Low Loss Aluminum Nitride Waveguide Fabrication: Propagation Loss Reduction Through ALD and RTA

Matthew L. Day; Michal Bajcsy; Nikolay Videnov

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Low Loss Aluminum Nitride Waveguide Fabrication: Propagation Loss Reduction Through ALD and RTA

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A disclosed fabrication recipe achieves record-low propagation loss of 2.0 +/- 0.3 dB/cm at 852 nm in aluminum nitride waveguides on sapphire.

desk verdict A well-documented, record-level AlN waveguide loss result at 852 nm with honest attribution caveats; the central number needs replication, but the process study is real and useful. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.20245 v1 pith:HGYJGYP5 submitted 2025-08-27 physics.optics

Nikolay Videnov , Matthew L. Day , Michal Bajcsy This is my paper

classification physics.optics PACS 42.82.-m

keywords aluminumnitrideintegratedphotonicspropagationlossatomiclayerdepositionrapidthermalannealingelectronbeamlithography852nmsapphiresubstrate

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a fully disclosed fabrication recipe can make tightly confining single-mode aluminum nitride waveguides on sapphire with 2.0 +/- 0.3 dB/cm propagation loss at 852 nm, a figure that matches the best AlN loss reported at any wavelength and beats prior results near 852 nm. The recipe combines high-resolution electron-beam lithography with shape-based proximity-effect correction, atomic-layer deposition of roughly one nanometer of Al2O3, and a rapid thermal anneal to 400 C. The authors argue that Rayleigh scattering from sidewall roughness is the dominant loss mechanism, that ALD improves loss by passivating surface defects rather than smoothing roughness, and that a single RTA cycle after cladding can roughly halve the loss. If correct, the work gives quantum-optics and visible-spectrum photonics a practical low-loss AlN platform with a reproducible process.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the combination of three process controls: shape-based proximity-effect correction with a fine 4 nm shot pitch in electron-beam lithography to minimize mask roughness; ALD deposition of about 1 nm of Al2O3 immediately before cladding, which the paper argues passivates chemical defects at the etched AlN surface rather than smoothing roughness; and a single post-cladding RTA to 400 C with a fast ramp, which repairs etch damage but is degraded at higher temperatures. The paper also uses a 1/lambda^4 Rayleigh-scattering model to compare loss figures across wavelengths and to identify sidewall roughness as the dominant loss channel.

What would settle it

Fabricate several chips from the same AlN wafer with the full recipe, and companion chips with the ALD step omitted, the RTA step omitted, or both, keeping all other steps identical; if the full-recipe chip does not reproduce 2.0 +/- 0.3 dB/cm at 852 nm, or if a chip without ALD or RTA also reaches about 2 dB/cm, the central claim is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that low-loss AlN waveguides can be made by a specific, replicable sequence: B-grade AlN on sapphire, a chromium hard mask, electron-beam lithography with 4 nm shot pitch and shape-based proximity-effect correction, ICP-RIE etching, 10 ALD cycles of Al2O3 (about 1 nm) before PECVD SiNx cladding, and a post-cladding RTA ramping to 400 C at roughly 6 C/s with a 60 s soak. The best measured propagation loss is 2.0 +/- 0.3 dB/cm at 852 nm, which the paper positions as outperforming prior losses near 852 nm and consistent with the best loss at any wavelength for tightly confining single-mode AlN waveguides. The paper also reports that even a single ALD cycle gives a large imp

