pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.18272 · v4 · submitted 2025-09-22 · 💻 cs.SD · cs.MM· eess.AS

StereoFoley: Object-Aware Stereo Audio Generation from Video

Tornike Karchkhadze , Kuan-Lin Chen , Mojtaba Heydari , Robert Henzel , Alessandro Toso , Mehrez Souden , Joshua Atkins This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 14:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.SD cs.MMeess.AS
keywords video-to-audio generationstereo audioobject-awaresynthetic dataobject trackingspatial audioaudio synthesisvideo analysis
0
0 comments X

The pith

StereoFoley generates object-aware stereo audio from video by fine-tuning a base model on synthetically created spatially accurate examples.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces StereoFoley, a video-to-audio framework that produces semantically aligned, temporally synchronized, and spatially accurate stereo sound at 48 kHz. It first trains a base model to generate stereo audio from video at levels matching current state-of-the-art systems in semantic accuracy and timing. To handle the shortage of real spatially mixed datasets, it builds a synthetic data pipeline that analyzes video, tracks objects, and applies rule-based panning plus distance-based loudness adjustments during audio synthesis. Fine-tuning the base model on this pipeline creates clear links between visible objects and their corresponding sounds. A new stereo object-awareness metric plus human listening tests both show the gains, which would matter for creating more realistic audio tracks in video content where sound placement relative to objects adds immersion.

Core claim

This work establishes the first end-to-end framework for stereo object-aware video-to-audio generation. A base model is developed that generates stereo audio from video while matching state-of-the-art performance in semantic accuracy and synchronization. A synthetic data generation pipeline is then introduced that combines video analysis, object tracking, and audio synthesis with dynamic panning and distance-based loudness controls to overcome dataset limitations. Fine-tuning the base model on this synthetic dataset produces clear object-audio correspondence, with results validated by a newly proposed stereo object-awareness metric and aligned human listening study outcomes.

What carries the argument

The synthetic data generation pipeline that combines video analysis, object tracking, and rule-based dynamic panning with distance-based loudness controls to create spatially accurate training examples for fine-tuning.

If this is right

  • The fine-tuned model delivers stereo output with improved object correspondence while retaining semantic and temporal fidelity comparable to prior video-to-audio systems.
  • A stereo object-awareness metric is established that quantifies spatial alignment between objects and sounds.
  • Human listening studies produce results consistent with the objective metric trends.
  • Spatially accurate 48 kHz stereo audio becomes available for video inputs through this end-to-end process.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Automated sound placement in post-production pipelines could use similar object tracking to reduce manual panning work.
  • Rule-based synthesis pipelines may serve as a general way to bootstrap spatial learning when real annotated data is scarce.
  • The method points toward extensions that handle camera motion or multiple overlapping sound sources in more complex scenes.

Load-bearing premise

The synthetic data generation pipeline, which relies on video analysis, object tracking, and rule-based panning and distance loudness controls, produces training examples whose spatial properties transfer effectively to real-world videos during fine-tuning.

What would settle it

An evaluation on real videos after fine-tuning that shows no measurable gain in object-audio correspondence over the base model, either by the stereo object-awareness metric or by listener preference scores, would falsify the transfer claim.

read the original abstract

We present StereoFoley, a video-to-audio generation framework that produces semantically aligned, temporally synchronized, and spatially accurate stereo sound at 48 kHz. While recent generative video-to-audio models achieve strong semantic and temporal fidelity, they largely remain limited to mono or fail to deliver object-aware stereo imaging, constrained by the lack of professionally mixed, spatially accurate video-to-audio datasets. First, we develop a base model that generates stereo audio from video, achieving performance on par with state-of-the-art V2A models in both semantic accuracy and synchronization. Next, to overcome dataset limitations, we introduce a synthetic data generation pipeline that combines video analysis, object tracking, and audio synthesis with dynamic panning and distance-based loudness controls, enabling spatially accurate object-aware sound. Finally, we fine-tune the base model on this synthetic dataset, yielding clear object-audio correspondence. Since no established metrics exist, we introduce a stereo object-awareness metric and report it alongside a human listening study; the two evaluations exhibit consistent trends. This work establishes the first end-to-end framework for stereo object-aware video-to-audio generation, addressing a critical gap in the field.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces StereoFoley, a video-to-audio generation framework that produces semantically aligned, temporally synchronized, and spatially accurate 48 kHz stereo sound. It first trains a base stereo V2A model that matches SOTA semantic and temporal performance, then constructs a synthetic data pipeline combining video analysis, object tracking, and rule-based dynamic panning plus distance-based loudness controls, fine-tunes the base model on this data to obtain object-audio correspondence, and evaluates the result with a newly introduced stereo object-awareness metric together with a human listening study, claiming the first end-to-end solution for object-aware stereo V2A.

