pith. the verified trust layer for science. sign in

arxiv: 2510.09228 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-10 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI

Clear Roads, Clear Vision: Advancements in Multi-Weather Restoration for Smart Transportation

Vijay M. Galshetwar , Praful Hambarde , Prashant W. Patil , Akshay Dudhane , Sachin Chaudhary This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 08:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AI
keywords image restorationvideo restorationadverse weathermulti-weather restorationintelligent transportation systemsautonomous drivingCNNvision transformer
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Survey organizes image and video restoration methods into prior-based and data-driven categories to support weather-resilient transportation systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This survey aims to map out techniques that restore images and videos impaired by haze, rain, snow and similar conditions, which directly affects the reliability of cameras used in autonomous driving, traffic monitoring and surveillance. It groups the methods into older approaches that rely on physical priors and newer ones built on convolutional networks, transformers, diffusion models and vision-language models. The work further sorts them by task scope into single-weather fixes, multi-weather handling and all-in-one models that manage several degradations at once, while also covering day versus night differences, available datasets and evaluation standards. A reader would value the map because clearer restored visuals can reduce errors in safety-critical transportation applications.

Core claim

The survey presents a comprehensive review of image and video restoration techniques developed to mitigate weather-induced visual impairments. We categorize existing approaches into traditional prior-based methods and modern data-driven models, including CNNs, transformers, diffusion models, and emerging vision-language models (VLMs). Restoration strategies are further classified based on their scope: single-task models, multi-task/multi-weather systems, and all-in-one frameworks capable of handling diverse degradations. The survey also discusses day and night time restoration challenges, benchmark datasets, and evaluation protocols, while outlining future directions such as mixed-degredaton

What carries the argument

The taxonomy that divides restoration methods into traditional prior-based versus data-driven (CNNs, transformers, diffusion models, VLMs) and further into single-task, multi-task/multi-weather, and all-in-one frameworks.

If this is right

  • All-in-one frameworks reduce the need for separate models when multiple weather types occur together.
  • Night-time restoration techniques extend reliable operation of vision systems beyond daylight hours.
  • Identified limitations point toward the value of real-time implementations on edge devices in vehicles.
  • Future compound-degradation methods would address simultaneous effects such as rain plus haze.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same taxonomy could be tested on temporal consistency metrics for video sequences captured from moving vehicles.
  • Restored images might be evaluated as input to downstream tasks like object detection to measure end-to-end gains in transportation safety.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the chosen papers and the division into single-task, multi-task/multi-weather, and all-in-one categories fully and accurately capture the current research landscape in weather restoration for transportation.

What would settle it

Publication of a sizable set of weather-restoration papers whose methods fit none of the single-task, multi-task, or all-in-one categories would show the taxonomy is incomplete.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.09228 by Akshay Dudhane, Praful Hambarde, Prashant W. Patil, Sachin Chaudhary, Vijay M. Galshetwar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Real-world haze, rain, and snow degradations in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Synthetic image generation pipeline: atmospheric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The development timeline of hazy, rainy, snowy and multi-weather degraded image/video restoration approaches. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: From the results, it is clear that the existing SOTA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Visual result analysis of the existing methods: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Adverse weather conditions such as haze, rain, and snow significantly degrade the quality of images and videos, posing serious challenges to intelligent transportation systems (ITS) that rely on visual input. These degradations affect critical applications including autonomous driving, traffic monitoring, and surveillance. This survey presents a comprehensive review of image and video restoration techniques developed to mitigate weather-induced visual impairments. We categorize existing approaches into traditional prior-based methods and modern data-driven models, including CNNs, transformers, diffusion models, and emerging vision-language models (VLMs). Restoration strategies are further classified based on their scope: single-task models, multi-task/multi-weather systems, and all-in-one frameworks capable of handling diverse degradations. In addition, we discuss day and night time restoration challenges, benchmark datasets, and evaluation protocols. The survey concludes with an in-depth discussion on limitations in current research and outlines future directions such as mixed/compound-degradation restoration, real-time deployment, and agentic AI frameworks. This work aims to serve as a valuable reference for advancing weather-resilient vision systems in smart transportation environments. Lastly, to stay current with rapid advancements in this field, we will maintain regular updates of the latest relevant papers and their open-source implementations at https://github.com/ChaudharyUPES/A-comprehensive-review-on-Multi-weather-restoration

