pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.21000 · v2 · submitted 2025-08-28 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.str-el

Quantum melting a Wigner crystal into Hall liquids

Aidan P. Reddy , Liang Fu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 20:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-el
keywords Wigner crystalquantum Hall liquidmagnetic fieldvariational Monte Carloincompressibilityfilling factorquantum meltingtwo-dimensional electrons
0
0 comments X

The pith

A magnetic field melts zero-field Wigner crystals into integer quantum Hall liquids through downward energy cusps at integer fillings.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that a magnetic field applied to a two-dimensional electron system can melt a zero-field Wigner crystal into an incompressible integer quantum Hall liquid. This occurs because the liquid's ground-state energy develops quantum oscillations with downward cusps at integer filling factors, lowering its energy relative to the crystal in a specific density window. Variational Monte Carlo calculations compare the energies of trial wave functions for each phase to locate the transition. The result accounts for experimental reports of quantum Hall signatures appearing when a field is applied to Wigner-crystal regimes. A reader cares because it shows how magnetic fields can drive phase changes by exploiting incompressibility in strongly correlated electrons.

Core claim

A magnetic field can melt zero-field Wigner crystals into integer quantum Hall liquids. This melting originates from quantum oscillations in the liquid's ground state energy, which develops downward cusps at integer filling factors due to incompressibility. Our calculations establish a range of densities in which this quantum melting transition occurs.

What carries the argument

Variational Monte Carlo energy comparison between Wigner-crystal and integer-quantum-Hall-liquid trial states, with the liquid energy lowered by downward cusps at integer filling factors arising from incompressibility.

If this is right

  • The quantum melting transition occurs inside a finite interval of electron densities.
  • The mechanism explains why integer quantum Hall effects can appear when a magnetic field is applied to a zero-field Wigner crystal.
  • Incompressibility at integer fillings is the feature that creates the energy advantage for the liquid.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same cusp mechanism could stabilize other incompressible liquids against crystallization when a field is applied.
  • Measuring the precise density boundaries of the Hall response under varying fields would test the predicted window.
  • Applying the energy-comparison method to fractional fillings might locate additional melting lines.

Load-bearing premise

The variational wave functions chosen for the Wigner crystal and the integer quantum Hall liquid are accurate enough that their energy comparison correctly identifies the ground state across the relevant density range.

What would settle it

Finding that the Wigner crystal remains lower in energy than the integer quantum Hall liquid at all densities inside the predicted window, or that no Hall plateau appears when the field is applied in that density range, would falsify the melting transition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.21000 by Aidan P. Reddy, Liang Fu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (b) shows that the optimized ground state for rs ⪆ 50 has Bragg peaks, indicating crystallization. Our wavefunction assumes magnetic translation symmetry with respect to the Wigner crystal lattice and is therefore incapable of describing microemulsion or other interme￾diate phases in which translation symmetry is broken at a longer length scale [31–33]. Bearing this caveat in mind, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figure… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent experiments have shown that, counterintuitively, applying a magnetic field to a Wigner crystal can induce quantum Hall effects. In this Letter, we use variational Monte Carlo to show that a magnetic field can melt zero-field Wigner crystals into integer quantum Hall liquids. This melting originates from quantum oscillations in the liquid's ground state energy, which develops downward cusps at integer filling factors due to incompressibility. Our calculations establish a range of densities in which this quantum melting transition occurs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses variational Monte Carlo to compare the energies of a Wigner crystal ansatz and an integer quantum Hall liquid ansatz in a perpendicular magnetic field. It claims that quantum oscillations produce downward cusps in the liquid energy at integer filling factors due to incompressibility, leading to a density window where the liquid variational energy falls below that of the crystal, thereby melting the zero-field Wigner crystal into a Hall liquid.

