pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.17659 · v3 · submitted 2025-10-20 · 🪐 quant-ph

Field-Trial Quantum Key Distribution with Qubit-Based Frame Synchronization

Rui Guan , Jingchun Yu , Zhaoyun Li , Hongbo Xie , Yuxing Wei , Sen Li , Jing Wen , Xiaodong Liang
show 2 more authors
Yanwei Li Kejin Wei
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 06:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum key distributionframe synchronizationfield trialBB84 protocolpolarization feedbackmetropolitan fibersecure key rateone-decoy state
0
0 comments X

The pith

Qubit-based frame synchronization enables stable QKD over urban fibers without dedicated classical channels.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests a qubit-based distributed frame synchronization method inside a polarization-encoded one-decoy-state BB84 system. By pulling timing information straight from the quantum qubits, the design removes the need for separate classical synchronization light that normally adds noise and hardware cost. A twelve-hour continuous run on a metropolitan fiber link in Nanning maintained an average quantum bit error rate of 1.12 percent and produced a secure key rate of 26.6 kbit/s at 18 dB loss. The same setup still delivered a finite-key secure rate of 115 bit/s when channel loss reached 40 dB, with real-time polarization compensation driven by the synchronization data itself. These results constitute the first extended field validation of the synchronization approach under actual urban-fiber conditions.

Core claim

Using the qubit-based distributed frame synchronization method together with integrated polarization feedback, the system achieves an average QBER of 1.12 percent and a secure key rate of 26.6 kbit/s during twelve hours of continuous operation at 18 dB loss, while still yielding 115 bit/s at 40 dB loss, confirming that reliable frame alignment and polarization control can be obtained directly from the quantum signal in a real metropolitan network without extra synchronization hardware.

What carries the argument

The qubit-based distributed frame synchronization method extracts timing information directly from the quantum qubits to align frames and supply data for real-time polarization compensation.

If this is right

  • Eliminates the cost and noise of separate classical synchronization signals in deployed QKD systems.
  • Preserves the validity of standard security proofs by avoiding post-selection on the quantum channel.
  • Enables continuous, automated polarization tracking in environments with dynamic birefringence.
  • Supports operation at high channel loss, extending the reach of practical metropolitan QKD links.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same timing extraction could be adapted to other discrete-variable protocols that already use single-photon detection.
  • Longer-term monitoring beyond twelve hours would test whether slow drifts in fiber properties eventually require additional compensation layers.
  • Integration with wavelength-division multiplexing might allow the synchronization data to share the same fiber without increasing loss further.

Load-bearing premise

The method extracts accurate timing from the quantum signal without adding errors or requiring post-selection that would affect the security proof, even when polarization drifts occur in urban fibers.

What would settle it

An experiment in comparable urban fiber that shows either loss of frame alignment or a sustained rise in QBER above roughly 2 percent traceable to timing jitter would falsify the central performance claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.17659 by Hongbo Xie, Jingchun Yu, Jing Wen, Kejin Wei, Rui Guan, Sen Li, Xiaodong Liang, Yanwei Li, Yuxing Wei, Zhaoyun Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Aerial view of the fiber link used in the QKD field trial performed in Nanning, China. [©2024 Baidu]. The link [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic representation of the setup employed in the experiment. In the upper-left and upper-right boxes we represent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: QBER on Z(X) basis of the system (left axis) and the feedback voltage of EPC (right axis, for EPC channels 1, 2, and 3 in blue, purple, and orange) over a 12-hour continuous operation in a field-deployed fiber link with 18 dB channel loss. The red (blue) point denotes the quantum bit error in Z(X) basis, which are recorded every 2.5 minutes. a gradient descent optimization algorithm running on Bob’s comput… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The secure key rate under different transmission losses. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantum key distribution (QKD) is a cryptographic technique that uses quantum mechanical principles to enable secure key exchange. Practical deployment of QKD requires robust, cost-effective systems that can operate in challenging field environments. A major challenge is achieving reliable clock synchronization without adding hardware complexity. Conventional approaches often use separate classical light signals, which increase costs and introduce noise that degrades quantum channel performance. To address this limitation, we demonstrate a QKD system incorporating a recently proposed qubit-based distributed frame synchronization method, deployed over a metropolitan fiber network in Nanning, China. Using the polarization-encoded one-decoy-state BB84 protocol and the recently proposed qubit-based distributed frame synchronization method, our system achieves synchronization directly from the quantum signal, eliminating the need for dedicated synchronization hardware. Furthermore, to counteract dynamic polarization disturbances in urban fibers, the system integrates qubit-based polarization feedback control, enabling real-time polarization compensation through an automated polarization controller using data recovered from the qubit-based synchronization signals. During 12 hours of continuous operation, the system maintained a low average quantum bit error rate (QBER) of 1.12/%, achieving a secure key rate of 26.6 kbit/s under 18 dB channel loss. Even under a high channel loss of 40 dB, a finite-key secure rate of 115 bit/s was achieved. This study represents the first successful long-term validation of a frame-synchronization based QKD scheme in a real urban environment, demonstrating exceptional stability and high-loss tolerance, and offering an alternative for building practical, scalable, and cost-efficient quantum-secure communication networks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a field trial of a polarization-encoded one-decoy-state BB84 QKD system deployed over metropolitan fiber in Nanning, China. The system uses a qubit-based distributed frame synchronization method to extract timing directly from the quantum signal, eliminating dedicated hardware, and incorporates qubit-based polarization feedback for real-time compensation. Results include 12 hours of continuous operation with average QBER of 1.12%, secure key rate of 26.6 kbit/s at 18 dB loss, and finite-key secure rate of 115 bit/s at 40 dB loss.