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a literature survey on image and video restoration techniques for mitigating weather-induced degradations (haze, rain, snow) in intelligent transportation systems. It organizes existing work into traditional prior-based methods versus modern data-driven approaches (CNNs, transformers, diffusion models, VLMs) and further classifies strategies by scope into single-task, multi-task/multi-weather, and all-in-one frameworks. The survey also addresses day/night restoration challenges, benchmark datasets, evaluation protocols, current limitations, and future directions such as compound-degradation handling, real-time deployment, and agentic AI frameworks. A GitHub repository is maintained for updates.

Significance. If the taxonomy accurately reflects the literature and the coverage is reasonably complete, the survey could provide a useful organizing reference for researchers working on weather-resilient vision in smart transportation. The explicit inclusion of emerging VLMs and forward-looking discussion of mixed degradations and real-time constraints adds practical value beyond a simple enumeration of papers.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (scope-based classification): the boundary between 'multi-task/multi-weather' and 'all-in-one' categories is described with acknowledged overlaps, yet the text does not supply explicit decision criteria or a decision tree for assigning a given method to one versus the other; this weakens the claimed utility of the taxonomy as an organizing lens.
  2. [Benchmark datasets and evaluation protocols] Benchmark datasets and evaluation protocols section: while datasets are listed, the manuscript provides no aggregated performance table or cross-method comparison on shared benchmarks (e.g., Rain100H, Snow100K); without such a summary the claim that 'advancements' have occurred remains largely qualitative.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that the GitHub repository will be updated regularly, but the manuscript itself does not indicate the cutoff date of the literature search; adding an explicit 'last updated' date would improve reproducibility.
  2. Several figure captions describing network architectures are terse; expanding them to note input/output dimensions or key architectural choices would aid readers unfamiliar with the cited models.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and the recommendation for minor revision. The comments identify valuable opportunities to strengthen the taxonomy's clarity and to provide more quantitative support for the survey's claims. We address each major comment point by point below and describe the corresponding revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (scope-based classification): the boundary between 'multi-task/multi-weather' and 'all-in-one' categories is described with acknowledged overlaps, yet the text does not supply explicit decision criteria or a decision tree for assigning a given method to one versus the other; this weakens the claimed utility of the taxonomy as an organizing lens.

    Authors: We agree that the current description acknowledges overlaps but lacks explicit decision criteria, which limits the taxonomy's precision as an organizing framework. In the revised manuscript we will augment Section 4 with a concise decision flowchart and a set of explicit criteria (e.g., whether a method is trained on a fixed set of weather types versus arbitrary combinations, whether it uses joint versus sequential optimization, and the generality of its degradation modeling). These additions will make classification reproducible while preserving the acknowledged overlaps. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Benchmark datasets and evaluation protocols] Benchmark datasets and evaluation protocols section: while datasets are listed, the manuscript provides no aggregated performance table or cross-method comparison on shared benchmarks (e.g., Rain100H, Snow100K); without such a summary the claim that 'advancements' have occurred remains largely qualitative.

