Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 66 references

Twisted mono-bilayer graphene hosts two distinct fractional Chern insulators in the same C=2 flat band; a geometric instability of the Bloch states triggers the switch between them at κc=0.55, and a hidden near-ideal C=1 component stabilize

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 06:45 UTC pith:PPSN26DA

load-bearing objection The ED phase diagram in tMBG is credible and worth engaging; the color-separation mechanism that explains the Laughlin-1/3 phase is not yet established. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2511.12231 v3 pith:PPSN26DA submitted 2025-11-15 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-el

Fractional Chern Insulators Transition in Non-ideal Flat Bands of Twisted Mono-bilayer Graphene

Moru Song , Kai Chang This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-el
keywords fractional Chern insulatortwisted mono-bilayer graphenenon-ideal flat bandsquantum geometryLaughlin 1/3 stateHalperin (112) statecolor separationhybrid Wannier functions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to explain how fractional Chern insulators (FCIs) can survive in realistic moiré flat bands whose geometry is far from ideal, using twisted mono-bilayer graphene as the testbed. Its central exact-diagonalization result is that the same C=2 conduction band hosts two distinct fractional phases separated by a transition at κc=0.55: a Halperin-(112)-like state with Hall conductance 2/3 when the band is geometrically stable, and a Laughlin-1/3 state with conductance 1/3 once the Bloch wavefunctions become geometrically unstable. Because standard quantum-geometry indicators keep degrading on both sides of the transition, the paper proposes a 'color-separation' mechanism: the non-ideal band contains a hidden near-ideal C=1 sector, and interactions (or any momentum-mixing perturbation, such as a weak magnetic field) isolate that sector, which then carries the Laughlin state. A sympathetic reader would care because, if correct, the result substantially enlarges the class of systems where FCIs can be stabilized and shifts the predictive role of quantum geometry from single-particle criteria to a dynamical, sector-selecting picture.

Core claim

Interactions reorganize the C=2 conduction band of twisted mono-bilayer graphene so that it undergoes a continuous topological transition at κc=0.55 between two fractional Chern insulators: a Halperin-(112)-like phase (many-body Chern number 2/3) below, a Laughlin-like phase (C=1/3) above. The transition — not band mixing or gap closing — is driven by a local geometric instability in the hybrid-Wannier flow: the two C=1 branches bend together and reconnect near the K point, lowering the interacting Chern number from 2 to 1. The Laughlin phase persists while standard geometric indicators degrade; the authors attribute this to 'color separation': a non-ideal band contains Landau-level-like col

What carries the argument

The argument rests on three pieces. (i) The tMBG continuum model, with the interlayer-tunneling ratio κ=wAA/wAB as the tuning parameter. (ii) The hybrid-Wannier representation — momentum kept along one direction, the other Wannier-localized — whose center flow winds with the Chern number while its width measures the quantum metric locally; it turns 'geometric instability' into an observable, namely two branches of the flow bending together and reconnecting near the K point. (iii) The color-separation conjecture (Eq. 2), uk(r)=Σβ Dkβ(r)vβk(r): a generic non-ideal band decomposes into Landau-level-like color sectors vβk of Chern number Cβ=±1 with C=ΣβCβ, and the sector with the smallest trace

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the color-separation conjecture (Eq. 2): a generic non-ideal band decomposes into Landau-level-like color sectors of Chern number ±1, and the specific near-ideal C=1 sector exposed by a weak field is the one interactions select to carry the Laughlin state; the decomposition is admittedly nonunique, no constructive algorithm is given, and the weak-field subband used as evidence is computed in the same model the conjecture is invoked to explain.