Load-bearing premise

The attribution of loss differences to individual process steps assumes that chips differ from one another only in the named variable, without uncontrolled fabrication variation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Other laboratories can reproduce the 2 dB/cm result using the disclosed recipe, since every fabrication step is specified in detail.
A single ALD cycle substantially improves propagation loss before any further optimization, so adding an ALD passivation step is a low-cost generic improvement for AlN waveguide fabrication.
A post-cladding RTA at 400 C with a fast ramp can halve the loss of already-good AlN-on-sapphire waveguides, while higher temperatures or repeated cycles should be avoided.
RTA must be performed before metal electrodes are patterned, because aluminum can diffuse into SiNx cladding at temperatures as low as 450 C.
Under the paper's 1/lambda^4 scattering model, the same recipe at shorter wavelengths will have higher loss, so the 852 nm benchmark sets a target for visible and UV applications.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the ALD improvement is chemical passivation rather than roughness smoothing, then a single ALD cycle should also improve loss on other etched high-index waveguides, such as silicon nitride or lithium niobate; this is a directly testable extension with minimal fabrication change.
The best chip combined a changed etch recipe, 10 ALD cycles, and RTA in one device, so the individual contributions may interact; a factorial experiment holding each step fixed would clarify which step actually carries the 2 dB/cm result.
The paper's RTA average includes chips without ALD passivation, so the optimal RTA temperature for ALD-passivated chips could differ from the 400 C optimum reported for the mixed sample set.
Using the paper's 1/lambda^4 scaling, a 2 dB/cm loss at 852 nm would extrapolate to roughly 40 dB/cm at 400 nm for the same sidewall roughness, indicating how much further roughness reduction would be needed for deep-visible and UV operation.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The headline here is the 2.0 ± 0.3 dB/cm at 852 nm, and it is a genuinely useful number for the AlN integrated photonics community. The paper does what a good fabrication study should: it gives a detailed, step-by-step recipe, isolates the effect of EBL shot pitch, ALD cycles, and RTA as best it can, and it is honest about the confounding factors on the best chip. The literature review is thorough and the 1/λ⁴ Rayleigh scaling context is sensible, not overclaimed. I also appreciate the physical argument for why ALD helps—chemical passivation rather than simply smoothing roughness—since the index contrast argument is sound. The paper deserves credit for being the first detailed report of ALD passivation and post-cladding RTA on AlN waveguides, and the authors explicitly flag that the best chip changed etch recipe, ALD count, and RTA simultaneously. That transparency is good.

The soft spots are real but not disqualifying. The central loss value comes from a single best chip, with no replicate devices, and the cutback-style fit on spirals assumes uniform coupling across facets. The ±0.3 dB/cm is fit precision, not reproducibility, so calling it a 'record' is only weakly supported. The per-step attribution is also weaker than the prose suggests: the ALD improvement from 7.3 to 4.9 to 3.8 dB/cm is clear, but the jump to 2.0 involves changing multiple variables, and the RTA comparison mixes chips with and without ALD. The paper acknowledges this, but the acknowledgment doesn't fix the lack of control. Some figures lack error bars, and there is no raw data table for the loss fits. These are legitimate referee asks, not fatal flaws.

The stress-test note is fair: the record claim cannot be audited from the data shown. But the core value of the paper is not the record per se; it is the reproducible recipe and the evidence that ALD and RTA each contribute. On that, the paper is credible. The measurements are quantitative, the methods are standard, and the conclusions are properly hedged. I would not cite the 2.0 dB/cm as a benchmark without replication, but I would cite the process study as a practical guide.

Who is this for? Fabrication-focused researchers in visible/UV integrated photonics, especially those working with AlN or similar wide-bandgap materials. A serious referee would be able to improve the paper by asking for replicate devices, raw loss data, and error bars on all figures. This is worth peer review, not desk rejection. I'd bring it to a reading group if anyone in our group works on fabrication; otherwise it's a specialized but solid contribution.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reports a detailed fabrication process for AlN-on-sapphire waveguides, combining electron-beam lithography with shape-based proximity-effect correction, ALD Al2O3 passivation, PECVD SiNx cladding, and post-fabrication rapid thermal annealing. It claims a record propagation loss of 2.0 ± 0.3 dB/cm at 852 nm for a tightly confining single-mode waveguide, and it attributes the improvement to systematic optimization of EBL shot pitch, ALD cycle count, and RTA conditions. A literature survey is used to place the result as outperforming prior 852-nm AlN waveguides and as consistent with the best reported AlN losses at any wavelength.

Significance. If the reported loss figure is robust, the paper would be a useful platform demonstration: it provides a fully disclosed, replicable recipe for low-loss AlN waveguides at visible wavelengths, where scattering losses are severe. Strengths include quantitative cutback-style loss measurements with error bars, a clearly isolated EBL comparison performed on the same chip, a nominally controlled ALD cycle-count series, and an unusually candid discussion of confounding variables. The Rayleigh 1/λ^4 comparison in Fig. 1 is a literature-scaling context rather than a fitted model, which is appropriate. However, the central record claim rests on a single best chip, and the paper itself states that this chip changed etch recipe, ALD count, and RTA simultaneously. The absence of raw cutback data, fit residuals, replicate chips, and per-condition sample sizes prevents the reader from auditing the loss extraction and the individual step attributions. These are load-bearing issues, but they are correctable with additional data or a more cautious framing.