    Authors: We concur that a summary table of representative results on common benchmarks would make the discussion of advancements more concrete. The revised version will include a compact table in the benchmark section that aggregates PSNR/SSIM figures reported by key methods on Rain100H, Snow100K, and similar datasets, drawn directly from the cited papers. We will also note the inherent limitations of cross-paper comparisons arising from differing training protocols and evaluation settings. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: survey with no derivations

full rationale

This is a descriptive literature survey that organizes existing weather restoration methods into categories (traditional prior-based vs. data-driven CNNs/transformers/diffusion/VLMs; single-task vs. multi-task vs. all-in-one) without any new equations, proofs, fitted parameters, or theoretical derivations. The central claim is a review and taxonomy of prior work, with overlaps explicitly acknowledged; no load-bearing step reduces to self-definition, self-citation chains, or renaming of results by construction. The GitHub update note is a maintenance statement, not a circular claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is a literature survey and introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities. Its contribution rests on the selection and organization of prior publications.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5789 in / 1140 out tokens · 46569 ms · 2026-05-18T08:13:29.723343+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. RIRF: Reasoning Image Restoration Framework

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    R&R couples structured diagnostic reasoning from a fine-tuned Qwen3-VL model with reinforcement learning guided by degradation severity to achieve state-of-the-art universal image restoration with added interpretability.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

259 extracted references · 259 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Unified multi- weather visibility restoration,

    A. Kulkarni, P. W. Patil, S. Murala, and S. Gupta, “Unified multi- weather visibility restoration,”IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 25, pp. 7686–7698, 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Multi-weather degradation-aware transformer for image restoration,

    R. Zhu, M. Wu, X. Xiong, X. Zhu, and Y . Fan, “Multi-weather degradation-aware transformer for image restoration,” inIEEE ICASSP. IEEE, 2024, pp. 3765–3769

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Pureformer: Transformer- based image denoising,

    A. Gautam, A. Pawar, A. Joshi, S. N. Tazi, S. Chaudhary, P. Hambarde, A. Dudhane, S. Vipparthi, and S. Murala, “Pureformer: Transformer- based image denoising,” inProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, 2025, pp. 1441–1449

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Mipi 2023 challenge on nighttime flare removal: Methods and results,

    Y . Dai, C. Li, S. Zhou, R. Feng, Q. Zhu, Q. Sun, W. Sun, C. C. Loy, J. Gu, S. Liuet al., “Mipi 2023 challenge on nighttime flare removal: Methods and results,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2023, pp. 2853–2863

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Darkgan: night image enhancement using generative adversarial networks,

    P. Alaspure, P. Hambarde, A. Dudhane, and S. Murala, “Darkgan: night image enhancement using generative adversarial networks,” in International Conference on Computer Vision and Image Processing. Springer, 2020, pp. 293–302

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Deep learning-based weather image recognition,

    L.-W. Kang, K.-L. Chou, and R.-H. Fu, “Deep learning-based weather image recognition,” inInternational Symposium on Computer, Con- sumer and Control (IS3C). IEEE, 2018, pp. 384–387

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Multi-modal visibility improvement under abnormal weather conditions using contextual con- ditional gan,

    M. Siddiqua, N. Akhter, and J. Khurshid, “Multi-modal visibility improvement under abnormal weather conditions using contextual con- ditional gan,” inInternational Conference on Emerging Technologies (ICET). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–6. MANUSCRIPT SUBMITTED TO THE IEEE TRANSACTIONS 14

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Video restoration framework and its meta-adaptations to data-poor conditions,

    P. W. Patil, S. Gupta, S. Rana, and S. Venkatesh, “Video restoration framework and its meta-adaptations to data-poor conditions,” inECCV, 2022, pp. 185–200

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Wipernet: A lightweight multi-weather restoration network for enhanced surveillance,

    A. Kulkarni and S. Murala, “Wipernet: A lightweight multi-weather restoration network for enhanced surveillance,”IEEE Transactions on ITS, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 24 488–24 498, 2022

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Varicolored image de-hazing,

    A. Dudhane, K. M. Biradar, P. W. Patil, P. Hambarde, and S. Murala, “Varicolored image de-hazing,” inCVPR, 2020, pp. 4564–4573

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    Multi-weather city: Adverse weather stacking for autonomous driving,