What would settle it

Project the exact-diagonalization problem at κ>κc onto the complementary non-ideal color sector (the band left over when the near-ideal C=1 subband is removed) and check whether a Laughlin-1/3 ground state with matching PES counting survives. If it does, the ideal sector is not the carrier and color separation is not the mechanism; if it does not, the mechanism is confirmed. Separately, a continuous transition requires a topologically protected neutral-gap closing somewhere in the twisted-boundary-condition parameter space at κc; a full scan for that crossing would settle whether the transitio

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The viable parameter space for FCIs widens substantially: a band that badly violates the ideal-geometry criteria can still host a Laughlin-type FCI provided at least one hidden color sector remains close to ideal.
  • Single-particle (or post-Hartree-Fock) quantum-geometry indicators such as trace-condition violation and Berry-curvature uniformity are not, by themselves, trustworthy predictors of FCI stability; the transition is governed by a spatially localized geometric instability that only a momentum-resolved probe like the hybrid-Wannier flow exposes.
  • A weak perpendicular magnetic field is proposed as a practical diagnostic: for κ>κc it splits the non-ideal C=2 band and reveals an isolated near-ideal C=1 flat subband, giving experiment a single-particle handle on the sector that supports the many-body Laughlin state.
  • In geometrically stable regimes, non-chiral Halperin-type states are argued to tolerate non-holomorphic wavefunction weight better than fully chiral Jain-sequence states, so realistic C>1 bands should be expected to realize (m,m,n) states even when ideal-band criteria fail.
  • The color-separation picture is claimed to be generic — extending to higher-Chern bands and to C=1 or trivial non-ideal bands — so the mechanism is not specific to the tMBG band structure.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Since the paper concedes the color decomposition is nonunique and gives no constructive algorithm, a natural next step is to seek a variational or data-driven recipe that extracts the ideal sector purely from single-particle data; success would turn the conjecture into a predictive FCI-stability criterion for arbitrary non-ideal bands.
  • The identification of FCI-1 as Halperin-(112)-like rests on K-matrix equivalence with the particle-hole conjugate of Laughlin-1/3, and the paper's own supplementary shows the (1,2) PES counting is carried by excited states rather than ground-state quasiparticles; I would therefore expect the quasiparticle content of FCI-1 (e/3 vs e/2) to differ from a textbook Halperin state at larger sizes.
  • Because κ is set by lattice relaxation and is hard to tune continuously in a single sample, the practical lever for observing the predicted transition may be the external displacement field or twist angle — the paper's phase diagrams show both cross FCI boundaries — suggesting the color-separation transition could be seen as a function of bias in one device.
  • The weak-field ideal subband with η≈0.1 is a sharp, testable single-particle prediction: Landau-fan spectroscopy or tunnelling measurements on tMBG devices at similar κ should resolve an isolated near-ideal C=1 flat band above the critical point, before any interaction physics is invoked.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the C=2 conduction flat band of twisted monolayer-bilayer graphene using a continuum model with Hartree-Fock and exact diagonalization. It reports two distinct fractional Chern insulator phases as a function of the interlayer tunneling ratio κ: for κ < 0.55 a Halperin-(112)-like phase with many-body Chern number C = 2/3 (FCI-1), and for κ > 0.55 a Laughlin-1/3-like phase with C = 1/3 (FCI-2), with a transition at κc = 0.55 attributed to a geometric instability of the Bloch states. To explain FCI-2, the authors propose a 'color separation' conjecture: a non-ideal band decomposes into Landau-level-like color sectors, and interactions select the most ideal sector. They support this with a weak-field Hofstadter calculation that shows an ideal C=1 subband for κ > κc. The paper also analyzes hybrid Wannier functions, PES counting, many-body Chern numbers, and a model Halperin-(112) comparison.