Significance. If the finite-key analysis properly incorporates any effects from the synchronization procedure, the work supplies direct experimental support for practical, low-complexity QKD in urban environments. The 12-hour continuous run and demonstrated tolerance to 40 dB loss constitute concrete evidence of stability under real-world polarization drift, strengthening the case for scalable metropolitan quantum networks.

major comments (1)
  1. [Finite-key analysis / security proof] The finite-key rate of 115 bit/s at 40 dB loss (abstract and implied security section) is presented using standard one-decoy BB84 bounds. It is unclear whether the qubit-based frame synchronization applies any data-dependent selection, adaptive coincidence windows, or timing gates that would modify the effective sifted-key fraction or statistical uncertainty; an explicit statement of how any such selection is folded into the Chernoff-bound analysis or block-size accounting is required to support the quoted rate.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] In the abstract the QBER is written '1.12/%'; this is a typographical error and should read 1.12%.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and the recommendation of minor revision. The single major comment is addressed below with a commitment to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Finite-key analysis / security proof] The finite-key rate of 115 bit/s at 40 dB loss (abstract and implied security section) is presented using standard one-decoy BB84 bounds. It is unclear whether the qubit-based frame synchronization applies any data-dependent selection, adaptive coincidence windows, or timing gates that would modify the effective sifted-key fraction or statistical uncertainty; an explicit statement of how any such selection is folded into the Chernoff-bound analysis or block-size accounting is required to support the quoted rate.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this important clarification request. The qubit-based distributed frame synchronization extracts frame timing solely from the arrival-time statistics of the detected quantum pulses; it performs no post-selection on the bit values, no adaptive adjustment of the coincidence window, and no data-dependent gating. The coincidence window is fixed in advance from the measured timing jitter of the detection system and remains constant for the entire data set. Consequently, the synchronization step does not alter the sifted-key fraction or introduce additional statistical bias beyond that already accounted for in the standard one-decoy-state finite-key analysis. The Chernoff bounds are applied directly to the full sifted block size after synchronization. We will insert an explicit paragraph in the Security Analysis section stating these facts and confirming that no modification to the block-size accounting is required. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Experimental field-trial measurements stand independently with no derivation chain

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental outcomes from a 12-hour metropolitan fiber field trial of a polarization-encoded one-decoy BB84 QKD system using a referenced qubit-based frame synchronization method. All headline numbers (1.12% average QBER, 26.6 kbit/s at 18 dB loss, 115 bit/s finite-key rate at 40 dB) are measured quantities obtained under stated channel conditions, not outputs of a theoretical derivation or model that reduces to fitted parameters or self-citations by construction. The synchronization technique is described as 'recently proposed' and integrated with polarization feedback, but the performance data are presented as empirical validation rather than a closed logical loop. No equations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are invoked in the provided text that would make the reported rates equivalent to their inputs. The central claims therefore remain self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is an experimental demonstration. It relies on the standard security assumptions of the one-decoy-state BB84 protocol and on the correctness of the previously proposed qubit-based synchronization technique. No new free parameters are introduced in the abstract; no new physical entities are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Security of one-decoy-state BB84 protocol holds under the observed QBER and finite-key regime
    Invoked implicitly when reporting finite-key secure rates at 18 dB and 40 dB loss.
  • domain assumption Qubit-based frame synchronization extracts timing without violating the quantum channel assumptions used in the security proof
    Central to the claim that no dedicated classical sync hardware is needed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5845 in / 1482 out tokens · 37181 ms · 2026-05-18T06:01:56.228348+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Security Risks of VOA-Induced Luminescence in Chip-Based quantum key distribution