Significance. If the synthetic pipeline successfully transfers spatial object correspondence to real videos, the work would address a genuine gap in current V2A models. The base-model parity with SOTA, the new metric, and the human study are constructive contributions; however, the overall significance is limited by the absence of direct evidence that rule-based synthetic spatial cues generalize beyond the constructed training distribution.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that fine-tuning 'yields clear object-audio correspondence' is load-bearing yet unsupported by any reported cross-domain ablation, real-video test-set details, or before/after comparison of spatial metrics; without such evidence the transfer from synthetic panning/loudness controls to real acoustics remains unverified.
  2. [§3 (Synthetic Data Pipeline)] Synthetic data generation pipeline: the rule-based dynamic panning and distance-based loudness controls omit reverberation, diffraction, room geometry, and multi-source masking; this omission risks the model learning synthetic artifacts rather than generalizable spatial cues and should be addressed with an explicit limitation discussion or targeted ablation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Evaluation section] Clarify the exact formulation and normalization of the new stereo object-awareness metric so that readers can reproduce it from the provided description.
  2. [Human study] The human listening study reports consistent trends with the metric; include participant count, statistical tests, and inter-rater agreement to strengthen the evaluation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the paper where the suggestions strengthen the presentation of our contributions without altering the core claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that fine-tuning 'yields clear object-audio correspondence' is load-bearing yet unsupported by any reported cross-domain ablation, real-video test-set details, or before/after comparison of spatial metrics; without such evidence the transfer from synthetic panning/loudness controls to real acoustics remains unverified.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee identifying the need for clearer evidence of generalization. The original submission reports a human listening study performed exclusively on real videos and introduces a stereo object-awareness metric evaluated on both synthetic and real data. To directly address the concern, the revised manuscript now includes: (i) explicit details on the real-video test set composition and sources, (ii) before-and-after comparisons of the stereo object-awareness metric on held-out real videos demonstrating improvement after fine-tuning, and (iii) a cross-domain ablation table contrasting base-model and fine-tuned performance across synthetic and real domains. These additions provide quantitative support for the transfer of object-audio correspondence. The abstract has been updated to reference these results more precisely. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3 (Synthetic Data Pipeline)] Synthetic data generation pipeline: the rule-based dynamic panning and distance-based loudness controls omit reverberation, diffraction, room geometry, and multi-source masking; this omission risks the model learning synthetic artifacts rather than generalizable spatial cues and should be addressed with an explicit limitation discussion or targeted ablation.

    Authors: We agree that the synthetic pipeline employs simplified rule-based panning and loudness controls that deliberately omit full acoustic modeling of reverberation, diffraction, room geometry, and multi-source masking. This design choice isolates the contribution of object tracking and spatial controls. In the revision we have added an explicit limitations paragraph in §3 and the conclusion that acknowledges these omissions and the associated risk of synthetic artifacts. We have also included a targeted ablation in which a subset of the training data was augmented with simulated reverberation; the resulting model retains the reported gains in object-awareness while showing modest improvements in perceived realism, indicating that the core spatial cues learned are not limited to artifacts of the simplified simulation. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper describes a standard generative modeling pipeline: training a base stereo V2A model, constructing a synthetic dataset via video analysis/object tracking plus rule-based panning and distance loudness, fine-tuning the base model on that data, and evaluating with a newly introduced stereo object-awareness metric plus human listening study. No equations, self-referential definitions, or load-bearing self-citations are quoted that would reduce the claimed object-aware stereo output to quantities defined by the model's own fitted parameters or prior author work. The transfer assumption from synthetic to real video is presented as an empirical claim supported by the reported evaluations rather than a definitional reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim depends on the transferability of synthetic spatial audio to real videos and on the validity of the newly introduced evaluation metric; these are not derived from prior literature but postulated for the method to succeed.

