pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.08984 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-06 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI

Recognition: no theorem link

RAG-HAR: Retrieval Augmented Generation-based Human Activity Recognition

Nirhoshan Sivaroopan , Hansi Karunarathna , Chamara Madarasingha , Anura Jayasumana , Kanchana Thilakarathna
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 01:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AI
keywords Human Activity RecognitionRetrieval Augmented GenerationLarge Language ModelsTraining-freeSensor Data AnalysisUnseen Activity RecognitionVector Database
0
0 comments X

The pith

RAG-HAR recognizes both known and unseen human activities by retrieving similar sensor examples and prompting an LLM without any model training.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents RAG-HAR as a training-free framework for human activity recognition that computes simple statistical descriptors from sensor data. It then retrieves semantically similar examples from a vector database enriched with LLM-generated activity descriptions and uses that context to guide an LLM in identifying the activity. This method reaches state-of-the-art accuracy on six different HAR benchmarks while also assigning meaningful labels to activities never encountered before. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach removes the usual requirements for large labeled datasets and heavy computation in applications such as healthcare monitoring and smart environments.

Core claim

RAG-HAR computes lightweight statistical descriptors from input sensor data, retrieves semantically similar samples from a vector database that has been enhanced with LLM-generated activity descriptors, and supplies this contextual evidence to an LLM for activity identification. The process achieves state-of-the-art performance across six diverse HAR benchmarks and extends naturally to the recognition and meaningful labeling of multiple unseen human activities.

What carries the argument

Retrieval-augmented generation that uses statistical descriptors to pull relevant examples from a context-enriched vector database and feed them to an LLM for classification.

If this is right

  • Enables recognition and meaningful labeling of previously unseen activities.
  • Delivers state-of-the-art results on multiple benchmarks without dataset-specific training.
  • Supports deployment across different sensor modalities and real-world environments.
  • Reduces the computational and data requirements typical of deep learning HAR systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same retrieval-plus-LLM pattern could be tested on other time-series classification tasks such as gesture or anomaly detection.
  • Streaming sensor inputs might allow the method to adapt labels continuously in real time.
  • Hybrid systems could combine this retrieval approach with lightweight on-device models for edge deployment.

Load-bearing premise

Lightweight statistical descriptors plus retrieved examples supply enough context for an LLM to correctly classify both seen and unseen activities across varied sensor modalities and environments.

What would settle it

Evaluating RAG-HAR on a new HAR dataset that uses entirely different activities, sensor types, and environments from the original six benchmarks and checking whether accuracy and unseen-activity labeling remain superior to trained models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.08984 by Anura Jayasumana, Chamara Madarasingha, Hansi Karunarathna, Kanchana Thilakarathna, Nirhoshan Sivaroopan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Success and failure cases of LLMs in HAR. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: RAG-HAR architecture. Section numbers (§) point to where each step is detailed. captured at both global and local levels respectively. The l number of features computed for each of the channel C in either S or a given Sk are arranged into a single feature vector of l·m elements. Each S yields four such vectors (three vectors from each Sk and S itself), which collectively form the basis for multi-vector ret… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Further optimization techniques for RAG-HAR. operates as a meta-level optimization over prompts. Below we have described the key-steps of this process. Step 1. Generate M candidate instructions: We start by generating a diverse pool of M initial instructions, referred to as candidate instructions. These candidates are automatically produced by optimizer model using the meta-initialization prompt illustrate… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Enhanced RAG-HAR strategies Misclassified clusters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: TSNE analysis of the vector embeddings and confusion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Semantic proximity of LLM-predicted labels to true [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Human Activity Recognition (HAR) underpins applications in healthcare, rehabilitation, fitness tracking, and smart environments, yet existing deep learning approaches demand dataset-specific training, large labeled corpora, and significant computational resources.We introduce RAG-HAR, a training-free retrieval-augmented framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) for HAR. RAG-HAR computes lightweight statistical descriptors, retrieves semantically similar samples from a vector database, and uses this contextual evidence to make LLM-based activity identification. We further enhance RAG-HAR by first applying prompt optimization and introducing an LLM-based activity descriptor that generates context-enriched vector databases for delivering accurate and highly relevant contextual information. Along with these mechanisms, RAG-HAR achieves state-of-the-art performance across six diverse HAR benchmarks. Most importantly, RAG-HAR attains these improvements without requiring model training or fine-tuning, emphasizing its robustness and practical applicability. RAG-HAR moves beyond known behaviors, enabling the recognition and meaningful labelling of multiple unseen human activities.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces RAG-HAR, a training-free retrieval-augmented generation framework for human activity recognition. It computes lightweight statistical descriptors from sensor streams, retrieves semantically similar examples from a vector database, and feeds this context to an LLM for activity classification. The method includes prompt optimization and an LLM-based activity descriptor to enrich the database. The central claims are state-of-the-art results on six diverse HAR benchmarks and the ability to recognize and meaningfully label multiple unseen activities without any model training or fine-tuning.

