pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.00707 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-30 · 📡 eess.SP

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Bridging FR1 to FR3: Urban Channel Parameterization Anchored at 4.85 GHz and Literature-Referenced Cross-Band Trends

Inocent Calist , Minseok Kim
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 03:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords urban radio channels4.85 GHzdelay spreadangular spreadFR1 to FR3cross-band trendslog-log parameterization3GPP comparison
0
0 comments X

The pith

New 4.85 GHz urban measurements combined with literature anchors yield log-log trends for delay and angular spreads from 4 to 28 GHz.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper conducts double-directional channel measurements at 4.85 GHz in urban macrocell and microcell environments in Yokohama. From these, it extracts means for large-scale parameters and pairs them with scenario-matched literature values to fit log-log frequency trends for delay spread, azimuth spread of arrival, and azimuth spread of departure over a wide range crossing the FR1 to FR3 boundary. These trends are then compared against existing 3GPP reference models. A reader would care because filling the gap in the 4-8 GHz range supports the development of consistent channel models needed for the transition to 6G systems operating in new spectrum bands.

Core claim

By anchoring at 4.85 GHz measurements in UMa and UMi routes and combining with literature anchors, the paper derives log-log trends for DS, ASA, and ASD across approximately 4--28 GHz that span the 7.125 GHz FR1--FR3 boundary and compares them to 3GPP UMa/UMi parameterizations, presenting the result as measurement-informed and indicative for cross-band channel behavior.

What carries the argument

Log-log trends for delay spread (DS), azimuth spread of arrival (ASA), and azimuth spread of departure (ASD) fitted to combined measurement and literature data points.

If this is right

  • The derived trends offer a way to parameterize channels in the under-explored 4-8 GHz region without requiring measurements at every frequency.
  • Comparisons indicate where 3GPP models may over- or under-estimate parameter values as frequency increases toward 28 GHz.
  • Route-dependent spatial-consistency statistics from the 4.85 GHz data can support modeling of consistent channels in adjacent frequency bands.
  • Additional parameters like K-factor and path loss at this frequency provide reference points for urban propagation models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the trends prove stable, they could reduce measurement campaigns needed for new mid-band spectrum allocations.
  • Applying the same anchoring method to indoor or rural scenarios might extend the approach to other environments.
  • Discrepancies with 3GPP could motivate targeted updates to standard models for the FR1-FR3 transition.
  • Future work might test the linearity of the log-log relation with measurements at additional frequencies within the range.

Load-bearing premise

That the heterogeneous literature anchors are close enough in scenario and methodology to the new measurements to allow meaningful combination into single log-log trends.

