waves and dark matter and as a prototype for longer-baseline versions. The report's central engineering claims are that telescope lenses stay within nanometre and nanoradian tolerances under realistic building vibration, the double-layer magnetic shield gives sub-milligauss field control with sub-5 mG homogeneity, and the vacuum system can reach $10^{-11}$ mbar after an in-situ bakeout. A sympathetic reader would care because the analysis, if right, removes the main technical obstacles to scaling atom interferometry from laboratory scale to 10 m and beyond.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a linked set of computational models and one experimental data set. The structural model is a hybrid one-dimensional and two-dimensional finite-element tower with welded aluminium box sections, four wall supports and a base, run in single-input mode so the same measured building vibration is applied at every support; it produces the modal frequencies and the RMS/end-to-end lens motions used to judge the stability specification. The magnetic design rests on COMSOL finite-element analysis of a double-layer octagonal mu-metal shield and a five-coil-pair guide field, giving the static shielding factor, field homogeneity, and edge-compensation results. The vacuum design rests on Molflow+ Monte-Carlo simulation with a stainless-steel outgassing rate of $5\times10^{-13}$ mbar litres per second per square centimetre. The phase-shear detection platform, with its piezo-actuated retroreflecting mirror and closed-loop strain-gauge and optical-lever sensing, is the component that turns the tower into an interferometer and sets the 100 nm camera-stability target.

What would settle it

A synchronized multi-point vibration survey of the stairwell during a busy period, processed into relative displacement spectra between the four wall supports and the base, would settle the question: if the support points move relative to each other by amounts comparable to the 33 to 41 nm input in the 0.5 to 50 Hz band, or if the paper's multi-input model then predicts upper-lens motion above the 40 nm displacement specification, the stability conclusion fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that AION-10, a pair of vertically stacked 5 m atom interferometers in a 10 m tower using $^{87}$Sr, is technically ready: the tower structure, vacuum vessel, magnetic shielding, and vibration isolation meet the specifications set out in the report. The paper defends this with three linked analysis chains. Modal and response finite-element analysis gives a 24.0 Hz fundamental frequency and predicts telescope-lens displacements of roughly 36 to 45 nm RMS under the 33 to 41 nm input from the measured building spectrum, staying within the tens-of-nanometre pointing specification; a double-layer octagonal mu-metal shield with staggered seams gives a static shielding factor near 1000 and sub-5 mG field homogeneity; and Molflow+ Monte-Carlo vacuum modelling reaches the $10^{-11}$ mbar region with three 300 l/s pumps after an in-situ bakeout. The report states that critical optical components remain within specification 97% of the time under realistic operating conditions. It also notes that the stability numbers come from a single-input vibration model that treats the stairwell as rigid, and that a synchronized multi-input survey has been performed but its data are not yet incorporated.

Load-bearing premise

The stability conclusion assumes the 15-metre-deep stairwell moves as a rigid structure, so the same vibration reaches all four wall supports and the base; if the building flexes instead, the simulated lens motions could be larger than reported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the design is correct, the five module tower can be assembled offsite, craned into the stairwell by a professional lifting contractor, and vacuum-connected in clean boxes, with active isolators installed after the heavy lifting.
The telescope stability analysis supports proceeding with the full-structure tower rather than decoupling the magnetic shield and vacuum tube, since the lighter 'lite' variant gives only marginal improvement in lens response.
The double-layer octagonal shield plus correction coils extends the usable interferometry length, so the 10 m baseline retains nearly its full aperture for precision measurement.
The vacuum analysis justifies an in-situ bakeout and 300 l/s pumping as the route to $10^{-11}$ mbar, with a possible order-of-magnitude improvement from lower-outgassing materials.
The demonstrated phase-shear platform provides camera positioning and retroreflecting-mirror control at the required nanoradian and nanometre level, enabling the target phase-shear readout.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The 97% within-specification statement assumes the measured building vibration is a stationary random process; if operation coincides with non-stationary activity or rare transients in the stairwell, the duty-cycle figure could be optimistic.
The paper's planned synchronized multi-point survey is the natural adjudicator: until its data are fed into the multi-input model, the single-input stability numbers should be treated as provisional.
If the 10 m tower performs as modelled, the modular assembly approach and the combination of passive shielding plus active isolation look transferable to 100 m and kilometre baselines, where rigid-body behaviour is no longer plausible and distributed control becomes the key scaling issue.
The external optical interferometer network could be used continuously to measure drift of lenses and cameras, converting slow thermal motion from a stability error into a correctable common-mode signal.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is a real design document, not a placeholder. It gives the first integrated public engineering view of AION-10: the modular tower for the Beecroft stairwell, the double-layer staggered octagonal magnetic shield, Molflow+ vacuum estimates, measured building vibration and magnetic-field data, and a tested phase-shear platform adapted from MAGIS. The analyses are forward models driven by measured inputs and stated material properties; I see no fitting-to-target circularity and no invented results. The adaptation from MAGIS-100 and VLBAI is openly acknowledged, and the citation pattern looks normal for a collaboration TDR.