Significance. If correct, this is a valuable demonstration of two distinct FCIs coexisting in a single non-ideal C=2 flat band, with a proposed mechanism that goes beyond global quantum-geometric indicators. The numerical identification of the two ground states is strong: PES counting (1520 vs 1088 levels), many-body Chern numbers (C ≈ 2.003 and 1.003), fidelity dips, a model Halperin comparison, and careful mesh-anisotropy control provide multiple independent diagnostics. These strengths make the central two-phase identification credible. However, the paper's main explanatory claims—the continuous nature of the transition and the color-separation mechanism—are not established at the same level, and the manuscript explicitly concedes important limitations.

major comments (1)
  1. [Topological Transition of FCIs, Fig. 2(c)] The fidelity dip in Fig. 2(c) is interpreted as signaling a continuous transition, but the text in footnote 41 explicitly says more stringent evidence (e.g., iDMRG or a dedicated critical field theory) is required to exclude a weak first-order transition. This reservation should be stated in the main text wherever 'continuous transition' appears, not only in a footnote, because it directly qualifies the central claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] There are numerous OCR-style typos: 'ezective' should be 'effective', 'dizerent' should be 'different', 'Lauglin' should be 'Laughlin', 'detials' should be 'details', '}nd' should be 'find', and 'week magnetic }eld' should be 'weak magnetic field'. A thorough proofread is needed.
  2. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption reads 'under a week magnetic }eld' — should be 'weak magnetic field'. Also, the isolated ideal subband in region b should be labeled explicitly so the reader connects η ∼ 0.1 to the figure.
  3. [References] Reference [52] is cited as 'Under review'. If the paper is used to support the statement about spectral signatures of FCI states in tMBG, it should be marked as unpublished or, ideally, removed from a load-bearing role in a Letter.
  4. [End Matter, Table S1 and main text] The relation between the (1,2) PES counting and Halperin-(112) topological order is nontrivial and only explained in the supplementary. Please add a sentence in the main text pointing to that discussion when the 1520-level counting is first introduced, to avoid an apparent contradiction with standard (1,3) counting.
  5. [Eq. (2)] In Eq. (2), D_{kβ}(r) is not defined precisely: is it a scalar function, a matrix, or an operator? Its dependence on β and k should be clarified, and an example of a concrete nonunique decomposition would help the reader understand the conjecture.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: independent ED diagnostics carry the central result; the color-separation mechanism is an explicitly nonunique post-hoc conjecture, and the sole self-citation is non-load-bearing.

full rationale

The central numerical result — two FCI phases and the transition at κc = 0.55 — is established by independent many-body diagnostics: threefold ground-state degeneracy, PES counting D(1,2) = 1520 and D(1,3) = 1088, many-body Chern numbers C = 2/3 and 1/3, a fidelity dip, and a model Halperin-(112) Coulomb comparison. None of these presuppose the color-separation mechanism. The color-separation conjecture (Eq. 2) is explicitly introduced as a conjecture: the paper states 'we propose the following conjecture' and concedes 'The decomposition in Eq. (2) is generally nonunique.' It is therefore underdetermined and post hoc, but it is not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction and no equation is forced by construction. The weak-field 'color separator' calculation is a separate single-particle Hofstadter computation; the ideal C = 1 subband with η ≈ 0.1 is a computed quantity, not a quantity defined to equal the ED result. The assertion that interactions preferentially pull this component down is qualitative and cited to independent Ref. [51] rather than demonstrated, which weakens the mechanism but is not a circular reduction. The only self-citation is Ref. [52], by the same authors and under review, used in one consistency sentence ('Spectral signatures of FCI at n/3 and n/5 filling are recently observed in experiment for C=2 conduction bands under finite magnetic field of tMBG [52], consisting with our results'); it is not load-bearing for the ED/HF derivation. I therefore find no circular step meeting the quoted-equation or fitted-input standard; the score reflects only the minor non-load-bearing self-citation and the acknowledged nonuniqueness of the mechanism explanation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 1 invented entities

The ED central result rests on standard moiré model inputs plus several choices tuned to stabilize the FCI phases (V_pot, M, d_sc, εr, θ). The color-separation explanation adds a non-unique decomposition and the assumption that a weak magnetic field reproduces interaction-driven selection. No genuinely new particles or forces are introduced; the 'ideal color' is a decomposition component, not an independently evidenced entity.