major comments (4)

[Rapid Thermal Annealing / Device Fabrication] The 2.0 ± 0.3 dB/cm figure rests on a single chip and a cutback-style fit to 'a series of loss spirals with known and increasing length.' No raw transmission-vs-length data, number of spirals, fit residuals, or repeated measurements on identically processed chips are provided. The quoted uncertainty is therefore at best fit precision, not device-to-device reproducibility. Because the paper explicitly frames this number as a record and as evidence for a 'reproducible' recipe, this needs to be supported by replicate devices or an independent loss measurement, or the claims must be softened.
[Atomic Layer Deposition] The paper states that the best-performing chip had 10 ALD cycles, but also that 'the etch recipe was significantly different, and an RTA cycle was used.' Consequently, the final 2.0 dB/cm cannot be attributed to ALD alone; it is a combined result of multiple simultaneous changes. The earlier ALD trend (7.3 → 4.9 → 3.8 dB/cm) is well isolated and convincing, but the claim that the final jump to 2.0 dB/cm was 'only realized after RTA' conflates RTA with simultaneous etch and ALD changes. Please provide a factorial or partial-factorial comparison, or explicitly qualify the attribution.
[Rapid Thermal Annealing] The RTA attribution is further weakened by the admission that the two earliest RTA samples lacked ALD passivation and coincide with the two worst fractional changes. In addition, sample sizes per RTA condition are not stated, so the average improvement of 0.7 ± 0.1 and the claimed optimal recipe (400 °C, 6.3 °C/s, 60 s soak) cannot be audited. Since this section is the basis for the RTA recipe recommendation, the authors should report the number of chips per condition and either include ALD-passivated samples for all RTA variants or analyze ALD presence as a covariate.
[Electron Beam Lithography] The text claims that 'Across all ODUS settings and both PEC approaches a finer shot pitch results in less propagation loss... as shown in Fig. 3.' However, Fig. 3 contains an EBL file-preparation diagram and a TEM cross-section, not a propagation-loss versus shot-pitch plot. The data supporting the EBL contribution are therefore not actually shown. Please add the missing plot or correct the cross-reference.

minor comments (3)

[Introduction] The section references in the Introduction appear as empty placeholders ('Section .', 'Section .'). Please insert the actual section numbers.
[References] Reference [28], an encyclopedia of color science, is an unusual citation for the Rayleigh scattering wavelength scaling. Please provide a standard optics reference for the 1/λ^4 sidewall-scattering model.
[Throughout] Typos and formatting issues: 'Piranah' should be 'Piranha'; 'mirco-ring' should be 'micro-ring'; 'polycrystaline' should be 'polycrystalline'; Fig. 5 axis labels contain 'Propragation' and 'Fractiona'; 'NH4 free' should likely read 'ammonia-free'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is an empirical process-optimization study with independent loss measurements and no fitted-parameter prediction chain.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a measured propagation loss (2.0 ± 0.3 dB/cm at 852 nm) obtained by a standard cutback-style measurement on loss spirals of known and increasing length. This is an experimental report, not a derivation of a value from a model whose constants were fit to the same data. The 1/λ^4 Rayleigh-scattering comparison in Fig. 1 is a literature-scaling context and is explicitly framed as an observation about reported best results, not as a fitted prediction of this paper's loss. The ALD and RTA attribution arguments are supported by controlled comparisons: the ALD series compares chips with the same etch recipe and only the ALD cycle count varied, and the RTA results compare pre- and post-RTA loss on the same chips, giving fractional improvements that do not reduce by construction. The authors also explicitly acknowledge the confounded variables on the best chip (10 ALD cycles, a significantly different etch recipe, and an RTA cycle), which is the opposite of hiding a fitted input. The self-citations ([11], [33]) are peripheral: [33] is cited only for testing-station details and [11] is a prior device demonstration; neither supplies a load-bearing premise that makes the present result equivalent to its inputs. Concerns about single-chip reproducibility, error-bar meaning, and uncontrolled chip-to-chip variation are legitimate experimental-robustness or measurement-audit concerns, but they are not circularity in the sense of the derivation reducing to its own assumptions. No circular step can be exhibited from the paper's text.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The free parameters are empirical process choices (ALD cycles, RTA recipe, shot pitch), each varied on a small number of chips. The main structural assumptions are the dominance of Rayleigh sidewall scattering and the negligibility of material absorption.