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    VOA-induced luminescence in chip-based QKD creates a spectrally separated side channel enabling information leakage even from weak emission without disturbing quantum states.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing,

    C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, “Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing,”International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing, Bangalore, India, Dec 9-12, 1984, pp. 175–179, 1984. JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. XX, NO. XX, OCTOBER 2025 5 TABLE I: Experimental parameters and results.Land Loss are the channel lengt...

    work page 1984

  2. [2]

    Recent advances on integrated quantum communications,

    A. Orieux and E. Diamanti, “Recent advances on integrated quantum communications,”J. Opt., vol. 18, no. 8, Aug 2016

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Advances in quantum cryptography,

    S. Pirandola, U. L. Andersen, L. Banchi, M. Berta, D. Bunandar, R. Colbeck, D. Englund, T. Gehring, C. Lupo, C. Ottaviani, J. L. Pereira, M. Razavi, J. S. Shaari, M. Tomamichel, V . C. Usenko, G. Vallone, P. Villoresi, and P. Wallden, “Advances in quantum cryptography,”Adv. Opt. Photon., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1012–1236, Dec 2020

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices,

    F. Xu, X. Ma, Q. Zhang, H.-K. Lo, and J.-W. Pan, “Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices,”Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 92, no. 2, p. 025002, 2020

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Advances in chip-based quantum key distribution,

    Q. Liu, Y . Huang, Y . Du, Z. Zhao, M. Geng, Z. Zhang, and K. Wei, “Advances in chip-based quantum key distribution,”Entropy, vol. 24, no. 10, p. 1334, 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    The evolution of quantum key distribution networks: On the road to the qinternet,

    Y . Cao, Y . Zhao, Q. Wang, J. Zhang, S. X. Ng, and L. Hanzo, “The evolution of quantum key distribution networks: On the road to the qinternet,”IEEE Commun. Surv. Tut., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 839–894, 2022

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Quan- tum key distribution in multiple fiber networks and its application in urban communications: A comprehensive review,

    G. Granados, W. Velasquez, R. Cajo, and M. Antonieta-Alvarez, “Quan- tum key distribution in multiple fiber networks and its application in urban communications: A comprehensive review,”IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 100 446–100 461, 2025

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Secure quantum key distribution over 421 km of optical fiber,

    A. Boaron, G. Boso, D. Rusca, C. Vulliez, C. Autebert, M. Caloz, M. Perrenoud, G. Gras, F. Bussi `eres, M.-J. Li, D. Nolan, A. Martin, and H. Zbinden, “Secure quantum key distribution over 421 km of optical fiber,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 121, p. 190502, Nov 2018

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    Performance and security of 5 ghz repetition rate polarization-based quantum key distribution,

    F. Gr ¨unenfelder, A. Boaron, D. Rusca, A. Martin, and H. Zbinden, “Performance and security of 5 ghz repetition rate polarization-based quantum key distribution,”Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 117, no. 14, 2020

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    High-speed measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with integrated silicon photonics,

    K. Wei, W. Li, H. Tan, Y . Li, H. Min, W.-J. Zhang, H. Li, L. You, Z. Wang, X. Jiang, T.-Y . Chen, S.-K. Liao, C.-Z. Peng, F. Xu, and J.-W. Pan, “High-speed measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with integrated silicon photonics,”Phys. Rev. X, vol. 10, p. 031030, Aug 2020

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    A photonic inte- grated quantum secure communication system,

    T. K. Paraiso, T. Roger, D. G. Marangon, I. De Marco, M. Sanzaro, R. I. Woodward, J. F. Dynes, Z. Yuan, and A. J. Shields, “A photonic inte- grated quantum secure communication system,”Nat. Photon., vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 850–856, 2021

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Twin-field quantum key distribution without optical frequency dissemination,

    L. Zhou, J. Lin, Y . Jing, and Z. Yuan, “Twin-field quantum key distribution without optical frequency dissemination,”Nat. Commun., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 928, 2023