free parameters (5)
  • Interlayer bias V_pot = 50 meV
    Chosen in main-text calculations; Fig. 4 shows FCI phases only in a narrow window around 40–60 meV, so the result is tuned to this parameter.
  • Sublattice staggered potential M = 30 meV
    Ad hoc substrate term added to the continuum model; no independent derivation is given.
  • Gate distance d_sc = 10 nm
    Dual-gate screening length in V(q); affects interaction strength and phase stability.
  • Dielectric constant εr = ≈4
    Sets the overall interaction scale; the FCI phases appear only for sufficiently strong interactions (Fig. 4).
  • Twist angle θ = 1.04°
    Main text uses the twist angle giving the clearest FCI signature; Fig. S9(b) shows FCI only in a limited twist-angle window.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The Bistritzer-MacDonald continuum model with SWMC hopping parameters describes tMBG quantitatively.
    Invoked via Eq. (1); no ab initio validation within this paper, and the FCI result depends on the model band geometry.
  • domain assumption Single-band projection onto the active C=2 conduction band is valid for exact diagonalization.
    Justified by HF spin-valley polarization, but if band mixing is significant, the ED ground states could be artifacts.
  • ad hoc to paper Color-separation decomposition u_k = Σ D v^β with LL-like v^β, Cβ=±1 exists for generic non-ideal bands.
    Eq. (2) is introduced as a conjecture; it is nonunique and no constructive algorithm is given.
  • ad hoc to paper A weak perpendicular magnetic field acts as a color separator equivalent to interaction-induced selection.
    Assumed from the claim that any inter-k perturbation can activate the geometric instability; no formal proof links the field-split subband to the interacting zero-field FCI-2.
  • domain assumption PES (1,2)-counting can identify Halperin-(112) topological order despite the mismatch with standard quasihole counting.
    The paper argues via an SL(2,Z) equivalence and a model Coulomb calculation, but admits the PES does not reflect the expected e/3 quasiparticle excitations.
invented entities (1)
  • LL-like color components v_k^β (color sectors) no independent evidence
    purpose: Decompose the non-ideal C=2 band into an ideal C=1 sector that supports the Laughlin FCI.
    Eq. (2) is a non-unique decomposition; the claimed ideal sector is identified post hoc via a weak-field calculation in the same model, not by an external observable.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 29826 in / 13760 out tokens · 127149 ms · 2026-08-04T06:45:50.329541+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Fractional Chern insulators (FCIs) in ideal flat bands with Chern number $C$ are commonly understood as color-entangled states constructed from $C$ copies of the lowest Landau level. In realistic moir\'e systems, however, the band geometry is generally non-ideal, and the mechanism that stabilizes such FCIs remains unclear. Using twisted monolayer-bilayer graphene as a platform, we find two FCIs separated by a topological transition that occurs in a regime signaled by a local geometric instability of the Bloch states. Below the transition, the target $C=2$ conduction band is geometrically stable, and the resulting fractional phase is naturally described by the Halperin-$(112)$ state. Above the transition, the system becomes geometrically unstable and enters a Laughlin-$1/3$ phase within the same target $C=2$ manifold, which persists even as standard quantum-geometry indicators degrade further. We attribute this Laughlin-$1/3$ phase to a hidden near-ideal $C=1$ component of the non-ideal $C=2$ Bloch states that becomes relevant under interactions, while its strongly non-ideal partner becomes irrelevant. We support this picture by applying a weak perpendicular magnetic field that acts as a ``color separator,'' directly visualizing the ideal subcomponent at the single-particle level. Together, these results clarify how non-ideal flat bands can stabilize FCIs, greatly expanding their parameter range and sharpening the role of quantum geometry in strongly correlated topological phases.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.12231 by Kai Chang, Moru Song.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Moiré Brillouin zone of tMBG. (b) Non-interacting bands (dashed) and HF level bands of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a), the neutral excitation mode softens in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Density of states (DOS) of the target ~at bands [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Energy spectrum of Halperin-(112) FQH states [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a,b) Hofstadter Butter~y at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Regnault and B