What would settle it

Measurements at a frequency such as 7 GHz or 15 GHz in comparable urban UMa or UMi settings that fall outside the confidence bounds of the fitted log-log trends for delay spread or angular spreads.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.00707 by Inocent Calist, Minseok Kim.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Measurement system. sounding. This configuration yields a delay resolution of approximately 10 ns, with a tone spacing of 195 kHz and a total delay span of 5.12 µs. The transmitter (Tx) and receiver (Rx) were configured in an 8 × 8 full-MIMO architecture, enabling double-directional wideband channel characterization. The Tx (base station) employed a uniformly spaced linear array (ULA) with eight vertically… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Three urban cellular scenarios. TABLE I: Measurement setups. Scenarios Area BS Antennas MS Antennas Urban Macro (UMa) Kannai Area (Area1), Yokohama Daiichi Yuraku Bldg. 8-elem ULA Height: 33 m Direction: N 8-elem UCA Height: 2.7 m (on vehicle roof) Chinatown (Area2), NTTCom Yokohama Yamashita Bldg. 8-elem ULA Height: 34 m Direction: SE Urban Micro (UMi) Streets (Area3), Yokohama World Porters 8-elem UCA He… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Measurement routes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Power delay profiles (PDPs) computed from the measured, MPC-reconstructed, and residual MIMO channel matrices using (5). and only the first snapshot in each group was retained for analysis. III. SYSTEM-INDEPENDENT CHANNEL EXTRACTION A. MIMO Channel Matrix and Multidimensional Power Spec￾trum As described above, we obtained the MIMO CTF matrix HMIMO(f) ∈ C 8×8 . Because each antenna element exhibits a direc… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Path loss modeling. #1 #2 #3 ©2025 Esri (a) Area1 (UMa) Route. #1 #2 ©2025 Esri (b) Area2 (UMa) Route. #1 #2 #3 ©2025 Esri (c) Area3 (UMi) Route [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Measurement routes PL characterization. TABLE II: Model parameter fitting at 4.85 GHz. The ITU-R site-general models for the above-rooftop and below-rooftop categories correspond to UMa and UMi, respectively. Route Scenario State CI model fitting FI model fitting ITU-R model [5] n σ α β σ α β γ σ Area1 UMa LoS 2.19 3.60 1.34 62.22 3.37 2.29 28.6 1.96 3.48 NLoS 2.81 7.16 3.76 22.96 6.69 4.39 −6.27 2.30 6.89… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Delay spread. 20 60 log10(ASD [deg]) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 CDF 20 60 log10(ASA [deg]) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 CDF LoS Meas NLoS Meas LoS 3GPP NLoS 3GPP (a) Area1 (UMa). 20 60 log10(ASD [deg]) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 CDF 20 60 log10(ASA [deg]) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 CDF LoS Meas NLoS Meas LoS 3GPP NLoS 3GPP (b) Area2 (UMa). 20 60 log10(ASD [deg]) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 CDF 20 60 log10(ASA [deg]) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 CDF LoS… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Angle spreads. TABLE III: Model parameters obtained from measurements at 4.85 GHz (Mean µ and Std. Dev. σ). Parameter Area1 (UMa) Area2 (UMa) 3GPP (UMa) Area3 (UMi) 3GPP (UMi) LoS NLoS LoS NLoS LoS NLoS LoS NLoS LoS NLoS RMS DS log10(DS/1 s) µ −6.9931 −6.8815 −6.9953 −6.9443 −6.9576 −7.0022 −6.9338 −6.8112 −6.4813 −6.6328 σ 0.18 0.28 0.35 0.31 0.66 0.7 0.28 0.33 0.39 0.32 RMS ASD log10(ASD/1 ◦ ) µ 1.4100 0… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Empirical CDFs of the Rician K-factor measured at 4.85 GHz for UMa and UMi scenarios, compared against the frequency￾constant 3GPP reference model . 3) Rician K-factor The Rician K-factor quantifies the power ratio between the dominant (typically LoS) specular component and the scattered multipath components. Classically, K-factor charac￾terizes narrowband temporal fading. In this work, however, we estimat… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: LSP distance dependency. LoS/NLoS median curves with shaded 5-95% CI bands for DS, ASA, and ASD versus distance. each bin and parameter X, we generate B = 1000 bootstrap samples by sampling with replacement from the bin contents, recompute the median for each sample, and take the 5th and 95th percentiles, thereby providing a stable estimate of the typical channel behavior at a specific distance [PITH_FUL… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Spatial consistency. Bars show the estimated decorrelation distance. The vertical error bars denote the 95% confidence intervals of the decorrelation distance. index blocks Ij , a set of indices {j, j + 1, . . . , j + L − 1}, selected uniformly with boundary wrap-around: X(b) = [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Frequency continuity. Markers represent the measured data (blue circles for LoS and red squares for NLoS, and the filled markers for this work), while the lines indicate the corresponding fitted frequency-dependent models (blue for LoS and red for NLoS); the dashed lines indicate 3GPP models in Table V. The vertical dotted line denotes the boundary (7.125 GHz) between FR1 and FR3 bands. with tuning consta… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The transition from 5G to 6G requires frequency-dependent, physically consistent radio channel models across the FR1--FR3 span, particularly in the under-explored $4$--$8$~GHz region targeted in the current WRC-$27$ studies, where outdoor urban channel measurements and parameterizations remain scarce. This paper presents a $4.85$~GHz measurement-anchored study of urban channels and a literature-referenced cross-band analysis. Double-directional measurements were conducted at $4.85$~GHz in urban macrocell (UMa) and urban microcell (UMi) routes in Yokohama, Japan, from which path loss, delay spread (DS), azimuth spread of arrival/departure (ASA/ASD), $K$-factor, and route-dependent spatial-consistency statistics were extracted. To align these results in a broader cross-band context, the measured $4.85$~GHz large-scale parameter (LSP) means were combined with scenario-matched literature anchors to derive log-log trends for DS, ASA, and ASD over an approximately $4$--$28$~GHz range that spans the $7.125$~GHz FR1--FR3 boundary. The resulting trends were compared with 3GPP UMa/UMi reference parameterizations over the same interval. Because the cross-band analysis relies on a single in-house measurement band and a limited number of heterogeneous literature anchors, it is presented as measurement-informed and indicative, rather than as a definitive multi-band model. The paper therefore contributes both a detailed, parameterized $4.85$~GHz urban measurement reference and a bounded literature-referenced cross-band view of channel behavior near the FR1--FR3 transition.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper reports new double-directional measurements at 4.85 GHz in UMa and UMi urban routes in Yokohama, extracting LSPs such as path loss, delay spread (DS), ASA, ASD, K-factor, and spatial consistency. It combines these with scenario-matched literature anchors to derive log-log frequency trends for DS, ASA, and ASD from approximately 4 to 28 GHz, compares them to 3GPP models, and presents the cross-band results as indicative due to the limited anchors.