    V . Musat, I. Fursa, and P. Newman, “Multi-weather city: Adverse weather stacking for autonomous driving,” inICCV Workshop, 2021, pp. 372–381

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Multimodal prompt perceiver: Empower adaptiveness generalizability and fidelity for all- in-one image restoration,

    Y . Ai, H. Huang, X. Zhou, J. Wang, and R. He, “Multimodal prompt perceiver: Empower adaptiveness generalizability and fidelity for all- in-one image restoration,” inCVPR, 2024, pp. 25 432–25 444

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    A hierarchical approach for rain or snow removing in a single color image,

    Y . Wang, S. Liu, C. Chen, and B. Zeng, “A hierarchical approach for rain or snow removing in a single color image,”IEEE TIP, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 3936–3950, 2017

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    Nature based solutions for climate adaptation-paying farmers for flood control,

    M. Zandersen, J. S. Oddershede, and A. B. Pedersen, “Nature based solutions for climate adaptation-paying farmers for flood control,” Ecological Economics, vol. 181, p. 106919, 2021

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    Multi-level fusion and attention-guided cnn for image dehazing,

    X. Zhang, T. Wang, W. Luo, and P. Huang, “Multi-level fusion and attention-guided cnn for image dehazing,”IEEE Transactions on CSVT, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 4162–4173, 2020

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    A semi-supervised video dehazing method based on cnns,

    W. Fan, M. Weixin, W. Le, D. Peng, and L. Junbo, “A semi-supervised video dehazing method based on cnns,”Research Square, pp. 6391– 6403, 2024

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Perceptual generative adversarial network for single image de-snowing,

    W. Wan and H. J. Lee, “Perceptual generative adversarial network for single image de-snowing,”KIPS Transactions on Software and Data Engineering, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 403–410, 2019

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    Attentive generative adversarial network for raindrop removal from a single image,

    R. Qian, R. T. Tan, W. Yang, J. Su, and J. Liu, “Attentive generative adversarial network for raindrop removal from a single image,” in CVPR, 2018, pp. 2482–2491

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Transweather: Transformer-based restoration of images degraded by adverse weather conditions,

    J. M. J. Valanarasu, R. Yasarla, and V . M. Patel, “Transweather: Transformer-based restoration of images degraded by adverse weather conditions,” inCVPR, 2022, pp. 2353–2363

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Learning multiple adverse weather removal via two-stage knowledge learning and multi-contrastive regularization: Toward a unified model,

    W.-T. Chen, Z.-K. Huang, C.-C. Tsai, H.-H. Yang, J.-J. Ding, and S.- Y . Kuo, “Learning multiple adverse weather removal via two-stage knowledge learning and multi-contrastive regularization: Toward a unified model,” in2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on CVPR, 2022, pp. 17 632–17 641

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Multi- weather image restoration via domain translation,

    P. W. Patil, S. Gupta, S. Rana, S. Venkatesh, and S. Murala, “Multi- weather image restoration via domain translation,” inICCV, 2023, pp. 21 696–21 705

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Restoring vision in adverse weather conditions with patch-based denoising diffusion models,

    O. Özdenizci and R. Legenstein, “Restoring vision in adverse weather conditions with patch-based denoising diffusion models,”IEEE TPAMI, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 10 346–10 357, 2023

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Efficient method and architecture for real-time video defogging,

    R. Kumar, R. Balasubramanian, and B. K. Kaushik, “Efficient method and architecture for real-time video defogging,”IEEE Transactions on ITS, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 6536–6546, 2020

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Revitalizing convolutional network for image restoration,

    Y . Cui, W. Ren, X. Cao, and A. Knoll, “Revitalizing convolutional network for image restoration,”IEEE TPAMI, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 9423– 9438, 2024

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Dynamic pre-training: Towards efficient and scalable all-in-one image restoration,

    A. Dudhane, O. Thawakar, S. W. Zamir, S. Khan, F. S. Khan, and M.-H. Yang, “Dynamic pre-training: Towards efficient and scalable all-in-one image restoration,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.02154, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Burst image restoration and enhancement,

