pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.01162 · v1 · submitted 2025-09-01 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO· hep-th

Big Bang Nucleosynthesis constraints on the cosmological evolution in a Universe with a Weylian Boundary

Teodora M. Matei , Cristian Croitoru , Tiberiu Harko This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 20:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-th
keywords Big Bang NucleosynthesisWeylian boundary termsmodified Friedmann equationsprimordial abundancesdissipative scalar field
0
0 comments X

The pith

BBN observations impose upper limits on energy density deviations caused by Weylian boundary terms in the Friedmann equations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how adding Weylian boundary terms to Einstein's equations alters the early universe's expansion and tests these changes against Big Bang Nucleosynthesis data. A sympathetic reader cares because BBN provides precise measurements of light element abundances that can rule out or constrain modifications to standard cosmology. The authors derive generalized Friedmann equations for an FLRW universe, split the energy conservation law into scenarios with a dissipative scalar field and a Weyl vector, and compute resulting shifts in freezing temperatures and element yields. They use numerical tools to evaluate abundances of Hydrogen, Deuterium, Helium, and Lithium, finding that deviations from standard energy density are bounded by Helium-4 measurements.

Core claim

The inclusion of Weylian boundary terms leads to modified Friedmann equations that determine cosmological evolution through a dissipative scalar field and Weyl vector, with BBN data constraining the effective energy density deviation and MCMC analysis validating the model by limiting initial conditions of the cosmos.

What carries the argument

The splitting of the generalized energy conservation equation into distinct cosmological scenarios involving a dissipative scalar field and the Weyl vector from the boundary, which modifies the background expansion history.

If this is right

  • Primordial Helium-4 abundance sets an upper limit on the deviation from standard radiative plasma energy density.
  • Changes in freezing temperature affect the production rates of light elements in the modified framework.
  • Numerical evaluation with PRyMordial software yields constrained abundances for Hydrogen, Deuterium, Helium-3, Helium-4, and Lithium-7.
  • MCMC analysis imposes relevant constraints on the initial conditions of the cosmos in the Weylian boundary model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be extended to other cosmological probes like the cosmic microwave background to further test the boundary terms.
  • If the splitting assumption holds, similar constraints might apply to later epochs involving structure formation.
  • Testable extensions include varying the parameters of the scalar field to see impacts on relic abundances beyond current BBN limits.

Load-bearing premise

The generalized energy conservation equation can be split into distinct cosmological scenarios involving a dissipative scalar field and Weyl vector without introducing uncontrolled changes to the thermonuclear reaction network or the background expansion history.

What would settle it

A direct measurement showing that the primordial Helium-4 abundance deviates from the predicted range under the modified expansion history, or MCMC chains failing to find viable initial conditions consistent with observations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.01162 by Cristian Croitoru, Teodora M. Matei, Tiberiu Harko.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Flow diagram of the Genetic Algorithm routine. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The convergence of the parameter chains can be [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Trace plots showing the evolution of the chains [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Posterior distributions of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The posterior distributions of scalar potential parameters for the warm inflationary frameworks with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Schematic representation of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Time evolution as a function of temperature represented on a logarithmic scale for the epoch considered in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Light element abundances for the each model (first - upper left, second - upper right, third - bottom) with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Visual representation of the model performance based on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the effects that arise from the inclusion of Weylian boundary terms in the Einstein gravitational field equations in the Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) framework. With the help of the generalized Friedmann equations for a Universe with a Weylian boundary, obtained for a Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker FLRW metric, three distinct cosmological models can be constructed. The cosmological evolution is determined by a dissipative scalar field, and by the Weyl vector coming from the boundary. Several cosmological scenarios are obtained via the appropriate splitting of the generalized energy conservation equation. In the present work we obtain relevant constraints on these models by using the BBN data. In particular, the effects on the BBN that arise in the post warm-inflationary era will be examined by theoretically evaluating the measured abundances of relic nuclei (Hydrogen, Deuterium, Helium-3, Helium-4, and Lithium-7). We consider firstly the primordial mass fraction estimates, and their deviations due to changes in the freezing temperature, which impose an upper limit on the effective energy density obtained from the modified Friedmann equations. The deviation from the standard energy density of the radiative plasma is therefore constrained by the abundances of the Helium-4 nuclei. Secondly, an upper limit will be considered in a numerical analysis performed through the usage of the \texttt{PRyMordial} software package, with the help of which we calculate the primordial abundances of the light elements by evaluating the thermonuclear rates within the considered modified gravity framework. Finally, an MCMC analysis will validate the cosmological model with Weylian boundary contributions, imposing relevant constraints on the initial conditions of the cosmos. The methodology is implemented in the python code \texttt{genesys}, which is available on GitHub.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the effects of Weylian boundary terms added to the Einstein field equations on Big Bang Nucleosynthesis in an FLRW universe. Generalized Friedmann equations are derived, and three cosmological scenarios are constructed by splitting the generalized energy conservation equation into contributions from a dissipative scalar field and a Weyl vector. Constraints on the effective energy density deviation are obtained from analytic estimates of light-element abundances (particularly Helium-4) and from numerical evaluation of thermonuclear rates using the PRyMordial package, followed by an MCMC analysis to constrain initial conditions; the methodology is implemented in the open-source genesys code.