Significance. If the trends hold under closer scrutiny of anchor comparability, the work fills a gap in channel data for the 4-8 GHz range relevant to 6G and WRC-27 studies. The new 4.85 GHz parameterization provides a concrete reference point, and the literature-referenced trends offer a starting point for updating models across the FR1-FR3 boundary. Strengths include the detailed measurement campaign and explicit acknowledgment of limitations.

major comments (2)
  1. The log-log fits for DS, ASA, and ASD (described in the section combining 4.85 GHz means with literature anchors) depend on the assumption that the heterogeneous literature values are directly comparable to the Yokohama measurements in terms of scenario definition, post-processing (e.g., power delay profile truncation), and normalization. No quantitative assessment of potential offsets is provided, which could affect the fitted slopes and the conclusion that the trends bridge the FR1-FR3 boundary at 7.125 GHz.
  2. Table or section listing the literature anchors: the small number of points and their specific sources introduce potential bias in the trend estimation. A leave-one-out or sensitivity analysis would strengthen the claim that the observed frequency dependence is robust rather than driven by particular anchor choices.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and the positive evaluation of our paper's significance. We provide point-by-point responses to the major comments and describe the revisions we intend to implement.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The log-log fits for DS, ASA, and ASD (described in the section combining 4.85 GHz means with literature anchors) depend on the assumption that the heterogeneous literature values are directly comparable to the Yokohama measurements in terms of scenario definition, post-processing (e.g., power delay profile truncation), and normalization. No quantitative assessment of potential offsets is provided, which could affect the fitted slopes and the conclusion that the trends bridge the FR1-FR3 boundary at 7.125 GHz.

    Authors: We concur that the assumption of direct comparability among the heterogeneous literature values is critical for the log-log fits. The manuscript already qualifies the cross-band results as 'indicative' owing to this heterogeneity and the limited number of anchors. Performing a full quantitative assessment of potential offsets is challenging because many literature sources do not provide exhaustive details on post-processing steps such as power delay profile truncation or normalization procedures. In the revised manuscript, we will add a dedicated paragraph discussing possible sources of systematic offsets based on the available descriptions in the cited works and their potential effects on the derived slopes. This will enhance the transparency regarding the limitations of the trend analysis. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Table or section listing the literature anchors: the small number of points and their specific sources introduce potential bias in the trend estimation. A leave-one-out or sensitivity analysis would strengthen the claim that the observed frequency dependence is robust rather than driven by particular anchor choices.

    Authors: We agree that the small number of literature anchors could introduce bias in the trend estimation. To mitigate this concern and strengthen our claims, we will include a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis in the revised version. Specifically, we will re-estimate the log-log parameters after omitting each anchor in turn and report the range of resulting slopes for DS, ASA, and ASD. These results will be summarized in a new table or figure to demonstrate that the observed frequency trends are reasonably robust to the choice of individual anchors. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: cross-band trends combine new measurements with independent external literature anchors