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Fast single-photon detectors and real-time key distillation enable high secret- key-rate quantum key distribution systems,

    F. Gr ¨unenfelder, A. Boaron, G. V . Resta, M. Perrenoud, D. Rusca, C. Barreiro, R. Houlmann, R. Sax, L. Stasi, S. El-Khouryet al., “Fast single-photon detectors and real-time key distillation enable high secret- key-rate quantum key distribution systems,”Nat. Photon., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 422–426, 2023

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    High-rate quantum key distribution exceeding 110 mb s–1,

    W. Li, L. Zhang, H. Tan, Y . Lu, S.-K. Liao, J. Huang, H. Li, Z. Wang, H.-K. Mao, B. Yanet al., “High-rate quantum key distribution exceeding 110 mb s–1,”Nat. Photon., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 416–421, 2023

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Experimental twin-field quantum key distribution over 1000 km fiber distance,

    Y . Liu, W.-J. Zhang, C. Jiang, J.-P. Chen, C. Zhang, W.-X. Pan, D. Ma, H. Dong, J.-M. Xiong, C.-J. Zhang, H. Li, R.-C. Wang, J. Wu, T.-Y . Chen, L. You, X.-B. Wang, Q. Zhang, and J.-W. Pan, “Experimental twin-field quantum key distribution over 1000 km fiber distance,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 130, p. 210801, May 2023

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Continuous-mode quantum key distribution with digital signal processing,

    Z. Chen, X. Wang, S. Yu, Z. Li, and H. Guo, “Continuous-mode quantum key distribution with digital signal processing,”npj Quant. Inf., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 28, 2023

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Practical challenges in quantum key distribution,

    E. Diamanti, H.-K. Lo, B. Qi, and Z. Yuan, “Practical challenges in quantum key distribution,”npj Quant. Inf., vol. 2, Nov 8 2016

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    Field trial of a three-state quantum key distribution scheme in the florence metropolitan area,

    D. Bacco, I. Vagniluca, B. Da Lio, N. Biagi, A. Della Frera, D. Calonico, C. Toninelli, F. S. Cataliotti, M. Bellini, L. K. Oxenlowe, and A. Zavatta, “Field trial of a three-state quantum key distribution scheme in the florence metropolitan area,”EPJ Quantum Technol., vol. 6, no. 1, Oct 28 2019

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Field test of twin-field quantum key distribution through sending-or-not-sending over 428 km,

    H. Liu, C. Jiang, H.-T. Zhu, M. Zou, Z.-W. Yu, X.-L. Hu, H. Xu, S. Ma, Z. Han, J.-P. Chen, Y . Dai, S.-B. Tang, W. Zhang, H. Li, L. You, Z. Wang, Y . Hua, H. Hu, H. Zhang, F. Zhou, Q. Zhang, X.-B. Wang, T.- Y . Chen, and J.-W. Pan, “Field test of twin-field quantum key distribution through sending-or-not-sending over 428 km,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 126, p....

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Quantum key distribution over 658 km fiber with distributed vibration sensing,

    J.-P. Chen, C. Zhang, Y . Liu, C. Jiang, D.-F. Zhao, W.-J. Zhang, F.-X. Chen, H. Li, L.-X. You, Z. Wang, Y . Chen, X.-B. Wang, Q. Zhang, and J.-W. Pan, “Quantum key distribution over 658 km fiber with distributed vibration sensing,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 128, p. 180502, May 2022

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Recent progress in quantum key distribution network deployments and stan- dards,

    M. Stanley, Y . Gui, D. Unnikrishnan, S. Hall, and I. Fatadin, “Recent progress in quantum key distribution network deployments and stan- dards,”J. Phys. Conf. Ser ., vol. 2416, no. 1, p. 012001, Dec 2022

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Twin- field quantum key distribution without phase locking,

    W. Li, L. Zhang, Y . Lu, Z.-P. Li, C. Jiang, Y . Liu, J. Huang, H. Li, Z. Wang, X.-B. Wang, Q. Zhang, L. You, F. Xu, and J.-W. Pan, “Twin- field quantum key distribution without phase locking,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 130, p. 250802, Jun 2023

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Field test of quantum key distribution with high key creation efficiency,