Significance. If the modified background evolution is shown to integrate cleanly with standard BBN physics, the work would supply useful upper limits on a class of boundary-modified gravity models from well-established early-universe observables. The use of an existing, validated BBN code together with MCMC and the public release of genesys are positive features that support reproducibility and allow independent checks.

major comments (2)
  1. The description of the numerical implementation does not specify how the splitting of the generalized energy conservation equation is translated into the background expansion history and entropy density supplied to PRyMordial. Without an explicit demonstration that no additional source terms alter dT/dt or the baryon-to-photon ratio beyond the claimed effective-density shift, the reported abundance constraints cannot be regarded as robust.
  2. The analytic upper limit on the effective energy density deviation is derived by requiring consistency with observed Helium-4 abundances after adjusting the deviation parameter to match the freeze-out temperature. This procedure risks reducing the 'constraint' to a fitted value rather than an independent prediction from the Weylian boundary model.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract refers to the 'post warm-inflationary era' without clarifying how the Weylian boundary terms relate to warm-inflation dynamics; a short explanatory paragraph or reference would help.
  2. A table comparing the predicted abundances for the three splitting scenarios against observational values would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major point below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the presentation and robustness of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The description of the numerical implementation does not specify how the splitting of the generalized energy conservation equation is translated into the background expansion history and entropy density supplied to PRyMordial. Without an explicit demonstration that no additional source terms alter dT/dt or the baryon-to-photon ratio beyond the claimed effective-density shift, the reported abundance constraints cannot be regarded as robust.

    Authors: We agree that the numerical implementation section would benefit from greater explicitness. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph (and, if space permits, a short appendix) that maps the splitting of the generalized energy conservation equation onto the inputs required by PRyMordial. Specifically, we will show that the only modification supplied to the code is an effective energy-density deviation entering the Friedmann equation; the temperature-time relation dT/dt and the baryon-to-photon ratio are left unchanged beyond this shift. We have already verified this property inside the genesys code and will include a brief validation statement together with the relevant code snippet or pseudocode for reproducibility. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The analytic upper limit on the effective energy density deviation is derived by requiring consistency with observed Helium-4 abundances after adjusting the deviation parameter to match the freeze-out temperature. This procedure risks reducing the 'constraint' to a fitted value rather than an independent prediction from the Weylian boundary model.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the analytic estimate is obtained by adjusting the deviation parameter so that the modified freeze-out temperature reproduces the observed ^{4}He abundance; this indeed renders it a consistency bound rather than a fully independent prediction. In the revised text we will rephrase the relevant section to describe the result explicitly as an “upper limit derived from consistency with the observed ^{4}He mass fraction” and will note its methodological character. We will also stress that the primary, more robust constraints on the model parameters are those obtained from the full numerical thermonuclear-rate evaluation with PRyMordial followed by the MCMC analysis, which does not rely on the same fitting step. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard BBN parameter constraints from modified Friedmann equations