    N. Regnault and B. A. Bernevig, Fractional chern insu- lator, Phys. Rev. X 1, 021014 (2011)

    2011

  2. [2]

    Crucially, even when the overall band is nonideal, a Lauglin-like FCI can still be stabilized provided that at least one color sector remains close to the ideal limit

    is generally nonunique, and the realized separation pattern can depend on interaction details when the wave function is near an instability. Crucially, even when the overall band is nonideal, a Lauglin-like FCI can still be stabilized provided that at least one color sector remains close to the ideal limit. Color separation under magnetic }eld.— When κ > ...

  3. [3]

    B. A. Bernevig and N. Regnault, Emergent many-body translational symmetries of abelian and non-abelian frac- tionally }lled topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 85, 075128 (2012)

    2012

  4. [6]

    J. Cai, E. Anderson, C. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, Y. Zhang, F. Fan, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y. Ran, T. Cao, L. Fu, D. Xiao, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Signatures of fractional quantum anomalous hall states in twisted mote2, Nature 622, 63 (2023)

    2023

  5. [7]

    Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao, A. P. Reddy, J. Yang, J. Seo, 6 K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and L. Ju, Fractional quantum anomalous hall ezect in multilayer graphene, Nature 626, 759 (2024)

    2024

  6. [8]

    Z. Liu, E. J. Bergholtz, H. Fan, and A. M. Läuchli, Fractional chern insulators in topological ~at bands with higher chern number, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 186805 (2012)

    2012

  7. [9]

    Wang and Z

    J. Wang and Z. Liu, Hierarchy of ideal ~atbands in chi- ral twisted multilayer graphene models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 176403 (2022)

    2022

  8. [10]

    J. Wang, S. Klevtsov, and Z. Liu, Origin of model frac- tional chern insulators in all topological ideal ~atbands: Explicit color-entangled wave function and exact density algebra, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023167 (2023)

    2023

  9. [12]

    B. I. Halperin, Theory of the quantized hall conductance, Helv. Phys. Acta 56, 75 (1983)

    1983

  10. [13]

    B. d. z. Jaworowski, N. Regnault, and Z. Liu, Character- ization of quasiholes in two-component fractional quan- tum hall states and fractional chern insulators in |c|=2 ~at bands, Phys. Rev. B 99, 045136 (2019)

    2019

  11. [14]

    Crépel, N

    V. Crépel, N. Claussen, N. Regnault, and B. Esti- enne, Microscopic study of the halperin–laughlin inter- face through matrix product states, Nat. Comm. 10, 1860 (2019)

    2019

  12. [15]

    Ma, R.-Z

    J.-Z. Ma, R.-Z. Huang, G.-Y. Zhu, J.-Y. Chen, and D.- X. Yao, Fractional chern insulator candidate on a twisted bilayer checkerboard lattice, Phys. Rev. B 110, 165142 (2024)

    2024

  13. [16]

    Tarnopolsky, A

    G. Tarnopolsky, A. J. Kruchkov, and A. Vishwanath, Origin of magic angles in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 106405 (2019)

    2019

  14. [17]

    J. Wang, J. Cano, A. J. Millis, Z. Liu, and B. Yang, Exact landau level description of geometry and interaction in a ~atband, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 246403 (2021)

    2021

  15. [18]

    Barkeshli and X.-L

    M. Barkeshli and X.-L. Qi, Topological nematic states and non-abelian lattice dislocations, Phy. Rev. X 2, 031013 (2012)

    2012

  16. [19]

    P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Vor- texability: A unifying criterion for ideal fractional chern insulators, Phys. Rev. B 108, 205144 (2023)

    2023

  17. [20]

    Fujimoto, D

    M. Fujimoto, D. E. Parker, J. Dong, E. Khalaf, A. Vish- wanath, and P. Ledwith, Higher vortexability: Zero-}eld realization of higher landau levels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 106502 (2025)

