REVIEW 1 cited by
Probability Distributions Computed by Autoregressive Transformers
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Probability Distributions Computed by Autoregressive Transformers
read the original abstract
Most expressivity results for transformers treat them as language recognizers -- devices that accept or reject strings -- rather than as they are used in practice: as language models that generate strings autoregressively and probabilistically. We characterize the probability distributions that transformer language models can express. We show that making transformer language recognizers autoregressive can sometimes increase their expressivity, and that making them probabilistic can break equivalences that hold in the non-probabilistic case. Our overall contribution is to tease apart what functions transformers are capable of expressing in their most common use case as language models.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Surprisal Theory is Tautological (without Rational Grounding)
Unconstrained surprisal theory is a tautology: for any non-negative difficulty measure, a language model exists whose surprisal matches it affinely.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.