    Y .-C. Kao, S.-H. Huang, C.-H. Chang, C.-H. Wu, S.-H. Chu, J. Jiang, A.- C. Zhang, S.-Y . Huang, J.-H. Yan, K.-M. Feng, and C.-S. Chuu, “Field test of quantum key distribution with high key creation efficiency,”Opt. Express, vol. 31, no. 19, pp. 30 239–30 247, Sep 2023

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Field test of quantum key distribution over aerial fiber based on simple and stable modulation,

    Y .-L. Tang, Z.-L. Xie, C. Zhou, D. Zhang, M.-L. Xu, J. Sun, D. Sun, Y .-X. Xu, L.-W. Wang, Y . Ma, Y .-K. Zhao, M.-S. Jiang, Y . Wang, J. Li, K. Xue, N. Yu, M.-S. Zhao, D.-D. Li, W.-S. Bao, and S.-B. Tang, “Field test of quantum key distribution over aerial fiber based on simple and stable modulation,”Opt. Express, vol. 31, no. 16, pp. 26 301–26 313, Jul 31 2023

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Phase noise in real-world twin-field quantum key distribution,

    G. Bertaina, C. Clivati, S. Donadello, C. Liorni, A. Meda, S. Virzi, M. Gramegna, M. Genovese, F. Levi, D. Calonico, M. Dispenza, and I. P. Degiovanni, “Phase noise in real-world twin-field quantum key distribution,”Adv. Quantum Technol., vol. 7, no. 6, Jun 2024

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Independent-optical-frequency-comb-powered 546-km field test of twin-field quantum key distribution,

    L. Zhou, J. Lin, C. Ge, Y . Fan, Z. Yuan, H. Dong, Y . Liu, D. Ma, J.-P. Chen, C. Jiang, X.-B. Wang, L.-X. You, Q. Zhang, and J.-W. Pan, “Independent-optical-frequency-comb-powered 546-km field test of twin-field quantum key distribution,”Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 22, p. 064057, Dec 2024

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Field experimental mode- JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. XX, NO. XX, OCTOBER 2025 6 pairing quantum key distribution with intensity fluctuations,

    Z. Li, T. Dou, M. Cheng, Y . Liu, and J. Tang, “Field experimental mode- JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. XX, NO. XX, OCTOBER 2025 6 pairing quantum key distribution with intensity fluctuations,”Opt. Lett., vol. 49, no. 23, pp. 6609–6612, Dec 2024

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Field test of mode-pairing quantum key distribution,

    H.-T. Zhu, Y . Huang, W.-X. Pan, C.-W. Zhou, J. Tang, H. He, M. Cheng, X. Jin, M. Zou, S. Tang, X. Ma, T.-Y . Chen, and J.-W. Pan, “Field test of mode-pairing quantum key distribution,”Optica, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 883–888, Jun 2024

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Intermodal quantum key distribution field trial with active switching between fiber and free-space channels,

    F. Picciariello, I. Karakosta-Amarantidou, E. Rossi, M. Avesani, G. Fo- letto, L. Calderaro, G. Vallone, P. Villoresi, and F. Vedovato, “Intermodal quantum key distribution field trial with active switching between fiber and free-space channels,”EPJ Quantum Technol., vol. 12, no. 1, Dec 2025

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Synchronization in quantum key distribution systems,

    A. Pljonkin, K. Rumyantsev, and P. K. Singh, “Synchronization in quantum key distribution systems,”Cryptography, vol. 1, no. 3, 2017

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    Qkd protected fiber-based infrastructure for time dissemination,

    A. Meda, A. Mura, S. Virz `ı, A. Avella, F. Levi, I. P. Degiovanni, A. Geraldi, M. Valeri, S. Di Bartolo, T. Catuognoet al., “Qkd protected fiber-based infrastructure for time dissemination,”Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 13419, 2025

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Clock-offset recovery with sublinear complexity enables synchronization on low-level hard- ware for quantum key distribution,

    J. Krause, N. Walenta, J. Hilt, and R. Freund, “Clock-offset recovery with sublinear complexity enables synchronization on low-level hard- ware for quantum key distribution,”Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 23, p. 044015, Apr 2025

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Twin- field quantum key distribution over a 511km optical fibre linking two distant metropolitan areas,

    J.-P. Chen, C. Zhang, Y . Liu, C. Jiang, W.-J. Zhang, Z.-Y . Han, S.-Z. Ma, X.-L. Hu, Y .-H. Li, H. Liu, F. Zhou, H.-F. Jiang, T.-Y . Chen, H. Li, L.-X. You, Z. Wang, X.-B. Wang, Q. Zhang, and J.-W. Pan, “Twin- field quantum key distribution over a 511km optical fibre linking two distant metropolitan areas,”Nat. Photon., vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 570–575, Aug 2021