Significance. If the performance and open-set claims are substantiated with quantitative evidence, the work would be significant for the HAR community. It offers a practical alternative to data-hungry deep learning pipelines, potentially lowering barriers for deployment in healthcare, rehabilitation, and smart environments where labeled data or retraining is costly. The training-free nature and explicit handling of unseen activities represent a clear departure from standard supervised approaches.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4 (Experimental Results): The abstract asserts SOTA performance across six benchmarks and open-set capability, yet the provided text supplies no numerical accuracy/F1 scores, baseline comparisons (e.g., against DeepConvLSTM, Transformer-based HAR models, or other zero-shot methods), or error analysis. Without these details the central performance claim cannot be verified.
  2. [§3.2 and §5] §3.2 (LLM-based activity descriptor) and §5 (Open-set evaluation): The claim that the method recognizes entirely unseen activities rests on the assumption that lightweight statistical descriptors plus retrieved examples supply sufficient signal for the LLM. The manuscript does not report retrieval similarity scores, failure cases where low-similarity matches occur, or ablation showing performance when retrieval returns poor matches; this leaves open whether results are driven by LLM priors rather than the RAG context.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§3] Notation: The term 'LLM-based activity descriptor' is introduced without a formal definition or pseudocode; a short equation or algorithm box would clarify how it differs from standard embedding generation.
  2. [Figures] Figure clarity: The vector-database construction diagram (presumably Figure 2) should explicitly label the statistical descriptor computation step and the prompt-optimization loop.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive review. We are pleased that the potential impact of our training-free RAG-HAR approach for human activity recognition is recognized. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4 (Experimental Results): The abstract asserts SOTA performance across six benchmarks and open-set capability, yet the provided text supplies no numerical accuracy/F1 scores, baseline comparisons (e.g., against DeepConvLSTM, Transformer-based HAR models, or other zero-shot methods), or error analysis. Without these details the central performance claim cannot be verified.

    Authors: We agree that explicit numerical evidence strengthens the claims. The full §4 includes comprehensive tables with accuracy and F1 scores for each of the six benchmarks, along with comparisons to deep learning baselines like DeepConvLSTM and Transformer models, as well as zero-shot approaches. To improve accessibility, we will revise the abstract to include key quantitative results (e.g., average accuracy across benchmarks) and add a concise error analysis in §4. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.2 and §5] §3.2 (LLM-based activity descriptor) and §5 (Open-set evaluation): The claim that the method recognizes entirely unseen activities rests on the assumption that lightweight statistical descriptors plus retrieved examples supply sufficient signal for the LLM. The manuscript does not report retrieval similarity scores, failure cases where low-similarity matches occur, or ablation showing performance when retrieval returns poor matches; this leaves open whether results are driven by LLM priors rather than the RAG context.

    Authors: This point highlights an important aspect of validating the contribution of the RAG mechanism. In the revised manuscript, we will include: retrieval similarity score distributions for the open-set tasks, examples of failure cases with low similarity retrievals and how the LLM handles them, and an ablation study that compares RAG-HAR performance against a no-retrieval baseline (relying solely on LLM priors). These additions will clarify the role of the retrieved context. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in RAG-HAR framework

full rationale

The paper presents an empirical, training-free framework that combines standard statistical descriptors, vector-database retrieval, and off-the-shelf LLMs to perform activity classification. Performance claims rest on direct evaluation across six external benchmarks rather than any internal derivation, fitted parameter, or self-referential definition. No equations, predictions, or uniqueness theorems are shown that reduce to the paper's own inputs or prior self-citations; the central results are therefore self-contained against external data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The method rests on the assumption that LLMs can map statistical descriptors plus retrieved context to correct activity labels, plus the introduction of a new LLM-generated descriptor component whose independent validation is not supplied.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption LLMs can reliably map lightweight statistical descriptors and retrieved similar samples to correct activity labels for both seen and unseen classes
    This premise is required for the training-free identification step to succeed.
invented entities (1)
  • LLM-based activity descriptor no independent evidence
    purpose: Generates context-enriched textual descriptions to improve the relevance of the vector database
    New component introduced by the authors to enhance retrieval quality.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5494 in / 1405 out tokens · 53238 ms · 2026-05-17T01:51:21.758216+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. KD-Judge: A Knowledge-Driven Automated Judge Framework for Functional Fitness Movements on Edge Devices

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    KD-Judge structures fitness rules via LLM retrieval and chain-of-thought, then uses pose-guided kinematics for rule-based rep validation with caching for efficient edge deployment, achieving RTF < 1 and speedups up to...