full rationale

The paper extracts LSP means from new 4.85 GHz double-directional measurements in Yokohama UMa/UMi routes, then combines those means with scenario-matched literature values spanning ~4-28 GHz to fit log-log trends for DS, ASA, and ASD. This is a standard data-aggregation step using external anchors rather than any self-definitional loop, fitted-input prediction, or load-bearing self-citation. The paper explicitly labels the result 'indicative' and acknowledges heterogeneous-anchor limitations, leaving the core contribution (new parameterized 4.85 GHz reference) independent of the trend fit. No equations or citations reduce the claimed derivation to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on scenario matching between in-house routes and external studies plus the validity of log-log functional form for frequency dependence; no new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • log-log slope and intercept coefficients for DS, ASA, ASD trends
    Obtained by combining the 4.85 GHz measured means with selected literature anchors; exact numerical values not stated in abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Literature-reported LSPs can be treated as scenario-matched to the Yokohama UMa/UMi routes
    Invoked when deriving the cross-band trends from heterogeneous sources.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5622 in / 1603 out tokens · 40975 ms · 2026-05-17T03:45:12.910151+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Environment-Aware Channel Prediction for Vehicular Communications: A Multimodal Visual Feature Fusion Framework

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A three-branch multimodal fusion network predicts path loss, delay spread, angular spreads, and angular power spectrum from vehicle camera images and GPS in urban V2I scenarios.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Upper mid-band spectrum for 6G: Oppo rtunities and key enablers,

    Samsung Research, “Upper mid-band spectrum for 6G: Oppo rtunities and key enablers,” Samsung Research, Seoul, South Korea, Wh ite Paper,

    work page

  2. [2]

    Available: https://research.samsung.co m/blog/Upper-M id-Band-Spectrum-for-6G-Opportunities-and-Key-Enabl ers

    [Online]. Available: https://research.samsung.co m/blog/Upper-M id-Band-Spectrum-for-6G-Opportunities-and-Key-Enabl ers

    work page

  3. [3]

    6 G wireless channel measurements and models: Trends and chall enges,

    C.-X. Wang, J. Huang, H. Wang, X. Gao, X. Y ou, and Y . Hao, “6 G wireless channel measurements and models: Trends and chall enges,” IEEE V eh. Technol. Mag., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 22–32, Dec. 2020

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Davidson, National Spectrum Strategy Implementation Plan , National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA ), Washing- ton, DC, USA, Mar

    A. Davidson, National Spectrum Strategy Implementation Plan , National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA ), Washing- ton, DC, USA, Mar. 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    [Online]

    Radio Regulations , International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Geneva, Switzerland, 2020. [Online]. Available: https:// www.itu.int/ hub/publication/r-reg-rr-2020/

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Propagation Data and Prediction Methods for the Planning of Short- Range Outdoor Radiocommunication Systems and Radio Local A rea Networks in the Frequency Range 300 MHz to 300 GHz , Recommenda- tion ITU-R P .1411-13, International Telecommunication Un ion (ITU), Sep. 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Overview of 3GPP Release 19 study on chan- nel modeling enhancements to TR 38.901 for 6G,

    H. Poddar et al. , “Overview of 3GPP Release 19 study on chan- nel modeling enhancements to TR 38.901 for 6G,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.19266, Jul. 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Far-field to near-field: Experimental studies of MIMO c hannel characterization and modeling in the 6 GHz band,

    H. Miao, J. Zhang, P . Tang, L. Tian, W. Zuo, H. Xing, and Gua ngyi Liu, “Far-field to near-field: Experimental studies of MIMO c hannel characterization and modeling in the 6 GHz band,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 3889–3902, Nov. 2025

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Coverage evaluation of 7–15 GHz bands from exist ing sites,

    Nokia, “Coverage evaluation of 7–15 GHz bands from exist ing sites,” Nokia, Espoo, Finland, White Paper, 2025. [Online]. Availa ble: https: //www.nokia.com/asset/i/213702/

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    WRC-27 agend a items,

    Global Satellite Operators Association, “WRC-27 agend a items,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://gsoasatellite.com/WRC27/

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Comprehensive FR1(C) and FR3 lower and up per mid-band propagation and material penetration loss measur ements and channel models in indoor environment for 5G and 6G,

    D. Shakya, M. Ying, T. S. Rappaport, H. Poddar, P . MA, Y . W ang, and I. Al-wazani, “Comprehensive FR1(C) and FR3 lower and up per mid-band propagation and material penetration loss measur ements and channel models in indoor environment for 5G and 6G,” IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. , vol. 5, pp. 5192–5218, 2024

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Framework and Overall Objectives of the Future Development of IMT for 2030 and Beyond , Recommendation ITU-R M.2160-0, International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Sep. 2023

    work page 2030

  13. [13]

