Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

An ensemble of V-type three-level atoms, starting with N atoms in each of two upper states, can emit two superradiance pulses back-to-back so that the total emission time is about (E0 + log N)/N rather than the sum of two Dicke delays.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

A V-type three-level atomic ensemble with N atoms in each upper state emits two superradiance pulses in quick succession, the first pulse preparing the second via the shared ground level.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection Plausible numerical demonstration of two-pulse V-type superradiance; the 'synthesis' is a real population effect but is interpreted rather than derived. the 5 major comments →

arxiv 2509.01700 v1 pith:57VUXQ7D submitted 2025-09-01 quant-ph

Superradiant Syntheses via the V-type Three-Level Atoms

Gombojav O. Ariunbold , Tuguldur Begzjav This is my paper
classification quant-ph PACS 42.50.Fx
keywords Dicke superradiancetwo-mode superradianceV-type three-level atomssuperradiant synthesisquantum state engineeringmacroscopic quantum statescollective spontaneous emissionrate equations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that an ensemble of atoms in a V-shaped three-level configuration—two upper states that both decay into one shared ground state—can emit two separate superradiant bursts back-to-back, as if the two groups of atoms had fused into a single larger superradiant source. The authors call this 'superradiant synthesis' and claim it is demonstrated here for the first time. The load-bearing result is a timing identity: with N atoms in each upper state and decay rates separated by an order of magnitude, the first pulse carries its own half of the atoms down to the shared ground level, so the second transition immediately sees N excited atoms and N ground atoms—the configuration in which Dicke superradiance is already at full strength. The second pulse therefore fires at once, and the total emission time is about (E0 + log N)/N rather than the sum of two separate Dicke delays. If correct, this gives quantum state engineering a way to weld two independent N-atom ensembles into a single macroscopic 2N-atom emitter using only the timing of collective spontaneous emission.

Core claim

The discovery is that a V-type three-level ensemble of 2N atoms, prepared with N atoms in each of the two upper states and none in the shared ground state, successively emits a pair of Dicke superradiance pulses when the two decay rates differ by roughly an order of magnitude (Γ2/Γ1 ≈ 0.1). The first pulse, on the |1⟩→|3⟩ transition, completes in the ordinary Dicke delay τ1D = (E0 + log N)/N. Because the first transition empties into the shared ground level, the second transition's cooperative rate jumps from about N to N(N+1): the second mode sees N atoms excited and N atoms in the ground state, the half-excited condition where superradiance is strongest, so its pulse fires immediately. The

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the pair of cooperative decay rates I1(n,m) = n(2N−m+1) and I2(n,m) = (m−n)(2N−m+1), which govern the two one-photon transitions. Here 2N−m is the number of atoms in the shared ground state, and the common factor (2N−m+1) is what couples the two modes: both transitions gain collective strength from the same ground-state population. After the first pulse moves the |1⟩ atoms down, that factor is already at its maximum for the second mode, making I2 = N(N+1); the second sub-ensemble starts at peak cooperativity instead of needing its own buildup time. The rate equations themselves (Eq. 1) are the numerical engine, and the delay, noise, and intensity observables (Eqs. 2–

Load-bearing premise

The result assumes that all 2N atoms are packed into a volume smaller than both radiation wavelengths and that atomic interactions beyond the shared radiation modes—dipole-dipole forces and collective frequency shifts—can be neglected, so that the second pulse can start from an already-built macroscopic coherence of N excited and N ground atoms.

