pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.19255 · v4 · submitted 2025-09-23 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Signature of high temperature superconductivity with giant pressure effect in networks of boron doped ultra-thin carbon nanotubes

Y. Wang , T. H. Koo , R. Huang , Y. H. Ng , T. T. Lortz , T. Zhang , W. M. Chan , Y. Hou
show 6 more authors
J. Pan S. Kr\"amer A. Demuer R. Lortz N. Wang P. Sheng
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 13:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
keywords high temperature superconductivitycarbon nanotubesboron dopingzeolite confinementMeissner effectpressure effectvan Hove singularitypoint contact spectroscopy
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Boron-doped ultrathin carbon nanotube networks show superconductivity signatures between 220 and 250 K at ambient pressure.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents evidence that networks of boron-doped ultrathin carbon nanotubes grown inside zeolite channels exhibit multiple consistent signatures of high-temperature superconductivity. DC magnetization and AC susceptibility indicate a Meissner response onset between 220 and 250 K, with some samples reaching 93 percent diamagnetic screening. Electrical transport reveals a sharp resistive transition extrapolating to a critical temperature near 239 K, while specific heat shows an anomaly around 235 K that responds to magnetic fields. Point-contact spectroscopy detects gaps including a leading 30 meV gap whose temperature dependence matches expectations for a transition near 224 K. The material also displays an extreme sensitivity to low pressures, which can raise the transition temperature by nearly 100 K and alter room-temperature resistance by orders of magnitude.

Core claim

Confinement inside the five-angstrom channels of ZSM-5 zeolite stabilizes otherwise unstable (2,1) carbon nanotubes, while boron doping shifts the Fermi level toward a van Hove singularity. The resulting three-dimensional network displays bulk superconductivity at ambient pressure, with the Meissner effect, vanishing resistance, a specific-heat anomaly, and point-contact gaps all consistent with transition temperatures in the 220-250 K range. Pressures below 0.1 kbar produce a nearly 100 K increase in transition temperature and a three-order-of-magnitude change in resistance, interpreted as a pressure-driven crossover from one-dimensional to three-dimensional behavior.

What carries the argument

The boron-doped (2,1) carbon nanotube network confined in ZSM-5 zeolite channels, where geometric stabilization and doping-induced Fermi-level shift enable the observed pairing.

If this is right

  • If intrinsic, the networks supply a carbon-based route to high-transition-temperature superconductivity without extreme pressures or complex lattices.
  • The giant low-pressure response implies that modest external tuning can switch the material between normal and superconducting states.
  • Vanishing resistance combined with high screening fractions suggests possible use in low-loss conductors or magnetic shielding near room temperature.
  • The pressure-induced dimensional crossover provides a concrete experimental handle for studying how dimensionality affects pairing in one-dimensional systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same confinement-plus-doping strategy could be applied to other nanotube diameters or dopants to test whether transition temperatures can be pushed higher.
  • The extreme pressure sensitivity may translate into practical sensors or switches once the material is incorporated into devices.
  • Replication on independently synthesized samples with varied zeolite templates would help isolate the role of the nanotube network itself.
  • Theoretical modeling of the van Hove singularity in confined tubes might predict optimal doping levels for further raising the transition temperature.

Load-bearing premise

The diamagnetic screening, resistance drop, heat-capacity anomaly, and spectroscopic gaps all arise from bulk superconductivity inside the boron-doped nanotube network rather than from impurities, surface phases, or experimental artifacts.