free parameters (3)

RTA temperature/ramp/soak recipe = 400 °C, 60 s ramp, 60 s soak
Empirically optimized by scanning a small set of temperatures (350, 400, 600, 700 °C) and ramp rates; the chosen recipe is the best-performing combination on the samples tested, not a parameter-free prediction.
ALD cycle count = 10 cycles (~1 nm Al2O3)
Selected because loss improvement appeared asymptotic; counts 0, 1, 5, 10 were tested and 10 was adopted. The count is fit to the observed trend, though the final chip also differs in etch recipe.
EBL shot pitch = 4 nm shot pitch
Empirically chosen: finer pitch produced lower loss in the tested set; this is a process parameter optimised on the data.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption Rayleigh scattering from sidewall roughness is the dominant loss mechanism for tightly confining single-mode AlN waveguides, with 1/λ^4 scaling.
Invoked in the literature section to interpret the universal curve in Fig. 1 and to justify the claim that roughness reduction is the figure of merit. The paper notes prior studies found 1/λ^2.1 and 1/λ^3 scaling, so the 1/λ^4 model is a standard but not universally observed assumption.
domain assumption The commercial Kyma B-grade AlN films are of sufficient quality that material absorption is negligible at 852 nm.
Stated in the introduction: 'material absorption is negligible because 852 nm is far from the AlN band gap and we use high quality commercial thin films.' This underpins the attribution of all measured loss to geometry, scattering, and processing.
domain assumption Index changes from a 1 nm ALD Al2O3 layer are negligible and do not affect the loss comparison.
Supported by Lumerical MODE simulation and effective index measurements, though the uncertainty quoted for the 5-cycle resonator index (2.11 ± 0.1) is large enough to overlap the no-ALD value.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Low Loss Aluminum Nitride Waveguide Fabrication: Propagation Loss Reduction Through ALD and RTA." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HGYJGYP5

@misc{pith2026250820245,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Low Loss Aluminum Nitride Waveguide Fabrication: Propagation Loss Reduction Through ALD and RTA},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HGYJGYP5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.20245}
}

read the original abstract

Aluminum nitride (AlN) has emerged as a leading platform for integrated photonics in the visible and ultraviolet spectral ranges, particularly for quantum information applications involving trapped atoms. However, achieving low propagation loss in tightly confining single-mode AlN waveguides remains a challenge, especially at sub-micron wavelengths where scattering losses scale unfavorably. In this work, we present a reproducible and detailed fabrication process for low-loss AlN waveguides on sapphire, achieving a record loss of 2~dB/cm at 852~nm. Our results are enabled by systematic process optimization including high-resolution electron beam lithography with shape-based proximity effect correction, atomic layer deposition (ALD) of \ce{Al2O3} for waveguide surface passivation, and post-fabrication rapid thermal annealing (RTA). We provide a study of the contributions of each technique to propagation loss reduction and support our findings with quantitative loss measurements and comparison with an exhaustive literature review. This work represents the first detailed report of ALD passivation and post-cladding RTA applied to AlN waveguides.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.20245 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Nano fabrication flow diagram. Subsequent to the final st [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** a) EBL file preparation optimization. An over dose (OD) fac [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Propagation loss as a function of Al2O3 ALD cycle count, deposition rate is roughly 1 ˚A/cycle. In blue, each sample was prepared the same way aside from ALD count. In red is the best performing chip which had both 10 ALD cycles of Al2O3, and an optimized etch recipe. …

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: a) Fractional change in propagation loss, calculated as th [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Qualification pathways for Photonic Integrated Circuits in Astrophotonic Space Missions
astro-ph.IM 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A single, tailorable seven-phase qualification template (PIC-SQT) consolidates 19 NASA/ESA/industry test steps for space-bound astrophotonic chips, plus a gap list of unstandardized tests.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

The commercialization of silicon photonics,

A. Rickman, “The commercialization of silicon photonics,” Nature Photonics, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 579–582, 2014

work page 2014
[2]

Technologies for Modulation of Visible Light and their Applications

S. Park, M. Notaros, A. Mohanty, D. Kim, J. Notaros, and S. Mo uradian, “Technologies for Modulation of Visible and Near-UV Light and their Applications,” arXiv Preprint 2403.15606 , pp. 1–19, mar 2024

work page Pith review arXiv 2024
[3]

Silicon nitride passive and activ e photonic integrated circuits: trends and prospects,