What would settle it

Look for the second pulse's delay in a V-type ensemble with N atoms in each upper state and Γ2/Γ1 = 0.1. Superradiant synthesis predicts total completion time ≈ (E0 + log N)/N (0.04 for N=150); if instead the second pulse peaks only after a further delay ≈ 0.21, so the total is ≈ 0.23, the synthesis claim is refuted.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • With Γ2/Γ1 ≈ 0.1, both pulses from the V-type system satisfy all four Dicke superradiance criteria, so each mode is a bona fide superradiant burst, not a deformed or suppressed emission.
  • The total completion time for both pulses is about (E0 + log N)/N, an order-of-magnitude speedup over cascade superradiance (0.04 vs 0.23 for N=150 in the paper's example).
  • At low decay-rate ratio, each V-type mode reproduces the corresponding reduced two-level model; at ratios of 0.5 and 1, deviations appear, showing that intermodal competition sets the limit of the synthesis.
  • Two initially independent N-atom sub-ensembles are dynamically synthesized into a single 2N-atom coherent emitter, offering a concrete mechanism for building macroscopic quantum states from smaller decoupled pieces.
  • The V-type configuration is the complement of the Λ-type system: instead of one mode being suppressed, both modes exhibit superradiance, which broadens the toolbox for mode-based quantum state control.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension not in the paper: the synthesis mechanism should survive unequal sub-ensemble sizes—N1 atoms in one upper state and N2 in the other—predicting that the second pulse fires as soon as the first completes and acts like a combined N1+N2 ensemble; the model equations allow this immediately but the paper keeps N1 = N2.
  • Testable threshold: the paper uses 'order of magnitude' for the decay-rate ratio, but the numerical data only sample 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0; a fine scan between 0.1 and 0.5 would map where the second pulse's immediate firing degrades into a cascade-like delay.
  • Implicit design rule: any multi-level system where several transitions empty into a common ground state can use the shared-ground cooperative factor as a built-in trigger, suggesting generalizations to more than two upper states or to engineered reservoirs.
  • The rate-equation treatment neglects inhomogeneous broadening and dipole-dipole shifts; in a real sample those effects would add a finite dephasing time, and the synthesis would survive only while τ1D stays shorter than the coherence time—a condition the paper does not quantify.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies a V-type three-level ensemble of 2N atoms, with N atoms initially in each of the two upper states and none in the shared ground state. The dynamics are modeled by the two-mode rate equations (Eq. (1)) for collective Dicke states, and the authors numerically compute mode intensities, buildup time delays, and noise fluctuations (Eqs. (2)-(8)). They compare their numerical results against the standard Dicke superradiance scalings: peak intensity ~ N², delay τ_D=(E0+log N)/N, noise σ=π/[√6(E0+log N)], and width ~1/N. For the case Γ2/Γ1=0.1, they argue that the first mode emits a conventional Dicke pulse, populating the shared ground state, which then triggers an immediate second superradiant pulse from the |2>→|3> transition. This 'superradiant synthesis' is claimed to make the total emission time ~τ1D, rather than τ1D+τ2D, effectively merging the two sub-ensembles into one macroscopic collective state. The paper concludes with potential applications to quantum state engineering.