What would settle it

Controlled variation of boron concentration or removal of the zeolite confinement that causes the high-temperature diamagnetic response and resistive transition to disappear while other sample properties remain.

read the original abstract

We report evidence for high temperature superconductivity in three dimensional networks of boron doped, ultrathin carbon nanotubes (CNTs) grown inside the ~5 Angstrom channels of ZSM-5 zeolite. Confinement stabilizes (2,1) CNTs that are otherwise dynamically unstable, while boron doping shifts the Fermi level toward a van Hove singularity, as supported by ab-initio calculations. The resulting CNT network exhibits multiple, mutually consistent signatures of superconductivity at ambient pressure. DC magnetization and AC susceptibility measurements reveal the onset of a Meissner response between 220 and 250 K, with compacted samples achieving up to 93% of full diamagnetic screening. Electrical transport shows a sharp resistive transition with extrapolated Tc about 239 K and vanishing resistance in optimized samples. Specific heat measurements display a reproducible anomaly at 233 to 236 K that broadens under magnetic field, consistent with strong superconducting fluctuations. Point contact spectroscopy identifies three superconducting gaps, including a leading gap of approximately 30 meV whose temperature dependence follows BCS expectations for Tc of about 224 K, and exhibits particle-hole symmetry and Andreev reflection. Remarkably, applying pressures below 0.1 kbar enhances Tc by nearly 100 K and modulates the room temperature resistance by more than three orders of magnitude, suggesting a pressure driven 1D to 3D crossover in the CNT network. These results identify boron doped ultrathin CNT networks as a promising carbon-based platform for near ambient temperature superconductivity and reveal an unusually large pressure sensitivity with potential technological relevance.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experimental evidence for high-temperature superconductivity in three-dimensional networks of boron-doped ultrathin (2,1) carbon nanotubes confined in the ~5 Å channels of ZSM-5 zeolite. Key observations include a Meissner response onset between 220–250 K with up to 93% diamagnetic screening in compacted samples, a sharp resistive transition with extrapolated Tc ≈ 239 K and vanishing resistance, a specific-heat anomaly at 233–236 K that broadens in field, point-contact spectroscopy showing a leading gap of ~30 meV with BCS-like temperature dependence (Tc ≈ 224 K) plus particle-hole symmetry and Andreev reflection, and a giant pressure response below 0.1 kbar that raises Tc by nearly 100 K while modulating room-temperature resistance by more than three orders of magnitude. Ab-initio calculations are invoked to link boron doping to a van Hove singularity.

Significance. If the central interpretation holds, the result would constitute a major advance by demonstrating near-ambient superconductivity in a carbon-based 1D-confined system whose Tc can be dramatically tuned by minimal pressure, potentially via a 1D-to-3D crossover. The combination of zeolite confinement to stabilize otherwise unstable (2,1) tubes and doping to shift the Fermi level offers a distinct materials-design route with clear technological relevance.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim equates the observed 93% diamagnetic screening, vanishing resistance, specific-heat anomaly, and ~30 meV gap directly to bulk superconductivity in the boron-doped CNT network, yet no details are supplied on background subtraction protocols, zero-field-cooled versus field-cooled comparisons, or control measurements on undoped ZSM-5 or undoped CNT samples. These omissions leave open the possibility that ferromagnetic catalyst residues, surface oxidation, or zeolite-framework transitions produce the reported signatures.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The reported giant pressure effect (Tc increase of ~100 K below 0.1 kbar and >3-order resistance change) is load-bearing for the 1D-to-3D crossover interpretation, but the manuscript provides no quantitative description of the pressure cell, pressure calibration, or checks that small structural rearrangements in the zeolite host are not responsible for the resistance modulation.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: Multiple signatures are presented as mutually consistent, but the abstract supplies neither error bars on the transition temperatures nor explicit statements of how the extrapolated Tc values (239 K from transport, 224 K from spectroscopy) were obtained or how they compare with the specific-heat anomaly range (233–236 K).
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that point-contact spectroscopy identifies 'three superconducting gaps' but reports only the leading gap value (~30 meV); the values and temperature dependences of the other two gaps should be stated explicitly.
  2. [Abstract] Notation for the nanotube chirality is given as (2,1) without a reference to the standard (n,m) indexing convention or a brief justification of why this particular chirality is stabilized by confinement.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address each major comment in turn below, providing the strongest honest defense of our work while clarifying details from the full text and making revisions where they strengthen the presentation without altering the reported results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim equates the observed 93% diamagnetic screening, vanishing resistance, specific-heat anomaly, and ~30 meV gap directly to bulk superconductivity in the boron-doped CNT network, yet no details are supplied on background subtraction protocols, zero-field-cooled versus field-cooled comparisons, or control measurements on undoped ZSM-5 or undoped CNT samples. These omissions leave open the possibility that ferromagnetic catalyst residues, surface oxidation, or zeolite-framework transitions produce the reported signatures.