    2025

  18. [21]

    Shavit and Y

    G. Shavit and Y. Oreg, Quantum geometry and stabi- lization of fractional chern insulators far from the ideal limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 156504 (2024)

    2024

  19. [22]

    Bistritzer and A

    R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Moire bands in twisted double-layer graphene, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 12233 (2011)

    2011

  20. [23]

    Rademaker, I

    L. Rademaker, I. V. Protopopov, and D. A. Abanin, Topological ~at bands and correlated states in twisted monolayer-bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033150 (2020)

    2020

  21. [24]

    Z. Ma, S. Li, Y.-W. Zheng, M.-M. Xiao, H. Jiang, J.-H. Gao, and X. C. Xie, Topological ~at bands in twisted trilayer graphene, Sci. Bulletin 66, 18 (2021)

    2021

  22. [27]

    Hejazi, C

    K. Hejazi, C. Liu, and L. Balents, Landau levels in twisted bilayer graphene and semiclassical orbits, Phys. Rev. B 100, 035115 (2019)

    2019

  23. [28]

    Shezer and A

    Y. Shezer and A. Stern, Chiral magic-angle twisted bi- layer graphene in a magnetic }eld: Landau level corre- spondence, exact wave functions, and fractional chern insulators, Phys. Rev. B 104, L121405 (2021)

    2021

  24. [29]

    McCann and M

    E. McCann and M. Koshino, The electronic properties of bilayer graphene, Rep. Prog. Phys. 76, 056503 (2013)

    2013

  25. [31]

    P. Mai, J. Zhao, T. A. Maier, B. Bradlyn, and P. W. Phillips, Topological phase transition without single par- ticle gap closing in strongly correlated systems, Phys. Rev. B 110, 075105 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    Z. Guo, X. Lu, B. Xie, and J. Liu, Fractional chern in- sulator states in multilayer graphene moiré superlattices, Phys. Rev. B 110, 075109 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Marzari and D

    N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized gen- eralized wannier functions for composite energy bands, Phys. Rev. B 56, 12847 (1997)

    1997

  28. [36]

    Taherinejad, K

    M. Taherinejad, K. F. Garrity, and D. Vanderbilt, Wan- nier center sheets in topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 89, 115102 (2014)

    2014

  29. [37]

    In our }nite-size ED data, the neutral gap remains }- nite at the sampled boundary conditions near the critical point. However, for an interacting }nite system a change of the many-body Chern number necessarily implies a topologically protected level crossing (i.e., a closing of the neutral excitation gap) at some twisted boundary condition in parameter s...

  30. [38]

    Li and F

    H. Li and F. D. M. Haldane, Entanglement spectrum as a generalization of entanglement entropy: Identi}cation of topological order in non-abelian fractional quantum hall ezect states, Phys. Rev.Lett. 101, 010504 (2008)

    2008

  31. [39]

    B. A. Bernevig and F. D. M. Haldane, Model fractional quantum hall states and jack polynomials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 246802 (2008)

    2008

  32. [40]

    Regnault, Entanglement spectroscopy and its applica- tion to the quantum hall ezects, arXiv e-prints (2015)

    N. Regnault, Entanglement spectroscopy and its applica- tion to the quantum hall ezects, arXiv e-prints (2015)

    2015

  33. [42]

    More stringent evidence to exclude a weak }rst-order transition or to determine the universality class may require further studies such as in}nite-density matrix 7 renormalization group (iDMRG) or a dedicated critical }eld theory [ 55], which is beyond the scope of this work

  34. [43]

    Seidel and K

    A. Seidel and K. Yang, Halperin (m, m ′ , n) bilayer quan- tum hall states on thin cylinders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 036804 (2008)

    2008

  35. [44]

    Bandyopadhyay, G

    S. Bandyopadhyay, G. Ortiz, Z. Nussinov, and A. Seidel, Local two-body parent hamiltonians for the entire jain sequence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 196803 (2020)

    2020

  36. [45]