Significance. The central claim is novel and, if correct, identifies a new mechanism for sequentially generating two cooperative pulses from initially independent sub-ensembles that share a ground state. A strength of the paper is that the numerical data are compared to externally derived Dicke formulas without fitting parameters, so the agreement is a nontrivial consistency check. However, the verification is entirely numerical, and the paper lacks the solver details and direct timing comparisons needed to substantiate the 'immediate' second pulse. The synthesis mechanism also relies on the survival of shared-ground Dicke coherence, which is assumed by neglecting dipole-dipole interactions and collective shifts. These issues do not invalidate the model, but they make the current presentation insufficient for a definitive claim.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 4 / Numerical simulations] All results are obtained by numerical integration of Eq. (1), yet the manuscript gives no solver details: no integration scheme, time-step size, error tolerance, or convergence checks. The state space is large (scales as O(N^2) for N up to 300), and the claimed scalings depend sensitively on accurate long-time behavior. Without this information the numerical results are not reproducible, and the reader cannot assess whether the observed agreements with Dicke formulas are numerical artifacts.
  2. [Section 5 / Superradiant syntheses] The central claim that the total completion time is about τ1D, not τ1D+τ2D, is not directly demonstrated. The paper estimates τ1D for a sample case and compares it with the cascade sum, but it does not report the actual mean delay of the second pulse in the full V-type model or the time interval between the two intensity peaks. Fig. 8(A) shows the asymptotic delay of the second mode, but it is not compared with the natural delay of the reduced two-level model with Γ2=0.1 (which would be ~10 τ1D). A direct comparison, e.g., a table of extracted ⟨τ2(∞)⟩ for Γ2/Γ1=0.1 versus τ1D and τ2D, is needed to justify 'immediate' second emission.
  3. [Section 2 / Model assumptions] The synthesis mechanism relies on the shared-ground Dicke coherence generated by the first pulse. The model explicitly neglects dipole-dipole interactions and collective frequency shifts, but the required geometry (all 2N atoms in a volume smaller than both wavelengths) typically makes these effects non-negligible. If they dephase the |2>-|3> coherence, the second pulse would develop its own buildup delay of order τ2D and the claimed speedup would not occur. The authors should state the parameter regime in which the idealization is valid, or at least quantify the sensitivity of the synthesized delay to dephasing.
  4. [Section 5 / Data processing] The conclusions that 'both modes exhibit a clear linear relationship with N^2' and that noise data are 'consistent with theory' are based on visual inspection of Figs. 6-9. For the central claims, the paper should provide quantitative fits (e.g., log-log slopes for the N^2 scaling, reduced chi-squared values for the delay and noise comparisons) or at least report residuals. Without such quantification, the agreement with Dicke characteristics is not established to the standard claimed.
  5. [Highlights and Abstract] The first highlight states 'Exact solutions for two-mode superradiance.' The paper presents numerical solutions of rate equations, not exact analytic solutions. This overstates the contribution. The wording should be revised to 'exact numerical solutions' or similar, consistent with the body's reference to 'exact numerical solutions' in the introduction.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 5] There are two sections numbered 5: '5. Data processing' and '5. Superradiant syntheses'. The second should be renumbered as Section 6, and the conclusion as Section 7.
  2. [Throughout] The text repeatedly uses 'L-type' where the context and reference [44] indicate 'Λ-type'. Please correct.
  3. [Fig. 10 caption] The caption says 'Red surface (A, C): second mode intensity for Γ1=0 and Γ*=0.1' — the second rate should be Γ2=0.1. Also, the statement that the red surface is 'plotted at a delay time given by α(E0+log N)/N' with α=1/10 is unclear: does this mean the surface is artificially shifted? If so, state explicitly that the shift is for visualization only.
  4. [Fig. 9 caption] The sentence 'while identical dotted lines for π/[√6(E0+log N)] versus π/[√6(E0+log N)]' is confusing and appears to contain a typo. Clarify what the dotted lines represent.
  5. [Eq. (7)] The square-root symbol is rendered as 'U' in the equation. Ensure proper typesetting. Also check the definition of ⟨σ⟩: it is the relative fluctuation of the delay, which should be stated explicitly in the text.
  6. [References] Reference [30] is used to justify the scaling factor α=1/10 in Fig. 10. A brief explanation of the origin of this factor in the text would help the reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the two-mode predictions follow from the standard V-type rate equations and are compared against external Dicke formulas without parameter fitting; the 'superradiant synthesis' is a direct consequence of the cooperative rate I2 after the first pulse.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. The model uses the V-type rate equations from the 1970s literature [40-43] (Eq. 1), with cooperative factors I1=n(2N-m+1) and I2=(m-n)(2N-m+1). The observables (Eqs. 2-8) are standard definitions of intensity, delay, and relative fluctuation; they are introduced by citing the authors' prior methodology [30,44], but the physics is not loaded onto those citations—the same quantities can be read directly from the probability distribution P_{n,m}. The paper does not fit any parameter to the Dicke formulas tau_D=(E0+log N)/N or sigma=pi/[sqrt(6)(E0+log N)]; it numerically integrates Eq. (1) and then plots the resulting intensities, delays, and noises against these externally known formulas as a consistency check. The reduction to Dicke superradiance when one decay rate vanishes (Section 5, Fig. 4) is a genuine limit of Eq. (1), not a constructed coincidence. The central 'superradiant synthesis' claim is likewise a consequence of the equations: for Gamma1>>Gamma2 the fast first pulse leaves n≈0, m≈N, so the second-mode cooperative factor becomes I2=(m-n)(2N-m+1)≈N(N+1), i.e., the second transition starts from N excited and N ground atoms and emits with essentially no buildup delay; the total timing ≈tau_1D follows from the numerical solution, not from any enforced assumption. The stated neglect of dipole-dipole interactions and collective frequency shifts (Section 2) is a physical validity limitation—potentially important for the shared-ground coherence—but it is an assumption about the model, not a circular step. Self-citations to Refs. [30,44] occur for notational and methodological continuity but are not the load-bearing evidence for the synthesis result, which stands on the integrated rate equations and external Dicke checks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