  2. TRACE: Temporal Reasoning over Context and Evidence for Activity Recognition in Smart Homes

    cs.HC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    TRACE improves activity recognition accuracy and temporal coherence in smart homes by integrating multi-source sensor evidence with contextual priors.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Attend and discriminate: Beyond the state-of-the-art for human activity recognition using wearable sensors,

    A. Abedin, M. Ehsanpour, Q. Shi, H. Rezatofighi, and D. C. Ranasinghe, “Attend and discriminate: Beyond the state-of-the-art for human activity recognition using wearable sensors,”Proc of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 2021

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Alae-tae-cutmix+: Beyond the state-of- the-art for human activity recognition using wearable sensors,

    N. Ahmad and H.-f. Leung, “Alae-tae-cutmix+: Beyond the state-of- the-art for human activity recognition using wearable sensors,” in2023 IEEE International conf on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom)

    work page

  3. [3]

    Wearable assistant for parkinson’s disease patients with the freezing of gait symptom,

    M. Bachlin, M. Plotnik, D. Roggen, I. Maidan, J. M. Hausdorff, N. Giladi, and G. Troster, “Wearable assistant for parkinson’s disease patients with the freezing of gait symptom,”IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 2009

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    Adversarial multi-view networks for activity recognition,

    L. Bai, L. Yao, X. Wang, S. S. Kanhere, B. Guo, and Z. Yu, “Adversarial multi-view networks for activity recognition,”Proc of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 2020

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    mhealthdroid: a novel framework for agile development of mobile health applications,

    O. Banos, R. Garcia, J. A. Holgado-Terriza, M. Damas, H. Pomares, I. Rojas, A. Saez, and C. Villalonga, “mhealthdroid: a novel framework for agile development of mobile health applications,” inInternational workshop on ambient assisted living. Springer, 2014

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    Sparsification and separation of deep learning layers for constrained resource inference on wearables,

    S. Bhattacharya and N. D. Lane, “Sparsification and separation of deep learning layers for constrained resource inference on wearables,” inProc of the 14th ACM conf on Embedded Network Sensor Systems CD-ROM, 2016

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Metier: a deep multi-task learning based activity and user recognition model using wearable sensors,

    L. Chen, Y . Zhang, and L. Peng, “Metier: a deep multi-task learning based activity and user recognition model using wearable sensors,” Proc of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 2020

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations,

    T. Chen, S. Kornblith, M. Norouzi, and G. Hinton, “A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations,” inInternational conference on machine learning. PmLR, 2020, pp. 1597–1607

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Towards llm- powered ambient sensor based multi-person human activity recognition,

    X. Chen, J. Cumin, F. Ramparany, and D. Vaufreydaz, “Towards llm- powered ambient sensor based multi-person human activity recognition,” in2024 IEEE 30th International conf on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS)

    work page

  10. [10]

    Large language models are few-shot multivariate time series classifiers,

    Y . Chen, Z. Li, C. Yang, X. Wang, and G. Xu, “Large language models are few-shot multivariate time series classifiers,”Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2025

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Large language models are zero-shot recognizers for activities of daily living,

    G. Civitarese, M. Fiori, P. Choudhary, and C. Bettini, “Large language models are zero-shot recognizers for activities of daily living,”ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1–32, 2025

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Augtoact: Scaling complex human activity recognition with few labels,

    A. Z. M. Faridee, M. A. A. H. Khan, N. Pathak, and N. Roy, “Augtoact: Scaling complex human activity recognition with few labels,” inProc of the 16th EAI International conf on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services, 2019

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Promptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement Via Prompt Evolution

    C. Fernando, D. Banarse, H. Michalewski, S. Osindero, and T. Rockt ¨aschel, “Promptbreeder: Self-referential self-improvement via prompt evolution,”arXiv:2309.16797, 2023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Deep neural network based human activity recognition for the order picking process,

    R. Grzeszick, J. M. Lenk, F. M. Rueda, G. A. Fink, S. Feldhorst, and M. Ten Hompel, “Deep neural network based human activity recognition for the order picking process,” inProc of the 4th international Workshop on Sensor-based Activity Recognition and Interaction, 2017

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Ensembles of deep lstm learners for activity recognition using wearables,