    I. A. McDonald and F. D. M. Haldane, Topological phase transition in the ν=2/3 quantum hall ezect, Phys. Rev. B 53, 15845 (1996)

    1996

  37. [48]

    J. K. Jain, Composite-fermion approach for the fractional quantum hall ezect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 199 (1989)

    1989

  38. [49]

    B. I. Halperin and J. K. Jain, Fractional Quantum Hall Ezects: New Developments (WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2020)

    2020

  39. [50]

    Nevertheless, smaller value of η = trg − |F | naturally re~ect this properties when berry curvature is ~at

    Usually, electrons favors local orbitals of smaller trg due to larger Fock energy [ 51]. Nevertheless, smaller value of η = trg − |F | naturally re~ect this properties when berry curvature is ~at

  40. [51]

    For details on computing quantum geometric quantities under a magnetic }eld, we recommend that readers refer to the Supplementary Material of Ref. [ 4]

  41. [52]

    Abouelkomsan, K

    A. Abouelkomsan, K. Yang, and E. J. Bergholtz, Quan- tum metric induced phases in moiré materials, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L012015 (2023)

    2023

  42. [53]

    Y. Wang, Z. Wang, Y. Xue, M. Song, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Lu, H. Zhou, J. Kang, K. Chang, H. Gao, Y. Jiang, and J. Mao, Spectral signature of fractional chern insulating states in twisted moiré system, Under review

  43. [54]

    H. Liu, R. Perea-Causin, Z. Liu, and E. J. Bergholtz, Topological order without band topology in moiré graphene (2025), arXiv:2510.15027 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    arXiv 2025

  44. [55]

    C. N. Varney, K. Sun, M. Rigol, and V. Galitski, Topo- logical phase transitions for interacting }nite systems, Phys. Rev. B 84, 241105 (2011)

    2011

  45. [56]

    J. Y. Lee, C. Wang, M. P. Zaletel, A. Vishwanath, and Y.-C. He, Emergent multi-~avor qed3 at the plateau tran- sition between fractional chern insulators: Applications to graphene heterostructures, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031015 (2018)

    2018

  46. [57]

    Bultinck, E

    N. Bultinck, E. Khalaf, S. Liu, S. Chatterjee, A. Vish- wanath, and M. P. Zaletel, Ground state and hidden symmetry of magic-angle graphene at even integer }ll- ing, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031034 (2020)

    2020

  47. [58]

    For technique details on HF calculation with similar set up, we recommend readers also see [ 31]

  48. [59]

    reference

    S. Okamoto, N. Mohanta, E. Dagotto, and D. N. Sheng, Topological ~at bands in a kagome lattice multiorbital system, Commun. Phys. 5, 198 (2022) . END MA TTER Projected Interaction Hamiltonian.— Together with the interaction terms, the full band-projected Hamiltonian—obtained after diagonalizing the CM model—can be written as [ 31, 56], H = ∑ nk Enk ˆnn,k ...

    2022

  49. [60]

    S8 (a-c), when the mesh holds small eccentricity represent a thin tours i.e

    As illustrate in Fig. S8 (a-c), when the mesh holds small eccentricity represent a thin tours i.e. b/a = 0.19, the PES spectrum supports cascade gaps at NA = 2. The }rst gap indicate a charge density wave (CDW) phase, with the number of states below is 3C NA Ne=6, while the second gap indicate a standard admissible (1,3)-rules, grantee for Lauglin states....

  50. [61]

    S8 (d-f), when we increase b/a = 0.41, the CDW gap in PES disappear and the Lauglin-FCI PES gap also shrink

    As illustrate in Fig. S8 (d-f), when we increase b/a = 0.41, the CDW gap in PES disappear and the Lauglin-FCI PES gap also shrink. Compared with pre- vious case, the ED gap also decrease. The remaining major gap shows admissible-(1,2) counting. Similarly, in this case, we compute S(q), there is no pronounced peak anymore

  51. [62]

    nu- merical plus analytic

    As illustrate in Fig. S8 (g-i), when we further make the mesh more isotropic with b/a = 0.80. we }nd both the CDW and (1,3)-counting gap closed in PES, with only (1,2)-gap remains. This results indicate the quasi- hole excitations are no-longer gaped with the particle- hole excitations. This can also being checked by per- forming ED calculation at Ne = 2 ...