    A. Dudhane, S. W. Zamir, S. Khan, F. S. Khan, and M.-H. Yang, “Burst image restoration and enhancement,” inProceedings of the ieee/cvf Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 5759–5768

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Robust unseen video understanding for various surveillance environments,

    P. Patil, J. Singh, P. Hambarde, A. Kulkarni, S. Chaudhary, and S. Murala, “Robust unseen video understanding for various surveillance environments,” in18th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS). IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–8

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Single image haze removal using dark channel prior,

    K. He, J. Sun, and X. Tang, “Single image haze removal using dark channel prior,”IEEE TPAMI, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 2341–2353, 2011

    work page 2011

  29. [29]

    Single image dehazing with a physical model and dark channel prior,

    J. Wang, N. He, L. Zhang, and K. Lu, “Single image dehazing with a physical model and dark channel prior,”Neurocomputing, vol. 149, pp. 1017–1026, 2015

    work page 2015

  30. [30]

    Single image dehazing based on the physical model and msrcr algorithm,

    J. Wang, K. Lu, J. Xue, N. He, and L. Shao, “Single image dehazing based on the physical model and msrcr algorithm,”IEEE Transactions on CSVT, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 2190–2199, 2017

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    Single image dehazing using haze-lines,

    D. Berman, T. Treibitz, and S. Avidan, “Single image dehazing using haze-lines,”IEEE TPAMI, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 720–734, 2018

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    Single image dehazing using the change of detail prior,

    J. Li, H. Zhang, D. Yuan, and M. Sun, “Single image dehazing using the change of detail prior,”Neurocomputing, vol. 159, pp. 11–21, 2015

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    A confidence prior for image dehazing,

    F. Yuan, Y . Zhou, X. Xia, X. Qian, and J. Huang, “A confidence prior for image dehazing,”Pattern Recognition, vol. 119, p. 108076, 2021

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Bridging the gap between haze scenarios: A unified image dehazing model,

    Y . Feng, Z. Su, L. Ma, X. Li, R. Liu, and F. Zhou, “Bridging the gap between haze scenarios: A unified image dehazing model,”IEEE Transactions on CSVT, 2024

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Efficient single image dehazing and denoising: An efficient multi-scale corre- lated wavelet approach,

    X. Liu, H. Zhang, Y .-m. Cheung, X. You, and Y . Y . Tang, “Efficient single image dehazing and denoising: An efficient multi-scale corre- lated wavelet approach,”Computer Vision and Image Understanding, vol. 162, pp. 23–33, 2017

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    Single image de-hazing using globally guided image filtering,

    Z. Li and J. Zheng, “Single image de-hazing using globally guided image filtering,”IEEE TIP, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 442–450, 2017

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    Image dehazing based on improved color channel transfer and mul- tiexposure fusion,

    S. Ma, W. Pan, H. Liu, S. Dai, B. Xu, C. Xu, X. Li, and H. Guan, “Image dehazing based on improved color channel transfer and mul- tiexposure fusion,”Advances in Multimedia, vol. 2023, no. 1, p. 8891239, 2023

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Visibility in bad weather from a single image,

    R. T. Tan, “Visibility in bad weather from a single image,” inCVPR, 2008, pp. 1–8

    work page 2008

  39. [39]

    Enhanced variational image dehazing,

    A. Galdran, J. Vazquez-Corral, D. Pardo, and M. Bertalmio, “Enhanced variational image dehazing,”SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1519–1546, 2015

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    Dehazenet: An end-to-end system for single image haze removal,

    B. Cai, X. Xu, K. Jia, C. Qing, and D. Tao, “Dehazenet: An end-to-end system for single image haze removal,”IEEE TIP, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 5187–5198, 2016

    work page 2016

  41. [41]