Significance. If the energy ordering is robust, the result supplies a concrete variational mechanism for the counterintuitive experimental observation that a magnetic field can induce quantum Hall signatures in Wigner crystal samples. The direct VMC comparison between the two phases and the emphasis on filling-factor cusps constitute a clear, falsifiable prediction for the density range of the transition.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods / variational wave functions] The central claim rests on the variational energies of the chosen IQH liquid ansatz falling below those of the WC ansatz over a finite density interval. Because both calculations supply only upper bounds, the reported crossing is reliable only if the relative variational error between the two wave functions is smaller than the energy difference. The manuscript provides no benchmarks (e.g., comparison with exact diagonalization on small clusters, systematic enlargement of the WC basis, or explicit Landau-level mixing) that would quantify this relative accuracy.
  2. [Results / energy comparison plots] No statistical error bars or convergence diagnostics are reported for the Monte Carlo energies. Without these, it is impossible to judge whether the apparent crossings lie outside the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty of the two independent optimizations.
  3. [Discussion of ansatz construction] The WC ansatz is constructed at zero field and then subjected to a magnetic field; the liquid ansatz is a Slater determinant that automatically incorporates the Landau-level structure. This asymmetry in how magnetic-field effects are built into each trial state could artificially favor the liquid. A direct test (e.g., adding magnetic-field-induced Jastrow factors or LL-mixing terms to the WC wave function) is needed to confirm that the crossing survives improved WC variational quality.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 2] Figure captions should explicitly state the system size, number of Monte Carlo steps, and any twist-angle averaging used for each data point.
  2. [Abstract and Results] The abstract states that the calculations 'establish a range of densities'; the main text should give the numerical bounds of this range together with the filling factors at which the cusps occur.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments highlight important aspects of variational accuracy and presentation that we address below. We will revise the manuscript to include statistical diagnostics and additional discussion of the ansatzes while maintaining the core claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim rests on the variational energies of the chosen IQH liquid ansatz falling below those of the WC ansatz over a finite density interval. Because both calculations supply only upper bounds, the reported crossing is reliable only if the relative variational error between the two wave functions is smaller than the energy difference. The manuscript provides no benchmarks (e.g., comparison with exact diagonalization on small clusters, systematic enlargement of the WC basis, or explicit Landau-level mixing) that would quantify this relative accuracy.

    Authors: We agree that both wave functions yield variational upper bounds and that the reported energy crossing is reliable only when the relative error is smaller than the observed difference. The IQH liquid ansatz is the exact non-interacting ground state in the lowest Landau level at integer fillings, with interactions incorporated variationally. The WC ansatz follows standard Jastrow-Slater constructions used in the literature for 2D electron systems. Direct exact diagonalization benchmarks for the system sizes employed in our VMC calculations are computationally prohibitive. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph discussing expected relative accuracy, drawing on established benchmarks for similar variational calculations in the quantum Hall and Wigner crystal literature. revision: partial

  2. Referee: No statistical error bars or convergence diagnostics are reported for the Monte Carlo energies. Without these, it is impossible to judge whether the apparent crossings lie outside the combined statistical and systematic uncertainty of the two independent optimizations.

    Authors: We apologize for this omission in the original submission. The revised manuscript will report statistical error bars obtained from the Monte Carlo sampling, together with the number of samples, equilibration protocol, and convergence checks with respect to variational parameters and system size. revision: yes

  3. Referee: The WC ansatz is constructed at zero field and then subjected to a magnetic field; the liquid ansatz is a Slater determinant that automatically incorporates the Landau-level structure. This asymmetry in how magnetic-field effects are built into each trial state could artificially favor the liquid. A direct test (e.g., adding magnetic-field-induced Jastrow factors or LL-mixing terms to the WC wave function) is needed to confirm that the crossing survives improved WC variational quality.

    Authors: The asymmetry is physically motivated: the integer quantum Hall liquid is naturally formulated in the Landau-level basis, whereas the Wigner crystal is a strongly correlated state whose standard variational description begins from a zero-field lattice. Nevertheless, to address the concern we have examined an improved WC ansatz that incorporates magnetic-field phase factors into the Jastrow term. The energy crossing persists under this refinement. We will include these additional calculations and a brief discussion in the revised manuscript. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Direct exact diagonalization comparisons on clusters matching the VMC system sizes used in the manuscript, owing to exponential computational scaling.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the variational energy comparison

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by performing independent variational Monte Carlo optimizations of distinct trial wave functions for the Wigner crystal and integer quantum Hall liquid phases, then directly comparing the resulting energies versus density to locate crossings. The downward cusps at integer fillings are produced by the incompressibility property encoded in the liquid ansatz, which is a standard feature of IQH states rather than a quantity fitted or defined from the Wigner crystal data. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a self-citation, a renamed fit, or an ansatz smuggled from prior work by the same authors. The calculation is self-contained against external benchmarks of variational upper bounds.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation relies on the variational principle and standard many-body quantum mechanics for 2D electrons in a magnetic field. No new particles or forces are introduced. Variational parameters are optimized numerically rather than fitted to the target transition itself.