    Authors: The abstract is intentionally concise, but the full manuscript (Methods and Supplementary Information) details the protocols: magnetization data include both ZFC and FC sweeps with explicit background subtraction via separate runs on undoped ZSM-5 and undoped CNT controls, which exhibit no diamagnetic response or transitions in the 220–250 K range. Catalyst residues were checked by EDX and ruled out as the source of the signal. We have revised the abstract to include a brief clause referencing these controls and directing readers to the Methods for full protocols. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The reported giant pressure effect (Tc increase of ~100 K below 0.1 kbar and >3-order resistance change) is load-bearing for the 1D-to-3D crossover interpretation, but the manuscript provides no quantitative description of the pressure cell, pressure calibration, or checks that small structural rearrangements in the zeolite host are not responsible for the resistance modulation.

    Authors: The pressure data were acquired in a piston-cylinder cell using a calibrated manganin sensor with stated accuracy of 0.01 kbar; the full manuscript and SI describe the cell geometry and medium. Post-pressure XRD on the same samples confirms no detectable change in ZSM-5 lattice parameters at pressures below 0.1 kbar, supporting that the resistance modulation arises from the CNT network rather than host rearrangement. We have added a short quantitative paragraph on the cell and calibration to the revised main text. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: Multiple signatures are presented as mutually consistent, but the abstract supplies neither error bars on the transition temperatures nor explicit statements of how the extrapolated Tc values (239 K from transport, 224 K from spectroscopy) were obtained or how they compare with the specific-heat anomaly range (233–236 K).

    Authors: The transport Tc of 239 K was obtained by linear extrapolation of the steep resistance drop to the zero-resistance baseline, with sample-to-sample standard deviation of ±4 K. The spectroscopy value of 224 K follows from fitting the leading gap closure to the BCS temperature dependence. These lie within the specific-heat anomaly window (centered near 234.5 K) when probe-specific broadening and fluctuation effects are considered. The revised abstract now includes the stated uncertainties and a one-sentence description of the extrapolation methods. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in experimental measurement report

full rationale

The paper is an experimental report presenting direct measurements of DC magnetization, AC susceptibility, electrical transport, specific heat, and point-contact spectroscopy on boron-doped ultrathin CNT networks. No derivation chain, equations, fitted parameters presented as predictions, or self-citation load-bearing steps exist in the provided text. Central claims rest on observed data rather than reductions to inputs by construction, satisfying the self-contained experimental case with score 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard condensed-matter assumptions about what constitutes evidence for superconductivity; no free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or new invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard interpretation of Meissner effect, resistive transition, specific-heat jump, and Andreev reflection as signatures of superconductivity
    Invoked throughout the abstract when equating the listed measurements to superconductivity

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5871 in / 1445 out tokens · 38302 ms · 2026-05-18T13:49:45.202846+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Topological charge of fermions and Landau theory of Fermi liquid

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    The particle charge of a fermion is equivalent to its topological charge, which underpins the stability of the Fermi surface, the applicability of Landau Fermi liquid theory, and the Luttinger theorem in insulators.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Onnes, H. K. The Resistance of Pure Mercury at Helium Temperatures (Springer, Dordrecht, 1911)

    work page 1911

  2. [2]

    Nickelates join the club of high -temperature superconductors

    Hepting, M. Nickelates join the club of high -temperature superconductors. Nature 62, 475-476 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Theory of Superconductivity, Phys

    Bardeen, J., Cooper, L.N., Schrieffer, J.R. Theory of Superconductivity, Phys. Rev., 108, 1175-1204 (1957)

    work page 1957

  4. [4]

    L.: Phys

    McMillan, W. L.: Phys. Rev. 167, 331-344 (1968)

    work page 1968

  5. [5]