The soft spots are real and they sit right on the central claim. The abstract says critical optical components remain within specification 97% of the time, but I could not find that statistic or its derivation anywhere in the body. More concretely, Section 3.5 sets a <40 nm transverse-shift requirement for the first telescope lens, and Table 5 reports upper-lens RMS displacements of 44.6 nm in X and 42.0 nm in Y under the single-input model. For a zero-mean Gaussian, a 40 nm window around an RMS of 44.6 nm covers only about 63% of the distribution, not 97%. The authors acknowledge the upper lens is "around the maximum" and then argue the target is a worst-case estimate and the amplification factor is low. That may be defensible, but it is not the same as meeting the requirement, and it is not the promised 97%.

The other contradiction is explicit: Section 7 says the 300 l/s pumping configuration "will need to be increased to meet the agreed specification," which sits awkwardly with the abstract's "meets all performance requirements." Finally, the load-bearing single-input vibration model treats the stairwell as rigid, and Section 5.2 itself says the 15 m stairwell deformation can be notable and synchronized multi-input data are required. The new multi-input model is described but not yet applied to the lens responses. These are addressable engineering gaps, not fundamental errors. The design may well be buildable and capable of meeting its goals after iteration; the report just does not yet prove readiness at the level the abstract claims.

Who should read this: engineers designing long-baseline atom interferometers, and anyone tracking AION/MAGIS progress. It deserves a serious referee. I would send it to peer review with a clear ask: add a requirement-by-requirement compliance table, either derive or delete the 97% statement, report the multi-input model results, and state explicitly where the current design passes and where it still needs work.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a technical design report for AION-10, a 10 m strontium atom interferometer planned for the Beecroft building at Oxford. It describes the tower, telescope, vacuum system, magnetic shielding, and assembly sequence, and reports simulations intended to show that the design meets mechanical, magnetic, and vacuum specifications. The central verification claims are that the design meets all performance requirements and that critical optical components remain within specification 97% of the time under realistic operating conditions. These claims are not supported by the reported analyses: Table 5 shows upper-lens RMS displacements exceeding the 40 nm specification, the 97% statistic does not appear anywhere in the body, the vibration analysis relies on a single-input rigid-stairwell assumption that Section 5.2 explicitly says needs to be replaced by synchronized multi-input data, and Section 7.2 states that the pumping speed 'will need to increase' to meet the agreed specification.

Significance. A detailed technical design report of this kind is potentially significant: it lays out a concrete engineering path for a 10 m atom interferometer, including a modular assembly procedure through a stairwell, an active-isolation platform that can be installed after initial assembly, a double-layer octagonal magnetic shield, and Monte-Carlo vacuum estimates. The use of measured building vibration, ambient magnetic-field, and material outgassing data as forward-model inputs is a strength, as is the tested phase-shear platform hardware. If the stability and vacuum analyses were brought into agreement with the stated requirements, the report would be a useful foundation for the final design review. As written, however, the headline verification claim overreaches the evidence presented.

major comments (3)