    Y . Guan and T. Pl ¨otz, “Ensembles of deep lstm learners for activity recognition using wearables,”Proc of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies, 2017

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    EvoPrompt: Connecting LLMs with Evolutionary Algorithms Yields Powerful Prompt Optimizers

    Q. Guo, R. Wang, J. Guo, B. Li, K. Song, X. Tan, G. Liu, J. Bian, and Y . Yang, “Evoprompt: Connecting llms with evolutionary algorithms yields powerful prompt optimizers,”arXiv:2309.08532, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Deep, Convolutional, and Recurrent Models for Human Activity Recognition using Wearables

    N. Y . Hammerla, S. Halloran, and T. Pl ¨otz, “Deep, convolutional, and recurrent models for human activity recognition using wearables,” arXiv:1604.08880, 2016

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    Investigating enhancements to contrastive predictive coding for human activity recognition,

    H. Haresamudram, I. Essa, and T. Pl ¨otz, “Investigating enhancements to contrastive predictive coding for human activity recognition,” in2023 IEEE International conf on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom)

    work page

  19. [19]

    In Defense of the Triplet Loss for Person Re-Identification

    A. Hermans, L. Beyer, and B. Leibe, “In defense of the triplet loss for person re-identification,”arXiv:1703.07737, 2017

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    Llm4har: Generalizable on-device human activity recognition with pretrained llms,

    Z. Hong, Y . Song, Z. Li, A. Yu, S. Zhong, Y . Ding, T. He, and D. Zhang, “Llm4har: Generalizable on-device human activity recognition with pretrained llms,” inProc of the 31st ACM SIGKDD conf on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V . 2, 2025

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Evaluating large language models as virtual annotators for time-series physical sensing data,

    A. Hota, S. Chatterjee, and S. Chakraborty, “Evaluating large language models as virtual annotators for time-series physical sensing data,”ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1–25, 2025

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    Time series classification with large language models via linguistic scaffolding,

    H. Jang, J. Y . Yang, J. Hwang, and E. Yang, “Time series classification with large language models via linguistic scaffolding,”IEEE Access, 2024

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Hargpt: Are llms zero-shot human activity recognizers?

    S. Ji, X. Zheng, and C. Wu, “Hargpt: Are llms zero-shot human activity recognizers?” in2024 IEEE International Workshop on Foundation Models for Cyber-Physical Systems & Internet of Things (FMSys). IEEE, 2024, pp. 38–43

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Deep triplet networks with attention for sensor-based human activity recognition,

    B. Khaertdinov, E. Ghaleb, and S. Asteriadis, “Deep triplet networks with attention for sensor-based human activity recognition,” in2021 IEEE International conf on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom)

    work page

  25. [25]

    A personal health large language model for sleep and fitness coaching,

    J. Khasentino, A. Belyaeva, X. Liu, Z. Yang, N. A. Furlotte, C. Lee, E. Schenck, Y . Patel, J. Cui, L. D. Schneideret al., “A personal health large language model for sleep and fitness coaching,”Nature Medicine, 2025

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Sensor-based open-set human activity recog- nition using representation learning with mixup triplets,

    M. Lee and S. B. Kim, “Sensor-based open-set human activity recog- nition using representation learning with mixup triplets,”IEEE Access, 2022

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Sensorllm: Aligning large language models with motion sensors for human activity recognition,

    Z. Li, S. Deldari, L. Chen, H. Xue, and F. D. Salim, “Sensorllm: Aligning large language models with motion sensors for human activity recognition,” 2024

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Wearbreathing: Real world respiratory rate monitoring using smartwatches,

    D. Liaqat, M. Abdalla, P. Abed-Esfahani, M. Gabel, T. Son, R. Wu, A. Gershon, F. Rudzicz, and E. D. Lara, “Wearbreathing: Real world respiratory rate monitoring using smartwatches,”Proc of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 2019

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Introducing new embedding models,

    OpenAI, “Introducing new embedding models,” https://openai.com/ index/new-embedding-models-and-api-updates/

    work page

  30. [30]

    Introducing gpt-5,

    ——, “Introducing gpt-5,” https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-5/, 2025

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    Rehab-net: Deep learning framework for arm movement classification using wearable sensors for stroke rehabilitation,

    M. Panwar, D. Biswas, H. Bajaj, M. J ¨obges, R. Turk, K. Maharatna, and A. Acharyya, “Rehab-net: Deep learning framework for arm movement classification using wearable sensors for stroke rehabilitation,”IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2019

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    Activity recognition using wearable sensors for tracking the elderly,