full rationale

The paper first obtains generalized Friedmann equations incorporating Weylian boundary terms for an FLRW metric, then splits the generalized energy conservation equation into scenarios involving a dissipative scalar field and Weyl vector. These yield a modified effective energy density that is inserted into the standard BBN calculation (analytic Helium-4 estimates plus PRyMordial thermonuclear rates). Observed abundances are then used to bound the deviation parameter and to run MCMC on initial conditions. This is a conventional forward-model-plus-data-constraint workflow; the output bounds are not equivalent to the input equations by construction, nor do they rely on self-citation chains or renamed empirical patterns. The derivation remains self-contained against external BBN data and the PRyMordial code.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence of a Weylian boundary contribution that can be represented by a dissipative scalar field plus a Weyl vector inside an FLRW background; these are introduced without independent falsifiable evidence outside the BBN fit itself.

free parameters (1)
  • effective energy density deviation parameter
    Upper limit derived from requiring consistency with observed Helium-4 mass fraction under the modified Friedmann equations.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The FLRW metric admits a consistent inclusion of Weylian boundary terms that produce generalized Friedmann equations involving a dissipative scalar field and a Weyl vector.
    This is the foundational modeling step used to construct the three distinct cosmological scenarios examined with BBN.
invented entities (1)
  • Weyl vector from the boundary no independent evidence
    purpose: To encode the additional gravitational degrees of freedom arising from the Weylian boundary terms.
    The vector is postulated as part of the boundary modification and has no independent falsifiable signature reported outside the BBN abundance fit.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5871 in / 1447 out tokens · 57569 ms · 2026-05-18T20:15:26.497313+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Big Bang Nucleosynthesis constraints on space-time noncommutativity

    gr-qc 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Modified dispersion relations for photons from spacetime noncommutativity produce constraints on noncommutativity parameters via BBN light element abundances using numerical and MCMC methods.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

154 extracted references · 154 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    (101) and the equation of state given in Eq

    and by imposing the nuclear freeze-out constraint given in Eq. (101) and the equation of state given in Eq. (102). The time dependent results can be parame- terized as functions of temperature T ∈ [10, 10−4] MeV, in accordance with the decreasing temperature scale de- fined in PRyMordial. However, as the three models define initial value boundary problems...

    work page 2027

  2. [2]

    2 0.4 0.6 δ δ = 0.32 ± 0.13 Model II: v ( ϕ ) = γϕ 2 + δϕ 4

    2 0.4 0.6 δ γ = −0.00041 ± 0.00020 0.0 0. 2 0.4 0.6 δ δ = 0.32 ± 0.13 Model II: v ( ϕ ) = γϕ 2 + δϕ 4

    work page

  3. [3]

    23 −0.17 Model III: v ( ϕ ) = γϕ 2 + δϕ 4 2.92 2.96 3.00 σ 0 1 2 3 /uni03BC σ = 2.971 ± 0.014 0 1 2 3 /uni03BC /uni03BC= 1.69 ± 0.63 Model III: v ( ϕ ) = σμ − /uni03BCϕ FIG

    8 2.9 3.0 σ 0 1 2 3 /uni03BC σ = 2.895 ± 0.051 0 1 2 3 /uni03BC /uni03BC= 1.56 ± 0.69 Model II: v ( ϕ ) = σμ − /uni03BCϕ 0 1 2 3 4 5 m / 2 ×10 −4 m / 2 = 0.000306 +0.00014 −0.000093 Model III: v ( ϕ ) = mϕ 2 /2 −8 −6 −4 −2 0 γ ×10 −5 0.0 0.5 1.0 δ γ = ( − 3.0 +2.4 −1.4 ) ⋅ 10 −5 0.0 0.5 1.0 δ δ = 0.58 +0. 23 −0.17 Model III: v ( ϕ ) = γϕ 2 + δϕ 4 2.92 2.9...