[Sec. 3.5; Sec. 5.1, Table 5] The telescope specification in Sec. 3.5 is a maximal transverse shift of <40 nm for the first lens. Table 5 reports upper-lens RMS displacements of 44.6 nm (X) and 42.0 nm (Y) even under the favorable single-input rigid-tower model. For the zero-mean Gaussian model described in Sec. 5.1, an RMS of 44.6 nm implies the lens is within ±40 nm only about 63% of the time, not 97%; the quoted end-to-end values are ±3σ (6σ) excursions of 267.6 nm and 252.0 nm, roughly 6.7 times the specification. The sentence following Table 5 acknowledges that the displacement RMS for the upper lens is 'around the maximum transverse shift specified,' but no derivation is given that converts the 'worst case' wording or the low amplification factor into a 97% compliance statistic. This discrepancy directly undermines the abstract's 97% claim and the conclusion of satisfactory structural stability.
[Sec. 5.1 and 5.2] The stability analysis is load-bearing for the design-meets-requirements claim, and it rests on the assumption stated in Sec. 5.1 that 'Applying the same input to multiple support points is in practise equivalent to treating the stairwell as a rigid structure.' Section 5.2 immediately cautions that the 15 m deep stairwell can have notable deformation and that synchronized multi-input data are required to capture this effect. The November 2024 vibration test is described as taking only 45 minutes, with sensors limited by cable length and accessibility, and no multi-input analysis is presented. The reported lens responses are therefore conditional on a rigid-stairwell assumption that the manuscript itself identifies as inadequate; a revised report should either apply the multi-input model or explicitly state that the stability conclusion is a lower-bound estimate pending synchronized measurements.
[Sec. 7.2; Sec. 8; Abstract] The vacuum analysis does not support the global 'design meets all performance requirements' claim. After reporting that the 300 l/s simulation reaches the 10^-11 mbar range, the text states: 'Although modelling has been done with 300 l/s up to this point, we will need to increase this to meet the agreed specification.' It also notes a factor-of-3 pressure rise near the centre between pumping ports that still requires assessment. Nevertheless, the conclusions summarize the design as satisfactory and the abstract asserts that all requirements are met. Either the pumping configuration, the specification target, or the overall claim must be revised so that the report is internally consistent.

minor comments (4)

[Table 3] The modal-frequency table jumps from the 4th mode to the 7th mode without listing modes 5 and 6; this appears to be a transcription or formatting error and should be corrected.
[Sec. 6.1 and Fig. 44] The text states that the magnetic-field noise requirement is met for frequencies above 10^-4 Hz, while the caption of Fig. 44 states above 0.1 mHz; these numbers should be made consistent.
[Sec. 7.1 and 7.2] Section 7.1 discusses a 2000 l/s NEXTorr D2000-10 pump, while the Molflow+ simulations in Section 7.2 use 75 l/s and 300 l/s pumping speeds; the relationship between these configurations should be explained explicitly.
[Sec. 8] The 'Plans for Future Work' paragraph appropriately lists a thermal model, updated vibration analyses, and longer synchronized vibration tests as remaining tasks; given the issues in Section 5, these should be framed as prerequisites for the stability verification rather than as optional refinements.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reasoning: the design analyses are forward models from measured building vibration, magnetic field, and outgassing inputs; the main issues are overstatement and modeling conservatism, not circularity.

full rationale

No circular derivation chain is present in this TDR. The telescope stability analysis takes measured Beecroft building vibration data as input, applies it through an FEA support-tower model, and reports RMS/end-to-end lens responses in Table 5. The magnetic analysis uses COMSOL forward models of mu-metal shields and coil geometries with stated requirements. The vacuum analysis propagates an assumed stainless-steel outgassing rate through Molflow+ Monte-Carlo simulations. None of these steps fits a parameter to the target quantity and then renames that fit as a prediction. The phase-shear platform performance data come from the MAGIS prototype, which is an external engineering test, not a self-citation chain that forces the AION design conclusion. The paper does contain internal inconsistencies and unsupported claims, but they are not circularity: the abstract's '97% of the time' statistic is never derived from Table 5, and Table 5's upper-lens RMS of 44.6 nm in X already exceeds the Section 3.5 40 nm transverse-shift target even under the favorable single-input rigid-stairwell model. Section 7 also states that the 300 l/s pumping configuration 'will need to be increased to meet the agreed specification,' which conflicts with the abstract's claim that all performance requirements are met. Section 5.2 itself acknowledges that the single-input model treats the stairwell as rigid and that synchronized multi-input data are required for a more realistic analysis. These are correctness, completeness, and conservatism risks, not reductions of the claimed results to their own inputs. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The 'meets all requirements' conclusion rests on engineering models that, while described in detail, contain simplifying assumptions whose quantitative impact is not propagated into the final statement. No new physical entities are introduced and no data are fit to produce a law; the approximations are standard engineering practice but should be validated against measurements before construction.

free parameters (2)