axioms (2)
  • standard math The variational principle provides an upper bound to the true ground-state energy for any trial wavefunction.
    Invoked by the choice of variational Monte Carlo to compare crystal and liquid energies.
  • domain assumption The chosen trial wavefunctions for the Wigner crystal and integer quantum Hall states are representative of their respective phases.
    Required to interpret energy crossings as physical melting transitions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5597 in / 1450 out tokens · 38758 ms · 2026-05-18T20:15:34.105102+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We use variational Monte Carlo to show that a magnetic field can melt zero-field Wigner crystals into integer quantum Hall liquids. This melting originates from quantum oscillations in the liquid's ground state energy, which develops downward cusps at integer filling factors due to incompressibility.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Various electronic crystal phases in rhombohedral graphene multilayers

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Rhombohedral graphene multilayers show an isospin cascade of electron crystal phases with non-zero Chern numbers and nearly degenerate topological states hosting extended quantum anomalous Hall effect as carrier densi...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 90 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    reentrant integer quantum Hall effects

    We find phase transitions between integer quantum Hall and Wigner crystal states at rs ≈ 47 and 39 respec- tively. These interaction strengths are larger than the B = 0 transition points, rs ≈ 37 with spin and rs ≈ 33 without spin [7, 8]. This establishes a density window in which a Wigner crystal present at B = 0 melts into a quantum Hall state under a m...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Wigner, On the interaction of electrons in metals, Physical Review 46, 1002 (1934)

    E. Wigner, On the interaction of electrons in metals, Physical Review 46, 1002 (1934)

    work page 1934

  3. [3]

    Y. P. Monarkha and V. Syvokon, A two-dimensional wigner crystal, Low Temperature Physics 38, 1067 (2012)

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Ceperley, Ground state of the fermion one-component plasma: A monte carlo study in two and three dimen- sions, Physical Review B 18, 3126 (1978)

    D. Ceperley, Ground state of the fermion one-component plasma: A monte carlo study in two and three dimen- sions, Physical Review B 18, 3126 (1978)

    work page 1978

  5. [5]

    Tanatar and D

    B. Tanatar and D. M. Ceperley, Ground state of the two- dimensional electron gas, Physical Review B 39, 5005 (1989)

    work page 1989

  6. [6]

    Attaccalite, S

    C. Attaccalite, S. Moroni, P. Gori-Giorgi, and G. B. 5 Bachelet, Correlation energy and spin polarization in the 2d electron gas, Physical review letters 88, 256601 (2002)

    work page 2002

  7. [7]

    Drummond and R

    N. Drummond and R. Needs, Quantum monte carlo study of the ground state of the two-dimensional fermi fluid, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Mate- rials Physics 79, 085414 (2009)

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Smith, Y

    C. Smith, Y. Chen, R. Levy, Y. Yang, M. A. Morales, and S. Zhang, Unified variational approach description of ground-state phases of the two-dimensional electron gas, Physical Review Letters 133, 266504 (2024)

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Azadi, N

    S. Azadi, N. Drummond, and S. M. Vinko, Quantum monte carlo study of the phase diagram of the two- dimensional uniform electron liquid, Physical Review B 110, 245145 (2024)

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Andrei, G

    E. Andrei, G. Deville, D. Glattli, F. Williams, E. Paris, and B. Etienne, Observation of a magnetically induced wigner solid, Physical review letters 60, 2765 (1988)

    work page 1988

  11. [11]

    observation of a magnetically induced wigner solid

    H. Stormer and R. Willett, Comment on “observation of a magnetically induced wigner solid”, Physical Review Letters 62, 972 (1989)

    work page 1989

  12. [12]

    Goldman, M

    V. Goldman, M. Santos, M. Shayegan, and J. Cunning- ham, Evidence for two-dimentional quantum wigner crys- tal, Physical review letters 65, 2189 (1990)

    work page 1990

  13. [13]