free parameters (1)
  • dynamic panning and distance-based loudness controls
    Rule-based parameters in the synthetic audio synthesis step that determine left-right placement and volume scaling; their specific functional forms are chosen to enable object-aware training data.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Object tracking and video analysis can reliably identify sound sources for audio synthesis
    Invoked when constructing the synthetic dataset that is later used for fine-tuning.
invented entities (1)
  • stereo object-awareness metric no independent evidence
    purpose: Quantify how well generated stereo audio corresponds to specific objects in the video
    Introduced because no established metrics exist for this property.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5759 in / 1371 out tokens · 50805 ms · 2026-05-18T14:18:49.004254+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Our prior work [3] showed diffusion models can gener- ate spatial audio with user-controlled localization

    INTRODUCTION Recent advances in audio generation [1, 2] have demonstrated the ability to synthesize plausible sounds with different conditioning modalities. Our prior work [3] showed diffusion models can gener- ate spatial audio with user-controlled localization. Video-to-Audio (V2A) generative models have achieved strong semantic alignment and temporal s...

    work page

  2. [2]

    StereoFoley: Object-Aware Stereo Audio Generation from Video

    METHOD 2.1. Model Architecture Fig. 1 shows the architecture of StereoFoley, which is based on latent diffusion [1] and consists of two main components: encoders for video, audio, and text, and a generative diffusion base. Let us denote the inputs of the model as: audiox audio ∈ R(T×f s)×2 with sampling ratef s and stereo channels; textx text ∈ VL, a sequ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    good” or “excellent

    EXPERIMENTS AND RESULTS 3.1. Datasets For our StereoFoley-base experiments, we use VGGSound [16], a widely used public dataset for V2A and Foley sound research, con- taining approximately 200K video examples. Although the dataset nominally provides stereo audio, our analysis revealed that about 27%of videos are effectively mono, with left and right channe...

    work page

  4. [4]

    We showed that full-band stereo Foley generation can achieve state-of-the-art performance using SyncFormer with a simple latent- space matching strategy

    CONCLUSION We presented an end-to-end framework for video-to-audio genera- tion. We showed that full-band stereo Foley generation can achieve state-of-the-art performance using SyncFormer with a simple latent- space matching strategy. More importantly, we demonstrated that the main challenge for object-aware stereo audio generation is not architectural bu...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Audi- oLDM: Text-to-audio generation with latent diffusion models,

    Haohe Liu, Zehua Chen, Yi Yuan, Xinhao Mei, Xubo Liu, Danilo Mandic, Wenwu Wang, and Mark D Plumbley, “Audi- oLDM: Text-to-audio generation with latent diffusion models,” inICML, 2023, vol. 202, pp. 21450–21474

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Stable audio open,

    Zach Evans, Julian D Parker, CJ Carr, Zack Zukowski, Josiah Taylor, and Jordi Pons, “Stable audio open,” inICASSP, 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Immersediffusion: A generative spatial audio latent diffusion model,

    Mojtaba Heydari, Mehrez Souden, Bruno Conejo, and Joshua Atkins, “Immersediffusion: A generative spatial audio latent diffusion model,” inICASSP. IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–5

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Taming visually guided sound generation,

    Vladimir Iashin and Esa Rahtu, “Taming visually guided sound generation,” inBMVC, 2021

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Frieren: Efficient video-to-audio generation network with rectified flow matching,

    Yongqi Wang, Wenxiang Guo, Rongjie Huang, Jiawei Huang, Zehan Wang, Fuming You, Ruiqi Li, and Zhou Zhao, “Frieren: Efficient video-to-audio generation network with rectified flow matching,” inNeurIPS, 2024

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Foley- crafter: Bring silent videos to life with lifelike and synchro- nized sounds,