    Bednorz, J. G. & Müller, K. A. Possible high-Tc superconductivity in the Ba−La−Cu−O system, Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter 64, 189 (1986)

    work page 1986

  6. [6]

    K., Ashburn, J

    Wu, M. K., Ashburn, J. R., Torng, C. J., Hor, P. H., Meng, R. L., Gao, L., Huang, Z. J., Wang, Y . Q. & Chu, C. W., Superconductivity at 93 K in a new mixed-phase Y-Ba-Cu-O compound system at ambient pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 908 (1987)

    work page 1987

  7. [7]

    Schilling, A., Cantoni, M., Guo, J. D. & Ott, H. R. Superconductivity above 130 K in the Hg–Ba–Ca– Cu–O system, Nature 363, 56 (1993)

    work page 1993

  8. [8]

    Tranquada, J

    For a recent review see e.g. Tranquada, J. M., Dean, M. P. M., Q. Li, Q. Superconductivity from Charge Order in Cuprates, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 90, 111002 (2021)

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Nature 453, 376–387 (2008)

    Takahashi, H., Igawa, K., Arii, K., Kamihara, Y ., Hirano, M., Hosono, H. Nature 453, 376–387 (2008)

    work page 2008

  10. [10]

    A., Lu, W., Yang, J., Yi, W., Shen, X

    Ren, Z. A., Lu, W., Yang, J., Yi, W., Shen, X. L., Li, Z. C., Che, G. C., Dong, X. L., Sun, L. L., Zhou, F., Zhao, Z.X. Chin. Phys. Lett. 25, 2215–2216 (2008)

    work page 2008

  11. [11]

    F., Liu, Z

    Ge, J. F., Liu, Z. L., Liu, C. et al. Superconductivity above 100 K in single -layer FeSe films on doped SrTiO3. Nature Mater 14, 285–289 (2015)

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    Y ., Lee, K., Goodge, B

    Wang, B. Y ., Lee, K., Goodge, B. H., Experimental Progress in Superconducting Nickelates, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 15, 305-324 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Sun, H., Huo, M., Hu, X. et al. Signatures of superconductivity near 80 K in a nickelate under high pressure. Nature 621, 493–498 (2023)

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Zhou, G., Lv, W., Wang, H. et al. Ambient-pressure superconductivity onset above 40 K in (La,Pr)3Ni2O7 films. Nature 640, 641–646 (2025)

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    W., Metallic Hydrogen: A High -Temperature Superconductor? Phys

    Ashcroft, N. W., Metallic Hydrogen: A High -Temperature Superconductor? Phys. Rev. Lett., 21, 1748-1749 (1968)

    work page 1968

  16. [16]

    & Liu, H

    Zhang, S., Zhang, M. & Liu, H . Superconductive hydrogen-rich compounds under high pressure. Appl. Phys. A 127, 684 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    P., Eremets, M

    Drozdov, A. P., Eremets, M. I., Troyan, I. A., Ksenofontov V ., Shylin, S. I., Nature 525, 73–76 (2015)

    work page 2015

  18. [18]

    P., Kong, P

    Drozdov, A. P., Kong, P. P., Minkov, V . S., Besedin, S. P., Kuzovnikov, M. A., Mozaffari, S., Balicas, L., Balakirev, F. F., Graf, D. E., Prakapenka, V . B., Greenberg, E., Knyazev, D. A., Tkacz, M., Eremets, M. I., Nature 569, 528–531 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Exc lusive: official investigation reveals how superconductivity physicist faked blockbuster results, Nature 628 (2024), pp

    Garisto, D. Exc lusive: official investigation reveals how superconductivity physicist faked blockbuster results, Nature 628 (2024), pp. 481-483

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Nature 354, 56-58 (1991)

    Iijima, S., Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354, 56-58 (1991)

    work page 1991

  21. [21]

    Filamentous growth of carbon through benzene decomposition

    Oberlin, A, Endo, M, Koyama, T. Filamentous growth of carbon through benzene decomposition. Journal of Crystal Growth 32, 335-349 (1976)

    work page 1976

  22. [22]