    18.5.0, Rel

    NR; User Equipment (UE) Radio Transmission and Reception; P art 1: Range 1 Standalone, 3GPP TS 38.101-1, ver. 18.5.0, Rel. 18, Mar. 2024

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    5G channel model for bands up to 100 GHz,

    K. Haneda et al., “5G channel model for bands up to 100 GHz,” Special Interest Group (SIG) on 5G Channel Model, White Paper, Dec. 2 015. [Online]. Available: http://www.5gworkshops.com/2016/ 5G Channel Model for bands up to100 GHz(2015-12-6).pdf

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    18.0.1, Rel

    5G; Study on International Mobile Telecommunications (IMT ) Parame- ters for 6.425–7.025 GHz, 7.025–7.125 GHz and 10.0–10.5 GHz , 3GPP TR 38.921, ver. 18.0.1, Rel. 18, 2024

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Urban outdoor propagation measurements and channel model s at 6.75 GHz FR1(C) and 16.95 GHz FR3 upper mid-band spectrum for 5G an d 6G,

    D. Shakya, M. Ying, T. S. Rappaport, P . Ma, I. Al-Wazani, Y . Wu, Y . Wang, D. Calin, H. Poddar, A. Bazzi, M. Chafii, Y . Xing, A. Ghos h, “Urban outdoor propagation measurements and channel model s at 6.75 GHz FR1(C) and 16.95 GHz FR3 upper mid-band spectrum for 5G an d 6G,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. (ICC) , Montreal, QC, Canada, 2025, pp. 3291–3296

    work page 2025

  17. [18]

    Spectrum Sandbox report on propagation measurements, dissemination and policy,

    Y . He et al. , “Spectrum Sandbox report on propagation measurements, dissemination and policy,” Durham University, Durham, U.K ., Tech. Rep., 2025. [Online]. Available: https://assets.publish ing.service.go v.uk/media/683710d29411f0341f3236f2/DURHAM 4.PDF

    work page 2025

  18. [19]

    Novel scalable MIMO c han- nel sounding technique and measurement accuracy evaluatio n with transceiver impairments,

    M. Kim, J. Takada, and Y . Konishi, “Novel scalable MIMO c han- nel sounding technique and measurement accuracy evaluatio n with transceiver impairments,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. , vol. 61, no. 12, pp. 3185–3197, Dec. 2012

    work page 2012

  19. [20]

    Millimeter-wave propagation of 5G wireless ac cess,

    M. Kim, “Millimeter-wave propagation of 5G wireless ac cess,” in Handbook of Radio and Optical Networks Convergence , T. Kawanishi, Ed. Singapore: Springer, 2023, pp. 1–28

    work page 2023

  20. [21]

    Channel parameter estimation in mobile radio en vironments using the SAGE algorithm,

    B. H. Fleury, M. Tschudin, R. Heddergott, D. Dahlhaus, a nd K. I. Pedersen, “Channel parameter estimation in mobile radio en vironments using the SAGE algorithm,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 434–450, Mar. 1999

    work page 1999

  21. [22]

    Multi-dimensional rad io channel measurement, analysis and modeling for high frequency band s,

    M. Kim, J. Takada, and K. Saito, “Multi-dimensional rad io channel measurement, analysis and modeling for high frequency band s,” IEICE Trans. Commun., vol. E101-B, no. 2, pp. 293–308, Feb. 2018

    work page 2018

  22. [23]

    Propagation path loss models for 5G urban micro- and macro-cellular scenarios,

    S. Sun et al. , “Propagation path loss models for 5G urban micro- and macro-cellular scenarios,” in Proc. IEEE V eh. Technol. Conf. (VTC- Spring), Nanjing, China, May 2016, pp. 1–6

    work page 2016

  23. [24]

    Wideband millimeter-wave propagation measure- ments and channel models for future wireless communication system design,

    T. S. Rappaport et al., “Wideband millimeter-wave propagation measure- ments and channel models for future wireless communication system design,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 3029–3056, Sep. 2015

    work page 2015

  24. [25]

    Channel measurement and modelling in a suburban environment across five bands up to 15.5 GHz,

    Y . He et al. , “Channel measurement and modelling in a suburban environment across five bands up to 15.5 GHz,” in Spectrum Sandbox Report, Durham University, U.K., 2025

    work page 2025

  25. [26]