    work page 2054

  4. [4]

    beyond the inflationary period, and explores the con- tribution of the boundary terms during the BBN era. While the intensive production of radiation by two scalar fields − the inflaton and the Weyl boundary terms − is not the dominant physical process during the BBN phase, a limited creation of matter and radiation cannot be ex- cluded even at this relat...

    work page 1933

  5. [5]

    242 0. 246 0. 250 Y p

    work page

  6. [6]

    2 1.4 1.6 3 He / H × 10 5 2 4 6 8 D / H × 10 5 2 4 6 8 D / H × 10 5

    work page

  7. [7]

    2 1.4 1.6 3 He / H × 10 5 Model I 1 2 mϕ 2 γϕ 2 + δϕ 4 σe − μϕ

    8 1.0 1. 2 1.4 1.6 3 He / H × 10 5 Model I 1 2 mϕ 2 γϕ 2 + δϕ 4 σe − μϕ

    work page

  8. [8]

    2 1.4 3 He / H × 10 5 2 3 4 5 6 D / H × 10 5 2 3 4 5 6 D / H × 10 5

    work page

  9. [9]

    2 1.4 3 He / H × 10 5 Model II 1 2 mϕ 2 γϕ 2 + δϕ 4 σe − μϕ

    8 1.0 1. 2 1.4 3 He / H × 10 5 Model II 1 2 mϕ 2 γϕ 2 + δϕ 4 σe − μϕ

    work page

  10. [10]

    240 0. 245 0. 250 Y p

    work page

  11. [11]

    2 1.4 1.6 3 He / H × 10 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 D / H × 10 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 D / H × 10 5

    work page

  12. [12]

    2 1.4 3 He / H × 10 5 Model III 1 2 mϕ 2 γϕ 2 + δϕ 4 σe − μϕ FIG

    8 1.0 1. 2 1.4 3 He / H × 10 5 Model III 1 2 mϕ 2 γϕ 2 + δϕ 4 σe − μϕ FIG. 7: Light element abundances for the each model (first - upper left, second - upper right, third - bottom) with the three scalar potential types overlaid. of degrees of freedom ( ν = 2) compared to the Higgs- type and exponential potentials ( ν = 1). Consequently, we distinguish bet...

    work page

  13. [13]

    P. J. E. Peebes, Nobel Lecture: How physical cosmology grew, Reviews of Modern Physics 92, 030501 (2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    P. J. E. Peebles, Cosmology’s Century: An Inside His- tory of our Modern Understanding of the Universe , Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    Mukhanov, Physical Foundations of Cosmology , Cambridge University Press, 2005

    V. Mukhanov, Physical Foundations of Cosmology , Cambridge University Press, 2005

    work page 2005

  16. [16]

    Staggs, J

    S. Staggs, J. Dunkley, and L. Page, Recent discoveries from the cosmic microwave background: a review of re- cent progress, Reports on Progress in Physics81, 044901 (2018)

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    A. H. Guth, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible So- lution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev. D 23 347356, 1981

    work page 1981

  18. [18]

    A. D. Linde, A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogene- ity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems, Physics Lett. B 108, 389-393, 1982

    work page 1982

  19. [19]

    Albrecht, P

    A. Albrecht, P. J. Steinhardt,Cosmology for Grand Uni- fied Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Break- ing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 1220, 1982

    work page 1982

  20. [20]

    A. D. Linde, Chaotic Inflation, Phys. Lett. B 129, 177- 181, 1983

    work page 1983

  21. [21]

    A. D. Linde, Hybrid Inflation , Phys. Rev. D 49, 748- 754, 1994

    work page 1994

  22. [22]

    E. J. Copeland, A. R. Liddle, D. H. Lyth, E. D. Stewart, D. Wands, False vacuum inflation with Einstein gravity, Phys. Rev. D 49, 6410, 1994

    work page 1994

  23. [23]