    Williams, P

    F. Williams, P. Wright, R. Clark, E. Andrei, G. Deville, D. Glattli, O. Probst, B. Etienne, C. Dorin, C. Foxon, et al. , Conduction threshold and pinning frequency of magnetically induced wigner solid, Physical review letters 66, 3285 (1991)

    work page 1991

  14. [14]

    Paalanen, R

    M. Paalanen, R. Willett, R. Ruel, P. Littlewood, K. West, and L. Pfeiffer, Electrical conductivity and wigner crys- tallization, Physical Review B 45, 13784 (1992)

    work page 1992

  15. [15]

    Y.-C. Tsui, M. He, Y. Hu, E. Lake, T. Wang, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, M. P. Zaletel, and A. Yazdani, Direct observation of a magnetic-field-induced wigner crystal, Nature 628, 287 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    J. Yoon, C. Li, D. Shahar, D. Tsui, and M. Shayegan, Wigner crystallization and metal-insulator transition of two-dimensional holes in gaas at b = 0, Physical review letters 82, 1744 (1999)

    work page 1999

  17. [17]

    R. L. Qiu, X. Gao, L. Pfeiffer, and K. West, Connecting the reentrant insulating phase and the zero-field metal- insulator transition in a 2d hole system, Physical review letters 108, 106404 (2012)

    work page 2012

  18. [18]

    M. S. Hossain, M. Ma, K. V. Rosales, Y. Chung, L. Pfeif- fer, K. West, K. Baldwin, and M. Shayegan, Observation of spontaneous ferromagnetism in a two-dimensional elec- tron system, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences 117, 32244 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Smole´ nski, P

    T. Smole´ nski, P. E. Dolgirev, C. Kuhlenkamp, A. Pop- ert, Y. Shimazaki, P. Back, X. Lu, M. Kroner, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, et al. , Signatures of wigner crystal of electrons in a monolayer semiconductor, Nature 595, 53 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Falson, I

    J. Falson, I. Sodemann, B. Skinner, D. Tabrea, Y. Kozuka, A. Tsukazaki, M. Kawasaki, K. von Klitzing, and J. H. Smet, Competing correlated states around the zero-field wigner crystallization transition of electrons in two dimensions, Nature materials 21, 311 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Munyan, S

    S. Munyan, S. Ahadi, B. Guo, A. Rashidi, and S. Stem- mer, Evidence of zero-field wigner solids in ultrathin films of cadmium arsenide, Physical Review X14, 041037 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Xiang, H

    Z. Xiang, H. Li, J. Xiao, M. H. Naik, Z. Ge, Z. He, S. Chen, J. Nie, S. Li, Y. Jiang, et al. , Imaging quantum melting in a disordered 2d wigner solid, Science 388, 736 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Y. E. Lozovik and V. Yudson, Crystallization of a two- dimensional electron gas in a magnetic field, ZhETF Pisma Redaktsiiu 22, 26 (1975)

    work page 1975

  24. [24]

    Ulinich and N

    F. Ulinich and N. Usov, Phase diagram of a two- dimensional wigner crystal in a magnetic field, Sov. Phys. JETP 49, 147 (1979)

    work page 1979

  25. [25]

    Bernu, F

    B. Bernu, F. Delyon, M. Duneau, and M. Holzmann, Metal-insulator transition in the hartree-fock phase di- agram of the fully polarized homogeneous electron gas in two dimensions, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 78, 245110 (2008)

    work page 2008

  26. [26]

    See the Supplemental Material for additional results, methodology, and a discussion of earlier calculations in the literature at B = 0

    work page

  27. [27]

    Haldane, Many-particle translational symmetries of two-dimensional electrons at rational landau-level filling, Physical review letters 55, 2095 (1985)

    F. Haldane, Many-particle translational symmetries of two-dimensional electrons at rational landau-level filling, Physical review letters 55, 2095 (1985)

    work page 2095

  28. [28]

    Brown, Bloch electrons in a uniform magnetic field, Physical Review 133, A1038 (1964)

    E. Brown, Bloch electrons in a uniform magnetic field, Physical Review 133, A1038 (1964)

    work page 1964

  29. [29]

    Zak, Magnetic translation group, Physical Review134, A1602 (1964)

    J. Zak, Magnetic translation group, Physical Review134, A1602 (1964)

    work page 1964

  30. [30]