    Yiming Zhang, Yicheng Gu, Yanhong Zeng, Zhening Xing, Yuancheng Wang, Zhizheng Wu, and Kai Chen, “Foley- crafter: Bring silent videos to life with lifelike and synchro- nized sounds,”arXiv:2407.01494, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    Seeing and hearing: Open-domain visual-audio generation with diffusion latent aligners,

    Yazhou Xing, Yingqing He, Zeyue Tian, Xintao Wang, and Qifeng Chen, “Seeing and hearing: Open-domain visual-audio generation with diffusion latent aligners,” inCVPR, 2024

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Temporally aligned audio for video with autoregression,

    Ilpo Viertola, Vladimir Iashin, and Esa Rahtu, “Temporally aligned audio for video with autoregression,” inICASSP, 2025

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Mmau- dio: Taming multimodal joint training for high-quality video- to-audio synthesis,

    Ho Kei Cheng, Masato Ishii, Akio Hayakawa, Takashi Shibuya, Alexander G. Schwing, and Yuki Mitsufuji, “Mmau- dio: Taming multimodal joint training for high-quality video- to-audio synthesis,” inCVPR, 2025, pp. 28901–28911

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    AudioX: A Unified Framework for Anything-to-Audio Generation

    Zeyue Tian, Yizhu Jin, Zhaoyang Liu, Ruibin Yuan, Xu Tan, Qifeng Chen, Wei Xue, and Yike Guo, “Au- diox: Diffusion transformer for anything-to-audio generation,” arXiv:2503.10522, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Thinksound: Chain- of-thought reasoning in multimodal large language models for audio generation and editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.21448, 2025a

    Huadai Liu, Jialei Wang, Kaicheng Luo, Wen Wang, Qian Chen, Zhou Zhao, and Wei Xue, “Thinksound: Chain-of- thought reasoning in multimodal large language models for au- dio generation and editing,”arXiv:2506.21448, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    V2a-mapper: A lightweight solution for vision-to-audio generation by connecting foundation models

    Jun Wang, Xijuan Zeng, Chunyu Qiang, Ruilong Chen, Shiyao Wang, Le Wang, Wangjing Zhou, Pengfei Cai, Jiahui Zhao, Nan Li, Zihan Li, Yuzhe Liang, Xiaopeng Wang, Haorui Zheng, Ming Wen, Kang Yin, Yiran Wang, Nan Li, Feng Deng, Liang Dong, Chen Zhang, Di Zhang, and Kun Gai, “Kling-foley: Multimodal diffusion transformer for high- quality video-to-audio gener...

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Visage: Video-to-spatial audio generation,

    Jaeyeon Kim, Heeseung Yun, and Gunhee Kim, “Visage: Video-to-spatial audio generation,” inICLR, 2025

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Omniaudio: Generating spatial audio from 360-degree video,

    Huadai Liu, Tianyi Luo, Kaicheng Luo, Qikai Jiang, Peiwen Sun, Jialei Wang, Rongjie Huang, Qian Chen, Wen Wang, Xi- angtai Li, Shiliang Zhang, Zhijie Yan, Zhou Zhao, and Wei Xue, “Omniaudio: Generating spatial audio from 360-degree video,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.14906, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    See-2-sound: Zero-shot spatial environment-to-spatial sound,

    Rishit Dagli, Shivesh Prakash, Robert Wu, and Houman Khos- ravani, “See-2-sound: Zero-shot spatial environment-to-spatial sound,”arXiv:2406.06612, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Vggsound: A large-scale audio-visual dataset,

    Honglie Chen, Weidi Xie, Andrea Vedaldi, and Andrew Zis- serman, “Vggsound: A large-scale audio-visual dataset,” in ICASSP, 2020, pp. 721–725

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Audio set: An ontology and human-labeled dataset for audio events,

    Jort F. Gemmeke, Daniel P. W. Ellis, Dylan Freedman, Aren Jansen, Wade Lawrence, R. Channing Moore, Manoj Plakal, and Marvin Ritter, “Audio set: An ontology and human-labeled dataset for audio events,” inICASSP, 2017, pp. 776–780

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    Holman,Sound for Film and Television, Focal Press, 2010

    T. Holman,Sound for Film and Television, Focal Press, 2010

    work page 2010

  23. [23]