Guide field coil currents (A1/A2, B1/B2, C1/C2) = 4.6 A, 3.5 A, 3.3 A
Set in COMSOL to generate a 10.8 G field; the homogeneity and orientation conclusions depend on this tuning, and sensitivity to current drift or manufacturing tolerances is not presented.
Stainless steel outgassing rate = 5 x 10^-13 mbar l/s/cm^2
Assumed in Molflow+ simulations as a 'very good outgassing rate'; pressure results scale with this value, and the authors note better rates are possible, so the pressure conclusion is conditional on this choice.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The Beecroft stairwell moves as a rigid body under vibration; the same input spectrum applies at all tower supports.
Used for the single-input response analysis in Section 5.1. Section 5.2 explicitly states this is an approximation and a multi-input model with synchronized measurements is needed for the 15 m deep stairwell.
domain assumption The magnetic shield can be modeled as continuous, neglecting holes, flanges, and mounting ports.
Section 6.1: 'The modelling has been done for a single 5m beam pipe section, using continuous shields (neglecting any holes for mounting and fixings).' Real ports will reduce shielding; the report acknowledges this qualitatively but does not quantify the derating.
domain assumption Telescope lenses vibrate as rigid bodies rigidly connected to the outer case.
Section 5.1: 'To simplify the analysis, the lenses are modelled as rigidly connected parts with a direct connection to the outer case.' Mount compliance and internal lens flexure are neglected.
domain assumption Vacuum pressure can be estimated from a closed volume with virtual pump surfaces and a uniform outgassing rate.
Section 7.2: Monte Carlo simulation requires a closed volume; sidearms and laser transport are not modeled, and the assumed outgassing rate dominates the result.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of AION-10: Technical Design Report for a 10m Atom Interferometer in Oxford." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LB6FCITG

@misc{pith2026250803491,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: AION-10: Technical Design Report for a 10m Atom Interferometer in Oxford},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LB6FCITG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.03491}
}

read the original abstract

This Technical Design Report presents AION-10, a 10-meter atom interferometer to be located at Oxford University using ultracold strontium atoms to make precision measurements of fundamental physics. AION-10 serves as both a prototype for future larger-scale experiments and a versatile scientific instrument capable of conducting its own diverse physics programme. The design features a 10-meter vertical tower housing two atom interferometer sources in an ultra-high vacuum environment. Key engineering challenges include achieving nanometer-level vibrational stability and precise magnetic field control. Solutions include active vibration isolation, specialized magnetic shielding, and a modular assembly approach using professional lifting equipment. Detailed analysis confirms the design meets all performance requirements, with critical optical components remaining within our specifications 97% of the time under realistic operating conditions. Vacuum and vibration measurements in the host building validate that the instrument will achieve the precision needed for quantum sensing applications. This work establishes the technical foundation for scaling atom interferometry to longer baselines while creating a cutting-edge facility for precision measurements that could advance our understanding of fundamental physics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.03491 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Engineering drawing of the laser input arm to the beam conditioning pipe. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Left panel: Beam conditioning pipe on the full tower. Centre panel: Beam transfer pipe. Right panel: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (52 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: CAD model (upper left panel) and assembly phases (upper right, lower left, lower right panels) of the bottom retro-reflecting mirror system for the 10m MAGIS prototype at Stanford, which serves as a basis for the design of the corresponding system for AION-10. Upper ri…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Left panel: Schematic diagram of an interconnect chamber, showing the various connections in the horizontal plane. Right panel: CAD design of an interconnect chamber. The smallest grey viewports correspond to the camera viewports in the left panel. light reflected off …

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Launch lattice “scaffolding” protruding from an interconnect chamber. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Upper panel: Conceptual design of the custom vacuum flanges for the launch lattice. Lower panels: Details of the flanges [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: CAD diagram of a sidearm assembly: see [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Completed camera adjuster assembly. be extremely stable relative to one another (100 nm), see Section 2, and that they also be finely adjustable to ensure they can be precisely focussed at the atom cloud. They are close to a final level of design maturity, with full 6 …

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Upper panel: CAD drawing of the camera adjuster mechanism. Lower panel: Schematic diagram of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png]

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: Stages in the assembly of the isolator mount. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png]

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: Possible configurations for the isolator platform. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_12.png]

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: Left panel: Optical breadboard installed in the ceiling of the B2 level of the Beecroft stairwell. Right [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_13.png]

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: Illustration of the Oxford Beecroft building and its basement floors. (Image credit: Hawkins/Brown [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_14.png]

**Figure 15.** Figure 15: Upper left panel: The full tower assembly, with the modules highlighted. Top right panel: The telescope module. Middle right panel: A beam pipe module. Lower left panel: The upper interconnect module. Bottom right panel: The lower interconnect module. 18 [PITH_FULL_I…

**Figure 16.** Figure 16: Left panel: The cross-section of the beam pipe. Right panel: The layer structure of the instrument [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_16.png]