There are no fitted free parameters; the central claim rests on the validity of the rate equation model, the numerical solution, and the interpretation of processed data. No new physical entities are introduced.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The atomic ensemble obeys the rate equations (1) from Refs. [40-43], which assume cooperative Dicke decay with factors I1 = n(2N-m+1) and I2 = (m-n)(2N-m+1), no dipole-dipole interactions, no collective frequency shifts.
    Section 2 states this explicitly and cites [23-28, 30, 40-44].
  • domain assumption The initial condition has exactly N atoms in |1>, N atoms in |2>, and none in |3>.
    Section 2, initial condition. This is the unconventional state that seeds the synthesis.
  • domain assumption The Dicke delay formula tau_d = (E0 + log N)/N and noise formula sigma = pi/[sqrt(6)(E0 + log N)] are taken as external benchmarks from prior literature.
    Used throughout Section 5 as criteria; these are established results from Refs. [23-30, 31-39].
  • ad hoc to paper Numerical integration of Eq. (1) is accurate; no solver or convergence details are provided.
    The paper relies on numerical solutions without presenting error estimates (Section 4).

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Superradiant Syntheses via the V-type Three-Level Atoms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/57VUXQ7D

@misc{pith2026250901700,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Superradiant Syntheses via the V-type Three-Level Atoms},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/57VUXQ7D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.01700}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Quantum state engineering operating with photons is a key enabler of major scientific breakthroughs and future quantum technologies. Its primary obstacle, however, is decoherence often caused by spontaneous emission, which is inherently difficult to control. In contrast, superradiance offers a more controllable alternative. The temporal dynamics of superradiance can be tuned via external experimental parameters, unlike those of spontaneous emission. Incorporating superradiance into quantum state engineering could therefore provide more accessible control over quantum systems. Motivated by this, we present a theoretical model for an ensemble of atoms in a V - type three - level configuration. Our numerical data are analyzed against key superradiance characteristics. The system successively emits a pair of superradiance pulses, effectively synthesizing the dynamically decoupled sub - ensembles into a single macroscopic ensemble involving all atoms. To our knowledge, this process, which we term superradiant synthesis, is demonstrated here for the first time. These findings offer new insights for practical quantum state engineering, particularly in enabling syntheses of macroscopic quantum sub-systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.01700 by Gombojav O. Ariunbold, Tuguldur Begzjav.

Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Processed data. Asymptotic delay times ⟨𝜏₁, ₂(∞)⟩ extracted from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The numerical results demonstrate consistent with theory across the entire parameter space, including all examined atom numbers (𝑁 = 10 to 300) and decay rates ( 𝛤$ = 0.1, 0.5, 1 and 𝛤* = 1). Similar to the L-type three￾level system, this agreement persists despite the system's inherent dynamical evolution of fluctuations, confirming that the fundamental noise characteristics of Dicke superradiance remain … view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Nonclassical Many-Body Superradiant States with Interparticle and Spin-Momentum Entanglement

    quant-ph 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    A cross-cavity bad-cavity setup reaches steady-state superradiance through collective dissipation alone, yielding bunched light, spin-momentum entanglement, and heralded particle-particle entanglement with quantum-enh...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Introduction Producing, analyzing, controlling and synthesizing quantum states of light to achieve desired target states lies at the core of quantum state engineering. These target states often involve entanglement, made possible by advances in laser technologies, ultracold atoms and superconducting circuits – platforms that are crucial for quantum comput...

    work page 1954

  2. [2]

    Macroscopic Quantum Coherence and Quantum Computing 2001st Edition, (Springer, 2001)

    Averin, D.V.; Ruggiero, B.; Silvestrini, P. Macroscopic Quantum Coherence and Quantum Computing 2001st Edition, (Springer, 2001)

    work page 2001

  3. [3]

    Photons and Atoms (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, Weinheim, Germany, 1997)

    Cohen-Tannoudji, C.; Dupont-Roc, J.; Grynberg, G. Photons and Atoms (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, Weinheim, Germany, 1997)

    work page 1997

  4. [4]

    Quantum technologies with hybrid systems, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2015, 112,

    Kurizki, G.; Bertet, P.; Kubo, Y.; Mølmer, K.; Petrosyan, D.; Rabl, P.; Schmiedmayer, J. Quantum technologies with hybrid systems, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2015, 112,

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Biagi, N.; Francesconi, S.; Zavatta, A.; Bellini, M., Photon-by-photon quantum light state engineering, Progress in Quantum Electronics, 2022, 84, 100414

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    T.; Jäger, S

    Reilly, J. T.; Jäger, S. B.; Cooper, J.; Holland, M. J. Adiabatic control of decoherence-free subspaces in an open collective system, Phys. Rev. A, 2022, 106, 023703

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Knysh, S.; Zero-temperature quantum annealing bottlenecks in the spin-glass phase, Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12370

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    T.; Gornyi, I

    Roy, S.; Chalker, J. T.; Gornyi, I. V.; Gefen, Y.; Measurement-induced steering of quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 2020, 2, 033347

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Kumar, P.; Snizhko, K.; Gefen, Y.; Rosenow, B.; Optimized steering: Quantum state engineering and exceptional points, Phys. Rev. A, 2022, 105, L010203

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Quantum Eng

    Volya, D; Mishra, P.; State preparation on quantum computers via quantum steering, IEEE Trans. Quantum Eng. 2024, 5,

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    V.; Y Gefen, Yu.; Quantum state engineering by steering in the presence of errors Phys

    Medina-Guerra, E.; Kumar, P.; Gornyi, I. V.; Y Gefen, Yu.; Quantum state engineering by steering in the presence of errors Phys. Rev. Research, 2024, 6, 023159

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Ariunbold, G.O.; Quantum Dynamics via Hidden Liouville Space, J. Appl. Math. and Phys., 2023, 11, 1871-1880

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Ariunbold, G.O.; Nonstandard Unitary Transformations of Quantum States. J. Appl. Math. and Phys., 2023, 11, 2568-2575

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Scully, M.O.; Zubairy, M.S; Quantum Optics, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)

    work page 1997

  15. [15]

    Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics, (Cambridge University Press, 1995)

    Mandel L.; Wolf, E. Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics, (Cambridge University Press, 1995)

    work page 1995

  16. [16]

    H.; Evers, J.; Tailoring superradiance to design artificial quantum systems

    Longo, P.; Keitel, C. H.; Evers, J.; Tailoring superradiance to design artificial quantum systems. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23628

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    Higgins, K. D. B.; Benjamin, S. C.; Stace, T. M.; Milburn, G. J.; Lovett, B. W.; Gauger, E. M.; Superabsorption of light via quantum engineering, Nat. Commun, 2024, 5,