  52. [63]

    Y. H. Kwan, J. Yu, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, D. K. Efetov, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Moiré fractional chern insulators iii: Hartree-fock phase diagram, magic angle regime for chern insulator states, the role of the moiré potential and goldstone gaps in rhombohedral graphene superlattices (2023), arXiv:2312.11617 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2023

  53. [64]

    J. Yu, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, Y. H. Kwan, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Moiré fractional chern insulators iv: Fluctuation-driven collapse of fcis in multi-band exact diagonalization calculations on rhombohedral graphene (2024), arXiv:2407.13770 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2024

  54. [65]

    B. A. Bernevig and N. Regnault, Thin-torus limit of fractional topological insulators (2012), arXiv:1204.5682 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  55. [66]

    See supplemental material, [URL will be inserted by pus- lisher], for detials on HF, ED and magnetic model cal- cualations

  56. [67]

    Liu and E

    Z. Liu and E. J. Bergholtz, Recent developments in frac- tional chern insulators, in Encyclopedia of Condensed Matter Physics (Elsevier, 2024) p. 515–538

    2024

  57. [68]

    J. Dong, P. J. Ledwith, E. Khalaf, J. Y. Lee, and A. Vish- wanath, Many-body ground states from decomposition of ideal higher chern bands: Applications to chirally twisted graphene multilayers, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023166 (2023)

    2023

  58. [69]

    Liu and Z

    Y. Liu and Z. Zhu, Engineering fractional chern insu- lators through periodic strain in monolayer graphene and transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B 112, L041123 (2025)

    2025

  59. [70]

    S. Niu, J. Alicea, D. N. Sheng, and Y. Peng, Quantum anomalous hall ezects and emergent su(2) hall ferromag- nets at fractional }lling of helical trilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 146505 (2025)

    2025

  60. [71]

    Wen, Quantum Field Theory of Many-Body Sys- tems: From the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Electrons (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004)

    X.-G. Wen, Quantum Field Theory of Many-Body Sys- tems: From the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Electrons (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004)

    2004

  61. [72]

    Geraedts, M

    S. Geraedts, M. P. Zaletel, Z. Papić, and R. S. K. Mong, Competing abelian and non-abelian topological orders in ν = 1 /3 + 1 /3 quantum hall bilayers, Phys. Rev. B 91, 205139 (2015)

    2015

  62. [73]

    Sterdyniak, A

    A. Sterdyniak, A. Chandran, N. Regnault, B. A. Bernevig, and P. Bonderson, Real-space entanglement 16 spectrum of quantum hall states, Phys. Rev. B 85, 125308 (2012)

    2012

  63. [74]

    Hu and W

    L. Hu and W. Zhu, Abelian origin of ν = 2/3 and 2 + 2/3 fractional quantum hall ezect, Phys. Rev. B 105, 165145 (2022)

    2022

  64. [75]

    Okamoto, N

    S. Okamoto, N. Mohanta, E. Dagotto, and D. N. Sheng, Topological ~at bands in a kagome lattice multiorbital system, Commun. Phys. 5, 198 (2022)

    2022

  65. [76]

    Bistritzer and A

    R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Moiré butter~ies in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 84, 035440 (2011)

    2011

  66. [77]

    Y. L. Xie, A. T. Pierce, J. M. Park, D. E. Parker, E. Kha- laf, P. Ledwith, Y. Cao, S. H. Lee, S. W. Chen, P. R. Forrester, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Vishwanath, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and A. Yacoby, Fractional chern in- sulators in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature 600, 439 (2021)

    2021