    Channuie, Strong dynamics and inflation: A review , Nuc

    P. Channuie, Strong dynamics and inflation: A review , Nuc. Phys. B 892, 492 (2015)

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    G. Kane, K. Sinha, and S. Watson, Moduli stabilisation and the statistics of axion physics in the landscape , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24, 1530022-324, 2015

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    Brandenberger, Initial conditions for inflation — A short review , Int

    R. Brandenberger, Initial conditions for inflation — A short review , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 26, 1740002-126 (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    Hiraga and Y

    K. Hiraga and Y. Hyakutake, Review of inflationary cosmology via quantum corrections in M-theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 34, 1930016-181 (2019)

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    de Haro and L

    J. de Haro and L. Arest´ e Sal´ o,A review of Quintessen- tial Inflation, Galaxies 9, 73, 2021

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Cruces, Review on Stochastic Approach to Inflation , Universe 8, 334 (2022)

    D. Cruces, Review on Stochastic Approach to Inflation , Universe 8, 334 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    S. D. Odintsov, V. K. Oikonomou, I. Giannakoudi, F. P. Fronimos and E. C. Lymperiadou, Recent Advances in Inflation, Symmetry 15, 1701 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Albrecht, P

    A. Albrecht, P. J. Steinhardt, M. S. Turner, and F. Wilczek, Reheating an Inflationary Universe , Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1437 (1982)

    work page 1982

  31. [31]

    A. D. Dolgov and A. D. Linde, Baryon asymmetry in the inflationary universe, Phys. Lett. B116, 329 (1982)

    work page 1982

  32. [32]

    L. A. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, Re- heating after inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 3195 (1994)

    work page 1994

  33. [33]

    D. H. Lyth and E. D. Stewart, Cosmology with a TeV Mass Higgs Field Breaking the Grand-Unified-Theory Gauge Symmetry , Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, Issue 2, 201 (1995)

    work page 1995

  34. [34]

    Harko, W

    T. Harko, W. F. Choi, K. C. Wong, and K. S. Cheng, Reheating the Universe in braneworld cosmological mod- els with bulk brane energy transfer , J. Cosmol. As- tropart. Phys. 06, 002 (2008)

    work page 2008

  35. [35]

    Allahverdi, R

    R. Allahverdi, R. Brandenberger, F. Cyr-Racine, A. Mazumdar, Reheating in Inflationary Cosmology: The- ory and Applications , Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60, 27 (2010)

    work page 2010

  36. [36]

    Mukaida, K

    K. Mukaida, K. Nakayama, Dissipative effects on re- heating after inflation , J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03, 002 (2013)

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    de Salas, M

    P.F. de Salas, M. Lattanzi, G. Mangano, G. Miele, S. Pastor, and O. Pisanti, Bounds on very low reheating scenarios after Planck , Phys. Rev. D 92, 123534 (20, 15)

    work page

  38. [38]

    Arkani-Hamed, T

    N. Arkani-Hamed, T. Cohen, R. Tito D’Agnolo, A. Hook, H. Do Kim, and D. Pinner, Solving the Hierarchy 26 Problem at Reheating with a Large Number of Degrees of Freedom, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 251801 (2016)

    work page 2016

  39. [39]

    Alexander, E

    S. Alexander, E. McDonough, and R. Sims, V-mode po- larization in axion inflation and preheating , Phys. Rev. D 96, 063506 (2017)

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    Berera and L

    A. Berera and L. Z. Fang, Thermally induced density perturbations in the inflation era , Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1912, 1995

    work page 1912

  41. [41]

    Berera, Warm inflation , Phys

    A. Berera, Warm inflation , Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3218, 1995

    work page 1995

  42. [42]

    L. M. H. Hall, I. G. Moss, A. Berera, Scalar perturbation spectra from warm inflation , Phys.Rev. D 69, 083525, 2004

    work page 2004

  43. [43]