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Toyoda, K.; Watanabe, T.; Kimura, T.; Nomura, S.; Haze, S.; Urabe, S.; Generation of Dicke state using adiabatic passage, Phys. Rev. A, 2011, 83, 022315

    work page 2011

  19. [19]

    Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes, Physical Review, 1954, 93,

    Dicke, R.H. Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes, Physical Review, 1954, 93,

    work page 1954

  20. [20]

    Haroche, S

    Gross M.; S. Haroche, S. Superradiance: An essay on the theory of collective spontaneous emission, Physics Reports, 1982, 93, 301–396

    work page 1982

  21. [21]

    Superradiance: the principles of generation and implementation in lasers, Usp

    Kocharovsky, V.I.V.; Zheleznyakov, V.V.; Kocharovskaya, E.R.; Kocharovsky, V.V. Superradiance: the principles of generation and implementation in lasers, Usp. Fiz. Nauk 2017, 60, 345–384

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    Dicke superradiance in solids (invited review), J

    Cong, K.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Noe II, G.T.; Belyanin, A.; Kono, J. Dicke superradiance in solids (invited review), J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 2016, 33, C80-101

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    Superradiance: An Integrated Approach to Cooperative Effects in Various Systems, Adv

    Lin, G.-D.; Yelin, S.F. Superradiance: An Integrated Approach to Cooperative Effects in Various Systems, Adv. Atom. Mol. Opt. Phys., 2012, 61,

    work page 2012

  24. [24]

    Quantum statistical theory of super-radiance

    Bonifacio, R.; Schwendimann, P.; Haake, F. Quantum statistical theory of super-radiance. I, Phys. Rev. A, 1971, 4, 302–313

    work page 1971

  25. [25]

    Quantum statistical theory of super-radiance

    Bonifacio, R.; Schwendimann, P.; Haake, F. Quantum statistical theory of super-radiance. II, Phys. Rev. A, 1971, 4, 852–864

    work page 1971

  26. [26]

    Statistical properties of superradiant pulses, Opt

    Degiorgio, V. Statistical properties of superradiant pulses, Opt. Commun. 1971, 2, 362–364

    work page 1971

  27. [27]

    Lee, C.T

    C.T. Lee, C.T. Exact solutions of the superradiance master equation. I. Complete initial excitation, Phys. Rev. A, 1977, 15,

    work page 1977

  28. [28]

    Exact solution of the superradiance master equation

    Lee, C.T. Exact solution of the superradiance master equation. II. arbitrary initial excitation, Phys. Rev. A, 1977, 16, 301–312

    work page 1977

  29. [29]

    Fluctuations in tipping angles and delay times of simple superfluorescence, Appl

    Lee, C.T. Fluctuations in tipping angles and delay times of simple superfluorescence, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1982, 41,

    work page 1982

  30. [30]

    Room temperature spontaneous superradiance from single diamond nanocrystals, Nature Communications, 2017, 8,

    Bradac, C.; Johnsson, M.T.; van Breugel, M.; Baragiola, B.Q.; Martin, R.; Juan, M.L.; Brennen, G.K.; Volz, T. Room temperature spontaneous superradiance from single diamond nanocrystals, Nature Communications, 2017, 8,

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    A Cascade Superradiance Model, Phys

    Ariunbold, G.O. A Cascade Superradiance Model, Phys. Lett. A, 2022, 452, 128468

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Superfluorescence: macroscopic quantum fluctuations in the time domain, Nature, 1980, 70,

    Vrehen, Q.H.; Schuurmans, M.F.; Polder, D. Superfluorescence: macroscopic quantum fluctuations in the time domain, Nature, 1980, 70,

    work page 1980

  33. [33]

    Quantum fluctuations in superfluorescence delay times, Phys

    Vrehen, Q.H.F.; Der Weduwe, J.J. Quantum fluctuations in superfluorescence delay times, Phys. Rev. A 24 (1981) 2857(R)

    work page 1981

  34. [34]

    1981, Experimental study of quantum fluctuations of polarization in supperradiance, J