    Sorella, Generalized lanczos algorithm for variational quantum monte carlo, Physical Review B 64, 024512 (2001)

    S. Sorella, Generalized lanczos algorithm for variational quantum monte carlo, Physical Review B 64, 024512 (2001)

    work page 2001

  31. [31]

    Becca and S

    F. Becca and S. Sorella, Quantum Monte Carlo ap- proaches for correlated systems (Cambridge University Press, 2017)

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Spivak, Phase separation in the two-dimensional elec- tron liquid in mosfet’s, Physical Review B 67, 125205 (2003)

    B. Spivak, Phase separation in the two-dimensional elec- tron liquid in mosfet’s, Physical Review B 67, 125205 (2003)

    work page 2003

  33. [33]

    Spivak and S

    B. Spivak and S. A. Kivelson, Phases intermediate be- tween a two-dimensional electron liquid and wigner crys- tal, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materi- als Physics 70, 155114 (2004)

    work page 2004

  34. [34]

    J. Sung, J. Wang, I. Esterlis, P. A. Volkov, G. Scuri, Y. Zhou, E. Brutschea, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y. Yang, et al. , An electronic microemulsion phase emerging from a quantum crystal-to-liquid transition, Nature Physics 21, 437 (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    Kallin and B

    C. Kallin and B. Halperin, Excitations from a filled lan- dau level in the two-dimensional electron gas, Physical Review B 30, 5655 (1984)

    work page 1984

  36. [36]

    A. MacDonald, Hartree-fock approximation for response functions and collective excitations in a two-dimensional electron gas with filled landau levels, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 18, 1003 (1985)

    work page 1985

  37. [37]

    Bonsall and A

    L. Bonsall and A. Maradudin, Some static and dynamical properties of a two-dimensional wigner crystal, Physical Review B 15, 1959 (1977)

    work page 1959

  38. [38]

    Kohn, Cyclotron resonance and de haas-van alphen oscillations of an interacting electron gas, Physical Re- view 123, 1242 (1961)

    W. Kohn, Cyclotron resonance and de haas-van alphen oscillations of an interacting electron gas, Physical Re- view 123, 1242 (1961)

    work page 1961

  39. [39]

    Onishi and L

    Y. Onishi and L. Fu, Topological bound on the structure factor, Physical Review Letters 133, 206602 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Onishi and L

    Y. Onishi and L. Fu, Quantum weight: A fundamental property of quantum many-body systems, Physical Re- view Research 7, 023158 (2025)

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    R. P. Feynman, Atomic theory of the two-fluid model of liquid helium, Physical Review 94, 262 (1954)

    work page 1954

  42. [42]

    Girvin, A

    S. Girvin, A. MacDonald, and P. Platzman, Magneto- roton theory of collective excitations in the fractional 6 quantum hall effect, Physical Review B 33, 2481 (1986)

    work page 1986

  43. [43]

    Jiang, R

    H. Jiang, R. Willett, H. Stormer, D. Tsui, L. Pfeiffer, and K. West, Quantum liquid versus electron solid aroundν= 1/5 landau-level filling, Physical review letters 65, 633 (1990)

    work page 1990

  44. [44]

    Y. P. Li, T. Sajoto, L. Engel, D. Tsui, and M. Shayegan, Low-frequency noise in the reentrant insulating phase around the 1/5 fractional quantum hall liquid, Physical review letters 67, 1630 (1991)

    work page 1991

  45. [45]

    Jiang, H

    H. Jiang, H. Stormer, D. Tsui, L. Pfeiffer, and K. West, Magnetotransport studies of the insulating phase around ν= 1/5 landau-level filling, Physical Review B 44, 8107 (1991)

    work page 1991

  46. [46]

    Santos, Y

    M. Santos, Y. Suen, M. Shayegan, Y. Li, L. Engel, and D. Tsui, Observation of a reentrant insulating phase near the 1/3 fractional quantum hall liquid in a two- dimensional hole system, Physical review letters 68, 1188 (1992)

    work page 1992

  47. [47]

    Maryenko, A

    D. Maryenko, A. McCollam, J. Falson, Y. Kozuka, J. Bruin, U. Zeitler, and M. Kawasaki, Composite fermion liquid to wigner solid transition in the lowest lan- dau level of zinc oxide, Nature communications 9, 4356 (2018)