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Fpga-based synchronization of frequency-domain interferometer for qkd,

    N. Chandra and P. K. Krishnamurthy, “Fpga-based synchronization of frequency-domain interferometer for qkd,”IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, vol. 6, no. 4100111, pp. 1–10, 2025

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    Impact of raman scattered noise from multiple telecom channels on fiber-optic quantum key distribution systems,

    T. F. da Silva, G. B. Xavier, G. P. Temporao, and J. P. von der Weid, “Impact of raman scattered noise from multiple telecom channels on fiber-optic quantum key distribution systems,”J. Lightwave. Technol., vol. 32, no. 13, pp. 2332–2339, Jul 1 2014

    work page 2014

  36. [36]

    Perspectives and limitations of qkd integration in metropolitan area networks,

    S. Aleksic, F. Hipp, D. Winkler, A. Poppe, B. Schrenk, and G. Franzl, “Perspectives and limitations of qkd integration in metropolitan area networks,”Opt. Express, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 10 359–10 373, Apr 20 2015

    work page 2015

  37. [37]

    Synchro- nization and coexistence in quantum networks,

    I. A. Burenkov, A. Semionov, Hala, T. Gerrits, A. Rahmouni, D. Anand, Y .-S. Li-Baboud, O. Slattery, A. Battou, and S. V . Polyakov, “Synchro- nization and coexistence in quantum networks,”Opt. Express, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 11 431–11 446, Mar 2023

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Hong-ou-mandel interference with a coexisting clock using transceivers for synchronization over deployed fiber,

    A. Ramesh, D. R. Reilly, K. F. Lee, P. M. Moraw, J. Chung, M. S. Islam, C. Pena, X. Han, R. Kettimuthu, P. Kumar, and G. S. Kanter, “Hong-ou-mandel interference with a coexisting clock using transceivers for synchronization over deployed fiber,”Opt. Commun., vol. 576, Mar 2025

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Fast and simple qubit-based synchronization for quantum key distribution,

    L. Calderaro, A. Stanco, C. Agnesi, M. Avesani, D. Dequal, P. Villoresi, and G. Vallone, “Fast and simple qubit-based synchronization for quantum key distribution,”Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 13, p. 054041, May 2020

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    Simple quantum key distribution with qubit-based synchronization and a self- compensating polarization encoder,

    C. Agnesi, M. Avesani, L. Calderaro, A. Stanco, G. Foletto, M. Zahidy, A. Scriminich, F. Vedovato, G. Vallone, and P. Villoresi, “Simple quantum key distribution with qubit-based synchronization and a self- compensating polarization encoder,”Optica, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 284–290, Apr 2020

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    Resource-effective quantum key distribution: a field trial in padua city center,

    M. Avesani, L. Calderaro, G. Foletto, C. Agnesi, F. Picciariello, F. B. L. Santagiustina, A. Scriminich, A. Stanco, F. Vedovato, M. Zahidy, G. Val- lone, and P. Villoresi, “Resource-effective quantum key distribution: a field trial in padua city center,”Opt. Lett., vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 2848– 2851, Jun 15 2021

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Qubit-based clock synchronization for qkd systems using a bayesian approach,

    R. D. Cochran and D. J. Gauthier, “Qubit-based clock synchronization for qkd systems using a bayesian approach,”Entropy, vol. 23, no. 8, Aug 2021

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Cross-encoded quantum key distribution exploiting time-bin and polarization states with qubit-based synchroniza- tion,

    D. Scalcon, C. Agnesi, M. Avesani, L. Calderaro, G. Foletto, A. Stanco, G. Vallone, and P. Villoresi, “Cross-encoded quantum key distribution exploiting time-bin and polarization states with qubit-based synchroniza- tion,”Adv. Quantum Technol., vol. 5, no. 12, Dec 2022

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    Review of clock synchronization in quantum commu- nications,

    N. S. Azahari, N. Z. Harun, C. Chai Wen, S. N. Ramli, and Z. Ah- mad Zukarnain, “Review of clock synchronization in quantum commu- nications,” inProceedings of the 2024 13th International Conference on Software and Computer Applications, ser. ICSCA ’24. New York, NY , USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2024, p. 350–356