    Griddehazenet: Attention-based multi-scale network for image dehazing,

    X. Liu, Y . Ma, Z. Shi, and J. Chen, “Griddehazenet: Attention-based multi-scale network for image dehazing,” inICCV, 2019, pp. 7314– 7323

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    Pyramid channel- based feature attention network for image dehazing,

    X. Zhang, T. Wang, J. Wang, G. Tang, and L. Zhao, “Pyramid channel- based feature attention network for image dehazing,”Computer Vision and Image Understanding, vol. 197, p. 103003, 2020

    work page 2020

  43. [43]

    A novel fast single image dehazing algorithm based on artificial multiexposure image fusion,

    Z. Zhu, H. Wei, G. Hu, Y . Li, G. Qi, and N. Mazur, “A novel fast single image dehazing algorithm based on artificial multiexposure image fusion,”IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 70, pp. 1–23, 2020

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    Towards domain invariant single image dehazing,

    P. Shyam, K.-J. Yoon, and K.-S. Kim, “Towards domain invariant single image dehazing,” inAAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 35, no. 11, 2021, pp. 9657–9665

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    Self-guided image dehazing using progressive feature fusion,

    H. Bai, J. Pan, X. Xiang, and J. Tang, “Self-guided image dehazing using progressive feature fusion,”IEEE TIP, vol. 31, pp. 1217–1229, 2022

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Ryf-net: Deep fusion network for single image haze removal,

    A. Dudhane and S. Murala, “Ryf-net: Deep fusion network for single image haze removal,”IEEE TIP, vol. 29, pp. 628–640, 2020

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    Ri-gan: An end-to- end network for single image haze removal,

    A. Dudhane, H. S. Aulakh, and S. Murala, “Ri-gan: An end-to- end network for single image haze removal,” in2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on CVPR Workshops, 2019, pp. 2014–2023

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    Vifnet: An end-to-end visible-infrared fusion network for image dehazing,

    M. Yu, T. Cui, H. Lu, and Y . Yue, “Vifnet: An end-to-end visible-infrared fusion network for image dehazing,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07790, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Cycle-dehaze: Enhanced cyclegan for single image dehazing,

    D. Engin, A. Genç, and H. Kemal Ekenel, “Cycle-dehaze: Enhanced cyclegan for single image dehazing,” inCVPR workshops, 2018, pp. 825–833

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    Dehazegan: When image dehazing meets differential programming

    H. Zhu, X. Peng, V . Chandrasekhar, L. Li, and J.-H. Lim, “Dehazegan: When image dehazing meets differential programming.” inIJCAI, 2018, pp. 1234–1240

    work page 2018

  51. [51]

    Cdnet: Single image de-hazing using unpaired adversarial training,

    A. Dudhane and S. Murala, “Cdnet: Single image de-hazing using unpaired adversarial training,” inWACV. IEEE, 2019, pp. 1147–1155

    work page 2019

  52. [52]

    Single image dehazing via multi-scale convolutional neural networks with holistic edges,

    W. Ren, J. Pan, H. Zhang, X. Cao, and M.-H. Yang, “Single image dehazing via multi-scale convolutional neural networks with holistic edges,”International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 128, pp. 240– 259, 2020

    work page 2020

  53. [53]

    Tms-gan: A twofold multi-scale generative adversarial network for single image dehazing,

    P. Wang, H. Zhu, H. Huang, H. Zhang, and N. Wang, “Tms-gan: A twofold multi-scale generative adversarial network for single image dehazing,”IEEE Transactions on CSVT, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 2760–2772, 2021

    work page 2021

  54. [54]

    Cycle-snspgan: Towards real-world image dehazing via cycle spectral normalized soft likelihood estimation patch gan,

    Y . Wang, X. Yan, D. Guan, M. Wei, Y . Chen, X.-P. Zhang, and J. Li, “Cycle-snspgan: Towards real-world image dehazing via cycle spectral normalized soft likelihood estimation patch gan,”IEEE Transactions on ITS, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 20 368–20 382, 2022

    work page 2022

  55. [55]