C. Xiang, W. Jin, and J. E. Bowers, “Silicon nitride passive and activ e photonic integrated circuits: trends and prospects,” Photonics Research, vol. 10, p. A82, jun 2022

work page 2022
[4]

Integrated photonics on thin-ﬁlm lithium niobate,

D. Zhu, L. Shao, M. Yu, R. Cheng, B. Desiatov, C. J. Xin, Y. Hu, J . Holzgrafe, S. Ghosh, A. Shams- Ansari, E. Puma, N. Sinclair, C. Reimer, M. Zhang, and M. Lonˇ car, “ Integrated photonics on thin-ﬁlm lithium niobate,” Advances in Optics and Photonics , vol. 13, p. 242, jun 2021

work page 2021
[5]

High-conﬁnement a lumina waveguides with sub-dB/cm propagation losses at 450 nm,

E. McKay, N. G. Pruiti, S. May, and M. Sorel, “High-conﬁnement a lumina waveguides with sub-dB/cm propagation losses at 450 nm,” Scientiﬁc Reports , vol. 13, p. 19917, nov 2023

work page 2023
[6]

Aluminum nitride photonic inte grated circuits: from piezo- optomechanics to nonlinear optics,

X. Liu, A. W. Bruch, and H. X. Tang, “Aluminum nitride photonic inte grated circuits: from piezo- optomechanics to nonlinear optics,” Advances in Optics and Photonics , vol. 15, p. 236, mar 2023

work page 2023
[7]

Aluminum nitride nanophotonics for beyond-octave soliton microcomb generation and self-refere ncing,

X. Liu, Z. Gong, A. W. Bruch, J. B. Surya, J. Lu, and H. X. Tang, “Aluminum nitride nanophotonics for beyond-octave soliton microcomb generation and self-refere ncing,” Nature Communications, vol. 12, p. 5428, sep 2021

work page 2021
[8]

Directly accessing octave-spanning dissipative Kerr soliton frequ ency combs in an AlN microresonator,

H. Weng, J. Liu, A. A. Afridi, J. Li, J. Dai, X. Ma, Y. Zhang, Q. Lu, J . F. Donegan, and W. Guo, “Directly accessing octave-spanning dissipative Kerr soliton frequ ency combs in an AlN microresonator,” Photonics Research, vol. 9, p. 1351, jul 2021

work page 2021

Show all 38 references

[9]

Low-Loss, Silicon Int egrated, Aluminum Nitride Photonic Circuits and Their Use for Electro-Optic Signal Processing,

C. Xiong, W. H. P. Pernice, and H. X. Tang, “Low-Loss, Silicon Int egrated, Aluminum Nitride Photonic Circuits and Their Use for Electro-Optic Signal Processing,” Nano Letters , vol. 12, pp. 3562–3568, jul 2012

2012
[10]

Sub-optical wavelength acoustic wav e modulation of integrated photonic resonators at microwave frequencies,

S. A. Tadesse and M. Li, “Sub-optical wavelength acoustic wav e modulation of integrated photonic resonators at microwave frequencies,” Nature Communications, vol. 5, p. 5402, nov 2014

2014
[11]

Hybrid integrated laser at visible wavelengths using aluminum nitride photonic integrated circuit,

N. Videnov, M. L. Day, and M. Bajcsy, “Hybrid integrated laser at visible wavelengths using aluminum nitride photonic integrated circuit,” in Integrated Optics: Devices, Materials, and Technologies X XVIII (S. M. Garc ´ ıa-Blanco and P. Cheben, eds.), vol. 12889, p. 7, SPIE , mar 2024

2024
[12]

Aluminum nitride integrated photonics platform for the ultraviolet to visible spectrum,

T.-J. Lu, M. Fanto, H. Choi, P. Thomas, J. Steidle, S. Mouradian , W. Kong, D. Zhu, H. Moon, K. Berggren, J. Kim, M. Soltani, S. Preble, and D. Englund, “Aluminum nitride integrated photonics platform for the ultraviolet to visible spectrum,” Optics Express , vol. 26, p. 11147...