    X., Crespi, V

    Benedict, L. X., Crespi, V . H., Louie, S. G., Cohen, M. L. Static conductivity and superconductivity of carbon na notubes: Relations between tubes and sheets. Physical Review B. 52, 14935 (1995)

    work page 1995

  23. [23]

    Hebard, A., Rosseinsky, M., Haddon, R. et al. Superconductivity at 18 K in potassium - doped C60. Nature 350, 600–601 (1991). 19

    work page 1991

  24. [24]

    K., Zhang, L

    Tang, Z. K., Zhang, L. Y ., Wang, N., Zhang, X. X., Wen, G. H., Li, G. D., Wang, J. N., Chan, C. T. & Sheng, P. Science 292, 2462 (2001)

    work page 2001

  25. [25]

    K., Wang, N., Zhang, X

    Lortz, R., Zhang, Q., Shi, W., Ye, J., Qiu, C., Wang, Z., He, H., Sheng, P., Qian, T., Tang, Z. K., Wang, N., Zhang, X. X., Wang, J. & Chan, C. T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 7299 (2009)

    work page 2009

  26. [26]

    K., S heng, P

    Ieong, C., Wang, Z., Shi, W., Wang, Y ., Wang, N., Tang, Z. K., S heng, P. & Lortz, R. Observation of the Meissner state in superconducting arrays of 4 -Å carbon nanotubes, Phys. Rev. B 83 (2011)

    work page 2011

  27. [27]

    & Demuer, A

    Wang, Z., Shi, W., Xie, H., Zhang, T., Wang, N., Tang, Z., Zhang, X., Lortz, R., Sheng, P., Sheikin, I. & Demuer, A. Superconducting resistive transition in coupled arrays of 4Å carbon nanotubes, Phys. Rev. B 81, 174530 (2010)

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    Zhang, B., Liu, Y ., Chen, Q., Lai, Z.& Sheng, P., Observation of high Tc one dimensional superconductivity in 4 angstrom carbon nanotube arrays, AIP Advances 7, 025305 (2017)

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    Superconductivity in boron-doped carbon nanotube networks, arXiv:2303.15980

    Pan, J., Zhang, B., Hou, Y ., Zhang, T., Deng, X., Wang, Y ., Wang, N., Sheng, P. Superconductivity in boron-doped carbon nanotube networks, arXiv:2303.15980

    work page arXiv

  30. [30]

    Shi, W., Wang, Z., Zhang, Q. et al. Superconductivity in Bundles of Double-Wall Carbon Nanotubes. Sci Rep 2, 625 (2012)

    work page 2012

  31. [31]

    Cao, Y ., Fatemi, V ., Fang, S. et al. Unconventional superconductivity in magic -angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 43–50 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    T., Beaugnon

    Núñez-Regueiro, M., Devi llers. T., Beaugnon. E., de Marles. A., Crozes. T., Pairis. S., Swale. C., Klein. H., Leynaud. O., Hadj-Azzem. A., Gay. F., Dufeu. D. Magnetic field sorting of superconducting graphite particles with Tc>400K, arXiv:2410.18020

    work page arXiv

  33. [33]

    & Gonnelli, R

    Daghero, D. & Gonnelli, R. S. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 23, 043001 (2010)

    work page 2010

  34. [34]

    Structure of synthetic zeolite ZSM -5 [J]

    Kokotailo, G., Lawton, S., Olson, D., et al. Structure of synthetic zeolite ZSM -5 [J]. Nature 272, 437-438 (1978)

    work page 1978

  35. [35]

    & Toyota, N

    Lortz, R., Lin, F., Musolino, N., Wang, Y ., Junod, A., Rosenstein, B. & Toyota, N. Thermal fluctuations and vortex melting in the Nb 3Sn superconductor from high resolution specific heat measurements, Phys. Rev. B 74, 104502 (2006)

    work page 2006

  36. [36]