    Ganid: a novel generative adversarial network for image dehazing,

    C. M. Manu and K. Sreeni, “Ganid: a novel generative adversarial network for image dehazing,”The Visual Computer, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 3923–3936, 2023

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    Vision transformers for single image dehazing,

    Y . Song, Z. He, H. Qian, and X. Du, “Vision transformers for single image dehazing,”IEEE TIP, vol. 32, pp. 1927–1941, 2023

    work page 1927

  57. [57]

    Image self-enhancement de-hazing algorithm combined with generative adversarial network,

    W. Liu, Y . Cheng, and H. Qu, “Image self-enhancement de-hazing algorithm combined with generative adversarial network,”Journal of System Simulation, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1093–1106, 2024

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    Image hazing and dehazing: From the viewpoint of two-way image translation with a weakly supervised framework,

    Y . Li, H. Chen, Q. Miao, D. Ge, S. Liang, Z. Ma, and B. Zhao, “Image hazing and dehazing: From the viewpoint of two-way image translation with a weakly supervised framework,”IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 25, pp. 4704–4717, 2022. MANUSCRIPT SUBMITTED TO THE IEEE TRANSACTIONS 15

    work page 2022

  59. [59]

    Scanet: Self- paced semi-curricular attention network for non-homogeneous image dehazing,

    Y . Guo, Y . Gao, W. Liu, Y . Lu, J. Qu, S. He, and W. Ren, “Scanet: Self- paced semi-curricular attention network for non-homogeneous image dehazing,” inCVPR, 2023, pp. 1885–1894

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    Deep dehazing powered by image processing network,

    G. Kim, J. Park, and J. Kwon, “Deep dehazing powered by image processing network,” inCVPR, 2023, pp. 1209–1218

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    Ro- bust unpaired image dehazing via adversarial deformation constraint,

    H. Wei, Q. Wu, C. Wu, K. N. Ngan, H. Li, F. Meng, and H. Qiu, “Ro- bust unpaired image dehazing via adversarial deformation constraint,” IEEE Transactions on CSVT, 2024

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    Iterative predictor-critic code decoding for real-world image dehazing,

    J. Fu, S. Liu, Z. Liu, C.-L. Guo, H. Park, R. Wu, G. Wang, and C. Li, “Iterative predictor-critic code decoding for real-world image dehazing,” inCVPR, June 2025, pp. 12 700–12 709

    work page 2025

  63. [63]

    Vndhr: Variational single nighttime image dehazing for enhancing visibility in intelligent transportation systems via hybrid regularization,

    Y . Liu, X. Wang, E. Hu, A. Wang, B. Shiri, and W. Lin, “Vndhr: Variational single nighttime image dehazing for enhancing visibility in intelligent transportation systems via hybrid regularization,”IEEE Transactions on ITS, pp. 1–15, 2025

    work page 2025

  64. [64]

    Semi-supervised image dehazing,

    L. Li, Y . Dong, W. Ren, J. Pan, C. Gao, N. Sang, and M.-H. Yang, “Semi-supervised image dehazing,”IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 29, pp. 2766–2779, 2019

    work page 2019

  65. [65]

    A semi-supervised nighttime dehazing baseline with spatial-frequency aware and realistic brightness constraint,

    X. Cong, J. Gui, J. Zhang, and J. Hou, “A semi-supervised nighttime dehazing baseline with spatial-frequency aware and realistic brightness constraint,” inCVPR, 2024

    work page 2024

  66. [66]

    Contrastive learning for compact single image dehazing,

    H. Wu, Y . Qu, S. Lin, J. Zhou, R. Qiao, Z. Zhang, Y . Xie, and L. Ma, “Contrastive learning for compact single image dehazing,” inCVPR, 2021, pp. 10 551–10 560

    work page 2021

  67. [67]