**Figure 17.** Figure 17: (a): A vacuum pipe sub-assembly. (b): Pipe wrapped with heating elements and insulation. (c): [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_17.png]

**Figure 18.** Figure 18: Top left panel: U-shaped welded support structure. Top right panel: U-shaped structure with half of the magnetic shield attached. Middle left panel: Vacuum pipe sub-assembly lowered into the magnetic shield and fixed to the frame. Middle right panel: The second half o…

**Figure 19.** Figure 19: (a): The welded square profile frame of the lower interconnect module. (b): Lowering the lower [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_19.png]

**Figure 20.** Figure 20: Left and middle panels: Vertical assembly of the telescope module. Right panel: Horizontal assembly of the telescope module [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_20.png]

**Figure 21.** Figure 21: Upper panels: Lifting operation for horizontal assembly. Lower left panel: Connections installed to fix telescope. The indicated lifting points are representative, they will not be on the flexible end of bellows. Lower right panel: Bracings attached to complete the fr…

**Figure 22.** Figure 22: The exterior of the Beecroft building, showing the planned AION-10 staging area. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_22.png]

**Figure 23.** Figure 23: Example of the procedure for lifting one of the modules into the Beecroft stairwell [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_23.png]

**Figure 24.** Figure 24: Proposed Gantt chart for AION-10 lifting operations [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_24.png]

**Figure 25.** Figure 25: Overhead view of the Beecroft stairwell before tower installation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_25.png]

**Figure 26.** Figure 26: Left panel: Primary support structure (blue) with tower in place. Right panel: Secondary Support [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_26.png]

**Figure 27.** Figure 27: Clean box surrounding the lower interconnect chamber. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_27.png]

**Figure 28.** Figure 28: Upper and lower instrument beam pipe bellows. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_28.png]

**Figure 29.** Figure 29: Example of a viewport shutter incorporated in the ultrahigh vacuum design [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_29.png]

**Figure 30.** Figure 30: Left panel: The complete AION-10 tower following installation in the Beecroft stairwell. Right [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_30.png]

**Figure 31.** Figure 31: Left panel: Single bracing pattern. Right panel: Cross-bracing pattern. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_31.png]

**Figure 32.** Figure 32: The tower model used for the modal analysis. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_32.png]

**Figure 33.** Figure 33: 3D illustration of modes 1, 2, 4 and 5 (from left to right): 24 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_33.png]

**Figure 34.** Figure 34: The telescope lenses. In addition to the modal frequencies, the analysis produced deformation shapes for each mode [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_34.png]

**Figure 35.** Figure 35: Vibration measurement locations indicated by circles. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_35.png]

**Figure 36.** Figure 36: Acceleration and displacement power spectra of vibration data. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_36.png]

**Figure 37.** Figure 37: Vibration test set-up: data-acquisition system and vibration sensor. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_37.png]

**Figure 38.** Figure 38: Points of vibration measurements and experimental set up. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_38.png]

**Figure 39.** Figure 39: Acceleration power spectrum densities (APSDs) of the measured vibrations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_39.png]

**Figure 40.** Figure 40: Top panel: CAD image of the magnetic shielding. Middle panel: Zoomed-in view of the transverse [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_40.png]

**Figure 41.** Figure 41: Left panel: The magnetic field magnitude in the centre of a single layer (red line) and double layer (black line) octagonal 2 mm shielding as function of vertical position (z). The Earth magnetic field (0.6 G outside the shields) is seen to penetrate a distance of ∼ 5…

**Figure 42.** Figure 42: The magnetic field lines near the top section of the shields illustrating how the magnetic field will [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_42.png]

**Figure 43.** Figure 43: Ambient magnetic field measurements in the Beecroft building. The magnetic field (right panel) has [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_43.png]

**Figure 44.** Figure 44: The ambient magnetic noise density amplitude based on measurements in the Beecroft building. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_44.png]

**Figure 45.** Figure 45: CAD image of the guide field coil assembly. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_45.png]

**Figure 46.** Figure 46: Field coil geometry showing the two sets of coils. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_46.png]

**Figure 47.** Figure 47: Modelling of the field generated by the magnetic guide field coils inside the double layer magnetic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_47.png]

**Figure 48.** Figure 48: The magnetic field orientation as a function of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_48.png]

**Figure 49.** Figure 49: Illustration of field orientations generated by the different coils. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_49.png]

**Figure 50.** Figure 50: Magnetic field lines generated with equal currents through the coil sets. The magnetic field orientation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_50.png]