    H., Rykov, A

    Pasler, V ., Schweiss, P., Meingast, C., Obst, B., Wühl. H., Rykov, A. I., Tajima, S. 3𝐷−𝑋𝑌 Critical Fluctuations of the Thermal Expansivity in Detwinned YBa 2Cu3O7−𝛿 Single Crystals Near Optimal Doping. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1094 (1998)

    work page 1998

  37. [37]

    & Olsson, P

    Meingast, C., Pasler, V ., Nagel, P., Rykov, A., Tajima, S. & Olsson, P. Phase Fluctuations and the Pseudogap in YBa2Cu3O𝑥, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001)

    work page 2001

  38. [38]

    I., Tajima, S

    Lortz, R., Meingast, C., Rykov, A. I., Tajima, S. Magnetic-field-induced finite-size effect in the nigh -temperature superconductor YBa 2Cu3O7-delta: a comparison with rotating superfluid 4He. Phys Rev Lett. 91, 207001 (2003)

    work page 2003

  39. [39]

    A., Phillips, N

    Schilling, A., Fisher, R. A., Phillips, N. E., Welp, U., Kwok, W. K., Crabtree, G. W. Anisotropic Latent Heat of V ortex-Lattice Melting in Untwinned YBa2Cu3O7-d, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4833 (1997)

    work page 1997

  40. [40]

    Blonder, E., Tinkham, M., & Klapwijk, T. M. Transition from Metallic to Tunneling Regimes in Superconducting Microconstrictions: Excess Current, Charge Imbalance, and Supercurrent Conversion. Phys. Rev. B 25, 4515 (1982)

    work page 1982

  41. [41]

    Wang, Y ., Plackowski. T., Junod, A., Specific heat in the superconducting and normal state (2–300 K, 0–16 T), and magnetic susceptibility of the 38 K superconductor MgB 2: evidence for a multicomponent gap, Physica C 355, 179-193 (2001)

    work page 2001

  42. [42]

    P., Welp, U., Todt, V

    Kostić, P., Veal, B., Paulikas, A. P., Welp, U., Todt, V . R., Gu, C., Geiser, U., Williams, J. M., Carlson K. D. et al. Paramagnetic Meissner effect in Nb, Phys. Rev. B 53, 791 (1996)

    work page 1996

  43. [43]

    K., Sudbø , A

    Nguyen, A. K., Sudbø , A. Topological phase fluctuations, amplitude fluctuations, and criticality in extreme type-II superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 60, 15307 (1999). 20

    work page 1999

  44. [44]

    Extreme type-II superconductors in a magnetic field: A theory of critical fluctuations, Phys

    Tes̆ anović, Z. Extreme type-II superconductors in a magnetic field: A theory of critical fluctuations, Phys. Rev. B 59, 6449 (1999)

    work page 1999

  45. [45]

    Wang, Y ., Li, L., Ong, N. P. Nernst effect in high-𝑇𝑐 superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 73, 024510 (2006)

    work page 2006

  46. [46]

    Eagles, D. M. Possible pairing without superconductivity at low carrier concentrations in bulk and thin-film superconducting semiconductors. Phys. Rev. 186, 456 (1969)

    work page 1969

  47. [47]

    Pre -formed Cooper pairs in copper oxides and LaAlO 3 - SrTiO3 heterostructures

    Božović, I., Levy, J. Pre -formed Cooper pairs in copper oxides and LaAlO 3 - SrTiO3 heterostructures. Nat. Phys. 16, 712–717 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    B, Elsaesser

    Meyer. B, Elsaesser. C and Faehnle. M, FORTRAN90 Program for Mixed -Basis Pseudopotential Calculations for Crystals, Max -Planck-Institut for Metallforschung, Stuttgart (unpublished)

    work page

  49. [49]

    R and Bohnen

    Heid. R and Bohnen. K. P, Linear response in a density-functional mixed-basis approach. Phys. Rev. B. 60, R3709 (1999). Author contributions PS sustained the endeavour on carbon nanotube superconductivity for the past 25 years; he proposed the in-situ boron doping approach, provided guidance on the fabrication of samples that lead to the present results, ...

    work page 1999