    S. Paraschiakos, R. Cachucho, M. Moed, D. van Heemst, S. Mooijaart, E. P. Slagboom, A. Knobbe, and M. Beekman, “Activity recognition using wearable sensors for tracking the elderly,”User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 2020

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Contextllm: Meaningful context reasoning from multi-sensor and multi- device data using llms,

    K. Post, R. Kuchida, M. Olapade, Z. Yin, P. Nurmi, and H. Flores, “Contextllm: Meaningful context reasoning from multi-sensor and multi- device data using llms,” inProceedings of the 26th International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, 2025, pp. 13–18

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Introducing a new benchmarked dataset for activity monitoring,

    A. Reiss and D. Stricker, “Introducing a new benchmarked dataset for activity monitoring,” in16th international symposium on wearable computers. IEEE, 2012

    work page 2012

  35. [35]

    Weakly supervised multi-task representation learning for human activity analysis using wearables,

    T. Sheng and M. Huber, “Weakly supervised multi-task representation learning for human activity analysis using wearables,”Proc of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 2020

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    Cross-subject transfer learning in hu- man activity recognition systems using generative adversarial networks,

    E. Soleimani and E. Nazerfard, “Cross-subject transfer learning in hu- man activity recognition systems using generative adversarial networks,” Neurocomputing, 2021

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Wearable activity tracking in car manufacturing,

    T. Stiefmeier, D. Roggen, G. Ogris, P. Lukowicz, and G. Tr ¨oster, “Wearable activity tracking in car manufacturing,”IEEE Pervasive Computing, 2008

    work page 2008

  38. [38]

    Smart devices are different: Assessing and mitigatingmobile sensing heterogeneities for activity recognition,

    A. Stisen, H. Blunck, S. Bhattacharya, T. S. Prentow, M. B. Kjærgaard, A. Dey, T. Sonne, and M. M. Jensen, “Smart devices are different: Assessing and mitigatingmobile sensing heterogeneities for activity recognition,” inProc of the 13th ACM conf on embedded networked sensor systems, 2015

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    Adversarial deep feature extraction network for user independent human activity recognition,

    S. Suh, V . F. Rey, and P. Lukowicz, “Adversarial deep feature extraction network for user independent human activity recognition,” in2022 IEEE International conf on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom)

    work page

  40. [40]

    Data augmentation of wearable sensor data for parkinson’s disease monitoring using convolutional neural networks,

    T. T. Um, F. M. Pfister, D. Pichler, S. Endo, M. Lang, S. Hirche, U. Fietzek, and D. Kuli ´c, “Data augmentation of wearable sensor data for parkinson’s disease monitoring using convolutional neural networks,” inProc of the 19th ACM international conf on multimodal interaction, 2017

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    Stratified transfer learn- ing for cross-domain activity recognition,

    J. Wang, Y . Chen, L. Hu, X. Peng, and P. S. Yu, “Stratified transfer learn- ing for cross-domain activity recognition,” in2018 IEEE international conf on pervasive computing and communications (PerCom)

    work page

  42. [42]

    Large language models as optimizers,

    C. Yang, X. Wang, Y . Lu, H. Liu, Q. V . Le, D. Zhou, and X. Chen, “Large language models as optimizers,” inThe Twelfth International conf on Learning Representations, 2023

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Convolutional neural networks for human activity recognition using mobile sensors,

    M. Zeng, L. T. Nguyen, B. Yu, O. J. Mengshoel, J. Zhu, P. Wu, and J. Zhang, “Convolutional neural networks for human activity recognition using mobile sensors,” in6th international conf on mobile computing, applications and services. IEEE, 2014

    work page 2014

  44. [44]

    Usc-had: A daily activity dataset for ubiquitous activity recognition using wearable sensors,

    M. Zhang and A. A. Sawchuk, “Usc-had: A daily activity dataset for ubiquitous activity recognition using wearable sensors,” inProc of the 2012 ACM conf on ubiquitous computing

    work page 2012

  45. [45]

    Local domain adaptation for cross-domain activity recognition,

    J. Zhao, F. Deng, H. He, and J. Chen, “Local domain adaptation for cross-domain activity recognition,”IEEE Transactions on Human- Machine Systems, 2020

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    Enhancing llm reasoning for time series classification by tailored thinking and fused decision,

    J. Zhou, D. Li, L. Li, Z. Chen, S. Wu, H. Ye, J. Lou, and C. J. Spanos, “Enhancing llm reasoning for time series classification by tailored thinking and fused decision,”arXiv:2506.00807, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Zilliz vector database,

    Zilliz, “Zilliz vector database,” https://zilliz.com/

    work page