**Figure 51.** Figure 51: The magnetic field magnitude generated along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_51.png]

**Figure 52.** Figure 52: The magnetic field Bz inside the shields: near the edge of the shield the external field will penetrate into the shields. The spike at z=∼ 200 mm is due to mesh refinement. available length over which interferometry can be performed, it is of importance to minimise th…

**Figure 53.** Figure 53: Left panel: A pair of correction coils placed near the field edge. Right panel: The magnetic field in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_53.png]

**Figure 54.** Figure 54: Magnetic field over the full length of the interferometer applying guide fields and compensation coils. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_54.png]

**Figure 55.** Figure 55: AION-10 vacuum simulations with (left panel) three 75 l/s pumps and (right panel) three 300 l/s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_55.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

A Long-Baseline Atom Interferometer at CERN LHC Point 4: Implementation Study
physics.ins-det 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

A CERN implementation study finds that the PX46 shaft can be modified during the LHC's third long shutdown to host a 100 m atom interferometer alongside HL-LHC operations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

LIGO Scientific, Virgocollaboration, Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 061102 [ 1602.03837]

arXiv 2016
[2]

LIGO Scientific, Virgocollaboration, GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral , Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 161101 [ 1710.05832]

arXiv 2017
[3]

LISA collaboration, Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, 1702.00786

arXiv
[4]

International Pulsar Timing Arraycollaboration, Comparing Recent Pulsar Timing Array Results on the Nanohertz Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background , Astrophys. J. 966 (2024) 105 [ 2309.00693]

arXiv 2024
[5]

Buchmueller, J

O. Buchmueller, J. Ellis and U. Schneider, Large-scale atom interferometry for fundamental physics , Contemp. Phys. 64 (2023) 93 [ 2306.17726]

arXiv 2023
[6]

Badurina et al., AION: An Atom Interferometer Observatory and Network , Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (2020) 011 [ 1911.11755]

L. Badurina et al., AION: An Atom Interferometer Observatory and Network , Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (2020) 011 [ 1911.11755]

arXiv 2020
[7]

Dimopoulos, P.W

S. Dimopoulos, P.W. Graham, J.M. Hogan, M.A. Kasevich and S. Rajendran, Gravitational Wave Detection with Atom Interferometry , Phys. Lett. B 678 (2009) 37 [ 0712.1250]

arXiv 2009
[8]

Graham, J.M

P.W. Graham, J.M. Hogan, M.A. Kasevich and S. Rajendran, A New Method for Gravitational Wave Detection with Atomic Sensors , Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 171102 [ 1206.0818]

arXiv 2013

Show all 47 references

[9]

Graham, J.M

P.W. Graham, J.M. Hogan, M.A. Kasevich and S. Rajendran, Resonant mode for gravitational wave detectors based on atom interferometry , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 104022 [ 1606.01860]. 51

2016 arXiv
[10]

Ellis, M

J. Ellis, M. Fairbairn, J. Urrutia and V. Vaskonen, Probing Supermassive Black Hole Seed Scenarios with Gravitational-wave Measurements, Astrophys. J. 964 (2024) 11 [ 2312.02983]

2024 arXiv
[11]

Graham, D.E

P.W. Graham, D.E. Kaplan, J. Mardon, S. Rajendran and W.A. Terrano, Dark Matter Direct Detection with Accelerometers, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 075029 [ 1512.06165]

2016 arXiv
[12]

Arvanitaki, P.W

A. Arvanitaki, P.W. Graham, J.M. Hogan, S. Rajendran and K. Van Tilburg, Search for light scalar dark matter with atomic gravitational wave detectors , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 075020 [ 1606.04541]

2018 arXiv
[13]

Badurina, D

L. Badurina, D. Blas and C. McCabe, Refined ultralight scalar dark matter searches with compact atom gradiometers, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 023006 [ 2109.10965]

2022 arXiv
[14]

Biedermann, X

G.W. Biedermann, X. Wu, L. Deslauriers, S. Roy, C. Mahadeswaraswamy and M.A. Kasevich, Testing Gravity with Cold-Atom Interferometers , Phys. Rev. A 91 (2015) 033629 [ 1412.3210]

2015 arXiv
[15]

G. Rosi, G. D’Amico, L. Cacciapuoti, F. Sorrentino, M. Prevedelli, M. Zych et al., Quantum test of the equivalence principle for atoms in superpositions of internal energy eigenstates , Nature Commun. 8 (2017) 5529 [ 1704.02296]