2018
[13]

Ultra- high-Q UV microring resonators based on a single-crystalline AlN platf orm,

X. Liu, A. W. Bruch, Z. Gong, J. Lu, J. B. Surya, L. Zhang, J. W ang, J. Yan, and H. X. Tang, “Ultra- high-Q UV microring resonators based on a single-crystalline AlN platf orm,” Optica, vol. 5, p. 1279, oct 2018

2018
[14]

Aluminum nitride as nonlinear optical mat erial for on-chip frequency comb generation and frequency conversion,

H. Jung and H. X. Tang, “Aluminum nitride as nonlinear optical mat erial for on-chip frequency comb generation and frequency conversion,” Nanophotonics, vol. 5, pp. 263–271, jun 2016

2016
[15]

Fabrication and characterization of aluminum nitride pedestal-type optical wavegu ide,

M. Alvarado, M. Pelegrini, I. Pereyra, T. de Assump¸ c˜ ao, L. K assab, and M. Alayo, “Fabrication and characterization of aluminum nitride pedestal-type optical wavegu ide,” Canadian Journal of Physics , vol. 92, pp. 951–954, jul 2014

2014
[16]

High Q micro-ring reson ators fabricated from polycrystalline aluminum nitride ﬁlms for near infrared and visible photonics,

W. H. Pernice, C. Xiong, and H. X. Tang, “High Q micro-ring reson ators fabricated from polycrystalline aluminum nitride ﬁlms for near infrared and visible photonics,” Optics Express , vol. 20, p. 12261, may 2012. 10

2012
[17]

Alu minum Nitride Ultralow Loss Waveguides and Push-Pull Electro-Optic Modulators for Near Infr ared and Visible Integrated Photon- ics,

S. Zhu, Q. Zhong, T. Hu, Y. Li, Z. Xu, Y. Dong, and N. Singh, “Alu minum Nitride Ultralow Loss Waveguides and Push-Pull Electro-Optic Modulators for Near Infr ared and Visible Integrated Photon- ics,” in Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2019 , (Washington, D.C.), p...

2019
[18]

Aluminum nitride-on-sapphire platform for integrate d high-Q microresonators,

X. Liu, C. Sun, B. Xiong, L. Wang, J. Wang, Y. Han, Z. Hao, H. Li, Y. Luo, J. Yan, T. Wei, Y. Zhang, and J. Wang, “Aluminum nitride-on-sapphire platform for integrate d high-Q microresonators,” Optics Express, vol. 25, p. 587, jan 2017

2017
[19]

Ultrahigh Q microring resonators using a single-crystal aluminum-nitride-on- sapphire platform,

Y. Sun, W. Shin, D. A. Laleyan, P. Wang, A. Pandey, X. Liu, Y. Wu , M. Soltani, and Z. Mi, “Ultrahigh Q microring resonators using a single-crystal aluminum-nitride-on- sapphire platform,” Optics Letters , vol. 44, p. 5679, dec 2019

2019
[20]

Integrated High- Q Crystalline AlN Microresonators f or Broadband Kerr and Raman Frequency Combs,

X. Liu, C. Sun, B. Xiong, L. Wang, J. Wang, Y. Han, Z. Hao, H. Li, Y. Luo, J. Yan, T. Wei, Y. Zhang, and J. Wang, “Integrated High- Q Crystalline AlN Microresonators f or Broadband Kerr and Raman Frequency Combs,” ACS Photonics , vol. 5, pp. 1943–1950, may 2018

1943
[21]

Ultraviolet to mid-infrared optical proper ties of sputtered Al(Sc)N-on- SiO 2 thin ﬁlms and experimental demonstration of AlN integrated pho tonic devices in the telecom C-band,

J. Spettel, N. Andrianov, F. Dubois, M. Azeem, H. Furci, T. Cas sese, N. Quack, G. Villanueva, M. Moridi, and T. D. Dao, “Ultraviolet to mid-infrared optical proper ties of sputtered Al(Sc)N-on- SiO 2 thin ﬁlms and experimental demonstration of AlN integrated pho tonic devices...