    Measuremen t-based close-in path loss modeling with diffraction for rural long -distance communications,

    J. Park, H.-B. Jeon, J. Cho, and C.-B. Chae, “Measuremen t-based close-in path loss modeling with diffraction for rural long -distance communications,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1334–1338, Aug. 2023

    work page 2023

  26. [27]

    19.1.0, Rel

    Study on Channel Model for Frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz , 3GPP TR 38.901, ver. 19.1.0, Rel. 19, 2025

    work page 2025

  27. [28]

    Estimation of the K-factor for temporal fading from single -snapshot wideband measurements,

    P . Tang, J. Zhang, A. F. Molisch, P . Smith, M. Shafi, and L. Tian, “Estimation of the K-factor for temporal fading from single -snapshot wideband measurements,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 49–63, Jan. 2019

    work page 2019

  28. [29]

    Review on ray tracing channel simulation accuracy in s ub-6 GHz outdoor deployment scenarios,

    A. W. Mbugua, Y . Chen, L. Raschkowski, L. Thiele, S. Jaec kel, and W. Fan, “Review on ray tracing channel simulation accuracy in s ub-6 GHz outdoor deployment scenarios,” IEEE Open J. Antennas Propag. , vol. 2, pp. 22–37, 2021

    work page 2021

  29. [30]

    Mill imeter-Wave Distance-Dependent Large-Scale Propagation Measurement s and Path Loss Models for Outdoor and Indoor 5G Systems,

    S. Sun, G. R. MacCartney, Jr., and T. S. Rappaport, “Mill imeter-Wave Distance-Dependent Large-Scale Propagation Measurement s and Path Loss Models for Outdoor and Indoor 5G Systems,” in the 10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP) , April. 2016

    work page 2016

  30. [31]

    An Introduction to the Boot strap,

    B. Efron and R. Tibshirani, “An Introduction to the Boot strap,” Chapman & Hall/CRC, 1993

    work page 1993

  31. [32]

    WINNER II channel models,

    J. Meinil¨ a, P . Ky¨ osti, T. J¨ ams¨ a, L. Hentil¨ a, M. Kyehpy, E. Suikkanen, E. Winberg, and M. K. K. Huttunen et al. , “WINNER II channel models,” IST-WINNER II D1.1.2 v1.2, Tech. Rep., 2007

    work page 2007

  32. [33]

    QuaDRiGa: A 3- D multi-cell channel model with time evolution for enabling virtual field trials,

    S. Jaeckel, L. Raschkowski, K. B¨ orner, and L. Thiele, “ QuaDRiGa: A 3- D multi-cell channel model with time evolution for enabling virtual field trials,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. , vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 3242–3256, Jun. 2014

    work page 2014

  33. [34]

    Spatial consistency model for geometry-based stochastic channels,

    F. Ademaj, S. Schwarz, T. Berisha, and M. Rupp, “Spatial consistency model for geometry-based stochastic channels,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 183414–183427, 2019

    work page 2019

  34. [35]

    Character- ization of spatial consistency of cluster channels in urban environments at 24 and 60 GHz,

    N. Suzuki, H. Tsukada, R. Takahashi, B. Bag, and M. Kim, “ Character- ization of spatial consistency of cluster channels in urban environments at 24 and 60 GHz,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett. , vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1583–1587, May 2024

    work page 2024

  35. [36]

    Analysis and comparison of 24 GHz cmWave ra dio propagation in urban and suburban scenarios,

    I. Rodriguez, E. P . L. Almeida, R. Abreu, M. Lauridsen, A . Loureiro, and P . Mogensen, “Analysis and comparison of 24 GHz cmWave ra dio propagation in urban and suburban scenarios,” in Proc. IEEE Wireless Commun. Netw. Conf. (WCNC) , Doha, Qatar, 2016, pp. 1–7

    work page 2016

  36. [37]

    Angular spread statistics for 6.75 GHz FR1(C) and 16.95 GHz FR3 mid-band frequencies in an indoor hotspot environment,

    D. Shakya, M. Ying, and T. S. Rappaport, “Angular spread statistics for 6.75 GHz FR1(C) and 16.95 GHz FR3 mid-band frequencies in an indoor hotspot environment,” in Proc. IEEE Wireless Commun. Netw. Conf. (WCNC) , Milan, Italy, 2025, pp. 1–6

    work page 2025

  37. [38]