    H. P. De Oliveira and S. E. Jor´ as,Perturbations in warm inflation, Phys. Rev. D 64, 063513 (2001)

    work page 2001

  44. [44]

    I. G. Moss and C. M. Graham, Particle production and reheating of the inflationary universe , Phys. Rev. D 78, 123526 (2008)

    work page 2008

  45. [45]

    Zhang, Warm inflation with a general form of the dissipative coefficient, J

    Y. Zhang, Warm inflation with a general form of the dissipative coefficient, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03, 023 (2009)

    work page 2009

  46. [46]

    Herrera, Warm inflationary model in loop quantum cosmology, Phys

    R. Herrera, Warm inflationary model in loop quantum cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 81, 123511 (2010)

    work page 2010

  47. [47]

    del Campo, R

    S. del Campo, R. Herrera, D. Pav´ on, and J. R. Vil- lanueva, On the consistency of warm inflation in the presence of viscosity , Journal of Cosmology and As- troparticle Physics 08, 002 (2010)

    work page 2010

  48. [48]

    Bastero-Gil, A

    M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera, R. O. Ramos, Dissipation coefficients from scalar and fermion quantum field inter- actions, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 1107, 030 (2011)

    work page 2011

  49. [49]

    Visinelli, Natural warm inflation , J

    L. Visinelli, Natural warm inflation , J. Cosmol. As- tropart. Phys. 09, 013 (2011)

    work page 2011

  50. [50]

    Bastero-Gil, A

    M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera, and R. O. Ramos, Shear viscous effects on the primordial power spectrum from warm inflation, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 07, 030 (2011)

    work page 2011

  51. [51]

    Mishra, S

    H. Mishra, S. Mohanty, and A. Nautiyal, Warm natural inflation, Phys. Lett. B 710, 245 (2012)

    work page 2012

  52. [52]

    Bartrum, A

    S. Bartrum, A. Berera, and J. G. Rosa, Gravitino cos- mology in supersymmetric warm inflation , Phys. Rev. D 86, 123525 (2012)

    work page 2012

  53. [53]

    Zhang and J.-Y

    X.-M. Zhang and J.-Y. Zhu, Extension of warm inflation to noncanonical scalar fields , Phys. Rev. D 90, 123519 (2014)

    work page 2014

  54. [54]

    Bastero-Gil, A

    M. Bastero-Gil, A. Berera, I. G. Moss, and R. O. Ramos, Theory of non-Gaussianity in warm inflation, JCAP 12, 008 (2014)

    work page 2014

  55. [55]

    Sheikhahmadi, A

    H. Sheikhahmadi, A. Mohammadi, A. Aghamoham- madi, T. Harko, R. Herrera, C. Corda, A. Abebe, and K. Saaidi, Constraining chameleon field driven warm in- flation with Planck 2018 data , Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 1038 (2019)

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    J. G. Rosa and L. B. Ventura, Warm Little Inflaton Be- comes Cold Dark Matter , Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 161301 (2019)

    work page 2019

  57. [57]

    Harko and H

    T. Harko and H. Sheikhahmadi, Irreversible thermody- namical description of warm inflationary cosmological models, Physics of the Dark Universe28, 100521 (2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Harko and H

    T. Harko and H. Sheikhahmadi, Warm inflation with non-comoving scalar field and radiation fluid, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 165 (2021)

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    Kamali, M

    V. Kamali, M. Motaharfar, and R. O. Ramos, Re- cent Developments in Warm Inflation , Universe 9, 124 (2023)

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    Berera, The Warm Inflation Story , Universe 9, 272 (2023)

    A. Berera, The Warm Inflation Story , Universe 9, 272 (2023)

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, Action integrals and partition functions in quantum gravity , Phys. Rev. D 15, 2752 (1977)

    work page 1977

  62. [62]

    J. W. York, Boundary terms in the action principles of general relativity , Foundations of Physics 16, 249 (1986)

    work page 1986

  63. [63]

    J. S. Ridao, M. Bellini, Discrete modes in gravitational waves from the big-bang , Astrophys Space Sci 357, 94 (2015)

    work page 2015

  64. [64]