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Qubit- based distributed frame synchronization for quantum key distribution,

    Y . Chen, C. Huang, G. Lin, S. Huang, Z. Zhang, and K. Wei, “Qubit- based distributed frame synchronization for quantum key distribution,” J. Lightwave. Technol., vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 5032–5039, 2025

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Qubit-based synchronization algorithm for measurement-device-independent quantum key distribu- tion,

    Z.-K. Huang, J.-X. Li, F.-Y . Lu, Z.-H. Wang, S. Wang, Z.-Q. Yin, D.-Y . He, W. Chen, G.-C. Guo, and Z.-F. Han, “Qubit-based synchronization algorithm for measurement-device-independent quantum key distribu- tion,”J. Lightwave. Technol., vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 3041–3050, Apr 1 2025

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    Optimized qubit-based synchronization in quantum key distribution,

    H.-B. Sun, J. Li, X.-W. Chu, J.-Y . Liu, H.-J. Ding, and Q. Wang, “Optimized qubit-based synchronization in quantum key distribution,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1087–1091, 2025

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    Fast qubit-based frequency recovery algorithm for quantum key distribution,

    F.-Y . Lu, Z.-K. Huang, J.-J. Deng, C. Zhang, S. Wang, D.-Y . He, Z.-Q. Yin, W. Chen, G.-C. Guo, and Z.-F. Han, “Fast qubit-based frequency recovery algorithm for quantum key distribution,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.17849, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Resource-efficient quantum key distribution with integrated silicon photonics,

    K. Wei, X. Hu, Y . Du, X. Hua, Z. Zhao, Y . Chen, C. Huang, and X. Xiao, “Resource-efficient quantum key distribution with integrated silicon photonics,”Photon. Res., vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1364–1372, Aug 2023

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    A cost-efficient quantum access network with qubit-based synchroniza- tion,

    C. Huang, Y . Chen, T. Luo, W. He, X. Liu, Z. Zhang, and K. Wei, “A cost-efficient quantum access network with qubit-based synchroniza- tion,”Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron., vol. 67, no. 4, p. 240312, 2024

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Breaking the synchronization barrier: Machine learning- enhanced qubit-based synchronization enables 200 km self-synchronized rfi-qkd,

    W. Chen, “Breaking the synchronization barrier: Machine learning- enhanced qubit-based synchronization enables 200 km self-synchronized rfi-qkd,”Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron., vol. 68, no. 7, p. 270332, 2025

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    Reference-frame-independent quantum key distribution based on machine-learning-enhanced qubit-based synchronization,

    Z. Tian, Z. Xie, Y . Chen, X. Fan, J. Huang, T. Mu, J. Guo, K. Wei, and S. Sun, “Reference-frame-independent quantum key distribution based on machine-learning-enhanced qubit-based synchronization,”Sci. China- Phys. Mech. Astron., vol. 68, no. 7, p. 270312, 2025

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    Simple quantum key distribution using a stable transmitter-receiver scheme,

    D. Ma, X. Liu, C. Huang, H. Chen, H. Lin, and K. Wei, “Simple quantum key distribution using a stable transmitter-receiver scheme,”Opt. Lett., vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 2152–2155, May 2021

    work page 2021

  54. [54]

    All-fiber self-compensating polarization encoder for quantum key distribution,

    C. Agnesi, M. Avesani, A. Stanco, P. Villoresi, and G. Vallone, “All-fiber self-compensating polarization encoder for quantum key distribution,” Opt. Lett., vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 2398–2401, May 2019

    work page 2019

  55. [55]

    Patterning-effect mitigating intensity modulator for secure decoy-state quantum key distribution,

    G. L. Roberts, M. Pittaluga, M. Minder, M. Lucamarini, J. F. Dynes, Z. L. Yuan, and A. J. Shields, “Patterning-effect mitigating intensity modulator for secure decoy-state quantum key distribution,”Opt. Lett., vol. 43, no. 20, pp. 5110–5113, Oct 2018

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    Improving Parameter Optimization in Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution,

    Z. Li and K. Wei, “Improving Parameter Optimization in Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution,”Quantum Eng., vol. 2022, p. 9717591, 2022

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    Finite-key analysis for the 1-decoy state qkd protocol,

    D. Rusca, A. Boaron, F. Gr ¨unenfelder, A. Martin, and H. Zbinden, “Finite-key analysis for the 1-decoy state qkd protocol,”Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 112, no. 17, 2018

    work page 2018