2024
[22]

Aluminum nitride as a new material for chip-scale optomechanics and nonlinear optics,

C. Xiong, W. H. P. Pernice, X. Sun, C. Schuck, K. Y. Fong, and H . X. Tang, “Aluminum nitride as a new material for chip-scale optomechanics and nonlinear optics,” New Journal of Physics , vol. 14, p. 095014, sep 2012

2012
[23]

Aluminum nitride waveguide beam splitters for integrated q uantum photonic circuits,

H.-S. Jang, D. Lee, H. Heo, Y.-S. Kim, H.-T. Lim, S.-W. Jeon, S. Mo on, S. Kim, S.-W. Han, and H. Jung, “Aluminum nitride waveguide beam splitters for integrated q uantum photonic circuits,” Pho- tonics Research, vol. 11, p. 1196, jul 2023

2023
[24]

Eﬀects of rapid thermal a nnealing on aluminum nitride waveg- uides,

X. Wu, J. Feng, X. Liu, and H. Zeng, “Eﬀects of rapid thermal a nnealing on aluminum nitride waveg- uides,” Optical Materials Express , vol. 10, p. 3073, dec 2020

2020
[25]

Towards a low-loss aluminum nitride on insulator (AlNOI) platform for integrated photon ics,

R. Amrar, A. Soltani, G. Beaudin, G. Droulers, S. Loquai, and P. G. Charette, “Towards a low-loss aluminum nitride on insulator (AlNOI) platform for integrated photon ics,” Optical Materials Express , vol. 15, p. 752, apr 2025

2025
[26]

L ow-loss aluminium nitride thin ﬁlm for mid-infrared microphotonics,

P. T. Lin, H. Jung, L. C. Kimerling, A. Agarwal, and H. X. Tang, “L ow-loss aluminium nitride thin ﬁlm for mid-infrared microphotonics,” Laser & Photonics Reviews , vol. 8, mar 2014

2014
[27]

Thermal annealing study of the mid- infrared aluminum nitride on insulator (AlNOI) photonics platform,

B. Dong, X. Luo, S. Zhu, T. Hu, M. Li, D. Hasan, L. Zhang, S. J. Chua, J. Wei, Y. Chang, Y. Ma, P. Vachon, G.-Q. Lo, K. W. Ang, D.-L. Kwong, and C. Lee, “Thermal annealing study of the mid- infrared aluminum nitride on insulator (AlNOI) photonics platform,” Optics Express, vol...

2019
[28]

Patel, Encyclopedia of Color Science and Technology , vol

H. Patel, Encyclopedia of Color Science and Technology , vol. 76. Cham: Springer International Pub- lishing, 2023

2023
[29]

Absor ption and scattering limits of silicon nitride integrated photonics in the visible spectrum,

M. Corato-Zanarella, X. Ji, A. Mohanty, and M. Lipson, “Absor ption and scattering limits of silicon nitride integrated photonics in the visible spectrum,” Optics Express , vol. 32, no. 4, p. 5718, 2024

2024
[30]

Mechanical dicing of optical quality facet s and waveguides in a silicon nitride platform,

P. C. Gow, G. M. Churchill, V. Vitali, T. D. Bucio, F. Y. Gardes, M. P . D’Souza, P. Petropoulos, C. B. Gawith, and J. C. Gates, “Mechanical dicing of optical quality facet s and waveguides in a silicon nitride platform,” Electronics Letters, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 8–10, 2024

2024
[31]

High-e ﬃciency, cryogenic-compatible grating couplers on an AlN-on-sapphire platform through bottom-side cou pling,

Y. Zhou, M. Shen, C. Li, L. Yang, J. Xie, and H. X. Tang, “High-e ﬃciency, cryogenic-compatible grating couplers on an AlN-on-sapphire platform through bottom-side cou pling,” Optics Letters, vol. 50, p. 742, feb 2025. 11

2025
[32]

Piezoelectric aluminum nitride thin-ﬁlms: A review of wet and dry etching techniques,

R. M. Pinto, V. Gund, C. Calaza, K. Nagaraja, and K. Vinayakum ar, “Piezoelectric aluminum nitride thin-ﬁlms: A review of wet and dry etching techniques,” Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 257, p. 111753, mar 2022

2022
[33]

Combination electro-optical and th ermo-optical phase tuner in aluminum nitride,

N. Videnov and M. Bajcsy, “Combination electro-optical and th ermo-optical phase tuner in aluminum nitride,” Optical Materials Express , vol. 15, p. 1859, aug 2025

2025
[34]

Model based hybrid proximity eﬀect correction scheme combining dose modulation and shape adju stments,

T. Klimpel, M. Schulz, R. Zimmermann, H.-J. Stock, and A. Zepka, “Model based hybrid proximity eﬀect correction scheme combining dose modulation and shape adju stments,” Journal of Vacuum Sci- ence & Technology B, Nanotechnology and Microelectronics: Materials, Processing, Mea...