2017 arXiv
[16]

Asenbaum, C

P. Asenbaum, C. Overstreet, M. Kim, J. Curti and M.A. Kasevich, Atom-Interferometric Test of the Equivalence Principle at the 10−12 Level, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 191101 [ 2005.11624]

2020 arXiv
[17]

Burrage, E.J

C. Burrage, E.J. Copeland and E.A. Hinds, Probing Dark Energy with Atom Interferometry , JCAP 03 (2015) 042 [ 1408.1409]

2015 arXiv
[18]

Hamilton, M

P. Hamilton, M. Jaffe, P. Haslinger, Q. Simmons, H. M¨ uller and J. Khoury, Atom-interferometry constraints on dark energy , Science 349 (2015) 849 [ 1502.03888]

2015 arXiv
[19]

Sabulsky, I

D.O. Sabulsky, I. Dutta, E.A. Hinds, B. Elder, C. Burrage and E.J. Copeland, Experiment to detect dark energy forces using atom interferometry , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 061102 [ 1812.08244]

2019 arXiv
[20]

Abdalla et al., Terrestrial Very-Long-Baseline Atom Interferometry: summary of the second workshop , EPJ Quant

A. Abdalla et al., Terrestrial Very-Long-Baseline Atom Interferometry: summary of the second workshop , EPJ Quant. Technol. 12 (2025) 42 [ 2412.14960]

2025 arXiv
[21]

Memorandum of Understanding for the Terrestrial Very Long Baseline Atom Interferometer Study

“Memorandum of Understanding for the Terrestrial Very Long Baseline Atom Interferometer Study.” https://indi.to/fshnp
[22]

Stray et al., Quantum sensing for gravity cartography , Nature 602 (2022) 590

B. Stray et al., Quantum sensing for gravity cartography , Nature 602 (2022) 590

2022
[23]

MAGIS-100 collaboration, Matter-wave Atomic Gradiometer Interferometric Sensor (MAGIS-100) , Quantum Sci. Technol. 6 (2021) 044003 [ 2104.02835]

2021 arXiv
[24]

AEDGE collaboration, AEDGE: Atomic Experiment for Dark Matter and Gravity Exploration in Space , EPJ Quant. Technol. 7 (2020) 6 [ 1908.00802]

2020 arXiv
[25]

6 (2023) 014409 [2305.20060]

AION collaboration, Centralized design and production of the ultra-high vacuum and laser-stabilization systems for the AION ultra-cold strontium laboratories , A VS Quantum Sci. 6 (2023) 014409 [2305.20060]

2023 arXiv
[26]

AION collaboration, A Prototype Atom Interferometer to Detect Dark Matter and Gravitational Waves , 2504.09158

arXiv
[27]

Sugarbaker, S.M

A. Sugarbaker, S.M. Dickerson, J.M. Hogan, D.M.S. Johnson and M.A. Kasevich, Enhanced atom interferometer readout through the application of phase shear , Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 113002

2013
[28]

M.M. Boyd, T. Zelevinsky, A.D. Ludlow, S. Blatt, T. Zanon-Willette, S.M. Foreman et al., Nuclear spin effects in optical lattice clocks , Physical Review A 76 (2007) 022510

2007
[29]

Glick, Z

J. Glick, Z. Chen, T. Deshpande, Y. Wang and T. Kovachy, Coriolis force compensation and laser beam delivery for 100-m baseline atom interferometry , A VS Quantum Science 6 (2024)

2024
[30]

Warburton and P

W. Warburton and P. Pianetta, A novel differential pump for synchrotron beamlines tests, models and applications, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 291 (1990) 350

1990
[31]

THORLABS Hex Adjusters, 6-80 Fine

“THORLABS Hex Adjusters, 6-80 Fine.” https://www.thorlabs.com/newgrouppage9.cfm?objectgroup_id=1204. 52
[32]

HERZAN Experts in Environmental Control

“HERZAN Experts in Environmental Control.” https://www.herzan.com/products/active-vibration-control/ avi-series-active-vibration-control-platform/avi-400-series.html
[33]

CYCLONE Crane Services

“CYCLONE Crane Services.” https://www.cyclonecranes.co.uk
[34]

HILTI HUS3-A 6 concrete screw anchor

“HILTI HUS3-A 6 concrete screw anchor.” https://www.hilti.co.uk/c/CLS_FASTENER_7135/CLS_MECHANICAL_ANCHORS_7135/r6253
[35]

