Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

WFC/WFD: Web Fuzzing Commons, Dataset and Guidelines to Support Experimentation in REST API Fuzzing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2509.01612 v1 pith:ZSHTGW4M submitted 2025-09-01 cs.SE

WFC/WFD: Web Fuzzing Commons, Dataset and Guidelines to Support Experimentation in REST API Fuzzing

classification cs.SE
keywords fuzzingfuzzersapisdifferentauthenticationcarriedcatalogcommons
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Fuzzing REST APIs is an important research problem, with practical applications and impact in industry. As such, a lot of research work has been carried out on this topic in the last few years. However, there are three major issues that hinder further progress: how to deal with API authentication; how to catalog and compare different fault types found by different fuzzers; and what to use as case study to facilitate fair comparisons among fuzzers. To address these important challenges, we present Web Fuzzing Commons (WFC) and Web Fuzzing Dataset (WFD). WFC is a set of open-source libraries and schema definitions to declaratively specify authentication info and catalog different types of faults that fuzzers can automatically detect. WFD is a collection of 36 open-source APIs with all necessary scaffolding to easily run experiments with fuzzers, supported by WFC. To show the usefulness of WFC/WFD, a set of experiments is carried out with EvoMaster, a state-of-the-art fuzzer for Web APIs. However, any fuzzer can benefit from WFC and WFD. We compare EvoMaster with other state-of-the-art tools such as ARAT-RL, EmRest, LLamaRestTest, RESTler, and Schemathesis. We discuss common pitfalls in tool comparisons, as well as providing guidelines with support of WFC/WFD to avoid them.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. MASTOR: A Multi-Agent Approach to Semantic Test Oracle Generation for RESTful APIs

    cs.SE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    MASTOR is a multi-agent system that generates semantic test oracles from REST API source code via source extraction and dual oracle-generation paths with challenger review, achieving 75.4% average mutation score on 13...

  2. Using OAI Overlay to Enhance REST API Fuzzing

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Native Overlay support in EvoMaster lets testers supply named examples that improve black-box REST API fuzzing results on industrial systems without vendor-specific formats.