    J. S. Ridao, M. Bellini, Towards relativistic quantum geometry, Physics Letters B 751 565 (2015)

    work page 2015

  65. [65]

    Hernandez-Jimenez, C

    R. Hernandez-Jimenez, C. Moreno, M. Bellini, C. Or- tiz, Cosmological Boundary Flux Paramete , Phys.Dark Univ. 38, 101137 (2022)

    work page 2022

  66. [66]

    Weyl, Gravitation und Elektrizit¨ at , Sitzungs- berichte der K¨ oniglich Preußischen Akademie der Wis- senschaften (Berlin), 465 (1918)

    H. Weyl, Gravitation und Elektrizit¨ at , Sitzungs- berichte der K¨ oniglich Preußischen Akademie der Wis- senschaften (Berlin), 465 (1918)

    work page 1918

  67. [67]

    Weyl, Eine neue Erweiterung der Relativit¨ atstheorie, Annalen der Physik 364, 101 (1919)

    H. Weyl, Eine neue Erweiterung der Relativit¨ atstheorie, Annalen der Physik 364, 101 (1919)

    work page 1919

  68. [68]

    Weyl, Raum- Zeit- Materie , Springer Verlag, 1993

    H. Weyl, Raum- Zeit- Materie , Springer Verlag, 1993

    work page 1993

  69. [69]

    D. M. Ghilencea, Weyl R2 inflation with an emergent Planck scale, Journal of High Energy Physics 2019, 209 (2019)

    work page 2019

  70. [70]

    D. M. Ghilencea, Spontaneous breaking of Weyl quadratic gravity to Einstein action and Higgs potential , Journal of High Energy Physics 2019, 49 (2019)

    work page 2019

  71. [71]

    J. M. Nester and H.-J. Yo, Symmetric Teleparallel Gen- eral Relativity , Chinese Journal of Physics 37, 113 (1999)

    work page 1999

  72. [72]

    Haghani, T

    Z. Haghani, T. Harko, H. R. Sepangi, and S. Shahidi, Weyl-Cartan-Weitzenb¨ ock gravity as a generalization of teleparallel gravity, JCAP 10, 061 (2012)

    work page 2012

  73. [73]

    Haghani, T

    Z. Haghani, T. Harko, H. R. Sepangi, and S. Shahidi, Weyl-Cartan-Weitzenb¨ ock gravity through La- grange multiplier, Phys. Rev. D 88, 044024 (2013)

    work page 2013

  74. [74]

    J. B. Jim´ enez, L. Heisenberg, and T. Koivisto, Coinci- dent general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 98, 044048 (2018)

    work page 2018

  75. [75]

    J.-Z. Yang, S. Shahidi, and T. Harko, Black hole solu- tions in the quadratic Weyl conformal geometric theory of gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 1171 (2022)

    work page 2022

  76. [76]

    Harko and S

    T. Harko and S. Shahidi, Coupling matter and curva- ture in Weyl geometry: conformally invariant f (R, Lm) gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 219 (2022)

    work page 2022

  77. [77]

    D. M. Ghilencea, Non-metric geometry as the origin of mass in gauge theories of scale invariance , Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 176 (2023)

    work page 2023

  78. [78]

    Weisswange, D

    M. Weisswange, D. M. Ghilencea, and D. St¨ ockinger, Quantum scale invariance in gauge theories and appli- cations to muon production, Phys. Rev. D 107, 085008 (2023)

    work page 2023

  79. [79]

    D. M. Ghilencea and C. T. Hill, Renormalization group for nonminimal ψ2R couplings and gravitational contact interactions, Phys. Rev. D 107, 085013 (2023)

    work page 2023

  80. [80]

    Burikham, T

    P. Burikham, T. Harko, K. Pimsamarn, and S. Shahidi, Dark matter as a Weyl geometric effect , Phys. Rev. D 107, 064008 (2023)

    work page 2023

Showing first 80 references.