    Measurement-based massive MIMO channel characterizatio n in 6 GHz band for 6G,

    H. Miao, P . Tang, J. Zhang, L. Tian, H. Xu, S. Liu, T. Gao, a nd Y . Li, “Measurement-based massive MIMO channel characterizatio n in 6 GHz band for 6G,” in 2024 IEEE Wireless Commun. Netw. Conf. (WCNC) , 2024, pp. 1–6

    work page 2024

  38. [39]

    Sub-6 GHz to mmWave for 5G-Advanced and Beyond: Channel Measurements, Characteristics and Impact on System Perfor mance,

    H. Miao, P . Tang, J. Zhang, L. Tian, H. Xu, S. Liu, T. Gao, a nd Y . Li, “Sub-6 GHz to mmWave for 5G-Advanced and Beyond: Channel Measurements, Characteristics and Impact on System Perfor mance,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1945–1960, Jun. 2023

    work page 1945

  39. [40]

    6G new mid-band/FR3 (6–24 GHz): Channel measure- ment, characteristics and modeling,

    H. Miao et al. , “6G new mid-band/FR3 (6–24 GHz): Channel measure- ment, characteristics and modeling,” IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. , Early Access, 2025

    work page 2025

  40. [41]

    M illimeter- wave urban cellular channel characterization and recipe fo r high- precision site-Specific channel simulation,

    H. Tsukada, N. Suzuki, B. Bag, R. Takahashi and M. Kim, “M illimeter- wave urban cellular channel characterization and recipe fo r high- precision site-Specific channel simulation,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Tech., vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 3598–3612, Mar. 2025

    work page 2025

  41. [42]

    Radio propagation measurements and statistical channel m odels for outdoor urban microcells in open squares and streets at 142, 73, and 28 GHz,

    D. Shakya, S. Ju, O. Kanhere, H. Poddar, Y . Xing, and T. S. Rappaport, “Radio propagation measurements and statistical channel m odels for outdoor urban microcells in open squares and streets at 142, 73, and 28 GHz,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. , vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 3580–3595, Apr. 2024

    work page 2024

  42. [43]

    Delay tracking of spread-spectrum sig nals for indoor optical ranging,

    D. Salido-Monz´ u, E. Mart´ ın-Gorostiza, J. L. L´ azaro-Galilea, E. Martos- Naya, and A. Wieser, “Delay tracking of spread-spectrum sig nals for indoor optical ranging,” Sensors, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 23176–23204, Dec. 2014

    work page 2014

  43. [44]

    New characteristics and modeling of 6G channels: Toward a unified channel model for standardization,

    H. Gong et al. , “New characteristics and modeling of 6G channels: Toward a unified channel model for standardization,” IEEE V eh. Technol. Mag., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 68–77, Sep. 2025

    work page 2025

  44. [45]

    Channel measurement, modeling, and simulation for 6G: A survey and tutorial,

    J. Zhang et al. , “Channel measurement, modeling, and simulation for 6G: A survey and tutorial,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16616v2 , Mar. 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [46]

    A novel mat erial parameter calibration algorithm for 6G ray-tracing channe l modeling,

    J. Shi, C. Huang, T. Qi, J. Li, and C.-X. Wang, “A novel mat erial parameter calibration algorithm for 6G ray-tracing channe l modeling,” in Proc. 2nd IEEE Int. Conf. Electron., Commun. Intell. Sci. (E CIS), Y ueyang, China, 2025, pp. 1–6

    work page 2025

  46. [47]

    Cheng, J.-Y

    C. Cheng, J.-Y . Wang, Y .-J. Liu, X.-H. Song, W.-X. Wang, and X. Wang, “Measurement-based delay, angular dispersion and propaga tion loss characteristics of outdoor propagation in beam domain and m ulti-beam operation at 38 GHz for 5G communication systems,” IET Microw., Antennas Propag., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 257–271, 2022

    work page 2022

  47. [48]

    Q uasi- deterministic modeling of sub-THz band access channels in s treet canyon environments,

    M. Kim, M. Y omoda, M. Mao, N. Kuno, K. Kitao, S. Suyama, “Q uasi- deterministic modeling of sub-THz band access channels in s treet canyon environments,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.10752 , Sep. 2025

    work page arXiv 2025