    Self- augmented unpaired image dehazing via density and depth decompo- sition,

    Y . Yang, C. Wang, R. Liu, L. Zhang, X. Guo, and D. Tao, “Self- augmented unpaired image dehazing via density and depth decompo- sition,” inCVPR, 2022, pp. 2037–2046

    work page 2022

  68. [68]

    U2d2net: Unsuper- vised unified image dehazing and denoising network for single hazy image enhancement,

    B. Ding, R. Zhang, L. Xu, G. Liu, and S. Yang, “U2d2net: Unsuper- vised unified image dehazing and denoising network for single hazy image enhancement,”IEEE TIP, 2023

    work page 2023

  69. [69]

    Ucl-dehaze: Towards real- world image dehazing via unsupervised contrastive learning,

    Y . Wang, X. Yan, F. Wang, and H. Xie, “Ucl-dehaze: Towards real- world image dehazing via unsupervised contrastive learning,”IEEE TIP, 2024

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    A video dehazing system based on fast airlight es- timation,

    Y . Park and T. Kim, “A video dehazing system based on fast airlight es- timation,” in2017 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP). IEEE, 2017, pp. 1185–1189

    work page 2017

  71. [71]

    Efficient traffic video dehazing using adaptive dark channel prior and spatial–temporal correlations,

    T. Dong, G. Zhao, J. Wu, Y . Ye, and Y . Shen, “Efficient traffic video dehazing using adaptive dark channel prior and spatial–temporal correlations,”Sensors, 2019

    work page 2019

  72. [72]

    Single image and video dehazing: A dark channel prior (dcp)-based approach,

    S. Adidela, S. Singh, T. Sahuet al., “Single image and video dehazing: A dark channel prior (dcp)-based approach,” in2021 IEEE 18th India Council International Conference (INDICON), 2021

    work page 2021

  73. [73]

    A real-time framework for hd video defogging using modified dark channel prior,

    X. Wu, X. Chen, X. Wang, X. Zhang, and S. Yuan, “A real-time framework for hd video defogging using modified dark channel prior,” Journal of Real-Time Image Processing, 2024

    work page 2024

  74. [74]

    Zero-shot image dehazing,

    B. Li, Y . Gou, J. Liu, H. Zhu, and J. Zhou, “Zero-shot image dehazing,” IEEE TIP, 2020

    work page 2020

  75. [75]

    Image and video dehazing based on transmission estimation and refinement using jaya algorithm,

    K. Ashwini, H. Nenavath, and R. Jatoth, “Image and video dehazing based on transmission estimation and refinement using jaya algorithm,” Optik, 2022

    work page 2022

  76. [76]

    Image and video dehazing using view-based cluster segmentation,

    F. Yu, C. Qing, X. Xu, and B. Cai, “Image and video dehazing using view-based cluster segmentation,” in2016 Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP), 2016

    work page 2016

  77. [77]

    An efficient and contrast-enhanced video de- hazing based on transmission estimation using hsl color model,

    P. Soma and R. Jatoth, “An efficient and contrast-enhanced video de- hazing based on transmission estimation using hsl color model,”The Visual Computer, 2022

    work page 2022

  78. [78]

    Video dehazing via a multi- range temporal alignment network with physical prior,

    J. Xu, X. Hu, L. Zhu, Q. Dou, and J. Dai, “Video dehazing via a multi- range temporal alignment network with physical prior,” inCVPR, 2023

    work page 2023

  79. [79]

    Video quality enhancement using dual-transmission-map dehazing,

    A. Ayoub, E. Naeem, and W. El-Shafai, “Video quality enhancement using dual-transmission-map dehazing,”Multimedia Tools and Appli- cations, 2024

    work page 2024

  80. [80]

    Video dehazing with spatial and temporal coherence,

    J. Zhang, L. Li, Y . Zhang, G. Yang, X. Cao, and J. Sun, “Video dehazing with spatial and temporal coherence,”The Visual Computer, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 749–757, 2011

    work page 2011

Showing first 80 references.