    High-fidelity audio compression with improved rvqgan,

    Rithesh Kumar, Prem Seetharaman, Alejandro Luebs, Ishaan Kumar, and Kundan Kumar, “High-fidelity audio compression with improved rvqgan,”NeurIPS, vol. 36, 2023

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Large-scale con- trastive language-audio pretraining with feature fusion and keyword-to-caption augmentation,

    Yusong Wu, Ke Chen, Tianyu Zhang, Yuchen Hui, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, and Shlomo Dubnov, “Large-scale con- trastive language-audio pretraining with feature fusion and keyword-to-caption augmentation,” inICASSP, 2023

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Natural language supervision for general-purpose audio rep- resentations,

    Benjamin Elizalde, Soham Deshmukh, and Huaming Wang, “Natural language supervision for general-purpose audio rep- resentations,” inICASSP, 2024, pp. 336–340

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Synchformer: Efficient synchronization from sparse cues,

    Vladimir Iashin, Weidi Xie, Esa Rahtu, and Andrew Zisser- man, “Synchformer: Efficient synchronization from sparse cues,” inICASSP, 2024, pp. 5325–5329

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Roformer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding,

    Jianlin Su, Murtadha H. M. Ahmed, Yu Lu, Shengfeng Pan, Wen Bo, and Yunfeng Liu, “Roformer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding,”Neurocomputing, vol. 568, 2024

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Scalable diffusion models with transformers,

    William Peebles and Saining Xie, “Scalable diffusion models with transformers,” inICCV. IEEE, 2023, pp. 4195–4205

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Long-form music generation with latent diffusion,

    Zach Evans, Julian D. Parker, CJ Carr, Zachary Zukowski, Josiah Taylor, and Jordi Pons, “Long-form music generation with latent diffusion,” inISMIR, 2024, pp. 429–437

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Progressive Distillation for Fast Sampling of Diffusion Models

    Tim Salimans and Jonathan Ho, “Progressive distillation for fast sampling of diffusion models,”arXiv:2202.00512, 2022

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities

    Gheorghe Comanici, Eric Bieber, Mike Schaekermann, , et al., “Gemini 2.5: Pushing the frontier with advanced reasoning, multimodality, long context, and next generation agentic capa- bilities,”arXiv:2507.06261, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Yolo-world: Real-time open- vocabulary object detection,

    Tianheng Cheng, Lin Song, Yixiao Ge, Wenyu Liu, Xing- gang Wang, and Ying Shan, “Yolo-world: Real-time open- vocabulary object detection,” inCVPR, 2024

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    SAM 2: Segment anything in images and videos,

    Nikhila Ravi, Valentin Gabeur, Yuan-Ting Hu, Ronghang Hu, Chaitanya Ryali, Tengyu Ma, Haitham Khedr, Roman R ¨adle, Chlo´e Rolland, Laura Gustafson, Eric Mintun, Junting Pan, Kalyan Vasudev Alwala, Nicolas Carion, Chao-Yuan Wu, Ross B. Girshick, Piotr Doll ´ar, and Christoph Feichtenhofer, “SAM 2: Segment anything in images and videos,” inICLR, 2025

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Classifier-free diffusion guid- ance,

    Jonathan Ho and Tim Salimans, “Classifier-free diffusion guid- ance,” inNeurIPS Workshop on Deep Generative Models and Downstream Applications, 2021

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Panns: Large-scale pre- trained audio neural networks for audio pattern recognition,

    Qiuqiang Kong, Yin Cao, Turab Iqbal, Yuxuan Wang, Wenwu Wang, and Mark D Plumbley, “Panns: Large-scale pre- trained audio neural networks for audio pattern recognition,” IEEE/ACM TASLP, vol. 28, pp. 2880–2894, 2020

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    Efficient training of audio transformers with patchout,

    Khaled Koutini, Jan Schl ¨uter, Hamid Eghbal-zadeh, and Ger- hard Widmer, “Efficient training of audio transformers with patchout,”Interspeech, 2022

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Improved techniques for training gans,

    Tim Salimans, Ian Goodfellow, Wojciech Zaremba, Vicki Che- ung, Alec Radford, and Xi Chen, “Improved techniques for training gans,”NIPS, 2016

    work page 2016