UHV Design

“UHV Design.” https://www.uhvdesign.com/products/view-port-shutters/view-port-shutters/
[36]

Clickmetal

“Clickmetal.” https://www.clickmetal.co.uk/?srsltid= AfmBOoppYzAGrYumoscSIqS9FkVT7dUeJLU5LbDjWizlZQ_u00YDw7KU
[37]

Bosch Rexroth

“Bosch Rexroth.” https://www.boschrexroth.com/en/gb/products/industrial-solutions/ assembly-technology/aluminum-profile-kit/
[38]

Lalanne, Mechanical Vibration and Shock Analysis , vol

C. Lalanne, Mechanical Vibration and Shock Analysis , vol. 3, ISTE Ltd and John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2 ed. (2009), 10.1002/9780470611937

2009 doi
[39]

Lutes and S

L.D. Lutes and S. Sarkani, Random Vibrations: Analysis of Structural and Mechanical Systems , Elsevier Inc. (2004)

2004
[40]

Lang and P.V

G.F. Lang and P.V. Baren, How well does 3 approximate infinity? understanding ±3σ clipping in random shake tests , Sound & Vibration (2009) 9

2009
[41]

COMSOL Multiphysics

“COMSOL Multiphysics.” https://www.comsol.com/comsol-multiphysics
[42]

Schlippert, C

D. Schlippert, C. Meiners, J. Rengelink, R. C. Schubert, D. Tell, ´E. Wodey et al., Matter-wave interferometry for inertial sensing and tests of fundamental physics , in CPT and Lorentz Symmetry: Proceedings of the Eighth Meeting on CPT and Lorentz Symmetry , (Singapore), pp. ...

2020
[43]

Wodey, D

´E. Wodey, D. Tell, M. Rasel, E. D. Schlippert, R. Baur, U. Kissling et al., A scalable high-performance magnetic shield for very long baseline atom interferometry , Review of Scientific Instruments 91 (2020) 035117

2020
[44]

FERROV AC ultra high vacuum technology

“FERROV AC ultra high vacuum technology.” https://www.ferrovac.com/?tool=ProductDescription&product=PUSAESNEXTorrD2000-10
[45]

Kersevan and M

R. Kersevan and M. Ady, Recent developments of monte-carlo codes molflow+ and synrad+ , in Proceedings of the 10th International Particle Accelerator Conference (IPAC2019) , (Geneva, Switzerland), pp. 1327–1330, JACoW Publishing, May, 2019, DOI

2019
[46]

Calder and G

R. Calder and G. Lewin, Reduction of stainless-steel outgassing in ultra-high vacuum , British Journal of Applied Physics 18 (1967) 1459

1967
[47]

J.R. Young, Errors in UHV pressure measurements resulting from leaks , Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology 6 (1969) 428 [https://pubs.aip.org/avs/jvst/article-pdf/6/3/428/11805570/428 1 online.pdf]. 53

1969

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

LIGO Scientific, Virgocollaboration, Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 061102 [ 1602.03837]

arXiv 2016

[2] [2]

LIGO Scientific, Virgocollaboration, GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral , Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 161101 [ 1710.05832]

arXiv 2017

[3] [3]

LISA collaboration, Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, 1702.00786

arXiv

[4] [4]

International Pulsar Timing Arraycollaboration, Comparing Recent Pulsar Timing Array Results on the Nanohertz Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background , Astrophys. J. 966 (2024) 105 [ 2309.00693]

arXiv 2024

[5] [5]

Buchmueller, J

O. Buchmueller, J. Ellis and U. Schneider, Large-scale atom interferometry for fundamental physics , Contemp. Phys. 64 (2023) 93 [ 2306.17726]

arXiv 2023

[6] [6]

Badurina et al., AION: An Atom Interferometer Observatory and Network , Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (2020) 011 [ 1911.11755]

L. Badurina et al., AION: An Atom Interferometer Observatory and Network , Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (2020) 011 [ 1911.11755]

arXiv 2020

[7] [7]

Dimopoulos, P.W

S. Dimopoulos, P.W. Graham, J.M. Hogan, M.A. Kasevich and S. Rajendran, Gravitational Wave Detection with Atom Interferometry , Phys. Lett. B 678 (2009) 37 [ 0712.1250]

arXiv 2009

[8] [8]

Graham, J.M

P.W. Graham, J.M. Hogan, M.A. Kasevich and S. Rajendran, A New Method for Gravitational Wave Detection with Atomic Sensors , Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 171102 [ 1206.0818]

arXiv 2013