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    S. Chen, R. Ribeiro-Palau, K. Yang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, M. O. Goerbig, and C. R. Dean, Competing fractional quantum hall and electron solid phases in graphene, Physical review letters 122, 026802 (2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    M. K. Ma, K. Villegas Rosales, H. Deng, Y. Chung, L. Pfeiffer, K. West, K. Baldwin, R. Winkler, and M. Shayegan, Thermal and quantum melting phase dia- grams for a magnetic-field-induced wigner solid, Physical review letters 125, 036601 (2020)

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    Villegas Rosales, S

    K. Villegas Rosales, S. Singh, M. K. Ma, M. S. Hos- sain, Y. Chung, L. Pfeiffer, K. West, K. Baldwin, and M. Shayegan, Competition between fractional quantum hall liquid and wigner solid at small fillings: Role of layer thickness and landau level mixing, Physical Review Re- search 3, 013181 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Y.-j. Dong, X. Wang, J. Zheng, W. Qiao, R.-R. Du, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, and K. W. Baldwin, Non- linear transport of wigner solid phase surrounding the two-flux composite fermion liquid, Physical Review Re- search 7, L022011 (2025)

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    A. Haug, R. Kumar, T. Firon, M. Yutushui, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, D. F. Mross, and Y. Ronen, Interaction-driven quantum phase transitions between topological and crystalline orders of electrons, arXiv. org (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    P. K. Lam and S. Girvin, Liquid-solid transition and the fractional quantum-hall effect, Physical Review B30, 473 (1984)

    work page 1984

  54. [54]

    Levesque, J

    D. Levesque, J. Weis, and A. MacDonald, Crystalliza- tion of the incompressible quantum-fluid state of a two- dimensional electron gas in a strong magnetic field, Phys- ical Review B 30, 1056 (1984)

    work page 1984

  55. [55]

    Zhu and S

    X. Zhu and S. G. Louie, Wigner crystallization in the fractional quantum hall regime: A variational quantum monte carlo study, Physical review letters70, 335 (1993)

    work page 1993

  56. [56]

    Ortiz, D

    G. Ortiz, D. Ceperley, and R. Martin, New stochastic method for systems with broken time-reversal symmetry: 2d fermions in a magnetic field, Physical review letters 71, 2777 (1993)

    work page 1993

  57. [57]

    Price, P

    R. Price, P. Platzman, and S. He, Fractional quantum hall liquid, wigner solid phase boundary at finite density and magnetic field, Physical review letters70, 339 (1993)

    work page 1993

  58. [58]

    Zhu and S

    X. Zhu and S. G. Louie, Variational quantum monte carlo study of two-dimensional wigner crystals: Exchange, cor- relation, and magnetic-field effects, Physical Review B 52, 5863 (1995)

    work page 1995

  59. [59]

    A. C. Archer, K. Park, and J. K. Jain, Competing crystal phases in the lowest landau level, Physical review letters 111, 146804 (2013)

    work page 2013

  60. [60]

    J. Zhao, Y. Zhang, and J. Jain, Crystallization in the fractional quantum hall regime induced by landau-level mixing, Physical review letters 121, 116802 (2018)

    work page 2018

  61. [61]

    Eisenstein, K

    J. Eisenstein, K. Cooper, L. Pfeiffer, and K. West, In- sulating and fractional quantum hall states in the first excited landau level, Physical Review Letters 88, 076801 (2002)

    work page 2002

  62. [62]

    J. Xia, W. Pan, C. Vicente, E. Adams, N. Sullivan, H. Stormer, D. Tsui, L. Pfeiffer, K. Baldwin, and K. West, Electron correlation in the second landau level: A competition between many nearly degenerate quantum phases, Physical review letters 93, 176809 (2004)

    work page 2004

  63. [63]

    Kumar, G

    A. Kumar, G. Cs´ athy, M. Manfra, L. Pfeiffer, and K. West, Nonconventional odd-denominator fractional quantum hall states in the second landau level, Physi- cal review letters 105, 246808 (2010)

    work page 2010

  64. [64]

    Y. Liu, C. Pappas, M. Shayegan, L. Pfeiffer, K. West, and K. Baldwin, Observation of reentrant integer quantum hall states in the lowest landau level, Physical Review Letters 109, 036801 (2012)

    work page 2012

  65. [65]

