Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Confidence Estimation for Text-to-SQL in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2508.14056 v1 pith:EHVW4X47 submitted 2025-08-08 cs.CL cs.DB

Confidence Estimation for Text-to-SQL in Large Language Models

classification cs.CL cs.DB
keywords confidenceestimationmodelstext-to-sqlaccessapproachesblack-boxeffectiveness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Confidence estimation for text-to-SQL aims to assess the reliability of model-generated SQL queries without having access to gold answers. We study this problem in the context of large language models (LLMs), where access to model weights and gradients is often constrained. We explore both black-box and white-box confidence estimation strategies, evaluating their effectiveness on cross-domain text-to-SQL benchmarks. Our evaluation highlights the superior performance of consistency-based methods among black-box models and the advantage of SQL-syntax-aware approaches for interpreting LLM logits in white-box settings. Furthermore, we show that execution-based grounding of queries provides a valuable supplementary signal, improving the effectiveness of both approaches.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Towards Agents That Know When They Don't Know: Uncertainty as a Control Signal for Structured Reasoning

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    An LLM agent using retrieval and summary uncertainty as training rewards and inference filters produces more factual, useful multi-omics summaries and better downstream survival predictions.