    Crubellier, A.; Liberman, S.; Pillet, P.; Schweighofer, M.G. 1981, Experimental study of quantum fluctuations of polarization in supperradiance, J. Phys. B: Atom. Mol. Phys. 1981, 14, L177

    work page 1981

  35. [35]

    Quantum fluctuations of superfluorescence delay observed with ultrashort optical excitations, Phys

    Ariunbold, G.O.; Sautenkov, V.A.; Scully, M.O. Quantum fluctuations of superfluorescence delay observed with ultrashort optical excitations, Phys. Lett. A, 2012, 376,

    work page 2012

  36. [36]

    Observation of Picosecond Superfluorescent Pulses in Rubidium Vapor Pumped by 100-Femtosecond Laser Pulses, Phys

    Ariunbold, G.O.; Kash, M.M.; Sautenkov, V.A.; Li, H.; Rostovtsev, Y.V.; Welch, G.R.; Scully, M.O. Observation of Picosecond Superfluorescent Pulses in Rubidium Vapor Pumped by 100-Femtosecond Laser Pulses, Phys. Rev. A, 2010, 82, 043421

    work page 2010

  37. [37]

    Temporal coherent control of superfluorescent pulses, Opt

    Ariunbold, G.O.; Sautenkov, V.A.; Scully, M.O. Temporal coherent control of superfluorescent pulses, Opt. Lett., 2012, 37,

    work page 2012

  38. [38]

    Ariunbold, G.O.; Sautenkov, V.A.; Scully, M.O.; Ultrafast laser control of backward superfluorescence towards standoff sensing, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2014, 104, 021114

    work page 2014

  39. [39]

    Pulsed cooperative backward emissions from non-degenerate atomic transitions in sodium, New J

    Thompson, J.; Ballmann, C.; Cai, H.; Yi, Z.; Rostovtsev, Y.; Sokolov, A.; Hemmer, P.; Zheltikov, A.; Ariunbold, G.O.; Scully, M.O. Pulsed cooperative backward emissions from non-degenerate atomic transitions in sodium, New J. Phys., 2014, 16, 103017

    work page 2014

  40. [40]

    Ariunbold, G.O.; Sautenkov, V.A.; Li, H.; Murawski, R.K.; Wang, X.; Zhi, M.; Begzjav, T.; Sokolov, A.V.; Scully, M.O.; Rostovtsev, Yu. V. Observations of Ultrafast Superfluorescent Beatings in a Cesium Vapor Excited by Femtosecond Laser Pulses, Phys. Lett. A, 2022, 428, 127945

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Quantum statistical theory of coherent emission from a system of multi-level atoms, Phys

    Agarwal, G.S. Quantum statistical theory of coherent emission from a system of multi-level atoms, Phys. Lett., 1973, 45A,

    work page 1973

  42. [43]

    Superradiance from three-level systems in atomic coherent state representation, Opt

    Agarwal, G.S.; Trivedi, S.S. Superradiance from three-level systems in atomic coherent state representation, Opt. Commun., 1976, 18,

    work page 1976

  43. [44]

    Ariunbold, G.O.; Begzjav, T.; A Mode-Selective Control in Two-Mode Superradiance from Lambda Three-Level Atoms, Photonics, 2025, 12 (7),

    work page 2025

  44. [45]

    Braggio, C.; Chiossi, F.; Carugno, G. A. Ortolan, G. Ruoso, Spontaneous formation of a macroscopically extended coherent state, Phys. Rev. Res., 2020, 2, 033059

    work page 2020

  45. [46]

    Cascade superfluorescence in Er:YLF, Phys

    Chiossi, F.; Braggio, C.; Khanbekyan, A.; Carugno, G.; Ortolan, A.; Ruoso, G.; Calabrese, R.; Di Lieto, A.; Tomassetti, L.; Tonelli, M. Cascade superfluorescence in Er:YLF, Phys. Rev. Res., 2021, 3, 013138

    work page 2021

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.