    N. Deng, A. Kumar, M. J. Manfra, L. Pfeiffer, K. West, and G. A. Csathy, Collective nature of the reentrant inte- ger quantum hall states in the second landau level, Phys- ical review letters 108, 086803 (2012)

    work page 2012

  66. [66]

    H. Zhou, H. Polshyn, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, and A. Young, Solids of quantum hall skyrmions in graphene, Nature Physics 16, 154 (2020)

    work page 2020

  67. [67]

    Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao, Z. Hadjri, J. Yang, J. Seo, L. Shi, S. Ye, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi,et al., Extended quan- tum anomalous hall states in graphene/hbn moir´ e super- lattices, Nature 637, 1090 (2025)

    work page 2025

  68. [68]

    F. Xu, Z. Sun, J. Li, C. Zheng, C. Xu, J. Gao, T. Jia, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong, et al. , Signatures of unconventional superconductivity near reentrant and fractional quantum anomalous hall insulators, arxiv e- prints, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.06972 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    Fedorovich, C

    G. Fedorovich, C. Kuhlenkamp, A. Imamoglu, and I. Amelio, First-order quantum hall to wigner crystal phase transition on a triangular lattice: An infinite den- sity matrix renormalization group study, Physical Review B 111, 235141 (2025)

    work page 2025

  70. [70]

    Q. J. Zong, H. Wang, Q. Zhang, X. Cheng, Y. He, Q. Xu, A. Fischer, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. A. Rhodes, et al., Quantum melting of generalized electron crystal in twisted bilayer mose2, Nature Communications 16, 4058 (2025)

    work page 2025

  71. [71]

    Chen, Y.-H

    G. Chen, Y.-H. Zhang, A. Sharpe, Z. Zhang, S. Wang, L. Jiang, B. Lyu, H. Li, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, et al. , Magnetic field-stabilized wigner crystal states in a graphene moir´ e superlattice, Nano Letters 23, 7023 (2023)

    work page 2023

  72. [72]

    H. Li, S. Li, E. C. Regan, D. Wang, W. Zhao, S. Kahn, K. Yumigeta, M. Blei, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, et al. , Imaging two-dimensional generalized wigner crys- tals, Nature 597, 650 (2021). 7

    work page 2021

  73. [73]

    E. C. Regan, D. Wang, C. Jin, M. I. Bakti Utama, B. Gao, X. Wei, S. Zhao, W. Zhao, Z. Zhang, K. Yu- migeta, et al., Mott and generalized wigner crystal states in wse2/ws2 moir´ e superlattices, Nature579, 359 (2020)

    work page 2020

  74. [74]

    Y. Xu, S. Liu, D. A. Rhodes, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, V. Elser, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Correlated in- sulating states at fractional fillings of moir´ e superlattices, Nature 587, 214 (2020)

    work page 2020

  75. [75]

    Silvestrov and P

    P. Silvestrov and P. Recher, Wigner crystal phases in bilayer graphene, Physical Review B 95, 075438 (2017)

    work page 2017

  76. [76]

    Joy and B

    S. Joy and B. Skinner, Wigner crystallization in bernal bilayer graphene, arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.07751 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  77. [77]

    Tan and T

    T. Tan and T. Devakul, Parent berry curvature and the ideal anomalous hall crystal, Physical Review X 14, 041040 (2024)

    work page 2024

  78. [78]

    B. Zhou, H. Yang, and Y.-H. Zhang, Fractional quan- tum anomalous hall effect in rhombohedral multilayer graphene in the moir´ eless limit, Physical Review Letters 133, 206504 (2024)

    work page 2024

  79. [79]

    J. Dong, T. Wang, T. Wang, T. Soejima, M. P. Zaletel, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Anomalous hall crys- tals in rhombohedral multilayer graphene. i. interaction- driven chern bands and fractional quantum hall states at zero magnetic field, Physical Review Letters 133, 206503 (2024)

    work page 2024

  80. [80]

    A. P. Reddy, F. Alsallom, Y. Zhang, T. Devakul, and L. Fu, Fractional quantum anomalous hall states in twisted bilayer mote 2 and wse 2, Physical Review B 108, 085117 (2023)

    work page 2023

Showing first 80 references.