2011
[35]

Fro m V. B. Aleskovskii’s “Framework

A. A. Malygin, V. E. Drozd, A. A. Malkov, and V. M. Smirnov, “Fro m V. B. Aleskovskii’s “Framework” Hypothesis to the Method of Molecular Layering/Atomic Layer Depo sition,” Chemical Vapor Deposition, vol. 21, pp. 216–240, dec 2015

2015
[36]

Reduced propagation loss in silicon strip and slot w aveguides coated by atomic layer deposition,

T. Alasaarela, D. Korn, L. Alloatti, A. S¨ ayn¨ atjoki, A. Tervon en, R. Palmer, J. Leuthold, W. Freude, and S. Honkanen, “Reduced propagation loss in silicon strip and slot w aveguides coated by atomic layer deposition,” Optics Express , vol. 19, p. 11529, jun 2011

2011
[37]

Optimal c ontrol of rapid thermal annealing in a semiconductor process,

R. Gunawan, M. Jung, E. Seebauer, and R. Braatz, “Optimal c ontrol of rapid thermal annealing in a semiconductor process,” Journal of Process Control , vol. 14, pp. 423–430, jun 2004

2004
[38]

Diﬀusion of aluminum into silicon nitride ﬁlms,

H. Ogata, K. Kanayama, M. Ohtani, K. Fujiwara, H. Abe, and H. Nakayama, “Diﬀusion of aluminum into silicon nitride ﬁlms,” Thin Solid Films , vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 333–338, 1978. 12

1978

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

The commercialization of silicon photonics,

A. Rickman, “The commercialization of silicon photonics,” Nature Photonics, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 579–582, 2014

work page 2014

[2] [2]

Technologies for Modulation of Visible Light and their Applications

S. Park, M. Notaros, A. Mohanty, D. Kim, J. Notaros, and S. Mo uradian, “Technologies for Modulation of Visible and Near-UV Light and their Applications,” arXiv Preprint 2403.15606 , pp. 1–19, mar 2024

work page Pith review arXiv 2024

[3] [3]

Silicon nitride passive and activ e photonic integrated circuits: trends and prospects,

C. Xiang, W. Jin, and J. E. Bowers, “Silicon nitride passive and activ e photonic integrated circuits: trends and prospects,” Photonics Research, vol. 10, p. A82, jun 2022

work page 2022

[4] [4]

Integrated photonics on thin-ﬁlm lithium niobate,

D. Zhu, L. Shao, M. Yu, R. Cheng, B. Desiatov, C. J. Xin, Y. Hu, J . Holzgrafe, S. Ghosh, A. Shams- Ansari, E. Puma, N. Sinclair, C. Reimer, M. Zhang, and M. Lonˇ car, “ Integrated photonics on thin-ﬁlm lithium niobate,” Advances in Optics and Photonics , vol. 13, p. 242, jun 2021

work page 2021

[5] [5]

High-conﬁnement a lumina waveguides with sub-dB/cm propagation losses at 450 nm,

E. McKay, N. G. Pruiti, S. May, and M. Sorel, “High-conﬁnement a lumina waveguides with sub-dB/cm propagation losses at 450 nm,” Scientiﬁc Reports , vol. 13, p. 19917, nov 2023

work page 2023

[6] [6]

Aluminum nitride photonic inte grated circuits: from piezo- optomechanics to nonlinear optics,

X. Liu, A. W. Bruch, and H. X. Tang, “Aluminum nitride photonic inte grated circuits: from piezo- optomechanics to nonlinear optics,” Advances in Optics and Photonics , vol. 15, p. 236, mar 2023

work page 2023

[7] [7]

Aluminum nitride nanophotonics for beyond-octave soliton microcomb generation and self-refere ncing,

X. Liu, Z. Gong, A. W. Bruch, J. B. Surya, J. Lu, and H. X. Tang, “Aluminum nitride nanophotonics for beyond-octave soliton microcomb generation and self-refere ncing,” Nature Communications, vol. 12, p. 5428, sep 2021

work page 2021

[8] [8]

Directly accessing octave-spanning dissipative Kerr soliton frequ ency combs in an AlN microresonator,

H. Weng, J. Liu, A. A. Afridi, J. Li, J. Dai, X. Ma, Y. Zhang, Q. Lu, J . F. Donegan, and W. Guo, “Directly accessing octave-spanning dissipative Kerr soliton frequ ency combs in an AlN microresonator,” Photonics Research, vol. 9, p. 1351, jul 2021

work page 2021